The High Court ruling in Smith v Northumbria Police found police participation in Pride unlawful due to ideological partiality. The judgment has wide implications, warning public bodies—like councils, schools, and NHS trusts—that sponsoring or endorsing Pride events aligned with gender ideology may breach duties of impartiality, misuse public funds, and violate the rights of those with protected beliefs under equality law. Public neutrality is not optional.
Smith v Northumbria Police sets precedent against ideological partisanship in public institutions—from forces to councils, schools, and services
In a defining moment for the principle of impartiality in British public life, the High Court has ruled that Northumbria Police acted unlawfully by participating in a Pride event in a manner that conveyed ideological alignment with gender identity politics. The ruling in Smith v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police [2025] EWHC 1805 (Admin) makes clear that public authorities have no legal entitlement to side with one set of beliefs over another in live political or philosophical debates¹.
While the case concerned a police force, its implications are far broader. It places public authorities—including councils, schools, libraries, NHS Trusts, and publicly funded cultural bodies—on clear notice: you may not lawfully take sides in live political or ideological disputes, even under the banner of “inclusion.”
Mr Justice Linden’s ruling emphasised that the Progress Pride flag is not ideologically neutral, especially given its strong association with trans activism and groups that explicitly exclude gender-critical individuals². Participating in or sponsoring Pride under that symbol, or in association with activist groups that explicitly exclude dissenting views, creates a reasonable perception of partiality. That perception alone is unlawful in many public contexts³.Subscribed
The Limits of the Equality Act and PSED The case exposed the misapplication of the Public Sector Equality Duty (PSED) by police and other institutions. Northumbria Police had claimed that their support for Pride, and by extension gender ideology, was justified by the need to “advance equality of opportunity.” But the court firmly rejected that reasoning, stating that:
“The Defendant’s actions created the reasonable impression of partiality in a contested moral and political debate. The Equality Act does not override the police duty of neutrality.”⁴
The same logic applies to publicly funded schools who promote Pride Month without balance, councils that fly ideological flags from civic buildings, and leisure centres, libraries, or hospitals that host activist stalls without acknowledging protected beliefs on the other side.
Participation in politically or ideologically aligned events—such as Pride, where gender identity ideology is now deeply embedded—must be scrutinised. Not only must public authorities avoid taking sides; they must not even create the impression that they do⁵.
Schools, Councils, and Cultural Capture Many public institutions have become complicit in this ideological overreach. Examples include:
Schools compelling student participation in Pride-themed assemblies or displays, while failing to acknowledge the protected status of gender-critical views under the Equality Act⁶.
Council-run gyms and swimming pools festooned with Progress flags during June, with no balancing representation of dissenting beliefs.
Libraries and museums co-hosting drag events, “ally training,” or exhibitions steeped in gender ideology, with no input from alternative perspectives.
Town halls sponsoring Pride floats while event organisers explicitly bar groups who express biologically grounded views of sex.
All such conduct is now in legal question. The Smith ruling confirms that the appearance of alignment with one side of the gender identity debate is enough to breach duties of fairness and impartiality, even if the underlying intent is framed as “inclusion.”⁷
This is particularly acute in light of recent cases affirming that gender-critical views are protected under UK equality law and the European Convention on Human Rights⁸. Public institutions who display Progress Pride symbols, or participate in events where such beliefs are rejected or excluded, are now vulnerable to legal challenge.
Public Funds, Political Activism The ruling also intersects with long-standing restrictions on political activity by public bodies. For example, the Education Act 1996 requires schools to maintain political neutrality, especially when teaching controversial topics⁹. The Local Government Act 1986 prohibits councils from spending public funds on material that promotes a political view¹⁰.
The embrace of Pride—especially in its modern, gender-ideological form—may now be viewed not as neutral community engagement, but as partisan expression. Public funds spent on ideological branding, flag raising, or stall sponsorship may constitute misuse of public money.
Towards a Reset in Public Institutions For years, Pride events have enjoyed automatic institutional support. But as the Smith judgment shows, this support can no longer be taken for granted when such events are clearly aligned with contested political agendas.
This ruling restores an essential constitutional principle: public authorities must serve all citizens impartially, regardless of creed, conscience, or belief.
They must not act as champions of ideologies, no matter how popular or progressive those ideologies claim to be.
What Now? In light of the Smith judgment, public institutions must:
Reassess participation in Pride events, especially if official branding, uniformed staff, or sponsored materials are involved.
Cease use of the Progress Pride flag or similar symbols that imply endorsement of contested ideological positions.
Review all equality and diversity training to ensure it is ideologically neutral and includes protected belief perspectives.
Respect political neutrality in schools, ensuring pupils are exposed to all lawful perspectives on sex and gender.
Apply the Public Sector Equality Duty fairly, acknowledging the rights and dignity of all protected belief groups, not just the fashionable ones.
A Turning Point This judgment may prove to be a watershed moment in resisting the ideological overreach of state-funded bodies. It affirms that the law is not a tool of cultural revolution but a shield for all citizens, especially those whose views have been maligned or suppressed.
For gender-critical women, for faithful Christians, for traditional moral thinkers, and for ordinary citizens concerned by institutional drift into activism, Smith v Northumbria Police offers a powerful affirmation:
Your beliefs are lawful. The state may not take sides. Impartiality is not optional.
Thanks for reading Selsey Substack! This post is public so feel free to share it. Share
Footnotes
¹ Smith v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police [2025] EWHC 1805 (Admin) ² Ibid., §§15–16 ³ Ibid., §144 ⁴ Ibid., §139 ⁵ Ibid., §§63–66 ⁶ Equality Act 2010, s.10; Forstater v CGD Europe [2021] UKEAT/0105/20/JOJ ⁷ Smith, §48 ⁸ For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers [2025] UKSC 16 ⁹ Education Act 1996, ss.406–407 ¹⁰ Local Government Act 1986, s.2
Peers warn proposed definition could become a de facto blasphemy law on UK campuses and beyond.
As the Labour government reviews legal definitions of anti-Muslim hatred, traditional Catholics and civil libertarians alike should resist the ideological drift that falsely equates religious criticism with racism. At stake is not merely a terminological preference but the future boundary between lawful dissent and criminalised speech. The question is urgent: will criticism of Islam become functionally equivalent to racism in law and public life?
A Shifting Landscape of Definitions In early 2025, the newly elected Labour government under Prime Minister Keir Starmer inherited a policy initiative launched under the Conservative government to define the parameters of anti-Muslim hatred. The initiative took the form of a Working Group on Anti-Muslim Hatred/Islamophobia, chaired by Dominic Grieve KC, with the goal of producing a non-statutory definition that could inform hate crime enforcement, education policy, and civic guidance.
Despite assurances that any forthcoming definition would not be legally binding, Mr Grieve has expressed the hope that it would be “embedded in university speech codes” to curb so-called “micro-aggressions”¹. More than thirty peers from across the political spectrum have now written to Mr Grieve, warning that such a move would have a “chilling effect” on free speech and effectively reintroduce a blasphemy law in secular guise².
The APPG’s 2018 Definition: Ambiguity as Ideology The most widely circulated definition of Islamophobia remains that of the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on British Muslims, issued in 2018:
“Islamophobia is rooted in racism and is a type of racism that targets expressions of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness.”³
This definition, which has been adopted by the Labour Party in opposition and by many local authorities, has drawn criticism for its vagueness and ideological presuppositions. “Muslimness” is undefined and unbounded. It could refer to theological beliefs, cultural customs, political behaviours, or dress—leaving citizens unsure of what speech is permitted. Civil liberties groups, ex-Muslim reformers, and Christian leaders alike have warned that this framing protects not just persons from hate, but ideas from scrutiny, inverting the very principles of a pluralistic society.
Islam Is Not a Race The most dangerous presumption in the APPG definition is its claim that Islamophobia is a form of racism. This is conceptually incoherent. Islam is not a race—it is a global religion with adherents from every ethnic background. To label criticism of Islamic belief, law, or history as racism is to commit a category error—one that has already been used to stigmatise theological dissent.
From a Catholic perspective, the danger is acute. The Gospel proclaims Christ crucified and risen, the only Son of the Father, and Saviour of mankind. Islam explicitly denies these doctrines. If the critique or rejection of Islamic teaching is redefined as racism, then evangelisation itself becomes hate speech.
A Definition Drafted in Secret? Despite the gravity of its task, the Working Group has operated with a remarkable lack of transparency. Its terms of reference state that its proceedings are confidential, its advice to government private, and that the group “does not speak on behalf of HMG”⁴. No public list of members has been released, no minutes published, and no evidence of consultation with Christian, Hindu, Sikh, or secular groups—despite the fact that some of these communities are frequently misidentified in so-called “Islamophobic” incidents⁵.
This lack of oversight has been criticised in Parliament by Baroness Fox of Buckley⁶ and flagged by civil liberties groups including the Free Speech Union, the National Secular Society, and researchers at Policy Exchange⁷. Some working group members have known affiliations with Islamist-linked advocacy networks, raising serious questions about the group’s ideological balance and institutional objectivity⁸.
Peers Speak Out In a letter dated 14 July 2025, more than thirty peers—including Lord Moylan, Baroness Fox, Lord Frost, and Baroness Deech—raised additional red flags. They warned that the definition, if endorsed by government, will likely be embedded across the public sector: in universities, schools, NHS trusts, councils, regulatory bodies, and the courts⁹. They cite the case of Sir Trevor Phillips, suspended by Labour in 2020 under a non-statutory Islamophobia code, and warn that future disciplinary processes could follow the same path.
The letter also warns of a false sense of effectiveness. They note that the adoption of the IHRA definition of antisemitism has not curbed antisemitic hate incidents—especially in the wake of the Hamas attacks of October 2023—and that there is no evidence that defining Islamophobia would reduce hate crime against Muslims¹⁰.
The Grooming Gang Scandal One of the strongest arguments raised is that vague and ideologically slanted definitions have historically suppressed whistleblowing. Baroness Casey’s National Audit found that police officers, councillors, and journalists failed to raise concerns about grooming gangs in towns like Rotherham and Telford because of fear they would be labelled “Islamophobic”¹¹. Indeed, public figures who did speak out—such as Sarah Champion MP and feminist campaigner Julie Bindel—were denounced by advocacy groups and nominated for “Islamophobe of the Year” awards.
Conflating Faith and Hatred The peers urge Mr Grieve to drop the word “Islamophobia” altogether. They argue that the term blurs the crucial distinction between hatred of Muslims (a moral and legal evil) and criticism of Islam (a fundamental right in a free society). The term anti-Muslim hatred better names the wrong—targeting persons, not ideas. As they point out, this approach aligns with the Public Order Act 1986 and the Equality Act 2010, both of which protect individuals from religiously aggravated offences without prohibiting theological debate.
Proposed Solutions The peers make four key recommendations:
Broaden the Working Group to include non-Muslim religious voices and free speech advocates;
Postpone any formal recommendations until the national inquiry into grooming gangs concludes;
Drop the word Islamophobia from any proposed terminology;
Submit any definition to full parliamentary scrutiny before government adoption¹².
Why the Words Matter Catholics have a vital interest in this debate. Our fidelity to revealed truth requires us to proclaim the Lordship of Jesus Christ and the unique claims of the Gospel—claims which Islam explicitly denies. This must never be pathologised as hate. The terms anti-Muslim hatred and anti-Muslim prejudice are morally precise and legally sufficient. The term Islamophobia, by contrast, is a political invention used to place one religious worldview beyond critique.
Let the government name the evil clearly: hatred of persons, not scrutiny of religion. And let Catholics, with clarity and charity, defend both truth and freedom.
Letter to Dominic Grieve KC, 14 July 2025, p. 3.
Ibid., p. 2.
All-Party Parliamentary Group on British Muslims, Islamophobia Defined (2018).
UK Government, Working Group on Anti-Muslim Hatred/Islamophobia: Terms of Reference (March 2025).
The Spectator, “The Islamophobia Working Group is Unbalanced and Opaque,” April 2025.
Baroness Claire Fox, Parliamentary debate, Hansard, 20 March 2024.
PoliticsHome, “Concerns Raised Over Lack of Diversity in Islamophobia Working Group,” May 2025.
Policy Exchange / FWI Report, “Renewed Effort to Stifle Free Speech in the UK,” June 2025.
The voice of the Church resounds on this Second Sunday of Advent with the powerful cry of the prophet Isaiah: “People of Sion, behold, the Lord shall come to save the nations” (Isaiah 30:30). These words of the Introit capture the heart of Advent—a season of longing and preparation, a time when we, like the People of Israel, await the fulfillment of God’s promises.
The Church is, in a spiritual sense, the new Sion. As Israel awaited the coming of the Messiah, so too does the Church long for the return of Christ, her Redeemer and King. This parallel is not only historical but deeply personal and relevant, especially in the face of modern challenges. Just as Israel struggled to remain faithful amidst trials and temptations, the Church today faces her own crisis of fidelity in an age marked by spiritual confusion and modernist errors.
The Church as the New Sion
The prophets of old spoke to Israel with a dual purpose: to call them to repentance and to renew their hope in God’s faithfulness. Likewise, the Church’s liturgy today echoes these calls. We are reminded of the urgency of repentance, symbolized by the cry of St. John the Baptist: “Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make straight His paths” (Matthew 3:3).
But to prepare the way of the Lord, we must first recognize the obstacles that impede His coming. For Israel, these were the idols of their age—false gods, complacency, and disobedience to the covenant. For the Church today, the idols may take different forms: the exaltation of human reason over divine revelation, the desire for worldly relevance at the expense of eternal truth, and a loss of confidence in the supernatural mission of Christ’s Mystical Body.
In this modernist crisis, we see parallels to Israel’s history. Just as the prophets lamented Israel’s forgetfulness of God, we too must confront the forgetfulness of the sacred in our time. Yet the promise remains: “The Lord shall come to save the nations.” The Church’s foundation is Christ, and His promise to be with her until the end of the age remains our hope and strength.
Repentance as the Path to Renewal
Advent is a time for examining our hearts and responding to the call for repentance. St. Paul, in today’s Epistle, exhorts us to patience and the consolation of Scripture, that we may have hope (Romans 15:4). These words remind us that the Church, like Israel, finds her strength in returning to the Word of God and aligning herself with His will.
Repentance begins with humility. Just as Israel was called to recognize her dependence on God, so too must the Church today reject any tendency to rely on human innovations or compromise the Gospel to fit the spirit of the age. Fr. Gabriel of St. Mary Magdalene writes, “The way of the Lord is prepared through contrition, through the casting away of sin, and through the longing for grace.” In our personal lives and as a Church, this path must guide us.
The Joy of God’s Faithfulness
Even as the Church confronts her trials, the Advent liturgy reminds us of the unshakable joy that comes from God’s faithfulness. The Gradual proclaims: “Out of Sion hath God appeared in perfect beauty. Our God shall come manifestly” (Psalm 49:2-3). This beauty and glory of God are manifested most fully in the Incarnation, but they are also present in the Church, despite her human frailty.
The modernist crisis tempts us to despair, much like Israel despaired during their exile. Yet we are called to trust that God is at work, purifying and restoring His Church. Dom Prosper Guéranger reflects, “The trials of the Church are not signs of her abandonment but of God’s love, calling her to deeper faith and greater fidelity.”
This season of Advent is a time to rediscover that joy and beauty by returning to the sacred. The sacred liturgy, with its timeless prayers and chants, lifts us above the distractions of the world and reorients our hearts to the eternal. The Scriptures, so central to today’s liturgy, are a wellspring of hope, teaching us that every trial faced by the People of God ultimately leads to redemption.
The Church’s Mission in the World
As the new Sion, the Church is not only called to prepare her own heart for the Lord but also to bring the light of Christ to the nations. The Gospel for this Sunday reminds us that Christ’s mission is universal: “The poor have the Gospel preached to them” (Matthew 11:5). This mission continues through the Church, despite her challenges.
However, to preach the Gospel effectively, the Church must herself be renewed. Fr. Leonard Goffine notes, “The Church cannot give what she does not possess; her renewal begins with the holiness of her members and the faithfulness of her leaders.” Each of us has a role in this renewal by living lives rooted in prayer, penance, and charity.
Conclusion: People of Sion, Rejoice
Dear brothers and sisters, as we journey through this holy season of Advent, let us take to heart the call of the liturgy: “Behold, the Lord shall come to save the nations.” These words are not only a promise for the future but a reality breaking into our lives here and now.
May we, as the People of Sion, respond with faith and repentance, preparing the way of the Lord in our hearts and in the Church. In the face of trials, let us find hope in God’s faithfulness, joy in His promises, and strength in His Word. Let this Advent be a time of renewal for each of us and for the Church as a whole, so that, like Israel of old, we may behold the glory of the Lord and rejoice in His saving love.
