w/c 13.x.24

Ordo w/c 13.x.24

13 SUN	14 MON	15 TUE	16 WED	17 THU	18 FRI	19 SAT
Dominica XXI Post Pentecosten	S. Callisti Papæ et Martyris	S. Teresiæ Virginis	Feria	S. Hedwigis Viduæ	S. Lucæ Evangelistæ	S. Petri de Alcantara Confessoris
“In voluntáte”	“Sacerdotes Dei”	“Dilexísti”	–	“Cognóvi”	“Mihi autem”	“Justus”
Semi-duplex	Duplex	Duplex	Simplex	Semiduplex	Duplex II	Duplex
S. Eduardi Regis* Confessoris	In Octavis SS. Wilfridi et Edwardi*	In Octavis SS. Wilfridi et Edwardi*	In Octavis SS. Wilfridi et Edwardi*	In Octavis SS. Wilfridi et Edwardi*	In Octavis SS. Wilfridi et Edwardi*	Dies Octavæ S. Wilfridi*
“Os justi”	“Sacerdotes tui”	“Sacerdotes tui”	“Sacerdotes tui”	“Sacerdotes tui”	“Sacerdotes tui”	“Sacerdotes tui”

Vigilia Fiduciae

Carissimi

Grace and peace to you from our Lord Jesus Christ, the Divine Shepherd and Guardian of our souls. As we reflect on the themes of this Twenty-First Sunday after Pentecost, I invite you to consider the motto “Vigilia Fiduciae”—Vigilance of Trust—as a guiding principle for our spiritual lives in these challenging times.

The readings from today’s liturgy remind us of our need for both spiritual vigilance and a deep, abiding trust in God. In the Gospel, we encounter the parable of the unforgiving servant, which teaches us about the necessity of forgiveness and the consequences of failing to extend mercy. St. Paul exhorts us in his Letter to the Ephesians to put on the armor of God, to stand firm against the schemes of the devil, and to remain vigilant in our faith.

This message comes at a time when many Catholics are feeling disheartened. We are witnessing a crisis of faith within the Church, a time marked by division, confusion, and a lack of trust in ecclesiastical authority. Pope Francis’s pontificate has been a source of great joy and hope for many, yet it has also raised concerns and doubts among others. As faithful Catholics, we are called to navigate this crisis with both vigilance and trust, seeking God’s guidance as we persevere in our faith and commitment to Christian living.

Recognizing the Crisis: A Time of Testing

The Church has always faced trials, and this era is no exception. Today, there is a widespread lack of trust in the hierarchy, confusion over doctrinal matters, and a sense of division among the faithful. These issues can be unsettling, and they may cause us to question our place within the Church and our relationship with its leaders.

In such times, we must remember that the Church is both a human and divine institution. While it is led by fallible men, it is also the Body of Christ, protected and guided by the Holy Spirit. We must be vigilant in discerning what is true and good, even as we place our ultimate trust in God’s providence.

Vigilance of Faith: Standing Firm in Truth

In the Epistle today, St. Paul urges us to “put on the whole armor of God” so that we may withstand the wiles of the evil one. This armor is our faith, nourished by prayer, Scripture, and the sacraments. To preserve the faith in these challenging times, we must remain grounded in the unchanging truths of our Catholic tradition. Here are some ways to cultivate vigilance of faith:

1. Stay Rooted in Sacred Tradition: When confusion arises, turn to the richness of our Catholic tradition for clarity. The teachings of the Church Fathers, the Catechism, and the perennial magisterial documents provide a firm foundation. By grounding ourselves in these truths, we are better equipped to discern the difference between authentic development of doctrine and potential errors.
2. Be Spiritually Disciplined: Vigilance requires that we nurture our spiritual lives through regular prayer, especially the Rosary, which Our Lady has given us as a powerful weapon in times of trial. Frequent reception of the Eucharist and the Sacrament of Reconciliation strengthens us, providing the grace we need to persevere.
3. Pray for Discernment and Unity: Pray for wisdom and clarity, especially when confronting teachings or actions that seem confusing or troubling. Ask the Holy Spirit to guide the leaders of the Church and to bring about unity among the faithful.
4. Resist Despair and Division: Guard against the temptation to become embittered or divisive. Even when we have concerns, we must approach them with charity and respect, avoiding rash judgments and destructive criticism. Remember that the devil seeks to divide and discourage; our vigilance includes resisting such tactics.

Trust in God: Living with Hope and Perseverance

The motto “Vigilia Fiduciae” reminds us that our vigilance must be balanced with trust. While we remain watchful, we must also place our trust in God’s providence, knowing that He is always with us, guiding us even when the way is unclear. Here are practical ways to cultivate this trust:

1. Trust in God’s Ultimate Plan: God is in control of history and of the Church. Even when circumstances seem bleak, we must remember that God has not abandoned His people. As St. Augustine taught, “God can write straight with crooked lines.” Trust that God is at work, even in this crisis, bringing about His purposes in ways we may not yet understand.
2. Respect for Authority, While Seeking the Truth: We can hold concerns about certain decisions or actions while maintaining respect for the office of the Pope and the hierarchy. If there are legitimate doubts, seek answers through prayer, respectful inquiry, and dialogue. It is essential to stay connected to the Church and seek clarification rather than withdrawal or estrangement.
3. Faithful Witness and Constructive Involvement: Be an active member of your parish and the broader Church community. By participating in parish activities, assisting in catechesis, or helping the needy, you contribute positively to the Church’s mission and embody Christ’s love. We are called to be builders, not spectators, in the life of the Church.
4. Practice Forgiveness and Mercy: The parable of the unforgiving servant reminds us that we are all in need of God’s mercy. If you have felt betrayed or disappointed by the Church, seek healing through forgiveness. Let go of bitterness, and be open to the healing that only Christ can bring. Extend this same mercy to others, fostering a spirit of reconciliation and hope.

Living Out Our Faith in Challenging Times

Now more than ever, we are called to live as faithful witnesses of the Gospel. This crisis can either weaken our faith or deepen our commitment to Christ and His Church. The choice is ours. As St. Paul exhorts us, “Having done all, to stand firm” (Eph 6:13). By putting on the armor of God, remaining vigilant in our faith, and trusting in His providence, we can navigate these uncertain times with courage and perseverance.

In conclusion, let us be vigilant and trusting as we seek to live our faith authentically in a world that desperately needs the light of Christ. May we, like the saints who have gone before us, stand firm in our faith, trusting in God’s promise to be with us always. Let us pray for our Holy Father, Pope Francis, and for all the leaders of the Church, that they may be guided by the Holy Spirit in these challenging times.

Our Lady, Queen of the Church, pray for us!
St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle!

In the love of Christ, I remain,

---

---

Spiritual Reflection for the Twenty-first Sunday Post Pentecost in the Traditional Latin Rite

The Twenty-First Sunday after Pentecost in the Tridentine Liturgy centers on themes of forgiveness, repentance, and the ongoing battle against evil in the Christian life. The propers of the Mass—especially the Introit, Epistle, and Gospel—guide us to reflect on our relationship with God and the importance of seeking His mercy, being reconciled with others, and standing firm in faith.

Introit: Dan. 3:31, 29, 35

The Introit this Sunday begins with a prayer of contrition: “All that Thou hast done to us, O Lord, Thou hast done in true judgment, because we have sinned against Thee, and have not obeyed Thy commandments.” Here, the liturgy acknowledges the justice of God in allowing us to face the consequences of our sins, while also inviting us to seek His mercy.

Dom Prosper Guéranger reflects on this passage, emphasizing the importance of recognizing our own sinfulness before God. He writes, “The Church does not hesitate to confess her sins; she takes the words of the holy prophet Daniel and humbly acknowledges the justice of God’s judgments.” This acknowledgment of sin is a foundational step in true repentance, and the Church, by invoking these words, teaches us to approach God with humility and a contrite heart.

Epistle: Ephesians 6:10-17

In this powerful passage from St. Paul’s Letter to the Ephesians, the apostle exhorts us to “put on the armor of God” so that we may stand firm against the “wiles of the devil.” This vivid imagery of spiritual warfare calls to mind the Christian’s constant struggle against evil, both within and outside of ourselves.

Fr. Leonard Goffine describes the armor of God as an essential defense in the battle for our souls. He explains that each piece of armor—truth, righteousness, the gospel of peace, faith, salvation, and the word of God—corresponds to virtues that we must actively cultivate. St. Gregory of Nyssa also reflects on this passage, comparing the Christian life to that of a soldier who must be vigilant and well-equipped. He writes, “The battle we fight is not with flesh and blood, but with the passions that seek to dominate the soul.” St. Gregory’s interpretation encourages us to recognize that our primary battle is internal, as we strive to overcome vice and grow in virtue.

Gospel: Matthew 18:23-35

The Gospel reading presents the parable of the unforgiving servant, where Jesus teaches about the importance of forgiveness. In the parable, a servant who has been forgiven an enormous debt by his master refuses to forgive a much smaller debt owed to him by a fellow servant. Upon hearing of this, the master delivers the unforgiving servant to the torturers until he should repay all that he owes.

Fr. Gabriel of St. Mary Magdalene reflects on this parable, noting that the unforgiving servant’s fate is a warning to all Christians. “God’s mercy is inexhaustible, but it demands a heart that is likewise merciful. We cannot expect to receive God’s forgiveness if we are unwilling to extend that forgiveness to others.” St. John Chrysostom offers a similar reflection, explaining that this parable reveals the divine economy of forgiveness: “We are all debtors before God. The forgiveness we receive from Him is beyond measure; therefore, we are called to forgive those who offend us, no matter how great or small their offenses may be.”

Offertory: Job 1:6, 7

The Offertory, taken from the Book of Job, presents a scene in which Satan, the adversary, roams the earth looking for souls to tempt and destroy. This reinforces the theme of spiritual warfare introduced in the Epistle and serves as a reminder of the vigilance required of every Christian.

Dom Prosper Guéranger reflects on this passage, highlighting the vulnerability of the soul without God’s protection. He writes, “The adversary prowls about, seeking whom he may devour. It is only by remaining close to God, through prayer and the sacraments, that we are shielded from his malice.” The Offertory encourages us to prepare our hearts to receive the Eucharist, seeking strength and protection in the battle against the forces of darkness.

Communion Antiphon: Psalm 118:81, 84, 86

The Communion Antiphon expresses a longing for deliverance: “My soul is consumed with longing for Your salvation; I hope in Your word.” This psalm captures the soul’s deep yearning for God’s intervention and support, especially in times of trial.

Fr. Pius Pasch, reflecting on the Communion Antiphon, observes that this longing is not a sign of weakness but rather of the soul’s trust in God. He writes, “In hoping for God’s salvation, the soul expresses both its need and its faith. It trusts that God’s promises are true and that He will bring deliverance to those who wait on Him.” St. Augustine comments on this same psalm, noting that the soul’s longing for God is ultimately fulfilled in the Eucharist, where Christ comes to dwell within us, bringing peace and strength.

Thematic Reflection: Forgiveness, Spiritual Vigilance, and Divine Protection

The liturgy of the Twenty-First Sunday after Pentecost weaves together themes of forgiveness, vigilance, and reliance on God’s grace. The Introit and Gospel invite us to seek forgiveness and to extend that forgiveness to others. The Epistle and Offertory remind us of the spiritual battle we face daily and the necessity of putting on the armor of God to resist temptation. Finally, the Communion Antiphon expresses the soul’s deep longing for God’s salvation, a longing that is fulfilled in the Eucharist.

Through these readings and prayers, the Church teaches us that the Christian life is marked by a continual need for repentance and a vigilance against evil. However, we are not left to fight this battle alone. As Dom Guéranger reminds us, “God provides the strength, the armor, and the grace to persevere.” The liturgy is a call to place our trust in God, to seek His mercy, and to rely on His protection.

In conclusion, the Twenty-First Sunday after Pentecost offers a profound reminder that we are constantly in need of God’s mercy and grace. As we seek forgiveness for our sins, let us also forgive others and strive to live with the vigilance of a soldier clothed in the armor of God. May we find strength in the Eucharist, trusting that Christ will equip us to stand firm in faith and overcome the spiritual battles we face each day. St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle; be our protection against the wickedness and snares of the devil.

Discussion Questions

For Family Discussions

1. In the Gospel, we learn about forgiveness and the importance of showing mercy to others. Are there any unresolved conflicts or grudges within our family? How can we practice forgiveness and extend mercy to each other?
2. St. Paul speaks about putting on the armor of God to stand against the devil’s schemes. What are some ways our family can protect our faith and stay vigilant in our spiritual life?
3. Trusting God during uncertain times can be challenging. As a family, how can we cultivate trust in God’s plan, especially when we face difficulties or feel confused by events in the Church or world?
4. The Offertory from Job speaks about the devil seeking to harm us. How can we, as a family, be vigilant against temptation and stay close to God? What practices can help us grow stronger in faith together?

For Catechism Classes

1. In the parable of the unforgiving servant, Jesus teaches us about the importance of mercy. Why do you think God expects us to forgive others, and how does it affect our relationship with Him when we do?
2. St. Paul tells us to put on the armor of God. What are the pieces of this armor, and how can each help us to resist temptation and stay true to our faith?
3. Sometimes, events in the Church can be confusing or make us question our beliefs. What are some ways we can trust in God and seek clarity, even when we don’t fully understand?
4. The Psalm in the Communion Antiphon expresses a longing for God’s salvation. What does it mean to place our hope in God’s promises, and how can we practice patience and trust while we wait for His answers?

For Sunday School

1. Jesus tells a story about a servant who was forgiven but wouldn’t forgive others. Why is forgiveness important, and how can we be better at forgiving others in our own lives?
2. St. Paul says that we need to wear the armor of God. What do you think this means? How can we put on God’s armor to be strong and safe, especially when we face things that are hard?
3. Have you ever felt worried or unsure about what’s happening around you? How can we remember to trust God when things don’t make sense?
4. In the Psalm, the person talks about waiting for God to save them. How can we remember to wait and trust God, even if it takes a long time for things to get better?

For Youth Ministry

1. Forgiveness can be difficult, especially when someone has really hurt us. What does Jesus’ teaching on forgiveness say about our own need to let go of anger? How can forgiveness free us and help us to grow spiritually?
2. St. Paul’s description of spiritual armor is a powerful metaphor. Which piece of the armor of God do you think is most important for young people today, and why?
3. There are times when news about the Church can be discouraging. How can we remain vigilant and maintain our trust in God when we feel disillusioned or troubled by events in the Church?
4. In the Communion Antiphon, we hear about a longing for God’s help. How can we stay connected to God and nurture our faith, especially during times when we feel distant or lost?

For Personal Reflection

1. In what areas of my life do I struggle to forgive? How can I apply Jesus’ teaching on forgiveness to bring healing to myself and those I need to forgive?
2. St. Paul calls us to be vigilant by putting on the armor of God. How can I better equip myself with faith, prayer, and Scripture to withstand the challenges and temptations I face?
3. The Church today faces many difficulties, and I sometimes feel uncertain about the future. How can I balance vigilance and trust, remaining faithful while also trusting that God is guiding His Church?
4. When I experience spiritual dryness or longing for God, how can I rekindle my faith and trust in His presence? What steps can I take to draw closer to God during these times?

By discussing these questions, we can deepen our understanding of the Gospel message, strengthen our commitment to living in truth, and find ways to compassionately engage with the world around us.

---

---

Vigilia Fiduciae: Evangelizing Family, Friends, and Non-Traditional Catholics

In today’s world, where many experience doubts and uncertainties about faith, the motto “Vigilia Fiduciae”—Vigilance of Trust—offers a meaningful framework for evangelization. This approach calls us to be vigilant in our faith while maintaining a steadfast trust in God’s providence. Whether it’s family members, friends, or non-traditional Catholics, the theme of vigilance and trust guides us in sharing the faith with compassion, patience, and understanding.

The Foundation of Vigilia Fiduciae in Evangelization

“Vigilia Fiduciae” invites us to be watchful, prayerful, and discerning as we share the Gospel. This dual commitment to vigilance and trust means being grounded in our faith while being sensitive to the spiritual journeys of others. Just as St. Paul encourages us in Ephesians to put on the “armor of God,” we are called to approach evangelization with spiritual strength, wearing the virtues of love, peace, and patience, which can profoundly impact those we encounter.

Evangelizing Family: Building Faith and Trust at Home

Evangelizing within the family can be both the most challenging and the most rewarding. Family members often know us best and see our faith lived out daily, which can make evangelization a natural and influential part of family life.

1. Practice Forgiveness and Mercy: Family relationships sometimes suffer from longstanding hurts or misunderstandings. As today’s Gospel of the unforgiving servant shows us, forgiveness is foundational to spiritual healing. Extend mercy to family members, showing them through your actions that faith is a source of peace and reconciliation.
2. Model a Faithful Life: Vigilance of faith is best demonstrated through a life lived with consistency and integrity. Daily prayer, participation in the sacraments, and living out Christian virtues are powerful ways to evangelize family members without words.
3. Engage in Open and Respectful Dialogue: Conversations about faith can sometimes be sensitive, especially with family. Approach these discussions with humility, allowing space for questions and doubts. Show respect for their views, and patiently share your own journey with God.
4. Trust in God’s Timing: Remember that conversion is often a gradual process. Pray for your family members, trust that God is working in their hearts, and be vigilant in living out your faith as a silent witness to God’s love.

Evangelizing Friends: A Journey of Faith Together

Friendship provides a unique opportunity for evangelization through shared experiences, deep conversations, and mutual support. When it comes to friends, “Vigilia Fiduciae” calls us to be watchful over our own faith while being open and compassionate in sharing it with others.

1. Be a Faithful Witness: Friends are often influenced by our example. Live your faith openly and authentically, letting your actions reflect your beliefs. A life of joy, patience, and kindness can attract friends to the faith in powerful ways.
2. Provide a Safe Space for Questions: Many people have doubts or misunderstandings about the Church. Offer a listening ear, and be prepared to discuss difficult topics without judgment. Be vigilant in seeking the truth and offer explanations based on love and understanding.
3. Invite Friends to Experience the Faith: Rather than just talking about your faith, invite friends to join you in it. Whether it’s attending Mass, participating in a parish event, or simply praying together, these experiences can provide them with a deeper understanding of what it means to live as a Catholic.
4. Rely on the Holy Spirit for Guidance: Pray for your friends, asking the Holy Spirit to guide you in knowing how and when to share your faith. Trust that God is working in their lives, even if the impact is not immediately visible.

Evangelizing Non-Traditional Catholics: Reconnecting with the Church

Non-traditional Catholics—those who identify as Catholic but do not actively practice the faith—represent a significant part of our mission. These individuals often retain a cultural connection to the Church but may have drifted away from regular participation or may be disillusioned by various issues within the Church.

1. Respect and Acknowledge Their Experiences: Many non-traditional Catholics may have experienced hurt or confusion regarding Church teachings or actions. Listen to their stories with compassion, acknowledging their struggles and validating their experiences without judgment.
2. Gently Reintroduce the Sacraments: The sacraments, especially Reconciliation and the Eucharist, are the source of grace and healing. Invite them to return to the sacraments, emphasizing their power to bring peace, forgiveness, and strength.
3. Share the Beauty of the Faith: Non-traditional Catholics might have forgotten or never fully experienced the beauty of the Church’s teachings, liturgy, and spirituality. Share the aspects of the faith that inspire you, whether it’s the reverence of the Mass, the depth of Catholic teaching, or the example of the saints.
4. Be Patient and Persistent in Prayer: Conversion is often a long journey, particularly for those who feel distanced from the Church. Pray for these individuals, asking for the intercession of the saints and entrusting them to Mary’s care. Trust that God will work in their lives in His time.

Living Vigilia Fiduciae in Evangelization

In all forms of evangelization, whether with family, friends, or non-traditional Catholics, “Vigilia Fiduciae” requires us to balance vigilance with trust. We are called to be vigilant in our own faith, maintaining our spiritual practices and staying connected to God, while trusting that God is the one who ultimately transforms hearts.

This dual focus calls us to prepare ourselves spiritually, remaining grounded in prayer and the sacraments so that we can effectively witness to others. At the same time, we must trust in God’s timing, knowing that every seed of faith we plant can bear fruit in ways we may not immediately see.

As we continue our mission to share the faith with those around us, let us remember the words of St. Augustine: “Trust the past to God’s mercy, the present to God’s love, and the future to God’s providence.” Through vigilance and trust, may we be instruments of His peace, hope, and healing for all we encounter.Fides Sanans.

May our faith be a light and a healing presence for all those we seek to evangelize.

---

Life in the Spirit: Healing Faith

The phrase Fides Sanans, meaning “Healing Faith,” encapsulates the essence of the Christian life—living in the Spirit, guided by a faith that heals not only individuals but also families, communities, and society. As Christians, we are called to a life of deep, trusting faith in Jesus Christ, who alone has the power to restore what is broken. This healing power of faith touches all dimensions of our lives, from our personal spiritual journey to our relationships with others and our engagement with the world. But how do we practically live this out in our day-to-day lives? Let’s reflect on this essential question.

1. Faith in Christ: The Foundation of Healing

At the core of the Christian life is our faith in Jesus Christ, the source of all healing. This faith is not simply intellectual assent; it is a deep, living trust in the Lord’s power to transform us. In the Gospel of John, we hear the story of the royal official who, trusting in Christ’s word alone, experienced the healing of his son. His faith matured from seeking mere physical healing to trusting fully in Christ’s authority.

To live Fides Sanans in our daily lives, we must first cultivate a personal relationship with Christ through prayer, Scripture, and the sacraments. In the Eucharist, especially, we encounter Christ’s healing presence. Just as the royal official believed in the words of Jesus, so too must we approach the Eucharist with faith, believing that in receiving His Body and Blood, we are nourished and healed. Start your day with a simple prayer: “Jesus, I trust in You,” and let that trust guide your actions throughout the day.

2. Healing Begins with Forgiveness

One of the most powerful ways our faith can bring healing is through forgiveness. Many of the wounds in our families, relationships, and even society stem from unforgiveness and resentment. Christ teaches us that forgiveness is essential to living as His disciples. The healing of the royal official’s son is a powerful reminder that Christ desires not only to heal physical ailments but also to bring restoration to broken relationships and hearts.

To live Fides Sanans means to be generous in forgiving others, just as we have been forgiven by God. This can be difficult, especially when the wounds run deep, but it is through forgiveness that we allow God’s healing power to flow into our relationships. Start small—whether by letting go of minor grievances or extending an olive branch in a long-standing conflict—and trust that God’s grace will work through your act of forgiveness.

3. Faith and Action: Being a Healing Presence in the World

Living a life of healing faith requires not only belief but also action. St. James tells us, “Faith without works is dead” (James 2:26). Our faith is not meant to be hidden but shared with others through acts of love and service. The world is filled with suffering and brokenness, and as followers of Christ, we are called to be instruments of His healing in society.

One practical way to live this out is by engaging in works of mercy. Whether it is visiting the sick, feeding the hungry, or comforting the grieving, these acts of compassion are concrete expressions of Fides Sanans. They not only bring healing to others but also deepen our own faith by allowing us to encounter Christ in those we serve. As Mother Teresa often reminded us, “Not all of us can do great things, but we can do small things with great love.” In every act of kindness, we participate in the healing mission of Christ.

4. Building a Healing Environment in Your Home

Our homes are the first places where we experience faith and healing. The royal official’s entire household came to believe in Christ through his faith. Similarly, our faith has the power to transform our families. But how can we foster a healing environment in our homes?

Start by making prayer a central part of your family life. Simple practices like praying together before meals, reading Scripture as a family, and attending Mass together create a space where Christ is present and active. Be mindful of how you speak to one another—words of encouragement, patience, and kindness can heal wounds, while harsh or critical words can deepen them. As parents, model the faith for your children, showing them through your actions that trusting in God’s love brings peace and joy.

5. Faith in Times of Suffering

Living a life of healing faith does not mean we will avoid suffering. In fact, suffering is often part of the Christian journey. The royal official had to endure the pain of seeing his child gravely ill before he experienced the joy of healing. St. Paul reminds us that “suffering produces endurance, and endurance produces character, and character produces hope” (Romans 5:3-4).

When we face trials—whether they are personal struggles, family issues, or societal challenges—our faith invites us to trust that God is at work, even when we cannot see it. In moments of doubt, turn to prayer, and remember the words of Christ: “Do not be afraid; only believe” (Mark 5:36). Offer your suffering to God, asking Him to use it for your growth in holiness and for the healing of others. Just as the royal official’s faith was tested and deepened through his suffering, so too can our faith grow stronger when we entrust our pain to the Lord.

Conclusion: Living Fides Sanans Every Day

To live Fides Sanans—healing faith—is to embrace a life rooted in trust in Christ, a life that seeks healing through prayer, forgiveness, and acts of love. It means allowing Christ’s healing power to transform not only our individual hearts but also our families, communities, and the world around us.

Let us commit ourselves to living out this faith every day. Start small: deepen your prayer life, forgive those who have wronged you, serve those in need, and trust that Christ is with you in every moment. By living a life in the Spirit, guided by healing faith, we become instruments of Christ’s love and mercy, bringing healing to a world in need.

May the Holy Spirit guide us in this journey of faith, and may the healing power of Christ be with us always.

“Fides Sanans: A Faith That Heals.”

---

A Sermon for Sunday: Revd Dr Robert Wilson

St. Edward the Confessor/Twenty First Sunday after Pentecost

Today we celebrate the Feast of St. Edward the Confessor, as well as commemorating the Twenty First Sunday after Pentecost. Edward the Confessor was the son of Ethelred the Unready and Emma of Normandy. Though an Anglo Saxon his sympathises were Norman, derived from his Norman mother and upbringing in Normandy. His Norman sympathies were shown by his ecclesiastical appointments, such as that of Robert of Jumieges as Archbishop of Canterbury. His most famous achievement was the founding of Westminster Abbey. He died leaving no obvious successor, but his connection with the Dukes of Normandy led William, Duke of Normandy to claim the throne, defeating Harold at the Battle of Hastings in 1066.

Edward was the last of the Kings of Wessex, who had in effect replaced the other Saxon kingdoms, and emerged as the first Kings of all England, as Wessex was the last area to hold out against Danish invaders. Edward’s reign marked a period of transition between an Anglo Saxon England whose strength lay in local government to the coming of the Normans and their stronger central government structure.

While there is no reason to dispute his personal piety, opinion is very much divided about his success as a king. It depends very largely on the attitude taken to the subsequent Norman Conquest. For some, Edward’s pro-Norman policy fatally undermined the Saxon monarchy, and paved the way for the Norman conquest, which represented an alien yoke over the English people. For others, his Norman sympathies were an example of his enlightened outlook and paved the way for the replacement of the Anglo Saxons with more sophisticated continental Norman rulers, with their castles and massive cathedrals.

However, what both sides agree is that the period marked a dramatic change in the direction of English society. The Norman Conquest led to the replacement of virtually the entire English ecclesiastical hierarchy with Norman Frenchmen. The larger Saxon churches were pulled down and replaced by massive Norman cathedrals. Older Saxon sees were replaced by new ones centred on towns. For example, Sherborne was replaced by Salisbury and Selsey by Chichester. The Saxon nobility were replaced with Normans, and castles were built to enforce the Norman hegemony. English was replaced as the language of the court by Norman French. It would not be until the later Middle Ages that the English language reasserted itself, as the Normans went native. The Normans showed little understanding of the people whom they governed (this included the English saints, with many of their relics being destroyed by the Normans). This process was subsequently extended to Wales and Ireland, with the establishment in both countries of a Norman governing class over the native population. There is the same division of opinion over whether this process should be seen in a positive or negative light.

Nine hundred and fifty years later the people of these islands are divided on not dissimilar lines over the issue of whether they should have remained or left the European Union. This is essentially a more modern version of the older dispute between Saxon and Norman. For some Britain’s membership of the European Union marked an assault on our national identity. For others it was an example of our society becoming more cosmopolitan and enlightened. The nationalist sees the nation as a home which belongs to those who were born there. Outsiders are sometimes welcome as guests, but they remain outsiders. By contrast, the cosmopolitan sees our society as more like a hotel, in which people may book different rooms, but they all remain visitors and no one truly belongs, for to say some belong and not others will cause division and conflict. Yet cosmopolitans can often be very contemptuous of non- cosmopolitans, the mass of humanity. Most people want to belong somewhere rather than nowhere. The Christian Church is sometimes co-opted by both nationalists and cosmopolitans in support of their contrasting political agendas.

However, if we are to take the Bible seriously as our starting point, a different picture emerges than either nationalism or cosmopolitanism. The Israelites were defined by their covenant with God. They were a mixed multitude of many tribes, yet Moses welded them into a unity because they all, high and low, rich and poor were bound to the covenant. They subsequently conquered a land and had a monarchy and temple like other nations, but what ultimately united them as a people was their covenant with God. They were judged according to their faithfulness to the covenant. That is why they were able to survive the loss of land, monarchy and temple, because they were a people that “dwelleth alone, that shall not be numbered among nations”. Their identity was derived from their covenant with God.

The prophet Jeremiah looked forward to a time when a new covenant, in which sins would be forgiven, would be written on the hearts of men. The first Christians believed that this new covenant was sealed through the blood of Christ, his saving death and resurrection. The new covenant people of God, the Body of Christ, are those who have been baptised into Christ, and they are from every tribe, nation and tongue. Their life is sustained by the sacrament of the Eucharist. In this life they will continue to render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, for they will belong to an earthly society, whether it is nationalist or cosmopolitan, but their ultimate commonwealth is in heaven, as they await the Saviour’s second coming and that new heaven and new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness.

The peoples of these islands come from many different tribes, but what ultimately defined them was their adherence to this faith. The Venerable Bede could write the history of the English people before they obtained political unity because they were united as one people by their faith. The same could also be said of the nations of Scotland, Ireland and Wales, with their clan structure before they obtained political unity as nations. What ultimately gave them their distinct identity was the Christian faith.

If the peoples of these islands are to find a way forward out of the current crisis, it will not come from either nationalism or cosmopolitanism but from the Christian faith. What ultimately matters about Edward the Confessor is not whether he favoured Saxon or Norman, but the faith that is shown by the abbey that he founded. Let us pray that we may follow in his footsteps and build up the Church in this land in our own time.

---

---

---

St. Edward the Confessor: A Model for Traditional Catholics in Contemporary Britain

St. Edward the Confessor, King of England from 1042 to 1066, stands as a shining example of Christian virtue, humility, and devotion. As one of the last Anglo-Saxon kings, he is remembered not only for his political leadership but also for his deep piety and commitment to the faith. For traditional Catholics in contemporary Britain, the life and legacy of St. Edward offer rich spiritual lessons, providing a model of how to live out our faith in a society that often seems increasingly distant from its Christian heritage.

A King Guided by Faith

St. Edward’s reign was marked by an unwavering dedication to justice, peace, and charity. Born into royal privilege, he nonetheless chose to embrace a life of humility and service. His commitment to the Catholic faith shaped his kingship in profound ways. Rather than seeking power for its own sake, St. Edward governed with the heart of a servant, always seeking the good of his people and striving to foster a kingdom rooted in peace and justice. He is particularly remembered for his acts of charity, his devotion to prayer, and his concern for the poor.

In today’s Britain, where secularism has gained significant ground and religious values often seem to be sidelined, St. Edward’s example is especially relevant. For traditional Catholics striving to live their faith in the public square, Edward’s life teaches us the importance of placing God at the center of all that we do. His reign was a testament to how faith and leadership can harmoniously coexist, with charity and justice flowing from a deeply held commitment to the teachings of the Church.

Humility in Leadership

One of the most striking aspects of St. Edward’s life was his humility, even in the face of great power. While he held the highest office in the land, Edward’s reign was marked by a deep sense of his own dependence on God. He was often known to turn to prayer for guidance, seeking divine wisdom rather than relying on his own strength or political acumen. His construction of Westminster Abbey, perhaps his greatest legacy, was not only an act of architectural grandeur but also a symbol of his desire to leave behind a spiritual foundation for his kingdom.

In the contemporary world, where leadership is often equated with self-promotion and the pursuit of personal gain, St. Edward’s humility challenges traditional Catholics to embrace a different model. Whether we hold positions of authority in our communities, workplaces, or families, we are called to lead with humility, recognizing that true power lies in service to others. Edward’s legacy reminds us that it is possible to live our faith boldly and authentically, even in positions of influence, without compromising our humility before God.

The Role of Tradition in Modern Britain

St. Edward’s reign occurred during a period of transition in English history, as the influences of Norman culture were beginning to make their way into the fabric of the Anglo-Saxon world. Despite the shifting political landscape, Edward remained steadfast in his devotion to traditional Christian values, ensuring that his kingdom reflected the moral and spiritual teachings of the Church. His fidelity to these traditions is a powerful reminder to contemporary Catholics in Britain that we, too, are called to uphold the richness of our faith amidst societal change.