In the love of Christ, I remain,
The Primus’s Advent Pastoral Epistle
In his Advent pastoral letter, “Excita Quaesumus,” Archbishop Jerome Lloyd, the Primus of the Old Roman Apostolate, reflects on the dual purpose of Advent: preparing for the commemoration of Christ’s Nativity and anticipating His second coming in glory. Drawing on the ancient prayer, “Excita quaesumus” (“Stir up, we beseech thee, O Lord, the hearts of thy faithful people”), the Archbishop calls for spiritual renewal, self-examination, and repentance during this sacred season.
Archbishop Lloyd emphasizes the profound mystery of the Incarnation, urging the faithful to contemplate God’s immense love in assuming human nature for humanity’s redemption. His message underscores Advent as a time to deepen one’s relationship with Christ, not only in preparation for Christmas but also for His ultimate return as Judge of all. Through reflection and renewed devotion, believers are invited to align their lives with the hope and joy of the Gospel.
The Second Sunday of Advent deepens the themes of vigilance and preparation, emphasizing repentance and the hope for the fulfillment of God’s promises. The Tridentine Liturgy for this Sunday, with its carefully chosen Propers, invites the faithful to prepare their hearts for the coming of Christ by responding to the call of St. John the Baptist: “Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make straight His paths” (Matthew 3:3).
Through the prayers, readings, and chants, the Church calls us to reflect on Christ’s first coming in humility and His final coming in glory, urging us to respond with repentance, joy, and renewed faith.
The Introit: People Awaiting Redemption
The Introit for this Sunday, Populus Sion, proclaims: “People of Sion, behold, the Lord shall come to save the nations: and the Lord shall make the glory of His voice heard in the joy of your heart” (Isaiah 30:30). Dom Prosper Guéranger interprets this chant as a declaration of God’s faithfulness to His promises. He writes, “The Church, like the people of Israel, awaits the fulfillment of divine prophecy, lifting her voice in joyful expectation of the Savior.”¹
This antiphon also connects with the Advent virtue of hope, reminding us that salvation is not merely an event of the past but an ongoing reality that culminates in Christ’s final coming.
The Epistle: The Patience and Consolation of Scripture
In the Epistle (Romans 15:4–13), St. Paul reminds the faithful that the Scriptures were written for our learning, “that through patience and the consolation of the Scriptures, we might have hope.” This passage highlights the unity of salvation history and the enduring relevance of God’s Word. Fr. Leonard Goffine comments, “The Word of God sustains the soul, leading it from the shadows of sin to the light of Christ, who is the fulfillment of all prophecy.”²
The Fathers of the Church often emphasized how the Old Testament prophecies find their culmination in Christ. St. Augustine observed, “All the promises of God find their ‘Yes’ in Christ; the Scriptures are a mirror, reflecting His light from the beginning of time.”³
The Gospel: The Call to Repentance
The Gospel (Matthew 11:2–10) recounts St. John the Baptist sending his disciples to ask Jesus, “Art Thou He that art to come, or do we look for another?” Jesus responds by pointing to the fulfillment of Isaiah’s prophecies: the blind see, the lame walk, and the poor have the Gospel preached to them. Fr. Gabriel of St. Mary Magdalene reflects, “This Gospel reveals the signs of the Messianic age, calling the faithful to recognize Christ’s presence and respond with repentance and faith.”⁴
St. John Chrysostom saw in John’s question a profound humility and an opportunity for his disciples to witness Jesus’ mission firsthand. “The Baptist did not seek his own glory but directed his followers to the Lamb of God, preparing their hearts for the One who is greater than all,” he wrote.⁵
This Gospel also challenges us to examine our hearts: Are we ready to receive Christ, or do we allow distractions to obscure His presence? Advent calls us to make straight the paths in our own lives through prayer, penance, and acts of charity.
The Gradual and Alleluia: Rejoicing in the Coming of the Lord
The Gradual, Ex Sion species decoris eius (Psalm 49:2-3), declares the splendor of the Lord coming from Sion, and the Alleluia, Laetatus sum (Psalm 121:1), expresses joy in going to the house of the Lord. These chants reflect the dual Advent focus of repentance and joy, urging the faithful to rejoice in the nearness of Christ while preparing their hearts to receive Him.
Fr. Pius Pasch notes, “The Gradual and Alleluia remind us that the Lord’s coming brings both judgment and mercy. The Church rejoices in His approach but also calls her children to prepare through acts of penance and renewal.”⁶
The Offertory and Communion Antiphons: Preparing for the King
The Offertory, Deus tu convertens (Psalm 84:7), prays for God’s mercy and restoration, while the Communion Antiphon, Jerusalem surge (Baruch 5:5), urges the city to rise and behold the glory of the Lord. St. Ambrose saw these texts as calls to action: “The soul must awaken from its lethargy, casting off sin, and stand ready to meet the King of Glory.”⁷
These prayers invite us to approach the Eucharist with contrite hearts, recognizing Christ’s real presence as both the fulfillment of prophecy and the foretaste of eternal glory.
The Voice of the Prophets in Advent
The Second Sunday of Advent places significant emphasis on the prophetic witness of Isaiah, Baruch, and John the Baptist. Dom Guéranger highlights the unity of these voices, writing, “The prophets, from age to age, proclaim the same message: Prepare the way of the Lord. Their voices echo in the liturgy, awakening us to the urgency of conversion.”⁸
The Church Fathers often saw John the Baptist as the last and greatest of the prophets, the bridge between the Old Covenant and the New. St. Cyril of Alexandria praised John’s role, saying, “He prepares the way not only by his words but by his example, calling all to repentance and the fruits of righteousness.”⁹
Living the Themes of the Second Sunday of Advent
The liturgy of this Sunday calls us to make Advent a time of active preparation. Fr. Gabriel of St. Mary Magdalene advises, “True preparation for Christ’s coming requires a triple movement of the soul: contrition for sin, longing for grace, and joyful expectation of redemption.”¹⁰
In practical terms, this might involve:
Regular confession to remove obstacles to grace.
Reflecting daily on Scripture, particularly the prophetic texts of Advent.
Acts of charity and mercy to manifest Christ’s love in the world.
As we hear the voice of St. John the Baptist crying out, “Prepare ye the way of the Lord,” let us respond with hearts open to the transforming power of grace. May this Advent season lead us to recognize Christ’s presence in our lives and prepare us to meet Him with joy at Christmas and at the end of time.
¹ Dom Prosper Guéranger, The Liturgical Year: Advent. ² Fr. Leonard Goffine, The Church’s Year. ³ St. Augustine, City of God. ⁴ Fr. Gabriel of St. Mary Magdalene, Divine Intimacy. ⁵ St. John Chrysostom, Homily on Matthew 11. ⁶ Fr. Pius Pasch, Seasons of Grace. ⁷ St. Ambrose, Commentary on the Psalms. ⁸ Dom Prosper Guéranger, The Liturgical Year: Advent. ⁹ St. Cyril of Alexandria, Homily on John the Baptist. ¹⁰ Fr. Gabriel of St. Mary Magdalene, Divine Intimacy.
How does the call to “prepare the way of the Lord” resonate in my life? What specific obstacles need to be removed for Christ to enter my heart more fully?
In what ways have I allowed the distractions or errors of the world to influence my faith? How can I return to God’s truth and promises?
How does the hope of God’s faithfulness sustain me during times of personal or spiritual trial?
Am I vigilant in listening to the Word of God through Scripture and the teachings of the Church, or do I rely too much on my own understanding?
For Family Discussions
As a family, how can we “make straight the paths” for Christ’s coming into our home? Are there habits or distractions we need to change during Advent?
How does the story of St. John the Baptist challenge us to be witnesses to Christ in our words and actions?
What does it mean for us to see our family as part of the “People of Sion,” called to prepare for Christ’s coming?
How can we practice patience and trust in God’s promises, even when our prayers seem unanswered?
For Catechism Classes or Sunday School
Why did St. John the Baptist prepare people for Jesus by calling them to repentance? How can we apply his message to our lives today?
What do the Prophets of the Old Testament, like Isaiah, teach us about hope and God’s plan for salvation?
How does the Church continue the mission of St. John the Baptist, preparing the world for the second coming of Christ?
In what ways can we, as members of the Church, bring the light of Christ to others during Advent?
For Youth Ministry or Young Adults
What does repentance look like in modern life? How can young people respond to the Advent call to “make straight His paths”?
How do we remain hopeful and faithful to Christ in a world that often seems distracted by materialism or relativism?
What lessons can we learn from the humility and courage of St. John the Baptist in standing up for truth and pointing others to Jesus?
How can the Advent themes of light and preparation inspire us to be better friends, family members, or leaders?
For Group Reflection or Bible Study
The Epistle reminds us that “whatever was written in former days was written for our instruction.” How does this apply to the Old Testament prophecies we hear in Advent?
The Gospel speaks of the signs of the Messiah’s coming, such as healing the blind and preaching to the poor. How do these signs reflect Jesus’ mission, and how can we continue this mission today?
How can the Church, like Israel, remain faithful to God amidst modern challenges? What role does each of us play in this renewal?
How do we balance the joy of Christ’s nearness with the call to repentance and preparation during Advent?
For Families with Children
St. John the Baptist told people to prepare for Jesus. How can we prepare our hearts for Christmas as a family?
Why do we light more candles each week on the Advent wreath? What does it remind us about Jesus coming closer to us?
What does it mean to trust God’s promises, even when we can’t see them happening right away?
How can we bring the joy and light of Jesus to others, like St. John the Baptist did?
These questions are designed to encourage reflection, dialogue, and action, making the themes of the Second Sunday of Advent come alive in various settings.
Living the Lessons of the Second Sunday of Advent in the Domestic Church
The call of Advent, particularly on the Second Sunday, is clear: “Populus Sion: Behold, the Lord shall come to save the nations.” These words, drawn from the prophetic promises of Isaiah, resound with hope, but also with a summons to action. In the domestic church—the family—this call to “prepare the way of the Lord” must take root, transforming the home into a place of faith, repentance, and joyful anticipation.
Advent is a time not just to remember Christ’s first coming but to live in expectation of His return in glory. Yet in a world preoccupied with premature festivities and distracted by consumerism, Advent’s sacred rhythm is often forgotten. How can families reclaim Advent, restoring it as a season of preparation for the King of Kings?
Preparing the Way: Repentance and Renewal
St. John the Baptist’s cry, “Make straight the paths of the Lord,” is a challenge to every family to examine their spiritual lives. Fr. Gabriel of St. Mary Magdalene writes, *“The work of preparation begins with repentance, removing from the soul anything that might hinder the coming of Christ.”*¹ This echoes the Church’s perennial teaching that conversion begins in the home.
Families can practice this repentance through frequent confession during Advent, emphasizing the need to clear away the obstacles of sin. Pope St. Pius X, in his catechesis on Christian life, taught, *“The family is the first school of holiness. If Christ is to reign, His throne must be set up in the hearts of each member.”*² Parents can model this by taking time to examine their own lives, fostering humility and openness to grace.
Reclaiming the Spirit of Waiting
The modern rush to celebrate Christmas in early December undermines Advent’s role as a time of preparation. Dom Prosper Guéranger laments, *“The world would have the joy of Christmas without the penance of Advent. But true joy comes only to those who have prepared their hearts for the divine Guest.”*³
To reclaim Advent, families can create simple traditions that emphasize the waiting and longing for Christ. Delay putting up full Christmas decorations until closer to December 24th, instead focusing on the gradual preparation of the home. Light the candles of the Advent wreath each week, reflecting on the growing light of Christ as His coming draws near.
Encourage children to embrace the idea of spiritual preparation. For example, each family member can perform acts of kindness or sacrifices during Advent, symbolically offering them as “straw” to prepare the manger for Jesus. This tradition, rooted in European customs, teaches the value of small acts of love and the importance of interior readiness.
Centering the Domestic Church on Scripture and Prayer
St. Paul, in today’s Epistle, reminds us that the Scriptures were written “for our instruction, that through patience and consolation we might have hope” (Romans 15:4). The Word of God must be central to the Advent journey in the domestic church.
Incorporate daily Scripture readings into family life, focusing on the prophetic passages of Isaiah and the Gospel narratives of John the Baptist. The Jesse Tree, a traditional Advent devotion, offers an excellent way to teach children about salvation history, showing how God’s promises to Israel are fulfilled in Christ.
Fr. Leonard Goffine writes, *“Prayer and Scripture unite the family to the rhythm of the Church, aligning the domestic church with the great work of redemption.”*⁴ Begin or end each day with prayer, using the Collects and Antiphons from the Advent liturgy. Simple prayers like the “O Antiphons,” starting on December 17th, can deepen the sense of longing for the Messiah.
Restoring the Sacred: Silence and Simplicity
In the midst of the noise of modern life, Advent invites us to rediscover the sacred through silence and simplicity. St. John Chrysostom teaches, *“Silence is the dwelling of the Word. If the soul is to hear the voice of Christ, it must quiet the clamor of the world.”*⁵
Create moments of quiet reflection in the home during Advent. Turn off devices and distractions, and light candles to create a space of peace. Use this time for personal or family prayer, meditating on the mysteries of Christ’s coming.
Simplify holiday preparations to focus on the spiritual heart of the season. Avoid excessive materialism by emphasizing the spiritual value of giving rather than the commercial aspect of receiving. St. Nicholas’s Day (December 6th) offers a beautiful opportunity to teach children about generosity, following the example of the saint who gave anonymously to those in need.
Joyful Anticipation: Living Advent Fully
The Gradual for the Second Sunday proclaims: “Out of Sion hath God appeared in perfect beauty” (Psalm 49:2). This beauty, reflected in Christ’s Incarnation, should radiate from the domestic church. Fr. Pius Pasch writes, *“Advent is a season of sober joy—a joy rooted not in fleeting pleasures but in the eternal promise of Emmanuel.”*⁶
Let this joy be evident in your home through songs, prayers, and traditions that reflect the true meaning of the season. Celebrate St. Lucy’s Day (December 13th) with candles and prayers, reminding the family that Christ is the Light of the World. Participate in charitable works together, teaching children that preparing for Christ means serving Him in others.
Conclusion: The Domestic Church as the New Sion
The Church, as the new Sion, awaits her Lord with longing and hope. So too must each family live this Advent spirit, becoming a sanctuary where Christ’s light can dwell. As Dom Guéranger reminds us, *“The People of Sion must rise, for their King is coming, and His glory will shine upon them.”*⁷
May this Advent be a time of renewal in your homes, a season of light, silence, and joyful anticipation. Prepare the way of the Lord with hearts open to grace, confident in His promise, and ready to receive Him who comes to save the nations.
¹ Fr. Gabriel of St. Mary Magdalene, Divine Intimacy. ² Pope St. Pius X, Catechism of Christian Doctrine. ³ Dom Prosper Guéranger, The Liturgical Year: Advent. ⁴ Fr. Leonard Goffine, The Church’s Year. ⁵ St. John Chrysostom, Homily on Prayer. ⁶ Fr. Pius Pasch, Seasons of Grace. ⁷ Dom Prosper Guéranger, The Liturgical Year: Advent.
For I say that Christ Jesus was a minister of circumcision for the truth of God, to confirm the promises made unto the fathers but that the Gentiles are to glorify God for his mercy
In today’s epistle we hear St. Paul summarising what has been the central theme of his great epistle to the Romans, that in Jesus the hope for Israel and the world has been fulfilled. Through faith in Jesus, the Gentiles as well as the Jews can now share in the promises of God to Abraham that in his seed all the nations of the earth would be blessed. All the promises of God under the old covenant had been written for our learning: that through patience and comfort of the Scriptures we might have hope.
But how did Paul arrive at his conviction that the Gentiles as well as the Jews could now, through faith in Jesus, share in the promises of God to Abraham that in his seed all the nation of the earth would be blessed? Last week we saw how Paul had shared in the hope of Israel for a final coming of the Kingdom of God on earth as it is in heaven when sin and death and the dark forces that disfigure this present world would finally be done away with. We will now consider one central element of this future hope. This is that since the God of Israel was not simply a national God but the one and only God the final realisation of his purposes for his people would not only include the Jewish nation but the whole world. This was the great hope of the prophets, that in the end the Gentile nations would finally renounce their idols and come to Jerusalem to worship the God of Israel. But would those Gentile nations who finally renounced their idols need to convert to Judaism for this to happen? This was not necessary according to the hope of the prophets for the Jewish Law applied only to the Jews. All that was necessary was for the Gentiles to renounce idolatry and worship the one and only God. It was as Gentiles who now worshipped the God of Israel that they would obtain salvation in the messianic age.