In a time when many of the traditional moral and spiritual values that once shaped British culture are being eroded, traditional Catholics face a unique challenge: how to remain faithful to the timeless teachings of the Church while engaging with a rapidly changing society. St. Edward’s life shows us that fidelity to tradition does not mean isolation from the world but rather living in such a way that our faith becomes a leaven in society. His example encourages us to proudly hold fast to the truths of the Catholic faith, even when they stand in contrast to the prevailing norms of the day.

A Saint for Modern Catholic Families

St. Edward was deeply concerned with the spiritual and moral health of his people, much like how traditional Catholics today are concerned with the spiritual welfare of their families. His emphasis on charity, prayer, and devotion to the sacraments offers a roadmap for family life. In today’s Britain, where the pressures of secular culture can make it difficult to maintain a strong Catholic identity, Edward’s example reminds us of the importance of creating a “domestic church” within our homes. Just as Edward sought to build a kingdom grounded in faith, so too must Catholic families work to build homes where Christ is at the center, where the Rosary is prayed, and where the sacraments are frequently received.

For parents in particular, St. Edward’s devotion to his faith is a call to foster a culture of prayer and holiness in the family. His life serves as a reminder that Catholic families are meant to be beacons of light in the world, forming the next generation of faithful Christians who will, like Edward, shape society according to the values of the Gospel.

Holiness and the Public Square

Perhaps one of the most relevant aspects of St. Edward’s life for traditional Catholics today is his ability to live his faith publicly without compromising his personal sanctity. He governed with integrity, remained faithful to the Church, and sought to embody Christian virtues in his dealings with others. For Catholics in modern Britain, Edward’s example speaks to the importance of living our faith boldly in the public square, even when it may be met with indifference or opposition.

In an increasingly secular society, it can be tempting to privatize our faith or to downplay its significance in public life. Yet, Edward the Confessor shows us that holiness is not confined to the cloister or the chapel; it is meant to permeate every aspect of our lives, including our roles in the public sphere. Whether through involvement in politics, business, education, or community service, Catholics are called to witness to the truth of the Gospel in every setting. Edward’s legacy is a testament to the power of a life lived in fidelity to Christ, even in the most visible and influential positions.

Conclusion: Following St. Edward’s Example Today

St. Edward the Confessor offers a powerful model for traditional Catholics in contemporary Britain. His life of humility, devotion, and public witness to the faith provides a roadmap for how we can live out our Catholic identity in a world that often seems increasingly detached from its Christian roots.

In St. Edward, we see a saint who understood that true power lies in service, that leadership flows from humility, and that fidelity to the traditions of the Church can transform not only individuals but also society. As we navigate the challenges of living the Catholic faith in modern Britain, let us turn to St. Edward for inspiration and guidance, seeking to follow his example of holiness, charity, and devotion to God in all aspects of our lives.

St. Edward the Confessor, pray for us!

---

St. Luke: A Model of Vigilia Fiduciae

The life and legacy of St. Luke the Evangelist provide a powerful example of Vigilia Fiduciae—the Vigilance of Trust—in Christian discipleship. St. Luke, a physician, companion of St. Paul, and author of both the Gospel of Luke and the Acts of the Apostles, exemplifies how vigilance and trust in God guide our journey of faith. He dedicated his life to documenting the life of Christ and the early Church, focusing on themes of mercy, healing, and the universality of the Gospel message. In a world filled with uncertainty, St. Luke shows us how to live with a vigilant heart and a trusting spirit.

Vigilance in Faith: Attentive to God’s Call

St. Luke’s life was marked by an unwavering vigilance in responding to God’s call. As a physician, he was committed to healing physical ailments, but as a disciple, he extended his work to the spiritual healing of others. His attentiveness to the needs of the early Church and his commitment to spreading the Gospel reveal a life lived with purpose and discernment.

1. Documenting the Life of Christ
   St. Luke’s Gospel is known for its careful attention to detail, including unique accounts such as the Annunciation, the Magnificat, and the Prodigal Son. His vigilance is evident in his meticulous storytelling, which invites readers into a deeper understanding of Christ’s compassion and mercy. Luke’s commitment to accurately recording Jesus’ life and ministry serves as a model for how we should approach our own faith—with intentionality and a deep respect for the truth of the Gospel.
2. Focus on the Marginalized and Outcast
   Throughout his Gospel, Luke highlights Jesus’ outreach to the poor, the sick, and the marginalized. His vigilance in portraying Christ’s ministry to these groups underscores the importance of being attentive to those in need. St. Luke calls us to remain vigilant in our own lives, watching for opportunities to serve and advocate for those who are often overlooked. By following his example, we can ensure that our faith remains active and engaged with the world around us.
3. Staying Close to St. Paul During Trials
   St. Luke was a faithful companion to St. Paul, accompanying him on his missionary journeys and even standing by him during his imprisonment. In the Second Letter to Timothy, Paul mentions, “Only Luke is with me” (2 Timothy 4:11), showing Luke’s loyalty and vigilance in supporting his friend and fellow apostle. This unwavering presence reflects a vigilance in friendship and faithfulness, reminding us to stay close to those who need support during difficult times.
4. Witnessing and Preserving the Early Church’s Story
   Through his writings, particularly the Acts of the Apostles, Luke documented the growth of the early Church, the challenges it faced, and the victories it won through the power of the Holy Spirit. His vigilance in preserving these stories for future generations helps us today to remain connected to the Church’s roots. Luke’s example challenges us to reflect on how we might bear witness to our faith in a way that inspires and strengthens others.

Trust in God: Relying on Divine Guidance

While St. Luke’s life reflects vigilance, it is equally characterized by a profound trust in God’s guidance. As he traveled with Paul and chronicled the life of Jesus and the early Church, Luke demonstrated an openness to the Holy Spirit’s direction, trusting that God was at work even amid uncertainty and hardship.

1. Trusting the Holy Spirit’s Inspiration
   St. Luke’s Gospel and the Acts of the Apostles show a keen awareness of the Holy Spirit’s role in guiding the early Church. Luke himself trusted in the Spirit’s inspiration as he documented the events and teachings that would become central to the Christian faith. His trust in divine guidance reminds us that we too are called to rely on the Holy Spirit as we navigate our spiritual journeys, seeking wisdom and insight from God.
2. Confidence in the Universality of the Gospel
   Luke’s writings reflect a strong belief that the message of Christ is for all people, regardless of background or social status. His Gospel emphasizes Jesus’ interactions with Gentiles, Samaritans, and others often seen as outsiders. St. Luke’s trust in the universality of the Gospel calls us to share our faith without fear or hesitation, believing that God’s love is meant for everyone. By embracing this inclusive vision, we can trust that our efforts to evangelize will bear fruit in God’s time.
3. Trusting in God During Persecution
   Accompanying Paul through imprisonment and hardships, Luke witnessed firsthand the trials that came with being a follower of Christ. Yet, he did not abandon his mission. His trust in God’s providence gave him the strength to remain steadfast in his work, even in the face of persecution. This trust invites us to persevere in our own faith, believing that God is with us, especially in times of adversity.
4. Patiently Awaiting God’s Plan
   St. Luke’s writings emphasize patience and trust in God’s plan. He recounts Jesus’ teachings on the Kingdom of God, reminding believers to remain faithful as they await its fulfillment. This theme of waiting in hope calls us to embrace God’s timing in our lives, trusting that He is working behind the scenes to bring about His purposes. By following Luke’s example, we learn to cultivate a spirit of trust and surrender, confident that God’s plan is unfolding, even when it’s not immediately visible.

Living Vigilia Fiduciae: Practical Steps Inspired by St. Luke

St. Luke’s life and writings offer a blueprint for how we can embody Vigilia Fiduciae in our own lives. Here are some practical steps to live with vigilance and trust, inspired by St. Luke’s example:

• Be Attentive to God’s Presence in Daily Life
  Like St. Luke, we should seek to be attentive to God’s presence in all things. This involves regular prayer, Scripture reading, and a commitment to staying aware of how God is working in our lives. Make time each day to reflect on where you have seen God’s hand at work and give thanks for His guidance.
• Reach Out to the Marginalized
  St. Luke’s emphasis on serving the poor and the outcast reminds us to stay vigilant in our love for others, particularly those who are often overlooked. Find ways to extend compassion to those in need—whether through acts of charity, volunteering, or simply being a listening ear. This vigilance in love can open doors for sharing the Gospel with those who may not otherwise encounter it.
• Trust in the Power of the Holy Spirit
  Before making decisions or facing challenges, ask for the Holy Spirit’s guidance, just as St. Luke relied on the Spirit’s inspiration. Trust that God will provide the wisdom and strength you need. Embrace the Sacraments and other opportunities for spiritual growth, confident that the Spirit is leading you.
• Persevere in Faith During Difficult Times
  Like St. Luke accompanying St. Paul through trials, be steadfast in your faith even when you face difficulties. Trust that God is present in your suffering and that He will bring good out of your trials. Share your burdens with trusted friends or a spiritual director, knowing that God often works through others to support and guide us.

Conclusion: Embracing St. Luke’s Spirit of Vigilance and Trust

St. Luke the Evangelist exemplifies how we can live a life of Vigilia Fiduciae—remaining vigilant in our spiritual duties and trusting in God’s plans for us. His dedication to documenting the life of Jesus and the early Church, his compassion for the marginalized, and his trust in the Holy Spirit provide a model for our own faith journey. By following St. Luke’s example, we can live with purpose, resilience, and hope, knowing that God is guiding us every step of the way.

As we seek to embody vigilance and trust in our daily lives, let us remember the words attributed to St. Luke: “The Kingdom of God is among you” (Luke 17:21). By staying vigilant in faith and trusting in God’s presence, we draw nearer to the Kingdom each day.

St. Luke, pray for us!

---

Finding Light Amidst the Darkness: October, Month of the Holy Rosary

October, dedicated to the Holy Rosary, invites us to discover the profound light that shines through this powerful prayer. The Rosary, often described as a “spiritual weapon” and a “compendium of the Gospel,” offers solace, guidance, and strength to Catholics around the world. In times of uncertainty and difficulty, it becomes a beacon of hope, illuminating the path through life’s darkness with the light of Christ, reflected through the loving intercession of His Blessed Mother.

The feast of Our Lady of the Rosary on October 7th commemorates the pivotal victory at the Battle of Lepanto in 1571. In thanksgiving for this victory, attributed to the Rosary’s power, Pope Pius V established this feast. Centuries later, we continue to rely on this prayer, finding strength in its mysteries and solace in its rhythm. As we enter the month of the Rosary, we are called to deepen our devotion, reflecting on the ways this prayer can bring light to our lives and our world.

The Rosary: A Prayer for All Seasons of Life

The Rosary comprises twenty mysteries divided into four sets: the Joyful, Sorrowful, Glorious, and Luminous Mysteries. Each mystery invites us to meditate on pivotal moments in the lives of Jesus and Mary, making the Rosary a journey through the Gospel that touches on every aspect of the human experience—joy, sorrow, glory, and the search for truth.

1. In Times of Joy
   The Joyful Mysteries—the Annunciation, Visitation, Nativity, Presentation, and Finding in the Temple—celebrate the moments of joy in Mary and Jesus’ lives. They remind us that God is present in our everyday joys and that every blessing we receive is an opportunity to give thanks. Meditating on these mysteries brings light to the happy moments in our lives, encouraging gratitude and awareness of God’s gifts.
2. In Times of Sorrow
   The Sorrowful Mysteries—the Agony in the Garden, Scourging, Crowning with Thorns, Carrying of the Cross, and Crucifixion—help us find solace in suffering. By reflecting on Christ’s Passion, we realize that we are never alone in our pain. Jesus walked the path of suffering, and He walks alongside us now. These mysteries offer light in the darkness of grief and trial, helping us unite our sufferings with His for spiritual strength and growth.
3. In Times of Glory
   The Glorious Mysteries—the Resurrection, Ascension, Descent of the Holy Spirit, Assumption, and Coronation—remind us of the ultimate victory over death and the promise of eternal life. These mysteries assure us that after every Good Friday, there is an Easter Sunday, and they fill us with hope for our final destination in heaven. The Glorious Mysteries bring light to our faith, reminding us that Christ has conquered death and that we are called to share in His glory.
4. In the Search for Truth
   The Luminous Mysteries, while not part of the original fifteen decades, highlight key moments in Jesus’ public ministry, such as His Baptism, the Wedding at Cana, the Proclamation of the Kingdom, the Transfiguration, and the Institution of the Eucharist. These mysteries help us reflect on Jesus as the Light of the World, guiding us in truth and calling us to deeper communion with Him. They bring light to our spiritual journey, helping us to seek truth and live out our faith more fully.

The Rosary: A Beacon of Hope in Dark Times

In the darkness of today’s world—marked by divisions, uncertainties, and personal struggles—the Rosary serves as a refuge and a guide. Through its meditative repetition and profound mysteries, the Rosary brings peace to anxious hearts and offers a means to bring our intentions to the Blessed Virgin Mary, who intercedes for us with her Son.

1. A Source of Peace in Anxiety
   The repetitive nature of the Rosary has a calming effect, helping us slow down and focus our hearts and minds on God. By entering into this prayer, we allow ourselves to be held by Mary, who, as a loving mother, takes our concerns and brings them to Jesus. When anxiety threatens to overwhelm us, the Rosary becomes a haven where we can find solace and reassurance.
2. Guidance in Times of Confusion
   The mysteries of the Rosary offer us spiritual guidance by reminding us of God’s plan of salvation and His faithful presence throughout history. When we feel lost or uncertain, reflecting on these mysteries can provide clarity and direction, helping us see that God is with us every step of the way. Through the Rosary, we receive Mary’s gentle guidance, who leads us closer to her Son and helps us understand God’s will for our lives.
3. Strength to Face Life’s Challenges
   Just as Pope Pius V called upon the faithful to pray the Rosary in a time of crisis, we too can turn to this prayer for strength. The Rosary teaches us to persevere through difficulty, to trust in God’s providence, and to remain hopeful in the face of adversity. By contemplating the lives of Jesus and Mary, we learn how to embrace our own crosses with faith, trusting that God is working all things for our good.
4. A Prayer for the World
   In times of great need, the Rosary becomes a powerful intercessory prayer for the world. We can pray for peace, healing, and conversion, entrusting our petitions to Mary. Just as she interceded at Cana, prompting Jesus to perform His first miracle, so too does she intercede for us today. The Rosary unites us with Catholics around the world, creating a powerful chorus of prayer that can bring about change and transformation.

Practical Ways to Embrace the Rosary This October

As we honor the Month of the Holy Rosary, here are some practical ways to deepen your devotion and experience its light in your life:

• Pray the Rosary Daily: Make a commitment to pray the Rosary every day in October, dedicating each day’s prayer for a specific intention or need. Whether you pray a full Rosary or just a single decade, let this time be a moment to encounter God’s presence.
• Join or Organize a Rosary Group: Praying the Rosary with others can deepen your experience and bring a sense of community. Many parishes organize Rosary groups, or you can gather with family and friends to pray together. Consider joining or organizing a Rosary procession on October 7th, the Feast of Our Lady of the Rosary.
• Reflect on the Mysteries: Take time to meditate on the mysteries more deeply. Before praying, read the corresponding Gospel passage or reflect on a specific aspect of each mystery. This can help you connect the mysteries to your own life and find personal meaning in them.
• Pray for Peace and Healing: With so much turmoil in the world, dedicate this month’s Rosary prayers to intentions for peace, healing, and unity. Offer your Rosaries for specific needs in your community, the Church, or the world at large, trusting that Mary’s intercession will bring about the grace needed in these areas.

Conclusion: Letting the Light of the Rosary Shine

As we journey through this Month of the Holy Rosary, may we allow its light to guide us, dispelling the darkness that may surround us. The Rosary is not only a personal prayer but also a powerful tool for bringing God’s love and mercy into the world. By embracing this devotion, we invite Mary’s maternal intercession into our lives, helping us grow in faith, hope, and love.

In the Rosary, we find a pathway through the darkness, a light that leads us closer to Jesus through His Mother. As we meditate on the mysteries, let us ask for the grace to live out the virtues they inspire, and may we be instruments of God’s light and peace in the world.

Our Lady of the Rosary, pray for us!

---

CURRENT AFFAIRS

---

Bishop Bernard Tissier de Mallerais: Steadfast Guardian of Tradition

The death of Bishop Bernard Tissier de Mallerais has prompted a wave of tributes and eulogies from across the traditional Catholic world, as people remember his profound contributions to the Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) and the broader movement to preserve the Traditional Latin Mass. Bishop Tissier de Mallerais, who passed away on October 8, 2024, was a pivotal figure within the SSPX and a steadfast defender of pre-Vatican II Catholic teachings, often regarded as a theological and pastoral pillar within traditionalist Catholicism.