Since the ministry of Jesus did not lead to the Gentiles coming to Jerusalem to renounce their idols, but rather to his own crucifixion at the hands of the Gentiles St. Paul initially concluded that Jesus was a false messiah. He was a false messiah because he had suffered death at the hands of the pagans rather than leading them to convert to the God of Israel. But when St. Paul himself saw the risen Christ on the road to Damascus he realised that, since Jesus had been raised from the dead, he was in fact the true Messiah in whom the prophecies were being fulfilled. What Paul had been expecting to happen at the final resurrection on the last day had now happened to one man, Jesus Christ, in the midst of time and history. He was the one true and faithful Israelite in whom sin and death had finally been defeated. Since the purposes of God for Israel had now been fulfilled it was now time for the Gentiles to renounce their idols and worship the true God of Israel. Instead of the Gentile nations coming to Jerusalem to renounce their idols and worship the true God it was now his own vocation to be the apostle to the Gentiles himself. He would himself go out into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature. His converts were those who had turned to God from idols to worship the true and living God who had revealed himself in the person of Jesus Christ in his first coming in history and would come to judge the world at the end of history. There was no need for the pagan Gentiles to be circumcised and become observant Jews because now that the Messiah had come and the new age had dawned it was time for the Gentiles to renounce their idols and as Gentiles to worship the God of Israel.
It is important to emphasise this point because it has often been supposed that in becoming a Christian and in exercising his ministry as the apostle to the Gentiles St. Paul was abandoning the faith of Israel for a new and different religion. But this was not how St. Paul himself saw the matter. As far as he was concerned there was only one God, the God of Israel. But precisely because the God of Israel was not only the God of the Jews but also of the Gentiles as well, the hope of Israel had always been that in the end the Gentiles would renounce their idols and worship the one God. When he became convinced that Jesus was in fact the true Messiah of Israel who had been raised from the dead it meant that the messianic age had now dawned and it was time for the Gentiles to renounce their idols and worship the God of Israel, who had now revealed himself in the person of Jesus Christ.
But what would then be the fate of those Jews who had not accepted the gospel message? St. Paul had achieved great success as the apostle to the Gentiles, but the majority of the Jews had not responded. How then could it be said that the purpose of God for Israel had been fulfilled? This was a question St. Paul himself agonised over. Indeed, he devoted a section of his epistle to the Romans to this subject (Romans 9-11). He said that it was clear that, though the promises of God had been given to those who were of the seed of Abraham, in practice (as the prophets had found out through bitter experience) only a remnant had responded. It was the faithful remnant of Israel who had preserved the faith for future generations. Indeed in the end there had been only one faithful Israelite, Jesus himself, who had finally overcome the curse of sin and death. Hence, the fact that only a remnant of Israel had responded to the gospel should not been seen as surprising since this only recapitulated what had happened to the prophets when the majority of the nation had rejected their preaching. Did this mean God had now forsaken the rest of the nation who had not responded? On the contrary, St. Paul explained, what was now happening was only a temporary hardening. This was happening while the gospel was being preached to the Gentiles, but when the mission to the Gentiles was finally complete the Jews who had not responded to the Gospel would finally come to faith and in the end all Israel would be saved. This had ultimately to happen because without it the promises of God that all Israel and the righteous among the Gentiles would share in the world to come would not be fulfilled. For God had consigned all men to disobedience that he might have mercy on them all.
St. Paul had originally believed that in the world to come Israel would finally be delivered and the nations would come to worship the God of Israel. He still held to this faith and hope, but now believed it had been fulfilled in paradoxical form. In the coming of Jesus in time and history the purpose of God had been fulfilled in the one true faithful Israelite. Hence, the true Israel was now only found among the minority of the Jews who responded to him in faith and the Gentiles who also responded in faith. But the present situation could not be final because there still remained a final fulfilment and a second coming of the Messiah, when the majority of the Jews who had repudiated the Gospel would finally respond in faith, and so, when the fullness of the Gentiles had been converted, all Israel would be saved. In other words, instead of the response of the Jews leading to the conversion of the Gentiles, the response of the Gentiles in the present age would lead to the final conversion of the Jews at the end of the age. And so the fullness of the Gentiles would come to faith and all Israel would finally be saved.
There have been many attempts to address this question in subsequent Christian history, but no one has come up with a better solution than St. Paul. We still live in the time when the gospel is being preached among the nations, but we must continue to cherish the hope that finally in the end the Jews who have not responded will come to faith at the end of the age. For, as St. Paul put it, the gifts and calling of God are irrevocable.
Now the God of all hope fill you with all joy in believing that you may abound in hope and the power of the Holy Ghost.
The Spiritual Depth of Advent: A Time of Expectation and Renewal
Advent is not merely a season of waiting; it is a profound journey of preparation for the coming of Christ. This holy season encapsulates three comings of the Lord: His historical birth in Bethlehem, His mystical coming into our hearts through grace, and His glorious return at the end of time. Dom Prosper Guéranger writes, “Advent unites all three comings of our Lord into one single act of worship, enveloping the faithful in a cycle of hope, repentance, and joyful expectation.”¹
The Church, through her liturgy, directs our hearts and minds to live in this threefold dimension, inviting us to partake in the mystery of salvation through prayer, penance, and the anticipation of divine fulfillment.
The Spirit of Vigilance and Hope
The Advent liturgy repeatedly calls us to spiritual vigilance. St. Paul’s exhortation in Romans 13:11–14, read on the First Sunday of Advent, reminds us to “cast off the works of darkness” and “put on the armor of light.” Fr. Leonard Goffine reflects, “The call to awaken from spiritual sleep is the Church’s urgent plea to her children during this holy season. It is not only a preparation for Christ’s Nativity but a rehearsal for His final coming.”²
The Prophets of the Old Testament, particularly Isaiah, provide the backbone of Advent’s liturgical texts. Their imagery of light breaking into darkness resonates deeply, reminding us of the transformative power of God’s grace. St. Ephrem the Syrian poetically describes Advent as “the season when heaven’s gate begins to open, letting the King of Glory descend to transform His people.”³
Advent Penance and Purification
Advent is traditionally observed as a penitential season, though distinct from the rigor of Lent. Fr. Pius Pasch writes, “While Lent is marked by sorrow for sin, Advent’s penance is driven by longing and purification, the desire to prepare a worthy dwelling for the Lord.”⁴ The Ember Days of Advent, observed in the third week, emphasize fasting and prayer, practices that align our hearts with the humility and simplicity of Christ’s coming.
St. John Chrysostom highlights the necessity of penance, teaching that “repentance prepares the soul as Mary prepared the manger, clean and free of all distractions, ready to receive the King.”⁵ These practices are not burdens but opportunities to detach from worldly concerns, focusing instead on the eternal.
Customs and Devotions of Advent
Traditional Advent customs deepen the faithful’s engagement with the season’s spiritual richness. The Advent wreath, with its four candles symbolizing the weeks of waiting, is a beloved tradition. Each candle represents hope, faith, joy, and peace, mirroring the virtues that should animate our hearts. The lighting of the candles reflects the growing light of Christ as Christmas draws near.
Another meaningful custom is the Jesse Tree, which traces the genealogy of Christ through symbols and Scripture, connecting the family to salvation history. Fr. Gabriel of St. Mary Magdalene writes, “The Jesse Tree is a visual catechesis, reminding us that Christ comes not in isolation but as the fulfillment of God’s promises to His people.”⁶
The chanting of the “O Antiphons,” beginning on December 17th, encapsulates the longing of Advent. Each antiphon invokes a Messianic title for Christ, such as O Wisdom or O Key of David, and expresses the cry of humanity for redemption. St. Ambrose, in his hymn Veni, Redemptor Gentium, captures this longing, declaring, “Come, Redeemer of the nations, manifest Thy virgin birth: let all the earth be renewed, for such a birth befitted God.”⁷
Mary, Model of Advent Hope
No figure embodies the spirit of Advent more perfectly than the Blessed Virgin Mary. Her fiat, her joyful expectation, and her contemplative heart make her the model for all the faithful. Fr. Gabriel of St. Mary Magdalene emphasizes that “Advent is Marian in its essence, for Mary is the gate through which Christ enters the world, and her example teaches us to prepare a place for Him in our hearts.”⁸
The Feast of the Conception, celebrated in Advent, highlights Mary’s unique role in salvation history. She is the “singular vessel of devotion” (Litany of Loreto), preserved from sin so that she might bear the Redeemer. St. Bernard of Clairvaux exhorts, “Look to the Star of the Sea, call upon Mary; through her intercession, we prepare ourselves to welcome her Son.”⁹
Conclusion: The Fruit of Advent
Advent is a time of transformation. Through vigilance, penance, and devotion, the faithful are drawn into the mystery of Christ’s coming, not as passive spectators but as active participants in God’s redemptive plan. Dom Guéranger reminds us, “Let us go forth to meet the Savior with lamps burning brightly, hearts purified by grace, and souls longing for His light.”¹⁰
As we journey through this holy season, let us embrace its lessons with fervor, allowing the light of Christ to illuminate our hearts, families, and communities. The King is coming; let us prepare the way.
¹ Dom Prosper Guéranger, The Liturgical Year: Advent. ² Fr. Leonard Goffine, The Church’s Year. ³ St. Ephrem the Syrian, Hymns on the Nativity. ⁴ Fr. Pius Pasch, Seasons of Grace. ⁵ St. John Chrysostom, Homily on Repentance. ⁶ Fr. Gabriel of St. Mary Magdalene, Divine Intimacy. ⁷ St. Ambrose, Hymn Veni, Redemptor Gentium. ⁸ Fr. Gabriel of St. Mary Magdalene, Divine Intimacy. ⁹ St. Bernard of Clairvaux, Homily on the Nativity. ¹⁰ Dom Prosper Guéranger, The Liturgical Year: Advent.
The liturgical calendar for December 8th to 14th in the Traditional Latin Mass (TLM) reflects a harmonious blend of Advent themes and Marian devotion, especially surrounding the Solemnity of Our Lady’s Conception and its octave. This period also includes other significant feast days, highlighting the Church’s emphasis on preparation, repentance, and joy as we approach the Nativity of Our Lord.
December 8: The Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary (Transferred to December 9th in 2024) The Feast of Our Lady’s Conception, holds a unique place in the Church’s liturgy. When December 8th falls on a Sunday, as it does in 2024, the feast is transferred to Monday, December 9th, unless a nation or church is dedicated to Our Lady under this title, in which case it retains precedence as the patronal feast.
This solemnity reflects the Advent theme of preparation, as Mary, the New Eve, was made pure and immaculate to become the Mother of God. St. Bernard of Clairvaux writes, “God chose to prepare for Himself a pure dwelling, free from every stain, that He might enter the world as man without blemish.”¹
The liturgy for this feast proclaims the greatness of God’s redemptive plan, fulfilled in Mary. The Introit, “I will greatly rejoice in the Lord” (Isaiah 61:10), expresses the Church’s joy at the singular privilege granted to Our Lady. Families can honour this day by praying the Rosary, reflecting on the Annunciation (Luke 1:26–38), and meditating on the virtues of purity and humility.
December 9: Immaculate Conception (Transferred) On December 9th, the feast of Our Lady’s Conception is celebrated as transferred from December 8th. In nations or churches dedicated to this title, the feast is celebrated on its original date, taking precedence over the Second Sunday of Advent. The octave of this feast begins and continues throughout the week, taking precedence over the Advent ferias, though the ferias are commemorated with special prayers and readings.
December 10–13: Octave of Our Lady’s Conception and Advent Ferias During this period, the Masses of the Octave of Our Lady’s Conception take precedence over the Advent ferias, but the liturgical prayers of the ferias are commemorated. This intertwining of Marian devotion and Advent preparation underscores Mary’s central role in salvation history as the one who prepared the way for the Incarnation. St. Alphonsus Liguori reflects, *“Mary is the dawn preceding the Sun of Justice, the pure vessel that brings the Savior to us.”*²
Advent’s focus on repentance and hope is complemented by the joy of honouring Our Lady. The Propers of the Advent feria, when commemorated, call for vigilance and interior preparation, echoing the cry of St. John the Baptist: “Prepare ye the way of the Lord” (Matthew 3:3). Families can use this time to balance Marian devotion with Advent practices, such as lighting the Advent wreath or reading the O Antiphons.
December 13: Feast of St. Lucy, Virgin and Martyr St. Lucy (d. 304), whose name means “light,” is a virgin martyr celebrated as a patroness of purity and sight. Her feast is especially significant in Advent as it anticipates Christ, the Light of the World, who dispels the darkness of sin. St. Lucy’s heroic defense of her faith and commitment to virginity, even unto death, serve as a reminder of the Advent call to holiness and vigilance.
The liturgy of her feast emphasizes her courage and purity, with readings that highlight the triumph of faith over persecution. The Collect prays for the steadfastness to follow her example, seeking her intercession for spiritual and physical sight. Families might honor St. Lucy by reflecting on her life, lighting candles to symbolize Christ’s light, or sharing a traditional meal associated with her feast day, such as lussekatter (Lucy buns).
December 14: Feria of Our Lady’s Conception (Saturday) St. John Chrysostom reflects on the Advent theme of preparation: *“The paths must be made straight, the mountains of pride brought low, and the valleys of despair filled with hope, for the King is near.”*³ This final week before the O Antiphons (December 17th–23rd) is a critical time for deepening one’s spiritual preparation.
Liturgical Harmony of Advent and Marian Devotion This period showcases the Church’s ability to weave together the themes of Marian devotion and Advent expectation. The octave of Our Lady’s Conception reminds the faithful of Mary’s unique role in salvation, while the Advent ferias and commemorations highlight the need for repentance and readiness for Christ’s coming.
Practical Reflections for the Domestic Church Families can honour this week by:
Attending Mass for the Immaculate Conception and its octave, if possible.
Praying the Rosary daily, focusing on the Joyful Mysteries.
Reading the lives of St. Lucy and the Prophets, emphasizing their courage and faith.
Engaging in acts of charity, embodying the Advent call to prepare the way of the Lord through love and service.
As we journey through these holy days, may we imitate Mary’s purity, St. Lucy’s courage, and the Prophets’ faith, so that our hearts may be ready to welcome Christ with joy.
¹ St. Bernard of Clairvaux, Sermon on the Immaculate Conception. ² St. Alphonsus Liguori, The Glories of Mary. ³ St. John Chrysostom, Homily on Preparation for Christ’s Coming.
The Jesse Tree:A Tradition of Advent Reflection and Family Catechesis
The Jesse Tree is a beautiful Advent tradition that traces the lineage of Jesus Christ through symbols and Scripture, connecting families to the story of salvation history. Rooted in Isaiah’s prophecy—“A shoot shall come out from the stump of Jesse, and a branch shall grow out of his roots” (Isaiah 11:1)—this practice visually represents Jesus’ ancestry and God’s unfolding plan of redemption. Through daily readings, prayers, and symbolic ornaments, the Jesse Tree serves as a catechetical tool, deepening the spiritual preparation for Christmas.
Historical and Theological Roots of the Jesse Tree
The Jesse Tree tradition emerged in medieval Europe as part of visual catechesis. Early depictions appeared in stained glass windows, manuscripts, and carvings, illustrating Christ’s genealogy as recorded in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke. St. Bernard of Clairvaux remarked that these images were “sermons in color,” teaching biblical truths to the illiterate faithful.¹
Theologically, the Jesse Tree emphasizes the continuity of salvation history, showing how God’s promises to Adam, Abraham, David, and the prophets culminate in the birth of Christ. Pope Leo XIII reflected on this mystery: “The Incarnation is the perfection of God’s promises, uniting divine fidelity with human hope.”²
How to Start a Jesse Tree Tradition
The Jesse Tree can be adapted to suit families, parishes, or schools, offering a meaningful way to engage with Scripture and Advent themes. Here are practical steps to begin this tradition:
1. Choose or Create a Jesse Tree Structure The Jesse Tree can be as simple or elaborate as desired. Some families use a bare branch, a small artificial tree, or even a posterboard to display the ornaments. The simplicity of the tree reflects the humility of Christ’s lineage and His Incarnation.
2. Select Symbols and Readings Each day of Advent corresponds to a biblical figure or event in salvation history, represented by a symbol. For example, Adam and Eve may be symbolized by an apple, Noah by an ark, and David by a crown. Fr. Gabriel of St. Mary Magdalene suggests that these symbols “serve as a bridge between Scripture and the imagination, allowing even the youngest members of the family to grasp God’s plan.”³
Choose readings that highlight these figures and events. Popular lists often include key moments such as Creation (Genesis 1), the call of Abraham (Genesis 12), and the Annunciation (Luke 1). Families may read the Scripture passage, reflect on its meaning, and discuss how it points to Christ.