A Life Dedicated to Tradition

Born on September 14, 1945, in Sallanches, France, Bishop Tissier de Mallerais initially studied biology before embracing his vocation for the priesthood. He entered the SSPX’s seminary in Fribourg, Switzerland, in 1969, where he became one of the earliest seminarians under Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. His journey with the SSPX was marked by rapid advancement, reflecting his commitment to the SSPX’s mission to preserve Catholic orthodoxy. Ordained in 1975, he quickly became a professor, then rector, of the seminary in Écône. His teaching shaped the lives of many priests who would go on to serve in SSPX chapels around the world​ (SSPX)​(Catholic Insight).

Bishop Tissier was consecrated as a bishop by Lefebvre in 1988 in a ceremony conducted without papal approval, a moment that defined both his career and the SSPX’s relationship with the Vatican. This act led to automatic excommunication for both Lefebvre and the newly consecrated bishops, but Bishop Tissier saw the move as necessary to safeguard the SSPX’s apostolic mission. Reflecting on this moment, SSPX Superior General Davide Pagliarani said that Bishop Tissier was “a model of faithfulness and perseverance,” whose courage helped to sustain the SSPX during challenging times​ (SSPX)​(Angelus Press).

Remembered for His Scholarship and Influence

Bishop Tissier de Mallerais was also a respected scholar, best known for his biography of Archbishop Lefebvre, Marcel Lefebvre: The Biography, which remains an essential work for those studying traditionalist Catholicism. Angelus Press, which publishes many of Bishop Tissier’s writings, noted that his works “captured the essence of the Society’s mission and provided clarity on complex theological issues”​(Catholic Insight)​(Start).

His theological contributions extended beyond this biography, as he wrote and spoke extensively on the dangers he saw in modernist trends within the Church. Following the lifting of his excommunication by Pope Benedict XVI in 2009, Bishop Tissier continued to voice concerns over the Vatican’s direction, particularly regarding the reforms of Vatican II. He remained a vocal advocate for a return to what he and the SSPX perceived as authentic Catholic teachings, resisting efforts to fully reconcile the SSPX with the Church without substantial changes to the post-conciliar framework​ (Catholic Family News)​(Wikipedia).

A Global Pastoral Presence

Throughout his episcopate, Bishop Tissier de Mallerais traveled widely, visiting SSPX chapels around the world to administer sacraments, particularly confirmations, and ordinations. He was revered for his pastoral dedication, with many faithful remembering his visits as moments of great spiritual encouragement. His presence was especially significant in communities where access to the Traditional Latin Mass was limited, and he was known to bring solace and a sense of continuity to those who felt marginalized by the mainstream Church’s embrace of modern practices​ (SSPX)​(Angelus Press).

A memorable encounter that underscored his appreciation for those who preserved the Traditional Latin Mass occurred when he met Bishop Kelly of the Old Roman apostolate. At a dinner party hosted by a mutual friend in Chicago, Bishop Tissier expressed heartfelt gratitude for the work of the Old Romans in preserving the traditional liturgy in the United States. With a deep sense of camaraderie, he reportedly told the then Canon Kelly, “Thank you, thank you, thank you, for keeping the old Mass alive until we came!” Some Old Roman chapels in the United States served as foundational Mass centers for the SSPX during its early days in America. (Wikipedia)(SSPX).

Mourning and Legacy

In the days following his death, the SSPX and traditionalist communities worldwide have held memorial Masses and prayer vigils in his honor. Bishop Tissier de Mallerais’s death marks the end of an era for the SSPX, which now has only two of its original bishops remaining. His passing leaves a void within the Society, but his influence endures through his writings, the priests he formed, and the faithful he served. As SSPX faithful continue to reflect on his life and contributions, Bishop Tissier is remembered as a champion of tradition whose legacy will inspire future generations of Catholics dedicated to upholding traditional teachings​ (Start)​(Angelus Press).

In the words of one SSPX member from France, “He was a shepherd who cared deeply for his flock,” a sentiment that echoes through the many tributes pouring in from around the world. His legacy as a scholar, pastor, and defender of Catholic orthodoxy will undoubtedly remain a guiding force within the SSPX and for those who share his unwavering commitment to tradition.

---

Scotland’s Abortion Clinic Buffer Zones: Are Silent Prayers Now a Crime?

The implementation of Scotland’s new abortion legislation, which creates “safe access zones” around clinics, is fueled by concerns about harassment of patients. However, critics argue that these fears are overstated and point to a lack of concrete evidence that peaceful activities like silent prayer pose any real threat. Michael Robinson from the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC) argued that typical pro-life activities, such as holding vigils or praying quietly, are far removed from any behavior that could be genuinely considered harassing. Robinson remarked that imposing fines for such actions, even within private residences, is an excessive measure, especially given the sparse evidence of harassment within these zones​ (The Scotsman)​(Reason.com).

The case of Abort 67 in Brighton further complicates the narrative. In 2014, members of this pro-life group were taken to court after displaying graphic images of aborted fetuses outside a clinic, which some individuals claimed caused distress. However, the judge ultimately dismissed the charges, concluding that the displays did not meet the legal standard for harassment. The court found that while the images were upsetting to some, their display was a form of expression protected under free speech laws​ (The Scotsman). This case has been referenced by pro-life groups in Scotland as an example of why broad restrictions on anti-abortion activities may infringe on civil liberties without sufficient justification.

Christian Concern, another outspoken critic, has argued that the new Scottish legislation exemplifies “state overreach” and could set a worrying precedent. Andrea Williams, the organization’s chief executive, questioned the necessity of such sweeping restrictions, especially when they could lead to arrests or fines for quiet, non-confrontational acts of faith. She also highlighted that similar buffer zones in other parts of the UK have led to cases where individuals were arrested simply for praying silently near clinics. Williams views these actions as punitive and disproportionate, warning that they risk infringing on fundamental freedoms, particularly for those whose religious convictions lead them to peaceful, prayerful protest​ (Reason.com).

In August, West Midlands Police apologised and paid £13,000 to a Christian charity volunteer who said her arrest for silently praying outside an abortion clinic violated her human rights. Isabel Vaughan-Spruce was arrested in November 2022, and again in March last year, outside a clinic which had been covered by a local Public Spaces Protection Order (PSPO). After the case against her collapsed, Ms Vaughan-Spruce issued a claim against the force for two wrongful arrests and false imprisonments, assault and battery, and for a breach of her human rights.

In response, the Scottish Government has asserted that the law is meant to safeguard women’s access to healthcare without fear of intimidation or distress. However, critics argue that this aim does not justify the criminalization of prayer or other quiet expressions of belief, particularly when conducted within private homes or in a manner that is neither confrontational nor obstructive. The broad terms of the legislation leave open the possibility that even unobtrusive acts, like silently praying in one’s garden, could be penalized, as long as they are visible or audible within the buffer zone.

This debate taps into broader concerns about the balance between protecting access to healthcare services and preserving rights to free expression and religious practice. As similar legislation is expected to take effect in England and Wales, pro-life groups and civil liberties advocates across the UK are watching closely, fearing that these laws could set a restrictive precedent on expressions of faith and protest in public and private spaces alike.

---

A New Consistory: 21 new cardinals announced

Pope Francis will hold a consistory on December 8, 2024, to appoint 21 new cardinals, a move that will significantly influence the future leadership of the Catholic Church. These appointments reflect the Pope’s ongoing efforts to internationalize the College of Cardinals and shift its focus toward regions that have historically been underrepresented. With this consistory, the total number of cardinals will rise to 256, with 141 cardinals eligible to vote in a papal conclave, while 115 cardinals are over the age of 80 and therefore ineligible to vote​ (America Magazine)​(Vatican News).

Notable Appointments

Among the new appointments, Bishop Mykola Bychok, a 44-year-old Ukrainian prelate who serves as head of the Eparchy of Saints Peter and Paul of Melbourne, Australia, is the youngest of the new cardinals. His elevation is seen as both a recognition of the growing Ukrainian diaspora and a nod to the ongoing war in Ukraine. Bychok’s youth and dynamic leadership make him a significant figure within the newly expanded College of Cardinals​ (USCCB)​(Kmaupdates).

Angelo Acerbi, at 99 years old, is the eldest of the new appointees. As a retired Apostolic Nuncio with a long diplomatic career, Acerbi will not be eligible to vote in a future conclave due to his age. His appointment, however, is a recognition of his extensive service to the Church, including diplomatic missions to New Zealand, Colombia, Hungary, Moldova, and the Netherlands ​(America Magazine)​(USCCB). Acerbi’s appointment continues the Pope’s practice of honoring senior Church figures with decades of service, even if they are past voting age.

Another prominent figure is Archbishop Francis Leo of Toronto, Canada (53 years old), who was appointed Archbishop of Toronto in 2023. Leo is the only new cardinal from North America in this consistory, reflecting Pope Francis’ focus on bringing greater geographic balance to the College. Leo’s role in Toronto, a large and diverse archdiocese, places him in a strategic position within the Church​ (Global News).

Archbishop Tarcisio Isao Kikuchi of Tokyo, Japan, aged 65, is another significant appointment, representing the growing importance of the Church in Asia. Kikuchi has been known for his focus on social justice and interfaith dialogue in Japan, where Catholics are a small minority. His elevation signifies Pope Francis’ interest in promoting the Church’s mission in regions where it faces unique challenges​ (Vatican News).

Archbishop Carlos Gustavo Castillo Mattassoglio of Lima, Peru, aged 73, continues Pope Francis’ strong representation of Latin American leaders within the College. Castillo is noted for his work advocating for the poor and marginalized, aligning closely with the Pope’s emphasis on social justice and the Church’s role in addressing inequality​ (America Magazine).

Fr Timothy Radcliffe’s appointment as a cardinal has sparked controversy among conservative Catholics due to his past comments on issues related to sexuality and Church doctrine. Radcliffe, a former Master of the Dominicans, has been known for his progressive views, including remarks that some perceive as supportive of same-sex relationships and other stances that seem at odds with traditional Church teachings. Critics argue that his appointment reflects a broader trend in Pope Francis’ papacy towards inclusivity that some feel compromises doctrinal clarity. Supporters, however, see Radcliffe as a figure of compassion and openness, who represents the Pope’s call for a more pastoral approach within the Church ​(America Magazine)​(National Catholic Register).

The UK’s Growing Representation

This consistory also bolsters the United Kingdom’s presence in the College of Cardinals, bringing the total number of British cardinals to four. Among the new appointees is Timothy Radcliffe, O.P., a theologian and former Master of the Dominicans, known for his intellectual contributions to the Church and his role as a spiritual adviser to the Synod of Bishops. The other UK cardinals are Cardinal Vincent Nichols, Cardinal Arthur Roche, and Cardinal Michael Fitzgerald, further solidifying the UK’s influence in the global Church​ (USCCB).

Global Diversity and a Shift in Focus

The 2024 consistory underscores Pope Francis’ commitment to expanding the geographic diversity of the College of Cardinals. The new cardinals come from 18 different countries, including several from Asia, Latin America, and Africa, further decentralizing the Church’s leadership. In his efforts to bring the Church closer to its “edges,” Francis continues to break from tradition, appointing cardinals from regions that have not historically held significant power within the Vatican hierarchy​ (America Magazine)​(Vatican News).

This diversity will have a lasting impact on the Church, particularly when the time comes to elect a new pope. With the majority of voting cardinals now appointed by Pope Francis, his influence on the future direction of the Catholic Church is clear. By focusing on leaders with strong pastoral backgrounds, a commitment to social justice, and a global outlook, Francis is ensuring that the next generation of Church leadership reflects his vision of a more inclusive and outward-looking Church​ (USCCB)​(Kmaupdates).

This consistory represents another step in Pope Francis’ efforts to reshape the College of Cardinals to reflect the global Church’s diversity and the values central to his papacy: humility, pastoral care, social justice, and global representation.

---

What is Pope Francis’s vision for the Church?

Pope Francis’ efforts to reshape the Catholic Church through initiatives like Amoris Laetitia, Fiducia Suplicans, and synodality have stirred significant debate, particularly among Traditional Catholics. His approach, seen by some as progressive and pastoral, has raised concerns among conservative and orthodox Catholics who argue that these reforms could lead to doctrinal confusion and a weakening of the Church’s timeless teachings.

Synodality: A Call for Decentralization

One of the hallmark initiatives of Francis’ papacy is his push for synodality. This concept involves increasing dialogue and participation across the Church, particularly by laypeople, and fostering a decentralized governance model. While proponents argue this encourages greater involvement and reflection of diverse voices, Traditional Catholics fear it opens the door to heterodoxy. The Synodal Way in Germany has become a prime example of this concern, where discussions on gender, sexuality, and the role of women have challenged long-standing Catholic teachings. Traditionalists argue that synodality, as currently practiced, risks diluting the authority of the Magisterium and could lead to fragmentation of Church unity​ (America Magazine)​(National Catholic Register).

The concern here is not only about governance but also doctrine. By granting local synods more authority, critics warn that differing interpretations of moral teachings could emerge, particularly in areas like same-sex blessings and the ordination of women, which the German synod has discussed. This has led figures like Cardinal Gerhard Müller, former Prefect for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, to publicly express his concerns about the potential for heretical outcomes from these processes​ (America Magazine)​(National Catholic Register).

Amoris Laetitia: Pastoral Flexibility or Doctrinal Ambiguity?

Pope Francis’ apostolic exhortation Amoris Laetitia (The Joy of Love) has been a lightning rod for controversy, particularly in its handling of the issue of Communion for divorced and remarried Catholics. Chapter 8 of the document suggests the possibility of pastoral discernment for individuals in “irregular” situations to receive Communion, provided they undergo a process of spiritual guidance and reflection. While Francis frames this as an act of mercy, aimed at reintegrating those who have been estranged from the Church, traditionalists fear it undermines the Church’s teaching on the indissolubility of marriage.

Several prominent bishops and theologians have raised concerns about the potential doctrinal confusion stemming from Amoris Laetitia. The so-called “Dubia” presented by four cardinals, including Cardinals Raymond Burke and Carlo Caffarra, questioned the document’s alignment with Catholic teaching on marriage and the Eucharist. These prelates argue that the ambiguity around the conditions for receiving Communion could lead to widespread abuses and a departure from the Church’s historical teachings​ (America Magazine)​(National Catholic Register).

Traditionis Custodes: Restricting the Latin Mass

Perhaps the most significant flashpoint between Pope Francis and traditional Catholics is his 2021 motu proprio Traditionis Custodes, which severely restricted the celebration of the Traditional Latin Mass (TLM). This reversed Pope Benedict XVI’s Summorum Pontificum (2007), which had encouraged wider access to the TLM. Francis justified this move as necessary to preserve Church unity, claiming that the TLM had become a symbol of division, with some communities using it as a way to reject the reforms of the Second Vatican Council (Vatican II)​(National Catholic Register)​(Catholic News Agency).

For many traditional Catholics, Traditionis Custodes was seen as a harsh and unnecessary measure, particularly when progressive liturgical abuses, such as innovations in the Novus Ordo Mass, have been largely ignored. Critics argue that this move alienates a growing number of young Catholics who are drawn to the reverence and beauty of the TLM. Figures like Cardinal Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneider have openly condemned the restrictions, viewing them as a rejection of the Church’s rich liturgical heritage ​(America Magazine)​(Catholic News Agency).

Furthermore, many traditionalists feel that Francis has shown more tolerance for progressive elements within the Church, such as the controversial Pride Masses and liberal voices within the German Church, while clamping down on traditionalists. This perceived double standard has fostered a sense of alienation among conservative Catholics who feel their concerns are being dismissed​ (Catholic World Report)​(National Catholic Register).

Broader Concerns for the Future

The reforms initiated by Pope Francis, while championed by some as acts of pastoral mercy, have also raised alarm about the future direction of the Church. Orthodox theologians argue that the Pope’s focus on inclusion and dialogue with secular culture risks watering down the Church’s moral teachings. For example, the role of women in the Church, same-sex unions, and the reception of Communion for non-Catholics have all been subjects of increased discussion under this papacy, much to the dismay of traditionalists who view these developments as compromising the Church’s mission​ (America Magazine)​(National Catholic Register).

From a conservative standpoint, many see Francis’ papacy as one that prioritizes modernity over fidelity to tradition. The fear is that by prioritizing dialogue with the world, the Church may lose its countercultural witness and drift into doctrinal relativism. Critics point to figures like Cardinal Robert McElroy and Father James Martin, both of whom have been vocal in advocating for more progressive stances on sexuality, as evidence of the growing influence of heterodoxy within the Church​ (National Catholic Register).