3. Involve the Whole Family The Jesse Tree is an excellent opportunity for family catechesis. Children can help create ornaments, drawing or crafting symbols out of paper, felt, or clay. Dom Prosper Guéranger encourages families to use traditions like this to “build a domestic sanctuary of faith, where the young are taught to love the Church’s rhythm and to see Christ in all things.”⁴
As ornaments are added each day, parents can explain the significance of the symbol and ask reflective questions, such as, “How does this story prepare us for Jesus?”
4. Incorporate Prayer and Music Begin or end each Jesse Tree activity with a prayer. Families might light an Advent wreath candle, recite a short verse like the “O Antiphons,” or sing an Advent hymn. These elements create a liturgical atmosphere, emphasizing the sacredness of the tradition.
5. Keep It Flexible and Joyful For families with younger children or busy schedules, the Jesse Tree should be a source of joy, not stress. If daily readings feel overwhelming, focus on the major events in salvation history. What matters most is cultivating a spirit of anticipation and reflection.
Ideas for Jesse Tree Symbols and Readings
Here are examples of symbols and their corresponding Scripture passages:
Creation: Earth or stars (Genesis 1)
Noah: Ark or rainbow (Genesis 6–9)
Abraham: Stars or a tent (Genesis 12)
Moses: Burning bush or tablets (Exodus 3, 20)
Ruth: Sheaf of wheat (Ruth 1)
David: Crown or harp (1 Samuel 16)
Prophets: Scroll or flame (Isaiah 9)
Mary: Lily or heart (Luke 1)
The variety of symbols allows families to personalize their tree, fostering creativity and connection with Scripture.
Spiritual Benefits of the Jesse Tree
The Jesse Tree helps families focus on the true meaning of Advent, countering the commercialized rush to Christmas. St. John Paul II, reflecting on Advent, said, “Through meditation on Scripture, the family becomes a small Church, living the mysteries of Christ day by day.”⁵
By engaging with salvation history, the Jesse Tree fosters gratitude for God’s faithfulness and deepens the anticipation of Christ’s coming. It also builds familial bonds, creating cherished traditions that can be passed down through generations.
Conclusion: A Tradition Worth Keeping
The Jesse Tree is more than an artistic or educational activity; it is a spiritual journey through the story of God’s love for humanity. Rooted in Scripture, enriched by tradition, and adaptable to every home, it is a powerful way to prepare for Christmas. As families place the final ornament—the Christ Child in the manger—they can rejoice, knowing their hearts are ready to receive Him.
¹ St. Bernard of Clairvaux, Homilies on the Genealogy of Christ. ² Pope Leo XIII, Incarnationis Mysterium. ³ Fr. Gabriel of St. Mary Magdalene, Divine Intimacy. ⁴ Dom Prosper Guéranger, The Liturgical Year: Advent. ⁵ St. John Paul II, Homily for the First Sunday of Advent, 1980.
The Advent wreath is one of the most beloved symbols of the Advent season, embodying the themes of light, hope, and the gradual preparation for Christ’s coming. This custom, originating in northern Europe, has become a cherished practice in homes and churches worldwide. Its circular form, evergreen foliage, and candles speak deeply of eternal life, God’s unchanging love, and the light of Christ breaking into a world of darkness. As Dom Prosper Guéranger writes, “The Advent wreath reflects the liturgy’s gradual progression from the shadows of sin to the dawning of Christ’s redeeming light.”¹
Historical Origins and Symbolism of the Advent Wreath
The Advent wreath has its roots in pre-Christian Germanic traditions, where lighted candles symbolized hope during the darkest days of winter. Christian communities adapted the custom, infusing it with theological meaning. By the 16th century, it became a devotional tool in Lutheran homes, later spreading to Catholic and other Christian traditions.²
The wreath’s circular shape signifies eternity and God’s endless mercy, while the evergreen branches symbolize everlasting life through Christ. The candles, lit progressively each week, represent the growing light of Jesus, the “Light of the World” (John 8:12). St. Irenaeus of Lyons beautifully captured this theme, writing, “Christ, by His coming, has brought the light of immortality, illuminating hearts darkened by sin.”³
How to Use the Advent Wreath in Daily Devotion
The Advent wreath is a simple yet profound way to bring the liturgical season into the domestic church. Here are practical steps to incorporate this tradition into family life:
1. Prepare the Wreath An Advent wreath typically consists of a circular base adorned with evergreens and four candles—three purple and one rose. The purple candles reflect the penitential and preparatory nature of Advent, while the rose candle, lit on the third Sunday (Gaudete), signifies joy in the nearness of Christ. Some families add a white candle in the center, representing Christ and lit on Christmas Eve.
Creating the wreath can be a family activity, emphasizing the spiritual significance of its elements. Dom Guéranger suggests that the Advent wreath “becomes a visible catechesis, drawing even the youngest hearts into the rhythm of the Church’s seasons.”⁴
2. Establish a Prayer Routine The lighting of the candles can be accompanied by Scripture, prayers, and hymns. Begin with a simple invocation, such as, “Come, Lord Jesus, light of the world.” Each week, as another candle is lit, the glow increases, symbolizing the approach of the Savior.
Suggested readings include the prophetic texts of Isaiah (Isaiah 9:2-7), John the Baptist’s call to repentance (Luke 3:1-6), and the angelic announcement to Mary (Luke 1:26-38). Fr. Leonard Goffine emphasizes that these readings “draw us into the great drama of salvation, teaching us to prepare our hearts as Mary prepared hers.”⁵
3. Sing or Reflect on Advent Hymns Hymns like O Come, O Come, Emmanuel and Creator Alme Siderum enrich the wreath ceremony with Advent’s themes of expectation and longing. St. Ambrose, the author of many early hymns, reminds us that “song lifts the soul to the threshold of heaven, making the invisible visible through melody.”⁶
4. Use the Wreath as a Catechetical Tool Each candle has a traditional theme:
Week 1: Hope (Prophecy Candle) reflects the promise of the Messiah.
Week 2: Faith (Bethlehem Candle) recalls Mary and Joseph’s journey.
Week 3: Joy (Shepherds’ Candle) celebrates the approaching Nativity.
Week 4: Peace (Angels’ Candle) announces the harmony Christ brings.
Discussing these themes with children or guests provides an opportunity for evangelization and spiritual growth.
Spiritual Benefits of the Advent Wreath
The Advent wreath fosters a sense of anticipation, aligning domestic life with the liturgical calendar. Fr. Gabriel of St. Mary Magdalene notes, “The wreath transforms the home into a sanctuary of waiting, where Christ’s light is welcomed with reverence and joy.”⁷
Its progressive lighting mirrors the Church’s liturgical movement from penitence to rejoicing, helping families internalize the Advent message. St. John Chrysostom encourages this type of domestic ritual, saying, “Let every home be an altar, where the light of Christ dispels darkness and ignites the fire of faith.”⁸
Practical Tips for Advent Wreath Observance
Begin each week’s lighting with silence, creating a moment of recollection.
Involve children by having them light the candles or read the prayers.
Place the wreath in a central location, such as the dining table, to integrate it into daily life.
Extend the use of the wreath beyond family time by sharing its symbolism with friends or neighbors, inviting them into the Advent journey.
Conclusion: The Advent Wreath as a Sign of Christ’s Light
The Advent wreath is more than a decoration; it is a spiritual anchor that guides us through the season’s profound mysteries. Its simplicity and beauty draw us into the heart of Advent, reminding us of God’s faithfulness and the hope we have in Christ.
As each candle’s flame grows brighter, may we, too, grow in holiness, reflecting the light of Christ to a world longing for redemption. St. Augustine captures the essence of this tradition: “The light of Christ kindled in the heart is a flame that no darkness can extinguish.”⁹
¹ Dom Prosper Guéranger, The Liturgical Year: Advent. ² Fr. Pius Pasch, Seasons of Grace. ³ St. Irenaeus of Lyons, Against Heresies. ⁴ Dom Prosper Guéranger, The Liturgical Year: Advent. ⁵ Fr. Leonard Goffine, The Church’s Year. ⁶ St. Ambrose, Hymns for Advent. ⁷ Fr. Gabriel of St. Mary Magdalene, Divine Intimacy. ⁸ St. John Chrysostom, Homily on Light. ⁹ St. Augustine, Confessions.
Other Advent Traditions: Celebrating the Season of Anticipation
Advent is rich with traditions that help Christians prepare for the coming of Christ, offering opportunities for spiritual reflection and communal joy. Beyond the Jesse Tree and Advent wreath, many other customs, often rooted in specific saints’ feast days, provide meaningful ways to engage with the liturgical season. St. Nicholas’s Day, St. Lucy’s Day, and other practices weave together themes of generosity, light, and the joy of anticipation, all pointing to the Incarnation.
St. Nicholas’s Day (December 6th)
The Feast of St. Nicholas celebrates the life of Nicholas of Myra (d. 343), a bishop known for his extraordinary generosity and love for the poor. His reputation for secretly giving gifts, often to children, has made him the inspiration for the modern figure of Santa Claus. However, the true spirit of this feast focuses on charity and kindness, virtues that reflect the self-giving love of Christ.
A common tradition on St. Nicholas’s Day involves children placing their shoes by the door or window on the eve of December 6th. In the morning, they find small gifts, treats, or coins, symbolizing St. Nicholas’s anonymous acts of charity. Fr. Leonard Goffine wrote, “This feast day calls us to imitate the saint’s love for the needy, reminding us that Advent is not about receiving but giving.”¹
Practical ways to honor St. Nicholas’s Day:
Share stories of St. Nicholas’s life and his acts of generosity.
Encourage children to prepare small gifts or acts of kindness for others.
Donate to a local charity or help someone in need as a family.
Reflection: How can I emulate St. Nicholas’s spirit of selfless generosity in my own life this Advent?
St. Lucy’s Day (December 13th)
St. Lucy (d. 304), a virgin martyr of Syracuse, is celebrated as the patroness of light, her name deriving from the Latin lux, meaning “light.” Her feast day is especially popular in Scandinavian countries, where it coincides with the darkest time of the year. St. Lucy’s Day highlights the Advent theme of Christ as the Light of the World who dispels the darkness of sin and death.
In traditional observances, a girl dressed as St. Lucy wears a white robe with a red sash (symbolizing purity and martyrdom) and a crown of candles, leading a procession of children singing hymns. Families often bake lussekatter (Lucia buns) and serve them with coffee or tea, sharing the joy of the feast day.
Practical ways to celebrate St. Lucy’s Day:
Organize a candlelit procession or prayer service to reflect on Christ as the Light of the World.
Read the story of St. Lucy’s martyrdom and discuss her faith and courage.
Prepare and share a special meal, focusing on the theme of light overcoming darkness.
Reflection: How can I bring the light of Christ to those in darkness this Advent season?
Las Posadas (December 16th–24th)
A cherished tradition in Latin America, Las Posadas reenacts Mary and Joseph’s search for shelter in Bethlehem. This novena, celebrated over nine nights leading up to Christmas, involves processions where participants, often dressed as the Holy Family, visit different homes. At each stop, they sing hymns and reenact the Holy Family’s plea for lodging until they are finally welcomed in.
This tradition emphasizes the Advent themes of hospitality, humility, and spiritual preparation for welcoming Christ. It also fosters community and reminds participants of the importance of making room for Jesus in their hearts and lives.
Practical ways to participate in Las Posadas:
Host a small gathering where you read Scripture and reflect on Mary and Joseph’s journey.
Invite family or friends to share a meal and pray together.
Meditate on how to make your home and heart a fitting place for Christ’s arrival.
Reflection: What barriers in my life might prevent me from welcoming Christ fully?
Rorate Masses
The Rorate Caeli Mass, a traditional Advent devotion, is celebrated in honor of the Blessed Virgin Mary. It takes place in the early morning, lit only by candlelight, and features the Advent antiphon Rorate Caeli (“Drop down dew, O heavens”), based on Isaiah 45:8. This Mass reflects Mary’s pivotal role in salvation history and the Church’s longing for the coming of Christ.
The quiet, meditative nature of the Rorate Mass encourages deep reflection on the mystery of the Incarnation and Mary’s fiat. Dom Prosper Guéranger highlights, “This Mass, shrouded in darkness, mirrors the world awaiting the dawn of Christ’s light, with Mary as the herald of that light.”²
Practical ways to incorporate the spirit of the Rorate Mass:
Attend a candlelit Mass if available, or light candles at home and pray the Magnificat.
Reflect on Mary’s role in salvation and her example of perfect faith.
Meditate on the prophecies of Isaiah that speak of Christ’s coming.
Reflection: How can I imitate Mary’s trust and surrender to God’s will during Advent?
The O Antiphons (December 17th–23rd)
The “O Antiphons” are ancient liturgical prayers sung at Vespers in the final days of Advent, each highlighting a different title of Christ: O Wisdom, O Lord, O Root of Jesse, O Key of David, O Rising Sun, O King of Nations, O Emmanuel. These antiphons encapsulate the longing of Israel for the Messiah and the Church’s expectation of His coming.
St. Bernard of Clairvaux beautifully described this longing: “The Church cries out in these days, Come, Lord Jesus! Her cry rises like incense, mingled with the hopes of all creation.”³
Practical ways to pray the “O Antiphons”:
Reflect on each antiphon daily with Scripture and prayer.
Create artwork or crafts representing the titles of Christ.
Sing or listen to the hymn O Come, O Come, Emmanuel, which is based on these antiphons.
Reflection: Which of Christ’s titles in the O Antiphons speaks most deeply to my spiritual longing this Advent?
Conclusion: A Season of Enriching Traditions
Advent is a time to immerse ourselves in customs that deepen our anticipation of Christ’s coming. From the generosity of St. Nicholas to the light of St. Lucy, from the hospitality of Las Posadas to the prayerful reflections of the “O Antiphons,” these traditions enrich the spiritual journey of Advent. Each one, in its own way, invites us to prepare our hearts and homes to receive the Savior with faith, hope, and joy.
¹ Fr. Leonard Goffine, The Church’s Year. ² Dom Prosper Guéranger, The Liturgical Year: Advent. ³ St. Bernard of Clairvaux, Homilies on Advent.
Join 2,099 other subscribers
CURRENT AFFAIRS
Nick Vujicic Calls for Renewal in Church Culture: A Wake-Up Call for the Body of Christ
Evangelist Nick Vujicic has issued a bold critique of the state of the Western Church, describing it as “more like a country club and a social gathering” rather than a true reflection of the Body of Christ. Speaking with The Christian Post, Vujicic underscored the Church’s urgent responsibility to shepherd the next generation amid widespread moral, spiritual, and social crises. From a Catholic perspective, Vujicic’s remarks highlight the need for renewal in the Church, emphasizing the call to holiness, catechesis, and authentic discipleship rooted in the teachings of Scripture and Tradition.