Conclusion

Pope Francis’ vision for reshaping the Church has sparked considerable debate within Catholicism, especially among traditionalists who fear that his reforms may lead to doctrinal confusion and a weakening of the Church’s liturgical and moral foundations. Whether through the synodality process, the handling of issues like divorce and remarriage in Amoris Laetitia, or the restrictions on the Traditional Latin Mass in Traditionis Custodes, Francis’ papacy has opened up deep divisions within the Church that are likely to have lasting consequences. For traditional Catholics, the challenge is to remain faithful to the perennial teachings of the Church while navigating a landscape that appears increasingly open to modernist influences​ (Catholic World Report)​(Catholic News Agency)​(National Catholic Register).

---

First Warrior Teachers Conference: Archbishop’s reflections

I recently had the privilege of attending the first-ever Warrior Teachers conference, held at a hotel in Manchester. It was a truly significant occasion, as many of us gathered in person for the very first time. The event, chaired by the program’s visionary founder Barry Wall, brought together a passionate group of individuals committed to the cause of promoting critical thinking, intellectual resilience, and resisting the spread of ideological dogma in education and beyond.

One of the highlights of the day was the presence of Baroness Claire Fox, an advocate for free speech and Director of the Academy of Ideas, of which I am an Associate. As the keynote speaker, she reminded us of the crucial importance of resisting conformity in thought and maintaining open, robust debate in society. Her insights deeply resonated with all of us, as they align so closely with the goals of the Warrior Teachers program. The emphasis on equipping individuals to challenge the increasing influence of Critical Social Justice ideologies in our schools and public institutions is more pressing now than ever, and Claire’s speech underscored just how pivotal our work is.

Barry Wall, whose leadership and dedication have shaped this entire movement, guided us through the event with thoughtfulness and insight. It was clear that the program he has built is more than a curriculum—it’s a call to action, one that seeks to empower us all to engage critically with the challenges facing society today. His efforts have fostered a community of thinkers, educators, and advocates determined to counter the tide of ideological manipulation in education and public discourse.

During the conference, several of our fellow Warrior Teachers shared their own campaigns and projects, demonstrating how they have taken the principles of the program and applied them in real-world contexts. One of the standout presentations was from those involved in the Teach & Protect campaign. This initiative focuses on safeguarding our educational environments from ideological bias and political indoctrination, which can stunt students’ intellectual development. Their work is crucial in ensuring that our schools remain places where young people are encouraged to think critically and independently, free from the influence of harmful narratives.

This chimed with my own efforts. PSHEbrighton is a support and campaign group established with the aim of assisting families in Brighton & Hove who have concerns with the delivery of Personal, Social, Health, and Economic Education (PSHE) and Relationships and Sex Education (RSE) in local schools. PSHEbrighton acknowledges that the implementation and delivery of PSHE/RSE in Brighton & Hove face significant challenges. One major concern is the recruitment and retention of third-party organizations in schools, who may have vested interests and promote harmful ideologies and unscientific information to vulnerable and sensitive children.

Another presentation that sparked significant discussion was the King’s Cross Toilets fiasco. This case became a lightning rod for the broader debate around gender identity and public safety, especially in relation to policies that allow individuals to use facilities based on gender self-identification. The Warrior Teachers involved in this campaign are addressing one of the most complex issues of our time, advocating for clarity in policy and public discourse. Their efforts to bring reasoned debate to such sensitive matters reflect the core values of our movement—intellectual rigor, reasoned argument, and a commitment to public safety.

What struck me most during this conference was the sense of community that permeated the entire event. For many of us, this was our first opportunity to meet face-to-face, and the energy in the room was palpable. We shared our experiences, learned from one another, and discussed strategies to advance the mission of the Warrior Teachers program. There was a deep sense of camaraderie, knowing that we are united in our efforts to push back against the ideological forces that threaten to undermine both education and the values that underpin a free society.

As I reflect on the conference, I am filled with a renewed sense of purpose. The Warrior Teachers program is not merely an academic exercise—it is a movement, one that is gathering momentum as more people recognize the urgent need to safeguard the principles of critical thinking, free thought, and open debate. Barry Wall and his team have created something truly remarkable, and the presence of influential voices like Baroness Claire Fox only serves to strengthen our cause.

Looking ahead, I am excited to see where this movement will go. The success of this first conference has galvanized all of us, and I have no doubt that we will continue to grow, expand our influence, and take the fight for intellectual freedom to new heights. The work we are doing is essential—not just for the current generation but for those who will come after us. We owe it to them to create a world where free thought, reason, and truth are valued and protected.

This conference was just the beginning, and I am proud to stand alongside my fellow Warrior Teachers as we continue this important journey together.

Are you passionate about promoting critical thinking and safeguarding education from ideological influence? Join the Warrior Teacher programme and become part of a dynamic community dedicated to fostering intellectual resilience and challenging harmful narratives. Through interactive sessions and engaging discussions, you’ll gain the tools needed to make a real difference. Sign up now and help shape a brighter, more thoughtful future for the next generation!

---

Free Speech Under Siege: The Battle for Open Discourse in UK Politics, Academia, and Beyond

In the United Kingdom, free speech faces mounting challenges as cultural, political, and ideological divides deepen. Concerns over censorship and the suppression of dissenting voices span from academic institutions to public spaces, sparking debates among media personalities, politicians, philosophers, and Catholic commentators. This growing issue reflects a broader struggle within British society, where voices advocating for unrestricted discourse clash with those who favor restrictions to prevent harm and offense. At the heart of this debate are significant concerns about how free expression is handled, especially in academia, by the government, and on social media platforms.

The Political Arena and the Media’s Role

High-profile political figures like Nigel Farage have been vocal about what they perceive as an assault on free speech. Farage, whose political views have often been polarizing, recently claimed that UK banks targeted him by closing his accounts due to his political beliefs. He argued that the incident is emblematic of a larger trend in which individuals with conservative views face professional repercussions. Farage’s recent comments that Sir Keir Starmer represents “the greatest threat to free speech in British history” further underscore his stance that political correctness has morphed into a modern-day “McCarthyism,” where expressing divergent views can lead to ostracism or censorship​ (Evening Standard)​(Institute of Economic Affairs).

Media figures like J.K. Rowling have also been drawn into the fray. Rowling has faced backlash, including threats of violence, due to her views on gender identity. Her experience has been cited as part of a troubling pattern in the UK, where those who deviate from progressive norms risk personal and professional attacks. The Evening Standard has written extensively about this phenomenon, emphasizing how the cultural climate increasingly sidelines intellectual diversity. The paper warns of a shift from a society that values open debate to one that punishes dissent, often through online shaming and “cancel culture” ​(Evening Standard).

Academic Perspectives and Institutional Censorship

The issue of free speech is particularly pronounced within UK universities, where debates around controversial topics have increasingly led to protests, “no-platforming,” and legal battles. Dr. Arif Ahmed, a Cambridge philosopher recently appointed as the UK’s free speech tsar, has been at the forefront of these concerns. Ahmed launched a campaign on CrowdJustice to secure funding for legal challenges against university policies that he argues stifle open discourse. His initiative reflects a broader sentiment among academics who worry that institutions once dedicated to intellectual exploration are now limiting freedom of thought in favor of ideological conformity​ (Evening Standard)​(King’s College London).

Ahmed’s efforts align with high-profile cases like that of Simon Fanshawe, a co-founder of Stonewall, who faced backlash at Cambridge for his views on gender identity. Similarly, Kathleen Stock, a former professor at the University of Sussex, resigned after student protests against her gender-critical perspectives. These incidents suggest that universities, once seen as defenders of diverse viewpoints, are increasingly responding to activist pressures that suppress intellectual freedom. Such cases exemplify what many see as a disturbing trend within academia, where free speech is no longer viewed as an essential part of the educational mission but rather as a potential threat to inclusivity ​(Institute of Economic Affairs)​(King’s College London).

Adding to these efforts, the Free Speech Union (FSU) has launched a broader campaign against what it sees as government overreach in restricting free speech. The FSU contends that legislative measures intended to combat harmful content online risk creating an environment where dissenting opinions are easily silenced. Through lobbying and public advocacy, the FSU aims to protect a society in which all perspectives can be expressed freely without fear of censorship. Their campaign highlights concerns that government regulations intended to protect against harm are instead used to quash political dissent​ (Evening Standard).

Social Media and the Online Censorship Debate

The digital landscape has become both a platform for free expression and a battleground for censorship. Social media giants often play a dual role, enabling users to share ideas while simultaneously moderating content that they deem offensive or harmful. Critics argue that these platforms, through algorithms and moderation policies, contribute to the creation of echo chambers that stifle diverse viewpoints. The Institute of Economic Affairs has noted that this form of online censorship not only shapes public opinion but also limits the free exchange of ideas essential for a healthy democracy​ (Institute of Economic Affairs).

Concerns about social media censorship extend to public figures like Steven Pinker and Jordan Peterson, who have been vocal about the dangers of ideological conformity. Pinker argues that a natural tribalism, which he believes has been exacerbated by social media, is leading to the suppression of free speech, particularly when views challenge mainstream ideologies. Peterson, on the other hand, views the phenomenon as a manifestation of what he calls “neo-Marxist” ideology. He argues that this ideology regards free speech as a tool of oppression, thereby justifying its suppression in the name of progress​ (Evening Standard)​(Institute of Economic Affairs).

Catholic Commentary on Free Speech and Religious Freedom

Catholic voices have also weighed in on the free speech debate, particularly regarding religious expression. Many Catholic commentators, including Larry Chapp, have expressed concerns over the restrictions placed on traditional religious practices and viewpoints. Chapp has specifically criticized Pope Francis’ Traditionis Custodes, which restricts the Traditional Latin Mass, as an example of how even the Church can contribute to the erosion of free expression. For Chapp and other conservative Catholics, policies that favor inclusivity often seem to apply selectively, disproportionately affecting those with traditional religious views​ (National Catholic Register).

Beyond intra-Church controversies, there is a broader concern within Catholic circles about how free speech impacts religious expression in the public sphere. For instance, Public Space Protection Orders (PSPOs) and other regulations have been used to restrict Christian activists’ ability to pray or protest near abortion clinics. This has raised alarm among Catholics and other religious groups, who argue that such policies disproportionately target religious speech. The Institute of Economic Affairs has highlighted that while these measures are intended to maintain public order, they often serve to suppress dissenting religious viewpoints, which critics argue is a violation of basic freedoms ​(Institute of Economic Affairs).

Employment and Social Media

Kristie Higgs’ case at the Court of Appeal has drawn significant attention, as it could set an important precedent for free speech and religious freedom in the UK workplace. Higgs, a former pastoral administrator at Farmor’s School, was dismissed in 2019 after posting on Facebook about her concerns regarding LGBTQ+ education and transgender issues in schools. She argued that her dismissal was a form of religious discrimination, as her posts reflected her Christian beliefs, not animosity towards any group​ (Evening Standard)​(Christian Today).

In previous rulings, the Employment Tribunal upheld the school’s decision, stating that her posts could be perceived as homophobic or transphobic, and thus grounds for dismissal. However, an Employment Appeal Tribunal later allowed her case to proceed to the Court of Appeal, highlighting unresolved questions about the balance between expressing religious beliefs and maintaining workplace inclusivity​ (Evening Standard).

Higgs is supported by organizations like the Christian Legal Centre, which argues that her case underscores systemic bias against Christian beliefs. They contend that the school acted unlawfully by adopting the views of an anonymous complainant who had labeled her posts as prejudiced. The outcome of this case will likely influence how employers address similar situations in the future, particularly as third-party complaints about personal social media activity become more common​ (Christian Concern).

The Broader Implications and Societal Divide

The free speech debate in the UK reflects a profound tension between protecting individuals from harm and preserving open dialogue. Research from King’s College London shows that the public is divided on whether people are too easily offended or if greater sensitivity is needed. This split is indicative of a broader “culture war” over how to balance freedom of expression with the desire to protect against perceived harm ​(King’s College London).

As political correctness and social sensitivities evolve, comedians, academics, and public figures increasingly find themselves navigating a narrow path between acceptable and unacceptable speech. This climate has led to instances where, for example, TV shows are canceled over perceived offensive language, or public figures are “de-platformed” for views that were previously considered mainstream. This increasing regulation and restriction of speech reflect a shift toward what many see as an intolerant society, where open debate is replaced by echo chambers and ideological purity tests​ (Evening Standard)​(King’s College London).

Conclusion

The current state of free speech in the UK highlights a critical juncture in the nation’s commitment to liberal values. As political leaders, academics, media personalities, and Catholic commentators voice concerns over the suppression of dissent, the debate raises fundamental questions about the future of open discourse. While some advocate for more sensitivity to protect marginalized groups, others warn that these restrictions risk eroding the foundation of a free society.

Whether through the government’s legislative efforts, university policies, or the influence of social media, the threat to free speech appears to be growing. Figures like Dr. Arif Ahmed and organizations like the Free Speech Union are fighting to ensure that the right to speak freely is preserved, while critics worry that without robust protections, the UK could witness a steady decline in its commitment to open discourse. As the nation grapples with these challenges, it remains to be seen whether a balance can be struck that respects both the right to express controversial ideas and the need for a respectful public dialogue​ (Institute of Economic Affairs)​(King’s College London).

---

Casa USA: A Catholic Stand Against the “Culture of Death” with Padre Pio’s Vision for Healthcare in Michigan

Catholic Healthcare International’s (CHI) project in Howell, Michigan, aims to replicate Saint Padre Pio’s Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, originally founded in Italy, to foster a distinctly Catholic approach to healthcare that upholds the sanctity of life. The initiative, known as “Casa USA,” will include not only a hospital but also the Saint Padre Pio Institute for the Relief of Suffering, a medical school focused on pro-life and pro-family values. This endeavor reflects Padre Pio’s vision of establishing a network of hospitals devoted to compassionate, faith-based care.

At the core of CHI’s mission is a desire to counter what they refer to as the “culture of death,” a term frequently used in Catholic social teaching to describe societal trends that devalue human life, especially in areas like abortion, euthanasia, and assisted suicide. This term, popularized by Pope John Paul II in his encyclical Evangelium Vitae (The Gospel of Life), refers to ideologies and practices that undermine the dignity of life, often in the name of autonomy and subjective well-being. John Paul II stated that the “culture of death” is marked by “a war of the powerful against the weak,” where the weakest—like the unborn, the disabled, and the elderly—are often deemed expendable​ (CatholicVote org)​(Detroit Catholic).

CHI and its leaders see the establishment of Casa USA as a direct response to this culture. Dr. George Mychaskiw, the medical school’s president, has spoken against what he perceives as the erosion of ethical standards in medicine, where terms like “reproductive healthcare” and “ending suffering” are used as euphemisms to justify life-ending practices. Mychaskiw suggests that the current healthcare model echoes historical moments of moral failure, comparing contemporary trends to the medical ethics crises of 1940s Germany, where vulnerable populations were dehumanized and subjected to life-ending procedures ​(Catholic Review)​(Crux).

Catholic theologians and pro-life advocates have long highlighted the need for institutions that affirm life at all stages, pointing to the Church’s magisterial documents as a framework for understanding these issues. The Catechism of the Catholic Church articulates the principle that life is sacred “from conception to natural death” (CCC, 2258), and that any attack on innocent life is inherently wrong. Pope Francis, in his encyclical Laudato Si’, also criticizes the “throwaway culture” that often accompanies a utilitarian view of life, where those seen as “less productive” or “burdensome” are neglected or disposed of​ (Diocese of Lansing)​(Crux).

The Casa USA project seeks to provide a counter-narrative by embedding Catholic teachings into its medical curriculum. This includes elements of Humanae Vitae, which affirms the Church’s stance against artificial birth control and abortion, as well as Theology of the Body, a series of reflections by John Paul II that emphasize the sacredness of human sexuality and the body. Jere Palazzolo, CHI’s founder, envisions the medical school as a place where students are not only educated in medical sciences but also grounded in a Catholic worldview that equips them to resist societal pressures to conform to practices contrary to Church teachings​ (CatholicVote org)​(Detroit Catholic).

Fr. Calvin Robinson, a conservative commentator and member of the Casa USA Board of Trustees, has voiced his concerns about the challenges religious individuals face in today’s social climate. He highlights the importance of “standing firm” against what he describes as ideological pressure to abandon core beliefs. Reflecting on his own experience in the UK, where he perceives an increasingly hostile environment toward religious expression, Robinson underscores the importance of religious liberty and the protection of life. He warns against the dangers of acquiescing to “woke culture,” which he claims prioritizes subjective ideals over objective truth ​(Crux).

The initiative is further supported by Bobby Schindler, brother of Terri Schiavo, whose death in 2005 following the removal of her feeding tube sparked widespread debate over end-of-life care. The Terri Schiavo Home for the Brain Injured, to be included on the Casa USA campus, will provide specialized care for patients with severe brain injuries. Schindler advocates for a healthcare model that prioritizes patient dignity and family wishes over bureaucratic or financial pressures, reflecting CHI’s commitment to a pro-life healthcare ethos.

Catholics are encouraged to support Casa USA not just as a healthcare project but as a moral stand for life. In the words of Pope John Paul II, the Church is called to be “a people of life and for life,” tasked with defending the most vulnerable against a tide of cultural indifference. By contributing to Casa USA, supporters are participating in what CHI hopes will be a lasting testament to Padre Pio’s vision of compassionate, faith-filled healing that honors the intrinsic value of every human being​ (Diocese of Lansing)​(Catholic Review).

---

Tradition vs. Reform: Synod on Synodality’s Struggle to Balance Inclusivity and Catholic Doctrine

From a Traditional Catholic perspective, the current Synod on Synodality presents both a challenge and a call to action. Convened by Pope Francis to address issues of inclusion and synodality within the Church, the synod has brought contentious topics to the forefront, including the possible ordination of women as deacons and greater inclusion for LGBTQ individuals. For Traditional Catholics, these discussions pose a direct threat to the continuity of Catholic doctrine and emphasize the need to preserve the teachings passed down through sacred tradition.

The Role of Women in the Diaconate: Maintaining the Integrity of Holy Orders

The push for the ordination of women to the diaconate has emerged as a central theme of the synod, largely due to advocacy by groups like Discerning Deacons and the Ecclesial Conference of the Amazon (CEAMA). These groups argue that women are already performing deacon-like roles in pastoral settings, particularly in regions with limited access to ordained clergy. Ellie Hidalgo, co-director of Discerning Deacons, has expressed that women in these regions are effectively carrying out the same work as male deacons, yet without official recognition. Hidalgo claims, “In a violent world with so many urgent pastoral needs… Jesus is calling more women into service”. Supporters contend that recognizing women as deacons would better reflect the reality of the Church’s mission today.

However, from a Traditional Catholic standpoint, this position is at odds with the Church’s theological understanding of the sacrament of Holy Orders, which has traditionally been reserved for men. Pope John Paul II’s 1994 apostolic letter Ordinatio Sacerdotalis explicitly states, “The Church has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women” (Ordinatio Sacerdotalis, 4). Although this statement addresses the priesthood directly, many Traditional Catholics believe that it applies to the diaconate as well, given that both the priesthood and diaconate are forms of ordained ministry.

Dr. Peter Kwasniewski, a Traditional Catholic theologian, argues that any move to ordain women to the diaconate would not only contravene the Church’s sacred tradition but also disrupt the theological symbolism inherent in Holy Orders. Kwasniewski asserts that male-only ordination is rooted in Christ’s example, where he selected only male apostles, establishing a precedent that the Church has no authority to alter. He warns that expanding ordination to women would undermine the sacramental nature of the priesthood, potentially leading to further doctrinal erosion within the Church. He also argues that ordaining women would confuse the faithful about the distinct roles of clergy and laity, thereby blurring essential distinctions that uphold the Church’s sacramental identity.

The theological basis for a male-only diaconate is further supported by the Church’s understanding of the male priest as acting in persona Christi (in the person of Christ). For Traditional Catholics, this concept is essential to maintaining the integrity of Holy Orders. The Catechism of the Catholic Church states that, through ordination, a priest is conformed to Christ, who is the Bridegroom of the Church. This nuptial imagery is deeply symbolic, with the male priest representing Christ and the Church as his bride. Many Traditional Catholics contend that ordaining women would disrupt this sacred symbolism, thus altering the fundamental nature of the sacrament.

LGBTQ Inclusion and the Challenge of Moral Relativism

The synod’s discussions around LGBTQ inclusion have also raised concerns among Traditional Catholics, who view the Church’s teachings on sexuality as non-negotiable. The Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC) categorizes homosexual acts as “intrinsically disordered,” affirming that they are contrary to the natural law and cannot be approved under any circumstances (CCC, 2357). While the Church calls for compassion and respect toward individuals with same-sex attraction, it simultaneously holds that all Catholics are called to chastity and that sexual activity is reserved for marriage between a man and a woman.

An anecdote from the synod illustrates the cultural tensions surrounding these discussions. An African bishop advocated for pastoral care for polygamous couples, despite the Church’s teaching that polygamy is incompatible with the Gospel ideal. A day later, a priest echoed this argument, applying the same logic to LGBTQ Catholics. Both delegates advocated for inclusion and accompaniment, reflecting a synodal approach that some argue dilutes the Church’s moral teachings.

Bishop Athanasius Schneider, a prominent Traditional Catholic voice, has expressed grave concern over what he sees as the synod’s drift toward moral relativism. Schneider frequently references Veritatis Splendor, Pope John Paul II’s encyclical on moral theology, which emphasizes that certain truths are universal and unchanging, regardless of cultural or historical context. In Veritatis Splendor, John Paul II warned against the dangers of relativism, stating, “There can be no freedom apart from or in opposition to the truth” (Veritatis Splendor, 96). For Traditional Catholics, the synod’s discussions on LGBTQ inclusion risk undermining the Church’s witness to moral truth by suggesting that pastoral care might entail compromising on fundamental teachings.

From this perspective, the Church’s stance on LGBTQ issues should be rooted not in cultural adaptation but in fidelity to the teachings revealed by God. Traditional Catholics argue that true pastoral care requires adherence to these teachings, even when they are unpopular or difficult to uphold. Bishop Schneider and others have warned that any shift in the Church’s approach to LGBTQ inclusion must not deviate from the doctrinal truths about sexuality and marriage as enshrined in the Catechism and the Scriptures. In their view, offering pastoral care that does not affirm these teachings would be misleading, as it could create the impression that the Church has changed its stance on matters of sexual morality.

Synodality and the Preservation of Catholic Identity

The synod’s focus on synodality—a process of collective discernment and dialogue—has raised questions about the extent to which the Church should adapt to contemporary cultural pressures. Pope Francis has encouraged the synod to explore new forms of inclusivity and pastoral outreach, but he has also emphasized that the Church must remain rooted in the Gospel. In Evangelii Gaudium, he described the Church as a “field hospital” called to heal the wounds of a broken world, yet he also cautioned against a Church that conforms too closely to secular values. “We are not living an era of change but a change of era,” he noted, underscoring the need for the Church to retain its distinct identity amid shifting cultural tides.

For Traditional Catholics, this synodal emphasis on inclusivity risks overshadowing the Church’s primary mission of proclaiming the unchanging truths of the faith. They argue that any attempt to broaden the Church’s appeal by relaxing doctrinal standards would undermine its credibility as a moral and spiritual authority. Cardinal Robert Sarah has warned against what he calls the “prostitution of the Church” to the world, cautioning that compromises with modern values could lead the Church to abandon its prophetic witness. Traditionalists believe that true fidelity to the Church’s mission requires a willingness to stand against cultural currents, even when this stance is unpopular.

This view reflects a longstanding Traditional Catholic conviction that the Church must be a “sign of contradiction,” as Christ himself was, rather than a mirror to the world. From this perspective, the synod’s focus on dialogue and listening, while valuable, should not lead to changes that contradict the Church’s teachings. Instead, Traditional Catholics call for a return to the Church’s roots, a recommitment to its foundational beliefs, and a reaffirmation of the truths entrusted to it by Christ.

Women Deacons, LGBTQ Inclusion, and the Threat to Doctrine

The discussions on women deacons and LGBTQ inclusion within the synod reflect a broader cultural shift that Traditional Catholics see as a departure from the Church’s teachings. While proponents argue that these changes would make the Church more inclusive and responsive to contemporary needs, Traditionalists contend that they would compromise the Church’s doctrinal integrity. They believe that such changes are not authentic developments of doctrine but rather concessions to cultural trends that are incompatible with Catholic tradition.

Sr. Laura Vicuña Pereira Manso, vice president of CEAMA, expressed hope that the Holy Spirit would guide the Church’s discernment, saying that the Spirit—not antiquated structures—would ultimately settle these matters. However, Traditional Catholics argue that the Church is not free to alter doctrines based on perceived guidance from the Spirit if such alterations contradict established teachings. They caution that any attempt to reinterpret doctrine in light of modern values risks turning the Church into a mere echo of contemporary culture, rather than the transformative agent it is called to be.

For Traditional Catholics, the path forward is clear: the Church must resist the pressures of the modern world and reaffirm its commitment to the doctrines passed down from the Apostles. They argue that the Church’s teachings on the male-only diaconate and its stance on sexuality are not open to change because they reflect divine truths about human nature and the sacraments. As Pope John Paul II emphasized, “The Church imposes nothing; she only proposes. But she must propose with clarity and conviction” (Veritatis Splendor, 95).

Conclusion: A Call to Uphold Tradition

As the Synod on Synodality draws to a close, Traditional Catholics are left with a sense of urgency. For them, the Church’s future hinges on its ability to remain true to its identity as the Body of Christ, proclaiming eternal truths in a world that increasingly rejects them. They believe that any attempt to accommodate contemporary values at the expense of doctrine would ultimately lead to the Church’s spiritual and moral decline.

In their view, the synod’s discussions by Traditional Catholics echoes the call to uphold the Church’s teachings in the face of cultural pressures. They maintain that the Church’s mission is not to conform but to transform, offering the world an unchanging message of truth, even when it contradicts prevailing societal norms.

For Traditional Catholics, the synod has underscored the urgent need to preserve Catholic doctrine against calls for inclusivity that they believe threaten the Church’s doctrinal and sacramental integrity. They argue that while pastoral care is essential, it must be grounded in the truths of the Gospel. Ultimately, they hope that the Church will resist the temptation to conform to the world and instead reaffirm its role as a beacon of unchanging truth, faithfully transmitting the teachings of Christ to every generation. As the synod continues, they pray for a renewed commitment to the foundations of the faith, confident that the Church’s future lies in its adherence to tradition rather than in accommodation to modern cultural trends.

References

• Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2357-2358 – Teachings on homosexuality and chastity.
• John Paul II, Ordinatio Sacerdotalis (1994) – On the male-only priesthood.
• John Paul II, Veritatis Splendor (1993) – On moral absolutes and the dangers of relativism.
• Pope Francis, Evangelii Gaudium (2013) – On the Church as a “field hospital” and the call to uphold Gospel values.
• Statements by Cardinal Robert Sarah and Bishop Athanasius Schneider – Writings on maintaining doctrinal integrity against secular influences.
• Peter Kwasniewski – Commentary on Holy Orders and theological symbolism.
• Reports from National Catholic Reporter and Catholic News Agency – Coverage of the Synod on Synodality and associated discussions.
• Interview statements from Ellie Hidalgo and Sr. Laura Vicuña Pereira Manso – Advocating for women in ministry and LGBTQ inclusion.
• Vatican Synod documents and press releases – Synodal approach and stance on contentious issues.
• Various Catholic news sources (e.g., Catholic Review, Detroit Catholic, CatholicVote) – Updates and analysis on the synod’s proceedings and Traditional Catholic reactions.

---

---

Christian Concern: A call to action ref Assisted Dying

Christian Concern is calling on individuals to take action against a proposed assisted suicide bill currently under debate in the UK Parliament. They argue that legalizing assisted suicide could endanger vulnerable people, potentially pressuring those who are elderly, ill, or disabled into choosing death over life. To oppose this bill, Christian Concern urges the public to reach out to their Members of Parliament, share information within their communities, and participate in educational efforts to raise awareness about the risks and ethical concerns associated with assisted suicide.

Speak to your MP

Most MPs hold surgeries where you can meet them and explain your concerns. This is the most powerful way to ask your MP to oppose this bill. By attending your MP’s surgery, you can gently present your view to them, and they will be required to consider what you say and may even be confronted with a perspective they had not considered.

You can find out who your MP is and how to contact them using the link below. MPs usually share how to attend a surgery on their own websites, but you can always email them to ask.

If you cannot meet face-to-face with your MP, please write to them.

In either case, please engage your MP with truth and love, using the resources below.

• Find your MP (Parliament website)
• Guide for speaking to your MP

Alert your church

The Church is vital in this battle. Please ask your church leaders to speak up on this vital issue.

Here’s how to help:

• Play and share our video in church meetings and small groups to call your church to act
• Invite your MP to meet a group from the church and explain your opposition to assisted suicide
• Give time in your meetings to pray that assisted suicide would not be introduced

We will add more resources for churches to this page soon.

Understand the issue in depth

There are many good reasons Christians and everyone who loves their neighbour should oppose assisted suicide. Please use the resources below to understand the issue in more depth:

• Download and read Christian Concern’s booklet on euthanasia and assisted suicide
• Watch CC’s Gospel Issues seminar with Dr Peter Saunders: should Christians support the ‘right to die’?
• Watch CC’s video with Alex Schadenberg explaining how the assisted suicide law in Canada has led to a spiralling death culture
• Read: What does the Bible say about assisted suicide and euthanasia?
• Watch Liz Carr’s documentary, Better off Dead? on BBC iPlayer

---

Examining the Debate Over Gender-Affirming Treatments for Minors: A Call for Caution and Evidence-Based Care

Dr. Hilary Cass recently defended her review on gender identity services for children in the UK, a review that has sparked significant debate and concern, particularly in light of emerging data from the United States. The British Medical Association (BMA) recently voiced criticisms of Cass’s recommendations, which advocate a cautious, evidence-based approach to gender-affirming treatments for minors. These concerns reflect a growing transatlantic debate over the safety and appropriateness of treatments such as puberty blockers, hormone therapy, and surgical interventions for youth experiencing gender dysphoria. This article delves into Dr. Cass’s review, the criticisms it has received, and the broader implications of these treatments, drawing comparisons to findings and regulatory actions in the United States.

Dr. Hilary Cass’s Review and BMA Criticisms

Dr. Hilary Cass’s independent review, commissioned by NHS England, highlights the need for caution in the provision of gender-affirming care to minors, given the relatively limited long-term research on these interventions. Her report calls for a reassessment of puberty blockers and hormone therapy, which have increasingly been prescribed to adolescents experiencing gender dysphoria. The BMA, however, recently expressed concerns about Cass’s conclusions, arguing that her recommendations may not fully consider the needs and experiences of transgender youth​(PinkNews)​(The Independent).

The BMA’s position includes a call for further study, with an emphasis on understanding the link between Cass’s findings and her recommendations. The BMA voted to conduct an independent evaluation of the Cass Review, which, according to BMA Council Chairman Professor Philip Banfield, aims to ensure that transgender children receive the best possible care. Banfield emphasized the BMA’s “neutral” stance and commitment to an evidence-led approach, stating, “We will hear different perspectives, always prioritizing the needs of transgender children and young people”​(PinkNews).

Dr. Cass, in response, has defended her methodology, describing the criticisms as “inaccurate” and arguing that her recommendations are grounded in thorough, objective analysis. NHS England has also voiced support for the Cass Review, rejecting the BMA’s call for a pause in implementing her recommendations. An NHS spokesperson emphasized that the report represents “the most comprehensive review of its kind” and affirmed the organization’s commitment to ensuring that young people receive safe and effective care​ (The Independent).

Gender-Affirming Treatments: What They Entail

Gender-affirming treatments for transgender youth encompass various interventions aimed at aligning an individual’s physical appearance with their gender identity. These treatments are typically pursued by those experiencing gender dysphoria, a condition where a person’s experienced gender differs from their birth-assigned gender, often causing psychological distress. Here’s an overview of the most common gender-affirming treatments:

1. Puberty Blockers – These medications temporarily halt puberty, preventing the development of secondary sex characteristics like breast development or facial hair. Proponents argue that puberty blockers provide time for youth to explore their gender identity without the added stress of undergoing undesired physical changes. However, concerns have been raised about potential side effects, including impacts on bone density and future fertility. The Cass Review recommends cautious use of puberty blockers, citing the need for more research into long-term effects​(The Independent)​(Verywell Health).
2. Hormone Therapy – This involves administering hormones (e.g., estrogen for transgender women and testosterone for transgender men) to induce characteristics that align with a person’s gender identity. Hormone therapy can have both reversible and irreversible effects. While it can alleviate gender dysphoria by promoting traits that align with one’s gender identity, it also carries risks such as cardiovascular issues and potential infertility​(Verywell Health)​(1819 News).
3. Surgical Interventions – Surgeries like chest reconstruction for transgender men or breast augmentation for transgender women are generally reserved for adults but are sometimes requested by older adolescents. These procedures are irreversible and carry risks typical of major surgeries, including infection and complications. Given the permanence of surgical interventions, the Cass Review advocates that minors be given comprehensive psychological support before any irreversible treatments are considered​(1819 News)​(The Daily Dot).
4. Psychological Support – Recognizing that gender dysphoria involves significant psychological components, gender-affirming care often includes therapy and counseling. Psychological support helps individuals navigate their gender identity, manage the stress of transition, and explore non-medical aspects of their gender expression.