A Culture of Distraction and Spiritual Dilution
Reflecting on the shift in church culture, Vujicic traced the current challenges to the early 2000s when many churches embraced entertainment-focused approaches to attract youth. He lamented how these strategies led to a dilution of the Gospel: “A lot of Western churches in the USA changed their approach and started watering the Gospel… they went from meat to milk.” Such commentary aligns with the Catholic Church’s emphasis on robust catechesis and evangelization that imparts the fullness of the faith.¹
Vujicic also critiqued the lack of accountability in moral teachings, pointing to the absence of preaching on chastity, accountability, and other virtues. “Today, we have Gen Z swearing, saying the F-word, sleeping around, and everyone knows it, but no one’s really keeping anyone accountable.” This resonates with the Catholic call to uphold the moral law and foster accountability within the faithful, grounded in the Church’s teaching on personal holiness and the universal call to virtue.²
The Crisis Facing Generation Z
Vujicic painted a stark picture of the challenges facing today’s youth, including technology addiction, sexual exploitation, and the psychological wounds caused by abortion. He observed that “seven and a half hours a day, that’s how much time young people are spending on screens,” calling out the dangers of a digital culture that fosters isolation and disconnection. This echoes Pope Francis’ warnings about the detrimental effects of digital addiction and the need for authentic relationships.³
The evangelist also highlighted the trauma surrounding abortion, noting that many women who undergo the procedure are regular churchgoers and suffer from its emotional and spiritual aftermath. His concern aligns with the Catholic Church’s pro-life mission, which not only defends the dignity of unborn children but also provides healing for post-abortive mothers through ministries like Rachel’s Vineyard.⁴
A Call to Repentance, Accountability, and Unity
For Vujicic, the solution to these challenges lies in repentance, accountability, and unity. He warned that without a sincere return to God, the Church risks losing its spiritual authority and divine protection. “We need to repent. We need to unify. And while the window is open, we must choose to repent, or otherwise, I really believe that we may see the hand of God’s protection be completely removed from our country.” This call to repentance aligns with the Catholic understanding of metanoia—a radical conversion of heart that leads to communion with God and renewal within the Church.⁵
Native American Outreach: Healing the Wounds of Injustice
In November, Vujicic released Arise Warriors, a documentary focusing on bringing hope and healing to Native American communities. The project centers on the Crow Indian Reservation in Montana, where Vujicic and his team collaborated with former NFL player Tuff Harris to address systemic challenges such as addiction, poverty, and a tragically high youth suicide rate.⁶
From a Catholic perspective, this outreach reflects the Church’s commitment to social justice and the preferential option for the poor. The documentary’s emphasis on empowerment rather than mere charity resonates with the Catholic principle of subsidiarity, which promotes human dignity and self-sufficiency within marginalized populations.⁷
Vujicic also called for national repentance for historical injustices against Native Americans, noting that “as a nation, we were established with blood on our hands.” The Catholic Church has made similar appeals, including Pope Francis’ visits to Indigenous communities and his apologies for the Church’s role in cultural suppression.⁸
2025: A Year of Repentance and Unity
NickV Ministries’ broader campaign, Champions for the Brokenhearted, frames 2025 as a year of repentance and unity. Planned initiatives include sending Gen Z missionaries to reservations, fostering microfinance opportunities, and rebuilding community structures. “When we walked alongside these communities, we saw glimpses of light—people starting businesses, kids finding their purpose, churches beginning to work together,” Vujicic said. His reflections highlight the importance of building relationships and fostering solidarity, core principles of Catholic social teaching.⁹
A Call for the Church to Rise
Vujicic’s call to repentance and renewal echoes Christ’s mandate to His followers to be salt and light in a darkened world. From a Catholic perspective, his warnings about the Western Church’s complacency and his call to action align with the Church’s own mission of evangelization and the urgent need for renewal among the faithful.
“This is a story for all of us,” Vujicic concluded. “It’s a call to remember the forgotten, to repent, and to be the hands and feet of Jesus.” His message reminds Catholics and Christians alike of the need to live out the Gospel with courage, authenticity, and unity.
Arise Warriors is now streaming on the NickV Ministries YouTube channel. For Catholics, it serves as a poignant reminder that the mission field is not just abroad but also in our own backyard, calling us to serve with love, reconciliation, and humility.¹⁰
¹ The Christian Post, December 2024. ² Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2041-2043. ³ Pope Francis, Christus Vivit, 2019. ⁴ Rachel’s Vineyard Ministries, www.rachelsvineyard.org. ⁵ Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1431. ⁶ The Christian Post, December 2024. ⁷ Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church, 2004. ⁸ Pope Francis, Apology to Indigenous Peoples of Canada, July 2022. ⁹ Catholic Relief Services, www.crs.org. ¹⁰ NickV Ministries YouTube Channel, Arise Warriors.
Happiness in the Contemporary Zeitgeist and the Catholic Tradition
Happiness in the Contemporary Zeitgeist and the Catholic Tradition
Happiness, an age-old quest of humanity, occupies a central place in personal and societal aspirations. However, the meaning of happiness has diverged widely across cultures and epochs. In contemporary society, it is often equated with the pursuit of pleasure and the avoidance of pain, a perspective deeply rooted in utilitarian and hedonistic thought. Yet, this understanding has frequently proven insufficient, leaving many feeling unfulfilled despite an abundance of comforts and sensory delights.
The Catholic tradition, by contrast, offers a profound alternative: happiness not as fleeting pleasure, but as a state of fulfillment achieved through living in accordance with God’s will and realizing human flourishing through virtue, love, and self-sacrifice. This conception acknowledges the transformative power of suffering and emphasizes that true happiness is not only experienced but earned through growth, effort, and alignment with divine purpose. This essay explores the superficial understanding of happiness as pleasure, contrasting it with the Catholic tradition’s deeper insights, drawing from philosophical, theological, and magisterial sources, as well as examples from the lives of saints, to argue that true happiness lies in fulfillment, even in the face of adversity.
Contemporary Understanding of Happiness as Pleasure
The modern zeitgeist frequently aligns happiness with pleasure, a notion championed by the utilitarian philosophers Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. Mill’s “Greatest Happiness Principle” posits that actions are morally right insofar as they promote happiness, and wrong as they produce the opposite.1 Both thinkers defined happiness as “pleasure, and the absence of pain,” implying that life’s highest aim is maximizing pleasure and minimizing suffering.2
This perspective underpins much of contemporary consumer culture, which equates happiness with material acquisition, sensory enjoyment, and personal freedom. Advertisements, for example, promise happiness through products that bring momentary satisfaction—whether a new gadget, a luxurious experience, or even an improved physical appearance. Such messaging often fosters a dopamine-driven cycle of short-lived gratification, leaving people wanting more.3
Despite unprecedented access to material wealth and technological comforts, studies show rising rates of anxiety, depression, and existential dissatisfaction in modern societies.4 This paradox highlights the insufficiency of equating happiness with pleasure. Psychological research reveals that while pleasure stimulates dopamine release, fostering temporary enjoyment, true happiness is linked to serotonin, which is associated with deeper emotions such as contentment, gratitude, and connection.5 This relentless pursuit of pleasure can also lead to addiction, dependence, and a lack of resilience. People conditioned to avoid discomfort at all costs may struggle to cope with inevitable hardships, compounding their sense of unhappiness.
Catholic Understanding of Happiness as Fulfillment
In stark contrast to contemporary ideas, the Catholic tradition offers a multi-layered understanding of happiness, grounded in the concept of beatitudo—perfect happiness or blessedness. This is not achieved through external goods or sensory pleasures, but through alignment with God’s will and the realization of one’s highest potential.
St. Thomas Aquinas, drawing from Aristotle and Christian theology, argued that true happiness lies in “an operation according to perfect virtue.”6 For Aquinas, happiness is not merely subjective contentment but the objective fulfillment of one’s purpose as a rational and spiritual being. This ultimate happiness is found in the beatific vision—the direct encounter with God in the afterlife.7 Aquinas also distinguished between imperfect happiness, achievable in this life through virtue and contemplation, and perfect happiness, attainable only in eternity. This dual conception allows for the integration of temporal joys and eternal hope, emphasizing that earthly happiness is a foretaste of the ultimate union with God.
The Catechism of the Catholic Church reiterates these themes, stating: “The beatitude we are promised confronts us with decisive moral choices. It invites us to purify our hearts of bad instincts and to seek the love of God above all else” (CCC 1723).
It further explains that true happiness is not found in riches, fame, or pleasure, but in God alone, who is the source of every good and the ultimate fulfillment of human desire.8 This understanding calls believers to transcend worldly attachments and pursue virtues such as humility, charity, and perseverance.
The Transformative Power of Suffering
Unlike modern notions that avoid or reject suffering, Catholic thought sees it as integral to human growth and spiritual maturity. Suffering, when embraced in union with Christ, becomes redemptive, fostering humility, compassion, and dependence on God. St. Paul captures this paradox: “We rejoice in our sufferings, knowing that suffering produces endurance, and endurance produces character, and character produces hope” (Romans 5:3-4).
The principle of felix culpa (“happy fault”) epitomizes this belief, affirming that humanity’s fall, though resulting in suffering, ultimately led to the greater good of Christ’s Incarnation and Redemption.9 The lives of the saints vividly illustrate how suffering can lead to profound joy and fulfillment. St. Thérèse of Lisieux, for example, endured physical illness and spiritual darkness yet found happiness in surrendering herself to God’s will. Her “Little Way” of offering small sacrifices exemplifies how even ordinary struggles can become pathways to extraordinary grace.10
Similarly, St. Maximilian Kolbe’s heroic self-sacrifice in Auschwitz, where he offered his life for another prisoner, demonstrates the profound joy and peace that can arise from self-giving love, even in the face of unimaginable suffering.11
The Superficiality of Happiness as Pleasure
The modern fixation on pleasure often leads to disillusionment, as it fails to address the deeper human need for meaning, purpose, and connection. Many people who appear to “have it all” in terms of wealth, success, and comfort report feelings of emptiness and unhappiness. Fr. Robert Spitzer, SJ, identifies four levels of happiness, ranging from immediate gratification to ultimate transcendence. He argues that true happiness is found not in the lower levels (pleasure and ego fulfillment) but in the higher levels of love, self-gift, and communion with God.12
The Catholic tradition emphasizes that happiness requires effort, discipline, and the cultivation of virtue. As Aristotle observed, happiness is “an activity of the soul in accordance with virtue.”13 This aligns with the Beatitudes, where Christ teaches that true blessedness lies in qualities such as meekness, mercy, purity of heart, and peacemaking (Matthew 5:3-12). Virtue enables individuals to transcend their immediate desires and align their lives with higher purposes, fostering not only personal fulfillment but also the flourishing of others.
The Role of Community and Relationships
True happiness is not a solitary pursuit but is deeply connected to relationships and community. The Catholic Church, as the Mystical Body of Christ, provides a spiritual family where individuals can grow in faith, love, and mutual support. St. Augustine famously wrote, “Our hearts are restless until they rest in You.”14 This restlessness reflects the human longing for communion with God and others, a longing that can only be satisfied through self-giving love.
Conclusion
Happiness is one of humanity’s deepest desires, yet it is often misunderstood and misdirected. The contemporary zeitgeist’s emphasis on pleasure provides fleeting satisfaction but leaves many unfulfilled, unable to attain the deeper joy that comes from purpose and virtue. The Catholic tradition offers a richer and more enduring vision of happiness, rooted in the fulfillment of God’s will, the cultivation of virtue, and the embrace of suffering as a path to transformation. Drawing from the wisdom of the saints and the teachings of the Church, we see that true happiness is not merely a transient feeling but a state of being earned through love, self-sacrifice, and communion with the divine. As society grapples with rising dissatisfaction and existential angst, returning to these timeless truths can illuminate the path to a happiness that is not only felt but deeply lived.
Mill, John Stuart. Utilitarianism, Chapter 2.
Ibid.
“Happiness vs. Pleasure: Understanding the Difference,” Psychology Today.
World Happiness Report 2023.
Ibid.
Aquinas, St. Thomas. Summa Theologica, I-II, Q.3, Art.5.
Ibid.
Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1718.
St. Augustine, Enchiridion, Chapter 26.
Guy Gaucher, The Story of a Soul, St. Thérèse of Lisieux.
Doino, William. “St. Maximilian Kolbe: Martyr of Charity,” National Catholic Register.
Faith Perspectives on Assisted Dying: Addressing Common Objections
Faith-based perspectives on assisted dying often face objections from those who argue they impose religious beliefs on a secular society or fail to address the suffering of terminally ill individuals. However, these objections can be addressed thoughtfully, demonstrating that faith perspectives contribute valuable insights to this complex issue.
Faith-Based Perspectives and Pluralism
One common objection is that faith-based arguments impose religious beliefs on a pluralistic society. In reality, faith perspectives often appeal to universal principles such as the intrinsic value of human life, which resonate across diverse worldviews. These principles are not exclusive to any one religion and align with many secular ethical frameworks. Laws inevitably reflect moral values, and it is legitimate for citizens—religious or not—to participate in shaping them. Faith perspectives aim to foster dialogue about the common good rather than impose religious doctrines. For instance, protecting vulnerable individuals from societal pressures to choose assisted dying serves a shared interest in justice and human dignity¹.
Compassion and the Alleviation of Suffering
Critics sometimes argue that faith-based opposition disregards the suffering of terminally ill individuals. However, most religious traditions emphasize compassion and the alleviation of suffering. Faith communities advocate for improved palliative care and holistic support systems, offering alternatives to assisted dying. This approach recognizes that suffering is not only physical but also emotional, social, and spiritual. By addressing these dimensions, faith perspectives promote solutions that affirm life rather than terminate it. For example, many hospice programs inspired by faith traditions focus on accompanying the dying and ensuring their comfort through non-lethal means².
Timeless Principles, Not Dogma
Faith perspectives are often criticized as being rooted in outdated or dogmatic principles. In truth, the sanctity of life is a timeless concept rooted in deep reflections on human dignity and moral responsibility. Far from being dogmatic, these perspectives engage with contemporary bioethics, philosophy, and medical science to address modern dilemmas. Opposing assisted dying is not about rejecting progress but about warning against solutions that could have unintended consequences for society’s most vulnerable members. The erosion of safeguards in countries where assisted dying is legal underscores these concerns³.
Autonomy and True Freedom
Another objection is that faith perspectives undermine individual autonomy and the right to choose. While faith-based views value autonomy, they emphasize that true autonomy requires freedom from coercion and despair. Requests for assisted dying often stem from fear, loneliness, or a lack of adequate support. Faith perspectives argue that respect for autonomy must be balanced with a responsibility to protect the vulnerable, especially those who might feel pressured to choose death over life. They also propose a broader understanding of freedom—one that values care, interdependence, and the inherent worth of every person, even in their most fragile state⁴.
Addressing Real-Life Suffering
Critics argue that faith-based opposition to assisted dying prioritizes abstract principles over real-life suffering. On the contrary, faith perspectives are deeply practical, emphasizing the importance of accompanying the dying, managing pain effectively, and supporting families through the end-of-life journey. The rejection of assisted dying does not deny suffering but insists that eliminating a life is not the solution. Many faith communities lead initiatives in hospice care, counseling, and community support for the terminally ill, demonstrating their commitment to compassionate, life-affirming care⁵.
Faith Perspectives and Public Policy
A common objection is that not everyone shares religious beliefs, so faith perspectives should not influence public policy. However, in a pluralistic society, dismissing faith-based views undermines the principle of inclusive democratic deliberation. Faith-based arguments are often supported by secular reasoning. Concerns about the potential for coercion, the societal risks of normalizing assisted dying, and the erosion of safeguards resonate with both religious and non-religious individuals. Public policy must prioritize protecting the vulnerable, and faith traditions bring a long history of advocating for marginalized groups, enriching the debate on assisted dying⁶.
Conclusion
Faith perspectives on assisted dying contribute to the broader conversation on human dignity, compassion, and ethical responsibility. They challenge society to consider deeper values and propose comprehensive support for those suffering from terminal illness. By protecting the vulnerable and affirming the value of life, even in its most fragile state, these perspectives offer wisdom and moral clarity that enrich the public debate on assisted dying.
¹ Universal principles of human dignity are discussed in BMA. ² Hospice care initiatives rooted in faith traditions are detailed in Marie Curie. ³ Concerns about safeguard erosion can be seen in evidence from Belgium and the Netherlands, e.g., CARE. ⁴ Studies on autonomy and societal pressures are available in BMA. ⁵ Faith-led palliative care programs are outlined in Marie Curie. ⁶ Broader societal risks and secular support for faith arguments are covered in CARE.
In 2023, Muhammad became the most popular name for baby boys in England and Wales, surpassing Noah, which held the top spot in 2022. This marks the first time Muhammad has led the list, having been among the top ten since 2016.¹
The emergence of Muhammad as the most popular boys’ name underscores the growing influence and presence of Muslim communities in the United Kingdom. For Catholics, this presents an opportunity for and highlights the urgency of evangelization efforts and the need for Catholics to confidently witness their faith in increasingly pluralistic societies.
Olivia Continues to Lead Girls’ Names For the seventh consecutive year, Olivia remained the most popular name for baby girls, followed by Amelia and Isla, maintaining the same top three as in 2022.¹
The Decline of Traditional Christian Names
The declining popularity of names such as George, William, Elizabeth, and Charles—often associated with Christian saints and figures—points to the waning cultural influence of Christianity in public life. For Catholics, this trend calls for renewed catechesis on the significance of names, particularly those of saints, who serve as models of virtue and intercessors. Naming children after saints has historically been a way for parents to dedicate their children to God and provide them with heavenly patrons.
Regional Variations in Naming Trends Muhammad was the most popular boys’ name in four out of nine English regions, while in Wales, Noah and Oliver were more prevalent. Olivia dominated across most regions for girls, except in the East Midlands, where Amelia took the lead.¹
Influence of Popular Culture on Baby Names Names such as Margot and Cillian have risen in popularity, likely influenced by actors Margot Robbie and Cillian Murphy’s recent prominent film roles. Additionally, seasonal names like Autumn and Summer have become more common, reflecting a trend towards nature-inspired choices.²
The growing influence of popular culture and nature-inspired names like Margot, Cillian, Summer, and Autumn suggests that parents are increasingly turning to media and aesthetics rather than faith for inspiration. This is symptomatic of a culture that places less emphasis on transcendence and more on worldly trends. Catholics might reflect on the opportunity to encourage a return to names that honor God, saints, and virtues, reminding society of the deeper meanings behind our choices.