Emerging Data from the United States: The Do No Harm Database

The debate over gender-affirming treatments for minors has been similarly intense in the United States, where recent data from the organization Do No Harm sheds light on the scale of these interventions. According to their findings, between 2019 and 2023, around 5,747 minors in the U.S. underwent gender-related surgeries. In addition, numerous minors were prescribed hormone therapies and puberty blockers during this period. For example, Alabama reported 206 prescriptions for gender-affirming hormones and puberty blockers at a cost of over $154,000​ (1819 News)​(The Daily Dot).

The Do No Harm database, a controversial project, aims to track the prevalence of these treatments across the U.S., with the organization advocating for a halt on what they describe as “experimental” procedures for minors. Dr. Stanley Goldfarb, chairman of Do No Harm, argues that these findings underscore the need for more robust, long-term research before subjecting youth to irreversible interventions. The group’s stance is that gender-affirming treatments should not be provided to minors outside of well-regulated clinical trials until there is a more substantial evidence base​ (1819 News)​(The Daily Dot).

The release of these statistics has fueled legislative responses in multiple states. Alabama and Texas are among the states that have enacted laws restricting gender-affirming treatments for minors, reflecting a growing trend toward caution in pediatric gender medicine. Supporters of these laws argue that such measures protect children from potentially life-altering decisions made at a young age, while opponents claim they restrict necessary care for transgender youth​ (Verywell Health).

A recent CDC report on mental health challenges among transgender youth reveals significant disparities in suicidal ideation compared to their cisgender peers. According to the data, 25.9% of transgender youth reported attempting suicide within the past year. Of these, most attempts were not severe enough to require hospitalization. The findings indicate that while transgender youth do experience high rates of suicidal ideation, many attempts do not lead to life-threatening situations requiring medical intervention. This aligns with other studies indicating that while a significant number of LGBTQ+ youth report experiencing suicidal thoughts, the majority do not follow through with severe self-harm requiring hospitalization​ (CDC)​(LGBTQ Nation).

The Broader Implications: Balancing Safety, Autonomy, and Medical Ethics

The controversies surrounding gender-affirming treatments for minors raise complex questions about medical ethics, patient autonomy, and the role of the state in healthcare. Proponents of these treatments argue that they are essential for the mental health and well-being of transgender youth, many of whom face significant challenges, including high rates of anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation. They contend that denying access to these treatments can exacerbate these issues, leading to worse outcomes for young people experiencing gender dysphoria.

Conversely, critics argue that the irreversible nature of some treatments and the relative paucity of long-term data necessitate a more cautious approach. Dr. Hilary Cass and organizations like Do No Harm advocate for an evidence-based model that prioritizes safety and long-term well-being, particularly given that children and adolescents may lack the capacity to fully comprehend the permanent consequences of their decisions. Dr. Cass’s report and the data from Do No Harm both emphasize the need for rigorous, longitudinal studies to better understand the impacts of these treatments and inform clinical practices​ (PinkNews)​(The Daily Dot).

This debate also highlights the tension between patient autonomy and the duty of care that healthcare providers have, especially when treating minors. While healthcare professionals are committed to respecting the rights and choices of their patients, they are also obligated to ensure that treatments are safe and grounded in solid evidence. As Dr. Cass and the BMA continue to debate the best path forward, this tension is likely to persist as policymakers and medical professionals grapple with how to balance these considerations in an ethically responsible manner.

Conclusion: The Future of Gender-Affirming Care for Minors

As debates over gender-affirming care for minors continue in both the UK and the U.S., it is clear that the need for comprehensive, evidence-based research is critical. Dr. Cass’s review and the findings from Do No Harm both underscore the importance of caution in this rapidly evolving field. For now, policymakers, healthcare providers, and families face the challenge of navigating these complex issues in a way that protects the rights and well-being of young people while ensuring that medical interventions are safe, ethical, and scientifically sound.

The outcome of these debates will shape the future of transgender healthcare for minors, influencing both clinical practices and legislative approaches. With significant stakes for the young individuals affected, this is a conversation that will continue to draw intense scrutiny, as societies seek to reconcile the needs of transgender youth with broader ethical and medical considerations.

---

Gender-Affirming Treatments for Minors: The Ethical Debate and Traditional Catholic Perspectives

The growing debate over gender-affirming treatments for minors has elicited diverse perspectives, including significant concerns from Traditional Catholic voices. These perspectives emphasize the importance of safeguarding children while aligning with Catholic moral teachings on human dignity, the sanctity of life, and the natural order of human sexuality. As gender-affirming treatments gain prominence, many Catholics express apprehension about the potential risks and long-term consequences for youth, as well as the broader moral implications.

Traditional Catholic Perspectives on Gender and Identity

The Catholic Church teaches that gender is intrinsically linked to biological sex, a gift from God that reflects the natural order. According to the Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC), “Man and woman have been created, which is to say, willed by God: on the one hand, in perfect equality as human persons; on the other, in their respective beings as man and woman. Being man or being woman is a reality which is good and willed by God” (CCC, 369). This view underpins Catholic opposition to interventions that attempt to alter one’s biological sex to align with a perceived gender identity, especially when such treatments are applied to minors.

From a Traditional Catholic standpoint, gender-affirming treatments for children conflict with the Church’s teachings on human nature. Archbishop José Gomez of Los Angeles, a prominent Catholic leader, has spoken against what he calls the “ideology of gender,” arguing that it separates identity from biological reality and undermines the truth of human sexuality. For Catholics, this concept of gender as fluid or changeable contradicts the belief that God creates individuals as male or female for a purpose ​(Verywell Health)​(1819 News).

Concerns About Medical and Ethical Implications

Traditional Catholics often express concerns about the medical risks associated with gender-affirming treatments for minors, such as puberty blockers, hormone therapy, and surgeries. The irreversible nature of some procedures, especially surgeries, raises significant ethical issues. Catholic bioethics emphasizes the principle of primum non nocere—“first, do no harm”—which holds that medical interventions should prioritize the well-being and integrity of the person. From this perspective, subjecting children to irreversible treatments before they are fully capable of informed consent is morally problematic.

Catholic organizations, such as the National Catholic Bioethics Center, argue that puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones are experimental and carry unknown long-term health risks, potentially impacting fertility, bone health, and psychological well-being. Dr. Paul Hruz, a pediatric endocrinologist and Catholic bioethicist, has pointed out that much of the current research on gender-affirming care lacks the rigorous scientific evidence necessary to justify its widespread use, particularly for minors​ (The Daily Dot).

Human Dignity and the Sanctity of Life

Traditional Catholic teaching also emphasizes the inherent dignity of every person, created in the image and likeness of God. This perspective urges caution with gender-affirming treatments for youth, advocating instead for psychological and spiritual support to address underlying issues related to gender dysphoria. The Church encourages pastoral care that affirms each person’s dignity without necessarily endorsing medical interventions that alter the body.

Pope Francis has commented on these issues, referring to gender theory as part of a “global war” against the family. He has also expressed concern about what he sees as societal pressures that confuse young people about their identity and roles. In his apostolic exhortation Amoris Laetitia, he writes that “the young need to be helped to accept their own body as it was created” and that “thinking that we enjoy absolute power over our own bodies turns, often subtly, into thinking that we enjoy absolute power over creation” (Amoris Laetitia, 285)​(The Daily Dot).

The Call for Pastoral Care and Caution

While Traditional Catholics generally oppose medical interventions for gender transition in minors, they emphasize the need for compassion and pastoral care. The Church teaches that individuals experiencing gender dysphoria should be treated with respect and sensitivity, as they navigate complex challenges. Pope Francis has reiterated the importance of welcoming and accompanying those who struggle with their gender identity, though without endorsing gender-affirming treatments.

In summary, Traditional Catholic perspectives on gender-affirming care for minors advocate for a balance between respect for individual dignity and adherence to the Church’s teachings on human sexuality. As the debate continues, Catholic voices call for a cautious approach that respects the natural order, emphasizes the importance of sound scientific evidence, and prioritizes the holistic well-being of young people. For many Catholics, this means offering alternatives to medical interventions, such as counseling and spiritual guidance, that affirm a young person’s dignity without compromising Catholic values.

---

RECOMMENDED BOOKS

From theology to culture war there are some brilliant minds still publishing worthy, well-researched content heartily recommended to you for reading. These would make great additions to your own or another’s personal library, perhaps as a gift?

Immortal Souls: A Treatise on Human Nature

Delphi Complete Works of John Henry Newman (Illustrated)

The Way of Perfection

Novena to St. Edward the Confessor: Patron Saint of England

---

RECOMMENDED VIEWING

SYNOD CENTRAL

Luther and Sola Scriptura

A BAPTIST Discovers the EARLY CHURCH was CATHOLIC

How Vatican II was Hijacked by Liberals: They Have Uncrowned Him

Why I’m Off the Fence About Israel’s War – Konstantin Kisin

Is the Catholic Church Shifting on Marriage? Dr Gavin Ashenden and Dr Tony Rucinski interview

Race Politics & Mass Immigration are DESTROYING Australia

Romania is Building the Biggest Orthodox Church in the World

Uncovering the Truth About Muhammad’s Existence – Jay Smith

The Fall of England – Carl Benjamin | Real Talk with Zuby

---

---

PRACTICUM

The following are ways in which you may practically support the work of others for the betterment of our society and the plight of sufferers, the impoverished and defenceless.

Prayer Requests

Pray for vocations
Pray for traditional seminaries and the creation of formation houses
The Church – contending with the crisis of faith

Pray for Bishop Nioclas Kelly recovering from hip surgery
Pray for Eileen Butler diagnosed with colon cancer that has spread to her liver
Pray for Fr Stanislaus Ybarra FMCD in recovery relocating to Michigan

Praying for vocations

In our times of spiritual and moral challenges, the need for vocations to the Traditional Catholic priesthood and religious life is more pressing than ever. Traditional Catholic communities, which adhere closely to the liturgical and doctrinal practices predating the Second Vatican Council, offer a profound and timeless witness to the faith. These communities emphasize the Tridentine Mass, the rich traditions of the Church, and a deep commitment to orthodoxy and reverence in worship.

Praying for vocations to these communities is essential for several reasons:

SPIRITUAL LEADERSHIP AND GUIDANCE: The spiritual formation offered in traditional seminaries and religious houses is rigorous and deeply rooted in the Church’s intellectual and spiritual traditions. Priests and religious formed in this environment are well-prepared to provide strong spiritual leadership and guidance to the faithful. They play a crucial role in fostering spiritual growth, administering the sacraments with reverence, and leading souls to Christ.

PRESERVATION OF LITURGICAL HERITAGE: Traditional Catholic communities are guardians of the Church’s ancient liturgical heritage. The Tridentine Mass, also known as the Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite, offers a deeply contemplative and reverent worship experience that has nourished countless saints. By praying for vocations, we support the continuity of this sacred tradition and ensure that future generations can experience the beauty and depth of traditional Catholic worship.

WITNESS TO ORTHODOXY: In an age of doctrinal confusion and moral relativism, traditional Catholic communities stand as beacons of orthodoxy. Their unwavering commitment to the timeless teachings of the Church provides a clear and steadfast witness to the truth. Praying for vocations helps sustain this witness and equips the Church with priests and religious who can boldly proclaim the faith without compromise.

Response to a Growing Demand

There is a growing interest and demand for traditional liturgy and spirituality among the faithful. Many young people, in particular, are drawn to the beauty and depth of traditional Catholic practices. By praying for vocations, we support the growth of these communities and respond to the spiritual needs and desires of many who seek a deeper connection with their faith.

Please pray for the new formation house proposed by Archbishop Vigano, and likewise our own effort to establish a formation house under my own aegis here in Brighton.

In conclusion, praying for vocations to the priesthood and religious life is essential for the Church, especially during times of crisis. It is a way to invite Christ to send more laborers to the harvest, honor the contributions of religious orders, and ask for their intercession in renewing the Church. By praying for vocations during this time, we are participating in the Church’s mission to spread the Gospel and to build a stronger, more vibrant faith community.

---

Restore Justice for Rev. Dr. Bernard Randall: End the Church of England’s Unfair Blacklisting

Rev. Dr. Bernard Randall, a former Church of England chaplain, was dismissed after delivering a sermon upholding Christian teachings on marriage and advising against feeling pressured to accept any ideology. Despite being cleared by various authorities, he remains blacklisted by his diocese as a safeguarding risk, solely for his adherence to biblical teachings. Legal challenges have revealed serious errors in the Church’s handling of his case. Six months on, Bernard is still barred from ministry, forcing him to seek other work.

Read more and sign the petition to demand the Church of England stop this unjust punishment and restore his position.

---

New Threat to Legalize Assisted Suicide in the UK

Only a few weeks into the new Parliament, a new threat to legalize assisted suicide has emerged. Lord Falconer’s Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults Bill secured second place in the Lord’s ballot for private members’ bills. Concurrently, a similar bill is under debate on the Isle of Man and has been approved in principle in Jersey.

The most pressing concern is in Scotland, where Liam McArthur MSP introduced the Assisted Dying Scotland Bill on March 27, 2024. The Health, Social Care and Sport Committee at Holyrood is calling for evidence on this bill, and responses are crucial by August 16, 2024. This consultation will influence the Committee’s recommendation on whether the bill should proceed.

Ethical and Practical Concerns

Opponents of assisted suicide argue that legalizing such practices can lead to significant ethical and practical issues. According to Right to Life UK, concerns include the potential for abuse, pressure on vulnerable individuals, and the undermining of trust in medical professionals. There is also the argument that legalizing assisted suicide can create a slippery slope leading to the normalization of euthanasia.

The pro-assisted suicide lobby is expected to make persistent efforts to legalize assisted suicide in the coming months and years. It is vital for opponents to be prepared to respond to these attempts, starting with the current threat in Scotland.

Key Points:

• Terminology: “Assisted dying” is often used as a euphemism for assisted suicide and euthanasia. The UK proposals focus on assisted suicide, not euthanasia.
• Reasons for Assisted Suicide: Common reasons include fear of becoming a burden, loss of autonomy, and fear of future pain rather than current pain.
• Impact on Disabled People: Many disabled people and their advocacy groups oppose assisted suicide, fearing coercion and a reduction in their perceived value.
• Safeguards and Slippery Slope: Evidence from other countries shows that safeguards around assisted suicide often erode over time, leading to broader and potentially more dangerous practices.
• Effect on Suicide Rates: Legalizing assisted suicide has been associated with an increase in overall suicide rates.
• Palliative Care: Good palliative care can alleviate the primary reasons people seek assisted suicide. However, the availability and quality of palliative care can be undermined by the legalization of assisted suicide.
• Economic Pressures: There are concerns that financial pressures might lead to the promotion of assisted suicide as a cost-saving measure in healthcare systems.

Safeguarding risks

In Canada, since legalizing medically assisted death (MAiD) in 2016, the scope has expanded from terminally ill patients to include those with mental health conditions and marginalized individuals facing socio-economic pressures. Reports have shown cases where people seek assisted death due to poverty or inadequate housing rather than terminal illness.

Similarly, in the Netherlands and Belgium, initial restrictions on euthanasia have gradually loosened. For example, the number of dementia patients receiving euthanasia in the Netherlands has increased significantly, raising concerns about consent and the potential for abuse. Moreover, in Belgium, reports indicated a percentage of infant deaths involved active euthanasia by lethal injection, highlighting the risk of extending euthanasia practices to non-consenting or vulnerable populations.

These examples illustrate that once assisted suicide or euthanasia is legalized, the protections meant to safeguard vulnerable individuals often weaken, leading to broader applications that can endanger lives.

Increased Suicide Rates

Evidence from multiple studies indicates that legalizing assisted suicide is associated with an increase in overall suicide rates. Research analyzing the impact of assisted suicide laws in ten U.S. states showed a significant increase in total suicide rates following the legalization of assisted suicide. This increase was particularly notable among the elderly and women, with total suicide rates rising by about 18% overall and by 40% for women specifically​​​​.