Decline in Traditional Royal Names Traditional royal names have seen a decline in popularity. For instance, George fell from third to fourth place among boys’ names, and William dropped to 29th. Similarly, names like Elizabeth and Charles have decreased in usage over the past decade.²
Emergence of New Names in the Top 100 New entries into the top 100 boys’ names include Jax, Enzo, and Bodhi, while for girls, Nevaeh, Raya, and Hazel have made their debut. This diversification indicates evolving preferences among parents.³
Impact of Celebrity Culture on Naming Choices The influence of celebrity culture is evident, with names like Billie and Elton gaining popularity, possibly due to artists Billie Eilish and Elton John’s prominence. Similarly, names associated with the Kardashian-Jenner family, such as Reign and Saint, have seen increased usage.²
Seasonal and Nature-Inspired Names on the Rise Seasonal names like Autumn and Summer have entered the top 100, reflecting a growing trend towards nature-inspired names. Additionally, names like Poppy are more popular in November, possibly due to Remembrance Day associations.²
Overall Trends in Baby Naming The data from the Office for National Statistics highlights the dynamic nature of baby naming trends, influenced by cultural, regional, and societal factors. While some traditional names decline, others gain popularity due to media and cultural influences, showcasing the evolving landscape of naming conventions.¹
Challenges and Opportunities in Evangelization
These trends challenge Catholics to engage actively with a culture that increasingly values individualism and diversity over shared religious heritage. Rather than lamenting the changes, Catholics are called to respond by living their faith authentically, fostering a sense of joy and hope that can inspire others. Baptism and naming ceremonies are powerful moments for evangelization, where the significance of a Christian name can be explained and celebrated.
While the naming trends reflect a broader cultural shift away from traditional Christian values, they also provide Catholics with a unique opportunity to witness to their faith in meaningful ways. By choosing names that reflect their beliefs and teaching their children about the saints they are named after, Catholic families can contribute to the re-Christianization of society, one name at a time. These choices affirm that names are not merely labels but also bearers of identity, history, and hope rooted in the Gospel.
The call for Christians to stand firm in Christ and His Church arises against a backdrop of increasing global instability, societal fragmentation, and spiritual confusion. This appeal is not isolated to a single moment but is rooted in a historical and theological tradition that spans centuries. To understand its significance, we must explore the broader context in which it emerges—both within the Church and the world.
The State of the World
The 21st century is marked by crises on multiple fronts. From the disintegration of moral and social norms to the prevalence of violence and economic uncertainty, individuals and communities are facing unprecedented challenges. Western societies, once grounded in Judeo-Christian values, are now grappling with widespread secularization and relativism. These trends have eroded the moral foundations that historically provided stability and meaning.
Simultaneously, rising hostility toward Christianity has left many believers marginalized. Public expressions of faith are often met with suspicion, ridicule, or outright opposition. This growing intolerance is accompanied by a deeper spiritual malaise: a culture of individualism and materialism that leaves many feeling isolated and purposeless.
Challenges Within the Church
The Church is not exempt from the shaking of these turbulent times. Internally, the Body of Christ faces its own trials, including scandals, divisions, and a loss of credibility in the eyes of some. The faithful are also wrestling with confusion over doctrine and liturgy, as the Church seeks to navigate the challenges of modernity without compromising her mission.
Yet these challenges are not unprecedented. Throughout history, the Church has endured periods of persecution, internal strife, and cultural decline. Each time, she has emerged stronger and more spiritually vibrant, purified by the trials she has faced.
The Church Militant: A Forgotten Identity
Historically, the Church has embraced her identity as the “Church Militant,” a term that emphasizes her mission on earth as a spiritual battleground. This concept, deeply rooted in Catholic tradition, describes the Church’s role in contending with the forces of sin, evil, and spiritual darkness.
In recent decades, this identity has been de-emphasized, partly due to misconceptions in an age increasingly wary of militaristic language. However, the essence of the Church Militant is spiritual, not physical. It calls for vigilance, prayer, and action in the face of the world’s challenges. This understanding has been affirmed by Church leaders throughout history, including Pope Pius XII, who declared, “We belong to the Church militant because the powers of darkness are ever restless to encompass her destruction.”¹
Prophetic Voices of Renewal
Pope Benedict XVI, one of the most influential theologians of the modern era, offered profound insights into the Church’s current challenges and future. In his 1969 work Faith and the Future, he foresaw a time of trial for the Church, predicting that it would grow smaller and lose many of its worldly privileges. Yet, he also envisioned this as a period of purification, from which a spiritually revitalized Church would emerge:
“The Church will become small and will have to start afresh more or less from the beginning… But when the trial of this sifting is past, a great power will flow from a more spiritualized and simplified Church.”²
Benedict’s vision resonates deeply with the present moment. As cultural and political hostility toward Christianity grows, the Church’s mission to proclaim the Gospel and offer hope to the world becomes even more urgent.
Theological Foundations of the Church
From its earliest days, the Church has been understood not as a human institution but as the Mystical Body of Christ. This understanding is rooted in Scripture and the writings of the Church Fathers. Origen described the Church as the bride of Christ, born from the side of the Savior on the Cross.³ Irenaeus called the Church a paradise where believers are nourished and renewed.⁴
This theology underscores the Church’s role as both a spiritual home and a divine mission. To belong to the Church is to participate in the life of Christ and the communion of the Trinity. It is also to be sent into the world as a witness to God’s love, truth, and saving power.
A Call to Action
The background to this appeal is clear: the world is in crisis, and the Church is being tested. Yet, this is not a time for despair but for renewed faith and mission. The challenges we face are an opportunity for Christians to rediscover the beauty and power of the Gospel and to offer hope to a world in need.
As the Apostle Paul reminds us, our struggle is not against flesh and blood but against spiritual forces of evil (Ephesians 6:12). Armed with the “whole armor of God,” we are called to stand firm in Christ, to build our lives on the Rock, and to extend the love of God to those who are searching for stability and truth.
¹ Pius XII, Address to the College of Cardinals, 1953. ² Joseph Ratzinger, Faith and the Future, 1969. ³ Origen, Homilies on Leviticus 5:9. ⁴ Irenaeus, Against Heresies 5:20:2.
Nigeria: Fulani Herdsmen Attack Christian Villagesin Nasarawa State
On December 1, 2024, Fulani herdsmen launched violent attacks on multiple villages in central Nigeria’s Nasarawa State. These assaults resulted in the deaths of two Christians, injuries to another, and the abduction of a pastor and other individuals. The attacks targeted Gwanje, Ntsakpe, Goho, and Ningo villages in Akwanga Local Government Area.
Incident Details
Gwanje Village At approximately 8 p.m., assailants opened fire on residents gathered outside the home of Barnabas Para, who also operated a mini-store. Para was fatally shot during the attack. Another resident, Okigwe Gajere, was kidnapped but managed to escape shortly afterward.¹
Ntsakpe Village Around the same time, gunmen attacked a neighbor’s house in Ntsakpe, killing a Christian man identified as Mr. Sule. Another individual, Mr. Zamani, sustained gunshot wounds and was transported to Our Lady of Apostles (OLA) Hospital in Akwanga for treatment.²
Goho Village In Goho, a security aide to a former National Assembly member was killed during the abduction of Joseph Haruna Kigbu and his wife while they were en route to Jos.³
Ningo Village Days earlier, on November 28, Fulani herdsmen kidnapped Pastor Charles Joshua of the Living Faith Church, along with three other Christians. This attack occurred in the predominantly Christian village of Ningo, located just 2 kilometers from Gwanje.⁴
These coordinated assaults have sent shockwaves through local communities. Nathaniel Maaji Lauji, the media adviser to the Akwanga Local Government Council, confirmed the incidents and expressed condolences to the affected families.⁵
Broader Context
Nigeria remains one of the deadliest countries for Christians, with 4,118 individuals killed for their faith between October 1, 2022, and September 30, 2023, according to Open Doors’ 2024 World Watch List. Additionally, 3,300 Christians were kidnapped during this period, and 750 attacks were recorded on churches and Christian institutions.⁶
While Fulani herdsmen are predominantly Muslim, they consist of diverse clans across Nigeria and the Sahel region. Most do not hold extremist views, but some factions have adopted radical Islamist ideologies. The UK’s All-Party Parliamentary Group for International Freedom of Religion or Belief noted in a 2020 report that these groups use strategies similar to Boko Haram and ISWAP, targeting Christians and significant symbols of Christian identity.⁷
Christian leaders in Nigeria argue that the attacks are motivated by a desire to seize Christian lands and impose Islamic practices, as desertification has increasingly threatened the herdsmen’s traditional way of life.⁸
Morning Star News. Radical Fulani Herdsmen Kill 2 Christians, Capture Pastor. (Dec 5, 2024).
Open Doors USA. World Watch List 2024 Report.
Nasarawa State University Faculty Facebook Post (Dec 2, 2024).
Christian Post. Thousands of Christians Killed in Nigeria: Report (Sep 3, 2024).
UK All-Party Parliamentary Group for International Freedom of Religion or Belief. Nigeria Report (2020).
Open Doors USA. World Watch List 2024 Report.
Christian Daily International/Morning Star News. Fulani Herdsmen Attack Villages in Nasarawa State. (Dec 2024).
Christian Daily International. Analysis of Herdsmen Conflict in Nigeria. (2024).
UK The War on Free Speech in Football: A Catholic Perspective
Football and the Imposition of Ideology
The suspension of Mohamed Camara, an AS Monaco midfielder, for covering an LGBT badge on his jersey raises significant concerns about freedom of conscience and the growing tendency of football authorities to enforce ideological conformity. Camara’s action, rooted in his Muslim faith, was neither inflammatory nor disrespectful. It was a quiet refusal to endorse a campaign inconsistent with his beliefs. Yet, the Ligue de Football Professionnel (LFP) punished him for failing to “raise awareness” of its anti-homophobia campaign.¹
This incident highlights an alarming pattern within European football, where clubs and governing bodies increasingly pressure players and fans to conform to progressive ideologies, sidelining those who dissent. While the Church teaches respect and love for all individuals regardless of their sexual orientation,² it also upholds the primacy of conscience and the right to act according to one’s faith and beliefs.³
Freedom of Conscience: A Catholic Principle
Catholic social teaching emphasizes the sacredness of conscience, as articulated in Gaudium et Spes: “In the depths of his conscience, man detects a law which he does not impose upon himself, but which holds him to obedience.”⁴ The Church recognizes that this inner voice must be respected, especially in pluralistic societies where divergent beliefs coexist.
The punitive actions against Camara and other players, such as Toulouse’s Zakaria Aboukhlal and Nantes’ Mostafa Mohamed, violate this principle. These players did not engage in hate speech or incitement; they merely exercised their God-given right to refuse participation in campaigns that contradict their beliefs.⁵
The Danger of Compelled Speech
The Church has long opposed compelled speech, recognizing it as a violation of human dignity. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), echoing this sentiment, has consistently upheld the right not to express beliefs one does not hold.⁶ As Pope Benedict XVI warned, the modern tendency to impose “dictatorship of relativism” often results in the marginalization of those who adhere to objective truth.⁷
In the footballing context, this imposition manifests in contractual obligations or public pressure to endorse specific ideologies. Such requirements disregard the diversity of beliefs within the sport and undermine its potential to unite people across different cultures and religions.
Football’s Original Mission: Unity and Solidarity
Football, like all sports, has the capacity to bring people together in a spirit of camaraderie and mutual respect. However, when it becomes a vehicle for ideological coercion, it risks alienating players and fans who hold traditional or faith-based values. This shift from unity to division is antithetical to the Church’s vision of sports as a means of fostering community and solidarity.⁸
The actions of governing bodies like the LFP, which impose heavy sanctions on dissenting players, reflect a broader societal trend of prioritizing progressive agendas over authentic pluralism.⁹ This is not limited to France. Similar cases in Germany, such as fines imposed on fans for displaying gender-critical banners, reveal the extent of this ideological policing.¹⁰
A Call for Respect and Authentic Dialogue
The Catholic response to such situations is not to retreat into silence but to advocate for true dialogue rooted in mutual respect. The Church calls on governing bodies, players, and fans to recognize that respect for human dignity includes allowing individuals to live and act according to their conscience. Forcing players to participate in campaigns they find objectionable violates this principle and risks fostering resentment rather than understanding.¹¹
As the Catechism teaches: “Man has the right to act in conscience and in freedom so as personally to make moral decisions. He must not be forced to act contrary to his conscience.” (CCC 1782)¹²
A Path Forward
The footballing world must remember that its strength lies in its ability to unite, not divide. This requires a renewed commitment to respecting the diverse beliefs of all participants, from players to fans. Governing bodies should prioritize fostering an environment where individuals can freely express their convictions without fear of reprisal.
For Catholics, this means standing firm in defense of conscience and freedom of speech, even in the face of cultural pressures. By doing so, we witness to the truth that authentic unity is built not on coercion but on mutual respect and understanding.
Ligue de Football Professionnel (LFP) statement, as referenced in Freddie Attenborough, “The Football World’s War on Free Speech,” Artillery Row, June 13, 2024.
Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC), 2358.
Dignitatis Humanae, Vatican II Declaration on Religious Freedom, 1965, nos. 1–2.
Gaudium et Spes, Second Vatican Council, 1965, no. 16.
Freddie Attenborough, “The Football World’s War on Free Speech,” Artillery Row, June 13, 2024.
Buscarini & Others v. San Marino (1999), European Court of Human Rights.
Pope Benedict XVI, Homily at the Mass Pro Eligendo Romano Pontifice, April 18, 2005.
Pope John Paul II, Message for the Jubilee of Sportspeople, October 29, 2000.
Freddie Attenborough, “The Football World’s War on Free Speech,” Artillery Row, June 13, 2024.
German Football Association (DFB) ruling, as reported in Artillery Row, June 13, 2024.
Dignitatis Humanae, Vatican II Declaration on Religious Freedom, 1965, nos. 1–2.
South Australia, The Greens’ Proposal to Amend the Equal Opportunity Act
On July 3, 2024, the South Australian Greens, led by MLC Robert Simms, proposed amendments to the Equal Opportunity Act aimed at removing existing protections for religious schools and institutions (1). These protections currently allow faith-based schools to employ staff who adhere to their religious beliefs and values. The proposed changes have raised significant concerns within the Catholic community and among other Christian denominations.
Current Protections and Their Importance
Under the existing Equal Opportunity Act, religious schools in South Australia can require staff to uphold the tenets of their faith. This ensures that the educational environment aligns with the institution’s religious ethos, allowing schools to maintain their distinctive character and provide education consistent with their beliefs. For Catholic schools, this means the freedom to employ individuals who support and live according to Catholic teachings on matters such as marriage and human sexuality (2).
Implications of the Proposed Amendments
The Greens’ proposed amendments seek to eliminate these exemptions, compelling religious schools to adhere to broader anti-discrimination laws without consideration for their religious doctrines. Robert Simms MLC has argued that current exemptions permit discrimination, stating, “It is outrageous that in 21st century South Australia, a gay teacher working in a religious school can be in fear of losing their job simply because of their sexuality” (3). However, Catholic leaders and supporters contend that such changes would undermine the religious freedom of these institutions. They argue that the amendments would force schools to employ individuals whose lifestyles or beliefs may conflict with Catholic teachings, thereby diluting the school’s religious identity and compromising its mission to provide faith-based education (4).
Catholic Perspective on Religious Freedom in Education
The Catholic Church upholds the principle that parents are the primary educators of their children and have the right to choose schools that reflect their religious convictions. This is articulated in documents such as the Vatican’s Circular Letter on Religious Education in Schools, which emphasizes the importance of religious education in forming individuals and contributing to the common good (5). Furthermore, the Church teaches that religious freedom is a fundamental human right, encompassing the ability of religious communities to operate institutions in accordance with their beliefs. The International Theological Commission’s document, Religious Freedom for the Good of All, highlights the necessity of protecting this freedom to ensure a just and peaceful society (6).
Community Response and Call to Action
The proposed legislative changes have prompted significant concern among Christian communities in South Australia. The Australian Christian Lobby (ACL) has been vocal in opposing the amendments, describing them as an attempt to “destroy Christian schooling” (7). The ACL is actively encouraging individuals to contact their Members of Parliament to express support for the rights of religious schools to maintain their faith-based employment practices.
Broader Context
This issue is part of a wider national debate in Australia regarding the balance between anti-discrimination laws and religious freedoms. Similar legislative efforts have been observed in other states, prompting discussions about the rights of religious institutions to operate in accordance with their doctrines while adhering to principles of equality and non-discrimination.
Conclusion
The proposed amendments to South Australia’s Equal Opportunity Act represent a critical juncture for religious education in the state. From a Catholic perspective, preserving the ability of faith-based schools to employ staff who embody and uphold their religious values is essential to maintaining their unique identity and fulfilling their educational mission. Engaging in informed and respectful dialogue with legislators is crucial to ensure that any legal changes consider and protect the religious freedoms that are foundational to Catholic education.
Greens Move to End Religious Exemptions to SA’s Anti-Discrimination Laws. Robert Simms Official Website.
South Australia Equal Opportunity Act 1984, current exemptions.
Robert Simms, public statements on religious exemptions.
Australian Christian Lobby (ACL) campaigns against Equal Opportunity amendments.
Circular Letter on Religious Education in Schools. Vatican.
Religious Freedom for the Good of All. International Theological Commission.
ACL opposition to Greens’ proposals, New Life Faith News.
USA: Biden AdministrationReportedly Weighing Preemptive Pardons for Key Officials
Amid political tensions surrounding President Biden’s controversial pardon of his son, Hunter Biden, and President-elect Donald Trump’s announcement of Kash Patel as FBI Director, the Biden administration is reportedly considering issuing preemptive pardons for several high-profile individuals. This extraordinary measure would aim to protect them from potential prosecutions under a new Trump administration.
Preemptive Pardons Under Consideration
Reports suggest the administration is deliberating preemptive pardons for the following figures:
Dr. Anthony Fauci: The former Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Fauci has faced criticism for his role in the government’s COVID-19 response. Critics, including Senator Rand Paul, have accused him of dishonesty during congressional hearings, particularly regarding the origins of COVID-19 and his use of private emails to conduct government business. Paul has stated, “For his dishonesty, frankly, he should go to prison.” 1
Senator-elect Adam Schiff (D-California): A prominent critic of Trump, Schiff was a leading figure in the impeachment proceedings and a member of the January 6 Committee. His role in these events has made him a potential target for retribution under a Trump-led Justice Department. 2
Former Representative Liz Cheney (R-Wyoming): As a leading member of the January 6 Committee, Cheney has accused Trump of inciting the Capitol riot. Her vocal opposition to Trump’s actions led to her losing her primary election by a wide margin in 2022. 2
General Mark Milley: The former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff has been criticized for his handling of the U.S. military withdrawal from Afghanistan and for reportedly contacting Chinese officials during the final months of Trump’s presidency to reassure them against potential military action. These actions have been labeled “treasonous” by some Trump allies, including Senator Marco Rubio. 3
Context and Implications
The Biden administration’s discussions about preemptive pardons follow President Biden’s pardon of his son, Hunter Biden, who was convicted on federal gun charges. This move has sparked widespread debate about the appropriate use of presidential pardon power. 4
Kash Patel’s nomination as FBI Director by Trump has further escalated tensions. Patel, a close Trump ally, has openly criticized the FBI’s handling of investigations into Trump’s 2016 campaign and has vowed to hold public officials accountable for what he views as politically motivated actions against the former president. 5
Historical Precedents
Preemptive pardons are rare but not without precedent. President Gerald Ford famously pardoned Richard Nixon in 1974 for any crimes he “has committed or may have committed” during his presidency. Similarly, President Jimmy Carter granted amnesty to Vietnam War draft dodgers in 1977. These actions, while intended to promote national healing, were met with both support and controversy. 6
Legal and Ethical Considerations
The potential issuance of preemptive pardons raises significant legal and ethical questions. Critics argue that such pardons could undermine the rule of law by absolving individuals of accountability before any charges are filed. Supporters contend that they are necessary to protect officials from politically motivated prosecutions. The constitutionality of preemptive pardons remains largely untested, adding complexity to the administration’s deliberations. 7
Conclusion
As political tensions escalate ahead of Trump’s return to the White House, the Biden administration’s consideration of preemptive pardons underscores the fraught nature of American politics. The implications of such actions would reverberate far beyond the individuals involved, potentially shaping the future of accountability and justice in the United States.
Washington Examiner, “Rand Paul Accuses Fauci of Dishonesty During Congressional Hearings,”Link.
Reuters, “White House Aides Discuss Preemptive Pardons for Key Figures,”Link. 2
New York Post, “Mark Milley Criticized for Afghanistan Withdrawal and China Reassurances,”Link.
Associated Press, “Kash Patel Nominated as FBI Director by Trump,”Link.
The Sun, “Historical Use of Preemptive Pardons in U.S. History,”Link.
Reuters, “Legal and Ethical Considerations of Preemptive Pardons,”Link.
Ireland: Secularising Hate Speech Legislation
From a traditional Catholic perspective, the recent efforts by the Irish state to introduce hate speech legislation could be seen as part of a broader trend of secular and ideologically driven overreach. Journalist Michael Shellenberger, speaking at a European Parliament seminar hosted by the conservative ECR parliamentary group, compared the proposed legislation by Irish Minister Helen McEntee to authoritarian crackdowns seen in other parts of the world, such as Brazil. He also likened the proposals to scenarios from the dystopian series Black Mirror, suggesting a chilling future where individual freedoms and truth are subjugated to ideological conformity.
Shellenberger emphasized that it was “no coincidence” that Ireland, a nation historically rich in Catholic heritage but now deeply secularized, has been chosen as a testing ground for such laws. He highlighted the potential for these laws to be weaponized, including the alarming prospect of tech workers’ devices being seized for non-compliance.
The most controversial elements of the initial legislation proposed imprisonment for up to five years for so-called “hate speech” offenses. While some of these provisions have been stripped back following public backlash, the law still reflects a trajectory toward suppressing freedom of expression under the guise of combating extremism. Ireland’s regulatory agency, Coimisiún na Meán, is poised to enforce EU censorship directives as part of the recently enacted Digital Services Act (DSA). This act grants authorities sweeping powers to fine platforms for failing to remove content deemed objectionable—a development that risks being exploited by ideologically motivated figures close to left-leaning NGOs.
Concerns raised by Shellenberger and MEPs at the seminar point to the dangers of centralized censorship systems being driven by ideological agendas. Ireland’s regulatory alignment with multinational corporations and its role as an enforcer of EU policies are seen with skepticism by many within the European Parliament. Questions remain about the nation’s commitment to free speech, particularly in light of fiscal and ideological entanglements.
The challenges of enforcing such policies were laid bare during last November’s riots in Dublin, which revealed major regulatory failings. As chaos unfolded, Irish and EU officials were reportedly unable to act effectively, with key regulators unavailable to respond. This failure underscores the fragility of systems built on technocratic control rather than moral and social cohesion.
From a Catholic viewpoint, the imposition of such laws is troubling, as they reflect a drift away from the natural law and the principles of subsidiarity, which prioritize the dignity of individuals and communities over centralized control. True freedom of speech, rooted in the ability to express and defend eternal truths, is essential for the flourishing of both individuals and society. Catholics are called to resist efforts to undermine this freedom and to advocate for laws that reflect authentic justice, grounded in truth and the moral order.
USA: Detransitioner Chloe Cole Speaks at Supreme Court Rally: A Defining Moment in the Fight Against Gender-Affirming Care for Minors
On December 4, 2024, demonstrators gathered on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., to express their positions on United States v. Skrmetti, a pivotal case addressing Tennessee’s law banning gender-affirming medical care for minors. The rally, marked by intense emotions and a charged atmosphere, featured both supporters and opponents of the legislation. Among the speakers was Chloe Cole, a 20-year-old detransitioner whose story has become central to the movement opposing gender-affirming care for children.
Chloe Cole’s Address
Chloe Cole shared her personal journey at the rally, recounting her experience with puberty blockers and a double mastectomy at the age of 15 before choosing to detransition. Speaking amid cheers and jeers, Cole passionately urged the Supreme Court to uphold Tennessee’s law, emphasizing the irreversible harm caused by these interventions.
“What an absolute honor to be here on the steps of the Supreme Court speaking, surrounded by so many of my friends, my colleagues, and all the other brave souls who have pushed this battle forward,” Cole stated. She expressed gratitude toward Tennessee lawmakers for enacting the law, which she described as “a critical step in protecting children from irreversible harm.”[1]
Cole underscored her confidence in the justices: “I’m grateful the Supreme Court is willing to listen so soon and set a precedent that will allow most of the nation to protect children.” She went on to declare, “It doesn’t take a degree in biology to understand that a drug cocktail and a scalpel do not make a child the opposite sex.”[2]
Cole’s advocacy centers on her belief that children are “perfectly made in God’s image” and that transitioning minors is a harmful practice that society must reject. Her story, which includes the grief experienced by her parents, has been pivotal in raising awareness about the risks of gender-affirming care for minors.[3]
Other Key Speakers
The rally, organized by the medical nonprofit Do No Harm, also featured prominent voices like Daily Wire host Matt Walsh and Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene. Walsh, known for his documentary What Is a Woman?, lambasted gender ideology as “one of the greatest and most incomprehensible evils ever visited upon children.”[4]
Walsh emphasized the immutability of biological sex, calling on the Supreme Court to affirm this reality. “Biology is real,” he declared. “It is immutable. It is not subject to the whims of any individual or government or medical organization.”[5]
Counterprotests and Tensions
The event was not without conflict. Trans-rights activists held a counterprotest at the same location, displaying signs and chanting slogans in support of gender-affirming care for minors. At times, tensions flared, with activists shouting insults and attempting to disrupt the speakers.[6] Despite this, rally organizers maintained their focus on the legal and moral issues at stake.
Legal and National Context
Tennessee’s law, which took effect in July 2023, prohibits doctors from performing gender-affirming surgeries or prescribing puberty blockers and hormones for minors under 18. The law is being challenged by President Joe Biden’s Department of Justice and families represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Tennessee.[7]
Currently, 24 states have laws prohibiting gender-affirming surgeries and medications for minors, while two states—New Hampshire and Arizona—ban only the surgeries. Several of these laws face ongoing legal challenges, making the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Skrmetti particularly significant.[8]
Implications of the Case
The outcome of this case could have nationwide repercussions. Legal experts believe the justices may uphold the law by deferring to the states’ legislative authority to regulate medical practices. Ethics and Public Policy Center scholar Mary Rice Hasson noted that the court might avoid granting transgender individuals a protected status under the law. Instead, the justices are expected to focus on whether Tennessee’s legislature acted reasonably based on medical evidence.[9]
Observers have suggested that the Supreme Court’s ruling, anticipated in the summer of 2025, could serve as a precedent for other states, shaping the future of gender-affirming care regulations across the country.[10]
Catholic News Agency, “Detransitioner Chloe Cole Speaks at Rally on the Steps of the Supreme Court,” Dec. 5, 2024.
Associated Press, “Tensions Flare at Supreme Court Rally Over Gender-Affirming Care,” Dec. 4, 2024.
Politico, “Supreme Court Takes Up Tennessee’s Gender Care Ban,” Dec. 4, 2024.
AP News, “The Nationwide Impact of the Supreme Court’s Gender Care Case,” Dec. 4, 2024.
Ethics and Public Policy Center, “Analysis of United States v. Skrmetti,” Dec. 5, 2024.
Ibid.
EU: James Lindsay’s Speech to the European Parliament:A Warning Against Woke Ideology
On March 29, 2023, James Lindsay delivered a significant address to the European Parliament, warning of the cultural and political dangers posed by the “woke” movement. Titled “Woke: A Culture War Against Europe,” his speech highlighted the ideological roots, methods, and consequences of this growing trend. Lindsay’s arguments, supported by pointed quotes, urged Europe to resist this wave to safeguard its cultural and intellectual heritage.
A Cultural Revolution with Marxist Roots
Lindsay described the “woke” phenomenon as a modern cultural revolution rooted in Marxist and postmodernist theories. He argued that this movement seeks to dismantle traditional societal structures by framing them as systems of oppression. According to him, the weaponization of identity categories—such as race, gender, and sexuality—is central to this strategy.
“This is a Neo-Marxist project at its core,” Lindsay stated. “It builds on the critical theories of the mid-20th century and employs them not for economic class struggle but to fracture society along cultural and identity-based lines.”
He warned that the result of these efforts is a society divided into oppressors and oppressed, creating perpetual conflict rather than harmony. Lindsay emphasized that this approach is a departure from Europe’s Enlightenment values of individualism and reason.
The Subversion of Institutions
Lindsay argued that the “woke” movement infiltrates and co-opts institutions, transforming them into vehicles for ideological conformity. He cited education, corporations, and government as prime examples of this subversion.
“The mission of institutions is no longer to serve their original purpose, but to enforce ideological compliance under the guise of diversity, equity, and inclusion,” he said. Lindsay referred to this process as “institutional capture,” where organizations prioritize ideology over merit, truth, and freedom. He cited universities as particularly vulnerable, warning that they have become breeding grounds for indoctrination rather than critical inquiry.
Psychological Manipulation as a Tool of Control
A striking part of Lindsay’s speech was his analysis of the psychological tactics employed by “woke” ideology to enforce its agenda. He argued that guilt, shame, and fear are used to compel individuals and organizations into compliance.
“This movement thrives on coercion through emotional and psychological manipulation,” Lindsay remarked. “People are made to feel guilty for historical injustices they did not commit, and they are shamed for resisting ideological conformity.” He described this as a form of cultural warfare designed to destabilize societies by fostering division and distrust.
A Warning to Europe
Lindsay’s primary focus was to caution Europe against adopting these ideologies, which he argued are fundamentally at odds with its rich cultural heritage. He urged European leaders to resist importing what he called the “American export of wokeness.”
“Europe must not repeat the mistakes of the Anglophone world,” he warned. “These ideologies are not tools for progress but mechanisms of destruction. They aim to erase history, dismantle culture, and create chaos in the name of equity.”
Lindsay highlighted Europe’s intellectual traditions, rooted in Christianity and the Enlightenment, as essential to its identity. He cautioned that abandoning these foundations would lead to cultural and social fragmentation.
The Need to Uphold Traditions
A central theme of Lindsay’s address was the importance of preserving Europe’s cultural and intellectual legacy. He argued that the “woke” movement’s push for uniformity is antithetical to the diverse traditions and values that have shaped European civilization.
“We must defend our traditions, not because they are perfect, but because they are the product of centuries of hard-won wisdom,” he said. Lindsay emphasized that Europe’s unique identity is worth preserving against an ideology that seeks to erase it.
A Call to Action
Lindsay concluded with a rallying call for European nations to reject the “woke” movement and prioritize critical thinking, open dialogue, and genuine diversity of thought. He urged policymakers and citizens alike to recognize the dangers of ideological conformity and take proactive steps to protect their societies.
“This is a battle for the soul of Western civilization,” Lindsay declared. “If Europe loses this war, it will not only lose its culture but its future.”
Conclusion
James Lindsay’s speech to the European Parliament was both a critique of “woke” ideology and a warning about its potential impact on Europe. By tracing its Marxist roots, exposing its methods of institutional capture, and highlighting its cultural consequences, Lindsay provided a clear and urgent message. His speech stands as a critical reminder of the importance of preserving Europe’s intellectual and cultural identity in the face of an increasingly homogenizing ideological movement.
Lindsay, James. “Woke: A Culture War Against Europe,” European Parliament, March 29, 2023.
Spain: International Pro-Life Summit:Faith Is Neither Imposed Nor Hidden
The sixth Transatlantic Summit of the Political Network for Values (PNfV) took place on December 1–2, 2024, in Madrid’s Senate chamber. It brought together approximately 300 political and civic leaders from 45 countries across Europe, the Americas, and Africa. The summit, themed “For Freedom and the Culture of Life,” sought to address critical challenges to pro-life and pro-family values in an increasingly polarized global context.
This event represented an important platform for the pro-life movement, offering a space for leaders to articulate their vision for a society rooted in human dignity, freedom, and moral responsibility. Participants included politicians, opinion leaders, researchers, and advisors from different governments, demonstrating the network’s growing influence on the global stage (1).
Keynote Address by Jaime Mayor Oreja
Jaime Mayor Oreja, Spain’s former Minister of the Interior and honorary president of the PNfV, delivered a compelling keynote address. He sharply criticized what he described as a “sick obsession against the Christian foundations [of society], the contempt for science and biology, and the perverse manipulation of history.” His remarks highlighted the cultural and ideological challenges faced by those defending traditional values in modern society.