Additionally, another study highlighted that legalizing assisted suicide might lower societal taboos against suicide, thereby potentially increasing the overall inclination towards suicide, not just assisted suicide​​. This is consistent with findings from European countries where the introduction of assisted suicide or euthanasia laws has not reduced non-assisted suicide rates but, in some cases, has led to an increase.

These findings suggest that rather than providing a safeguard, the legalization of assisted suicide may inadvertently contribute to higher rates of both assisted and unassisted suicides, challenging the notion that such laws offer a protective measure against suicide. This underscores the need for careful consideration of the broader societal impacts of legalizing assisted suicide.

How to Respond

Supporters in Scotland, and throughout the UK, are encouraged to respond to the consultation. It’s essential to use personal words rather than identical responses, as the Committee will disregard duplicates. Including professional expertise or personal stories can add weight to your response.

The pro-assisted suicide lobby is expected to make persistent efforts to legalize assisted suicide in the coming months and years. It is vital for opponents to be prepared to respond to these attempts, starting with the current threat in Scotland.

Please respond to this consultation by 16 August 2024.

There is a short survey and a more detailed call for evidence. SPUC (Society for the Protection of the Unborn Children) has produced a guide explaining both options and giving advice on how to respond to the questions.

Action Steps

1. Respond to the Consultation: The Committee’s decision will hinge on public feedback. Use the provided guide to craft a personalized response.
2. Who Should Respond: While responses from Scotland are crucial, input from across the UK is also important as the outcome in Scotland could influence decisions in Westminster.
3. What to Say: Draw from personal experience and professional expertise. Avoid identical responses to ensure your submission is considered.

The next few months are critical in the fight against the legalization of assisted suicide. Your participation can make a significant difference.

---

Help Rescue the Freedom of Speech Act

In July, the UK’s Secretary of State for Education, Bridget Phillipson, issued a statement to the House of Commons indicating her intention to halt the commencement of the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act “in order to consider options, including its repeal.”

It was fitting that the Labour Government would declare war on free speech in a written statement, posted quietly to the House of Commons website on a Friday – a good day for bad news, as any journalist will tell you – and unaccompanied by any opportunity for parliamentary debate or scrutiny.

The Freedom of Speech Act was a carefully crafted piece of legislation, properly debated in both Houses of Parliament, and designed to address the free speech crisis in universities. It aimed to strengthen the legal duty on English universities to uphold and promote freedom of speech and introduced enforcement mechanisms, such as a complaints scheme overseen by the higher education regulator, to ensure universities adhered to this duty.

Having received cross-party support during the last Parliament, its most important clauses were due to be commenced on 1st August.

However, because Rishi Sunak called an election before the Act had been fully implemented, this Government has seized its chance to derail it.

The FSU has sent a pre-action protocol letter to the Education Secretary, threatening a judicial review if she does not reverse her decision.

To increase the chances of rescuing this vital piece of legislation, it is also necessary to maintain pressure on MPs. The FSU has provided a campaigning tool (here) to write to your local MP, urging them to ask Ms Phillipson to think again.

Completing the form is a simple is a simple, fast process that can have a significant impact. A template is provided to assist, but personalisation is encouraged. Every voice matters, and it is vital that individuals make theirs heard.

The threat to judicially review Bridget Phillipson’s decision is the first legal action this Government is facing, and anything involving lawyers is expensive.

Donations to the Fighting Fund to help cover some of these costs are welcome. Contributions can be made through the provided link. The FSU appreciates all support in this matter.

---

The Debate on Trans-Inclusive Conversion Therapy Bans

A recent case in Switzerland has highlighted the complexities and potential consequences of legislative measures related to conversion therapy. A 15-year-old Swiss girl was taken into state care after her parents refused to consent to a course of puberty blockers following a disputed diagnosis of gender dysphoria. This incident underscores the contentious nature of proposed legislative changes in the UK, as outlined in Sir Keir Starmer’s recent King’s Speech.

Labour’s Legislative Agenda

During the King’s Speech, Sir Keir Starmer presented his legislative programme for the current Parliamentary session, emphasizing Labour’s commitment to enacting a “full, trans-inclusive ban on conversion practices.” The proposal, while intended to protect vulnerable individuals from harmful conversion therapies, has raised significant concerns regarding free speech and the practical implications of such a ban.

Definitional Ambiguities

The term “conversion practices” remains ambiguously defined, leading to uncertainties about what actions and advice might be prohibited under the new law. This lack of clarity poses a risk to the freedoms enshrined in Articles 9 and 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protect freedom of thought and expression, respectively. The potential for these rights to be compromised is a major point of contention among critics of the proposed ban.

Concerns from the Free Speech Union (FSU)

The Free Speech Union (FSU) has voiced fears that a hastily implemented, poorly defined ban could severely restrict the ability of parents, teachers, religious leaders, and health professionals to engage in open dialogue with gender-confused children. The concern is that advocating for a child to consider all options and reflect before undergoing irreversible medical procedures could be misconstrued as a form of conversion therapy, thus falling foul of the new legislation.

The Swiss Case as a Cautionary Tale

The situation in Switzerland serves as a stark warning. In some cantons, where conversion therapy is already banned, a couple lost custody of their 15-year-old daughter because they did not agree to her taking puberty blockers immediately following her gender dysphoria diagnosis. This incident illustrates the potential extreme outcomes of such bans, where parental rights and alternative medical opinions may be overridden by a rigid interpretation of “gender affirmative care.”

Defining “Conversion Therapy” and Its Implications

Defining “conversion therapy” in a broad and imprecise manner could inadvertently criminalize standard religious practices and pastoral care. For instance, traditional religious counseling that encourages individuals to embrace their birth gender or offers prayer and spiritual guidance could be misconstrued as conversion therapy. This could lead to legal repercussions for clergy and lay counselors practicing their faith. The ambiguity in the definition risks entangling religious expressions and pastoral care in legal disputes, infringing on religious freedoms and the rights of individuals to seek spiritual guidance.

Ministerial Consultation Response

Archbishop Jerome of the Old Roman Apostolate has expressed significant concerns over similar legislation proposed in the UK, highlighting that the lack of clarity in defining “conversion therapy” could inadvertently criminalize standard religious practices and pastoral care. He stresses the need for precise language to ensure that legitimate religious and moral guidance is not misinterpreted as coercive or harmful practices.

Legitimate Religious and Moral Guidance

Legitimate religious and moral guidance refers to the spiritual advice and support provided by religious leaders and communities based on their beliefs and teachings. This includes counseling individuals to adhere to their faith’s principles, praying for them, and offering moral direction. The concern is that without clear definitions, these standard practices could be wrongfully classified as conversion therapy, leading to legal challenges and restrictions on religious freedom.

The Need for a Balanced Approach

Critics argue that a balanced approach is essential. While protecting individuals from genuine harm is paramount, it is equally important to safeguard the right to free speech and to ensure that all treatment options can be openly discussed. The fear is that without clear, precise definitions and protections, well-meaning legislation could lead to unintended and severe consequences, such as those seen in the Swiss case.

PSHEbrighton: Local Support for Parents and Families

A Brighton family, with support from PSHEbrighton, is threatening legal action against Brighton & Hove City Council over its “Classroom to Clinic” guidance, which advises schools on supporting transgender pupils. The family argues that the guidance encourages schools to facilitate children’s gender changes without parental consent, infringing on parental rights and potentially leading to irreversible medical decisions without proper oversight. They are particularly concerned that the policy allows schools to keep parents in the dark about their child’s gender transition, bypassing necessary medical consultations and psychological evaluations.

PSHEbrighton, an organization co-founded by Archbishop Jerome to support parents and families in similar situations, backs the family’s stance. They emphasize the importance of parental involvement in such significant decisions and highlight the need for policies that protect both children’s well-being and parental rights. The family’s lawyer has warned that if the council does not retract the guidance, legal action will proceed on grounds of violating parental rights and failing to provide proper duty of care to the children. The council defends its policy as a means to support transgender students and promote inclusivity in schools, but the case underscores the ongoing tensions and legal complexities surrounding transgender rights and parental consent in educational settings.

Schools in England and Wales are facing potential lawsuits from parents over their use of a gender toolkit that advises on supporting transgender students. The legal opinion by Karon Monaghan KC, recognised as the UK’s leading Human Rights lawyer, suggests the toolkit produced by Brighton & Hove City Council but used widely by other local authorities, fails in safeguarding and Equality Act legislation. The toolkit, intended to foster inclusivity, includes guidelines on allowing students to change their names and pronouns and access facilities corresponding to their gender identity, often without parental consent. Critics argue that these guidelines bypass parental rights and medical oversight, potentially leading to irreversible decisions about children’s gender transitions.

Action for Concerned Citizens

Given these concerns, the FSU is encouraging its members and the general public to voice their apprehensions by contacting their MPs. The FSU has provided an automated campaigning tool to facilitate this process, emphasizing the need to protect free speech, especially in contexts that could have life-altering consequences.

Conclusion

As the debate around trans-inclusive conversion therapy bans continues, it is crucial to strike a careful balance that protects individuals from harm while preserving fundamental rights to free thought and expression. The case of the Swiss teen underscores the importance of getting this balance right, to ensure that legislative measures do not inadvertently cause more harm than good.

---

Sir Keir Starmer must be reminded that free speech is a fundamental human right

The Prime Minister’s recent crackdown on free speech is extremely concerning. Since early August, we have witnessed the most significant attack on free expression in this country since Oliver Cromwell outlawed all theatrical performances in 1642.

In response to the civil unrest that spread across the UK following the tragic killing of three children in Southport, Sir Keir has attributed the surge in violence to ‘misinformation’ and ‘disinformation’ on social media. He has called on authorities to prosecute individuals for making supposedly inflammatory statements online.

As a consequence, one man has been sentenced to 18 months in prison for sharing something “offensive” that someone else posted on Facebook, another was imprisoned for three years for posting “anti-Establishment rhetoric,” and a third was jailed for 18 months for chanting “Who the f*** is Allah?”

Stephen Parkinson, the Director of Public Prosecutions, has even issued a warning that people who share footage of the riots online could face prosecution. “People might think they’re not doing anything harmful, but they are, and the consequences will be visited upon them,” he said.

This kind of threatening language is more characteristic of a repressive regime than the birthplace of parliamentary democracy. It has sparked widespread fear across the country, with hundreds of thousands now worried they could be imprisoned for posting something politically incorrect online.

This must end. We need to remind the Prime Minister, a former human rights lawyer, that free speech is the cornerstone of all other rights; without it, we cannot defend any of the others.

Here’s how you can take action: If you’re concerned about the Prime Minister’s attack on free speech, please use our campaign tool to write to your local MP using our template letter.

Completing the form is simple and straightforward.

Here’s how you can take action

If you’re concerned about the Prime Minister’s assault on free speech, please use the FSU campaigning tool to write to your local MP, using the template letter.

Completing the form is a simple, fast process that can have a significant impact. We’ve even provided a template to help, but feel free to personalise it. Your voice matters and it’s vital that you make it heard.

---

Become a Warrior Teacher

The Winning Mindset is an organization that recognizes the necessity for a more balanced and discerning approach to engaging with the information-rich world we inhabit. Their educational seminars are specifically designed to inspire individuals to think deeply and critically, fostering personal growth and development. By refining these skills, individuals can enhance their ability to counter popular arguments and challenge the prevailing mindset.

The Winning Mindset is an organization that recognizes the necessity for a more balanced and discerning approach to engaging with the information-rich world we inhabit. Their educational seminars are specifically designed to inspire individuals to think deeply and critically, fostering personal growth and development. By refining these skills, individuals can enhance their ability to counter popular arguments and challenge the prevailing mindset.

---

Petitions

Current Public Petitions Regarding Relationships & Sex Education (RSE) in the UK

There are several public petitions related to Relationships and Sex Education (RSE) in the UK, reflecting various concerns and opinions on the subject. Here are some notable ones:

1. Strip Ruth Hunt of her peerage for her role in the gender medical scandal
   • Summary: There has been wide cross-party support for the Cass Review, which delivered stinging criticisms of NHS gender clinics and found that for most young people, a medical pathway is not the best way to treat gender-related distress. It also found there is little or no evidence about the long-term effects of puberty blockers and sex hormones for the under-18s.
   • Link: Change.Org
2. New RSHE guidance for schools MUST become law
   • Summary: Following the election, it will be the responsibility of the incoming government and the new Education Secretary to review this consultation and decide whether to uphold the guidance and whether it should be statutory – which means schools MUST follow it.
   • Link: CitizenGo
3. Stop divisive Progress Pride flag displays
   • Summary: Christian Concern is objecting to a massive display of Progress Pride flags planned for Regent Street in 2024. These divisive, gaudy displays are completely inappropriate for this historic, iconic street at the centre of London. They make everyone who doesn’t support the whole LGBTQ+ agenda feel unwelcome.
   • Link: CitizenGo
4. Labour’s ‘conversion therapy’ ban will harm children, criminalise parents, and place restrictions on talking and praying
   • Summary: Labour has confirmed it will proceed with its pledged “trans-inclusive” ban on ‘conversion therapy’ and ‘conversion practices’. Announcing that work has begun on a ban, Sir Keir Starmer said it was “a promise that has lingered in the lobby of good intentions for far too long”. While the specifics of the ban remain unclear, it is important to note that harmful physical ‘conversion practices’ do not happen in the UK and are already illegal. Therefore, any ban on ‘conversion practices’ would primarily impact free speech, including consensual conversations, counselling, and even prayer.
   • Link: CitizenGo

For more detailed information, you can refer to the specific petitions linked above and the GOV.UK website, which provides comprehensive guidance and updates on RSE policies.

Current Public Petitions Regarding Changes to the UK’s Abortion Laws

There are several active public petitions in the UK addressing proposed changes to abortion laws. These petitions reflect a wide range of perspectives on this highly contentious issue. Here are some of the notable petitions:

1. Remove references to ‘gender identity’ from relationships education guidance
   • Summary: This petition argues against the inclusion of gender identity in RSE guidance, citing concerns about political indoctrination and inconsistency with the Education Act.
   • Link: Remove references to ‘gender identity’
2. Review abortion laws to reduce the gestational limit
   • Summary: A cross-party group of MPs has proposed reducing the upper gestational limit for abortions from 24 weeks to 22 weeks. This petition supports the amendment, highlighting that medical advancements have increased the survival rate of babies born at 22 weeks.
   • Link: Right to Life UK
3. Ban sex-selective abortions
   • Summary: This petition seeks to make it explicitly illegal to perform abortions based on the sex of the fetus, addressing concerns that sex-selective abortions are occurring in the UK despite current legal ambiguities.
   • Link: Right to Life UK
4. Oppose decriminalisation of abortion
   • Summary: This petition opposes any move to decriminalise abortion in the UK, arguing that current laws provide necessary safeguards to ensure ethical medical practice and protect both women and unborn children.
   • Link: British Medical Association
5. End ‘DIY’ Abortion Services
   • Summary: This petition calls for the cessation of ‘DIY’ abortion services, arguing that they endanger women’s lives and lack proper medical supervision, thus advocating for stricter regulations.
   • Link: Right to Life UK
6. A General Election has been called for 4 July 2024
   • Summary: Please contact your MP now asking them to make it clear to their party leadership that abortion decriminalisation and assisted suicide should not be included in manifestoes. You can use our tool below.
   • Link: SPUC

Current Public Petitions Regarding Abortion Laws in the USA

1. Nebraska Right to Abortion Initiative (2024)
   • Summary: This initiative proposes an amendment to the Nebraska Constitution to establish a right to abortion until fetal viability, defined by the professional judgment of the treating healthcare practitioner.
   • Link: Ballotpedia
2. End Abortion in the USA
   • Summary: The Moral Outcry is a petition aimed at making abortion illegal in all 50 states in the USA. The petition was instrumental in the reversal of Roe v. Wade and continues to push for comprehensive abortion bans nationwide.
   • Link: The Moral Outcry

These petitions represent the diverse and often conflicting views on abortion laws in the UK, highlighting ongoing debates about gestational limits, sex-selective practices, and the broader legal framework surrounding abortion.

---

Heavenly Father, we humbly beseech You to forgive the countless sins committed by mankind, for we have strayed far from Your commandments and fallen short of Your glory. Grant us Your boundless grace and strength to persevere in Your service, that we may walk in Your ways with steadfast hearts, ever seeking to do Your will. We place our trust in Your infinite mercy and ask for Your compassion and forgiveness…

Miserere nobis

---

Support this Newsletter and the work of the Archbishop and the Old Roman Apostolate

---