Oreja expressed confidence in the strength of pro-life arguments, underscoring the need to remain steadfast despite opposition. “The defense of the right to life is the foundation, the pillar of all our positions within this cultural debate,” he declared. He urged attendees to remain calm and grounded, stating, “Let’s not lose our cool, as they are losing theirs with us. By the solidity of our foundations, not by embracing extremism, let us know how to fulfill our obligation to the truth: to tell the truth, to defend the truth, and also sometimes to suffer for the truth” (1).
A controversial aspect of his address was his skepticism toward Darwin’s theory of evolution, which he claimed was losing credibility among scientists who support creationist views. This statement drew sharp criticism from secular circles and commentators, who argued that it undermined scientific consensus (2).
José Antonio Kast and Chile’s Pro-Life Leadership
José Antonio Kast, the leader of Chile’s Republican Party and then-president of PNfV, also spoke at the summit. Drawing inspiration from Jaime Guzmán, a Chilean politician assassinated by left-wing extremists, Kast emphasized the resilience of pro-life advocates. “They hate us because they fear us. And they fear us because they know we can’t be eliminated,” he said. Kast announced his resignation as PNfV president to launch another presidential campaign in Chile. He framed this decision as a family commitment to serving his country, underscoring the role of pro-life principles in his political agenda (1).
Kast’s leadership has been instrumental in expanding PNfV’s global reach. Over the past decade, the network has grown significantly, incorporating parliamentarians, researchers, and advisors from dozens of countries. This growth reflects the increasing relevance of pro-life and pro-family advocacy in global politics, particularly in regions where these values face strong ideological opposition (1).
Opposition and Protests
The summit faced fierce opposition from left-wing political parties and advocacy groups in Spain. The Spanish Socialist Workers’ Party (PSOE) and allied parties filed formal appeals to cancel the event, arguing that it promoted an “ultraconservative agenda” that undermined women’s rights. Despite these efforts, the event proceeded as planned (3).
Protests outside the Senate building highlighted the divisive nature of the summit. Activists from feminist organizations, including members of Femen, staged demonstrations to denounce the summit’s anti-abortion stance. Some activists managed to disrupt the event inside the Senate chamber, emphasizing the intensity of opposition to the pro-life message (4).
Mass Celebrated by Archbishop Bernardito Auza
Before the summit began, Archbishop Bernardito Auza, Apostolic Nuncio to Spain, celebrated Mass at the Monastery of the Incarnation near the Senate chamber. In his homily, Auza emphasized that the recognition of human dignity is the “fundamental principle and basis of our culture.” He reminded participants that this dignity exists “beyond all circumstances” and must be defended in every cultural and historical context. Auza encouraged summit attendees to continue educating others on the importance of placing human dignity at the center of societal development (1).
The Broader Context
The summit took place against the backdrop of growing cultural and political polarization over issues such as abortion, family rights, and freedom of expression. In many countries, pro-life advocates face increasing hostility from secular institutions and media. However, the PNfV’s growing global network reflects the resilience of those committed to defending the sanctity of life and traditional values.
Conclusion
The VI Transatlantic Summit underscored the complexity of debates surrounding life and family issues in contemporary society. While it provided an essential platform for pro-life advocates, the strong opposition it faced also highlighted the deep divisions these issues create. The summit served as both a rallying point for supporters and a reminder of the challenges that lie ahead in advocating for the dignity of human life and the family as the cornerstone of society.
France:Controversy over Notre Dames modernisations
Contemporary Design Elements The decision to introduce modern furnishings and liturgical vestments into the restored Notre-Dame de Paris has sparked fierce criticism from cultural historians, architects, and traditionalists. Designer Jean-Charles de Castelbajac’s bold new vestments, adorned with geometric patterns in primary colors, were inspired by the cathedral’s golden cross but have been criticized for their perceived lack of reverence for the Gothic aesthetic. Cultural historian Didier Rykner labeled them “aesthetic blunders,” emphasizing that they lack the solemnity and harmony typically associated with Notre-Dame’s sacred spaces. For critics, these vestments symbolize a broader disregard for the cathedral’s historic roots.
Similarly, the furniture designed by Guillaume Bardet has divided opinion. The minimalist bronze altar, baptismal font, and tabernacle have been praised by some for their craftsmanship but condemned by others as alien to Notre-Dame’s Gothic vocabulary. Stéphane Bern, a prominent French art critic, commented in Le Figaro: “These pieces do not speak the language of Notre-Dame. Instead, they impose a voice that feels alien to the building’s heritage.” Many argue that these contemporary additions disrupt the architectural unity of the cathedral, undermining the sense of continuity that has defined its identity for centuries. Advocates of these changes argue that they provide a modern interpretation of the sacred, but critics fear this modernization prioritizes aesthetic innovation over respect for tradition.¹
Modernization Concerns Efforts to modernize the cathedral’s interior have been particularly controversial, including plans to integrate advanced lighting systems and contemporary art installations. Proponents, such as Paris mayor Anne Hidalgo, assert that these updates are necessary to make Notre-Dame more engaging for a modern audience. “This is about bringing a 21st-century vision to an enduring symbol of French culture,” Hidalgo said in defense of the renovations. However, this vision has been met with sharp opposition. Historian Adrien Goetz described the modernization as “a betrayal of the spirit of Notre-Dame,” warning that it risks transforming the cathedral from a sacred place of worship into a mere cultural attraction.
Critics have also expressed concern over the diminishing recognition of 19th-century architect Eugène Viollet-le-Duc, who painstakingly restored Notre-Dame after the French Revolution. Viollet-le-Duc’s work is widely regarded as a faithful revival of the cathedral’s Gothic character, and his vision remains integral to its identity. Stéphane Troussel, writing in Le Monde, argued, “To deviate from Viollet-le-Duc’s vision is to erase the bridge between the past and the present that he so carefully constructed.” For many, the modernization project reflects a troubling trend of prioritizing novelty over preservation, raising fears that Notre-Dame’s historical essence may be permanently compromised.²
Stained Glass Window Controversy One of the most heated debates surrounding the restoration has been the proposed replacement of six 19th-century stained glass windows designed by Viollet-le-Duc with modern alternatives. Advocates for the change argue that contemporary designs could add a fresh perspective to the cathedral, making it more relevant to today’s audiences. However, critics strongly oppose this plan, viewing it as an assault on the cathedral’s architectural integrity. Alexandre Gady, an architectural historian, described the proposal as “a dangerous precedent that undermines the integrity of one of the world’s greatest treasures.”
The opposition to the replacement has been substantial. A petition to preserve the original windows garnered over 120,000 signatures, reflecting widespread public support for maintaining the cathedral’s historic elements. Ultimately, the Commission for National Heritage and Architecture (CNPA) unanimously rejected the plan, citing both the excellent condition of the original windows and their vital role in preserving the visual and spiritual harmony of Notre-Dame. This decision has been celebrated as a victory for preservationists, but the controversy highlights broader tensions between modernization and conservation in the restoration process.³
Summary of Criticisms The ongoing restoration of Notre-Dame de Paris has ignited intense debate over how best to balance modernization with the preservation of its historical and sacred character. The introduction of contemporary furnishings, bold liturgical vestments, and advanced lighting systems has been sharply criticized by cultural figures, including Stéphane Bern, Didier Rykner, and Alexandre Gady, who argue that these changes undermine the cathedral’s identity. The stained glass window controversy has further fueled this debate, with preservationists viewing the replacement proposal as an affront to the legacy of Eugène Viollet-le-Duc and the principles of historical integrity.
Proponents of modernization, including political and cultural leaders, argue that these updates breathe new life into the cathedral, making it more accessible and engaging for contemporary audiences. However, opponents fear that such changes risk transforming Notre-Dame into a spectacle that prioritizes aesthetics over its sacred and historical essence. As the debate continues, it underscores the broader challenges of restoring cultural monuments that must simultaneously serve as living places of worship and symbols of national identity.
¹ France24, “Designer vestments and furniture for Paris’s reborn Notre-Dame,” June 2024. ² Le Figaro, Stéphane Bern commentary, December 2023. ³ Le Monde, “The Stained Glass Debate at Notre-Dame,” August 2024.
From theology to culture war there are some brilliant minds still publishing worthy, well-researched content heartily recommended to you for reading. These would make great additions to your own or another’s personal library, perhaps as a gift?
“I have come to bring fire to the earth,” said Jesus Christ, and his words have come true in the lives of Catholic saints through the ages—men, women, and children on fire with love of Jesus, and with the desire to spread his word. The intention of this book of inspirational stories from the lives of saints is to fill the reader with this same fire. Whereas saints were once the popular heroes of our culture, populating our art and folklore, lending their names to our towns and streets and institutions, today they are all too often hidden away in scholarly books and articles. We are too often given a bland image of these holy men and women, whereas they were not vaguely “spiritual” do-gooders, but men and women on a mission: to attain to Heaven through the imitation of Christ, and to bring as many others along with them as possible!
The tales told in Inspiration from the Saints cover a variety of themes in the lives of these holy men and women: their childhoods, inspirations, and deaths; their boldness and their humility; their love of prayer, mortification, and the Eucharist; their urge to spread the Gospel; their family life; the impression they made upon others; and much more besides.
It is hard to imagine today that relatively few construction plans have been found for the impressive churches and cathedrals of the Romanesque and Gothic periods. Where did most of the drawings go? Were the plans destroyed in Europe or lost over time? Or were they never made at all? Although there are very few architectural drawings, there were numerous compasses. What were they used for and how? Was it possible to design complex buildings such as churches and cathedrals without blueprints?
The author takes the readers on an exciting cultural and historical journey through time, she looks at the spread of papyrus, parchment and paper and traces the ability to write and calculate in Europe. She also looks at the construction process in historical illustrations and draws comparisons with Arabic architecture. Finally, the author presents the various types of compasses that were available and explains how the drawing skills of master builders developed up to the Renaissance.
These insights into the history of architecture lead to some surprising discoveries: Architects of the Middle Ages thought and planned very differently from how we think today.
Dr. Sonja Ulrike Klug has been studying medieval architecture for over 20 years. She has published several books on Gothic cathedrals.
The mainstream Churches are faltering – or even at risk of dying out – in their Western and Middle Eastern heartlands. Surveys confirm that only a minority of people in a country such as Britain now claim Christian allegiance. The pattern is being matched in neighbouring societies. At the same time many opinion formers preach secularist ideology with a self-confidence shading into dogmatism. Others, unsure of their moorings, feel some residual attachment to spirituality, while being sceptical about the existence of God and other articles of belief.
Yet church teaching remains intellectually robust, as well as inspiring a transformative global presence. In this major and wide-ranging international study – both a report on the unsettling consequences of secularisation and a defence of a creed too often belittled by its opponents – Rupert Shortt outlines Christianity’s fading profile in the present, but also argues compellingly that Europe’s historic faith remains critical to the survival of a humane culture.
Unbelievers, doubters and skeptics continue to attack the truths of Christianity. Handbook of Catholic Apologetics is the only book that categorizes and summarizes all the major arguments in support of the main Christian beliefs, including key distinctively Catholic doctrines. Also included is a Protestant-friendly treatment of Catholic-Protestant issues. The Catholic answers to Protestant questions show how Catholicism is the fullness of the Christian faith.
An expanded, Catholic edition of the popular book Handbook of Christian Apologetics, Handbook of Catholic Apologetics is full of the wisdom and wit, clarity and insight of philosophers Peter Kreeft and Ronald Tacelli. This is an informative and valuable guidebook for anyone looking for answers to questions of faith and reason. Whether you are asking the questions yourself or want to respond to others who are, here is the resource you have been waiting for.
The following are ways in which you may practically support the work of others for the betterment of our society and the plight of sufferers, the impoverished and defenceless.
Prayer Requests
Pray for vocations Pray for traditional seminaries and the creation of formation houses The Church – contending with the crisis of faith
Pray for Bishop Nioclas Kelly recovering from hip surgery Pray for Eileen Butler diagnosed with colon cancer that has spread to her liver Pray for Fr Stanislaus Ybarra FMCD in recovery relocating to Michigan
Praying for vocations
In our times of spiritual and moral challenges, the need for vocations to the Traditional Catholic priesthood and religious life is more pressing than ever. Traditional Catholic communities, which adhere closely to the liturgical and doctrinal practices predating the Second Vatican Council, offer a profound and timeless witness to the faith. These communities emphasize the Tridentine Mass, the rich traditions of the Church, and a deep commitment to orthodoxy and reverence in worship.
Praying for vocations to these communities is essential for several reasons:
SPIRITUAL LEADERSHIP AND GUIDANCE: The spiritual formation offered in traditional seminaries and religious houses is rigorous and deeply rooted in the Church’s intellectual and spiritual traditions. Priests and religious formed in this environment are well-prepared to provide strong spiritual leadership and guidance to the faithful. They play a crucial role in fostering spiritual growth, administering the sacraments with reverence, and leading souls to Christ.
PRESERVATION OF LITURGICAL HERITAGE: Traditional Catholic communities are guardians of the Church’s ancient liturgical heritage. The Tridentine Mass, also known as the Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite, offers a deeply contemplative and reverent worship experience that has nourished countless saints. By praying for vocations, we support the continuity of this sacred tradition and ensure that future generations can experience the beauty and depth of traditional Catholic worship.
WITNESS TO ORTHODOXY: In an age of doctrinal confusion and moral relativism, traditional Catholic communities stand as beacons of orthodoxy. Their unwavering commitment to the timeless teachings of the Church provides a clear and steadfast witness to the truth. Praying for vocations helps sustain this witness and equips the Church with priests and religious who can boldly proclaim the faith without compromise.
Response to a Growing Demand
There is a growing interest and demand for traditional liturgy and spirituality among the faithful. Many young people, in particular, are drawn to the beauty and depth of traditional Catholic practices. By praying for vocations, we support the growth of these communities and respond to the spiritual needs and desires of many who seek a deeper connection with their faith.
Please pray for the new formation house proposed by Archbishop Vigano, and likewise our own effort to establish a formation house under my own aegis here in Brighton.
In conclusion, praying for vocations to the priesthood and religious life is essential for the Church, especially during times of crisis. It is a way to invite Christ to send more laborers to the harvest, honor the contributions of religious orders, and ask for their intercession in renewing the Church. By praying for vocations during this time, we are participating in the Church’s mission to spread the Gospel and to build a stronger, more vibrant faith community.
Restore Justice for Rev. Dr. Bernard Randall:End the Church of England’s Unfair Blacklisting
Rev. Dr. Bernard Randall, a former Church of England chaplain, was dismissed after delivering a sermon upholding Christian teachings on marriage and advising against feeling pressured to accept any ideology. Despite being cleared by various authorities, he remains blacklisted by his diocese as a safeguarding risk, solely for his adherence to biblical teachings. Legal challenges have revealed serious errors in the Church’s handling of his case. Six months on, Bernard is still barred from ministry, forcing him to seek other work.
Read more and sign the petition to demand the Church of England stop this unjust punishment and restore his position.
Only a few weeks into the new Parliament, a new threat to legalize assisted suicide has emerged. Lord Falconer’s Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults Bill secured second place in the Lord’s ballot for private members’ bills. Concurrently, a similar bill is under debate on the Isle of Man and has been approved in principle in Jersey.
The most pressing concern is in Scotland, where Liam McArthur MSP introduced the Assisted Dying Scotland Bill on March 27, 2024. The Health, Social Care and Sport Committee at Holyrood is calling for evidence on this bill, and responses are crucial by August 16, 2024. This consultation will influence the Committee’s recommendation on whether the bill should proceed.
Ethical and Practical Concerns
Opponents of assisted suicide argue that legalizing such practices can lead to significant ethical and practical issues. According to Right to Life UK, concerns include the potential for abuse, pressure on vulnerable individuals, and the undermining of trust in medical professionals. There is also the argument that legalizing assisted suicide can create a slippery slope leading to the normalization of euthanasia.
The pro-assisted suicide lobby is expected to make persistent efforts to legalize assisted suicide in the coming months and years. It is vital for opponents to be prepared to respond to these attempts, starting with the current threat in Scotland.
Key Points:
Terminology: “Assisted dying” is often used as a euphemism for assisted suicide and euthanasia. The UK proposals focus on assisted suicide, not euthanasia.
Reasons for Assisted Suicide: Common reasons include fear of becoming a burden, loss of autonomy, and fear of future pain rather than current pain.
Impact on Disabled People: Many disabled people and their advocacy groups oppose assisted suicide, fearing coercion and a reduction in their perceived value.
Safeguards and Slippery Slope: Evidence from other countries shows that safeguards around assisted suicide often erode over time, leading to broader and potentially more dangerous practices.
Effect on Suicide Rates: Legalizing assisted suicide has been associated with an increase in overall suicide rates.
Palliative Care: Good palliative care can alleviate the primary reasons people seek assisted suicide. However, the availability and quality of palliative care can be undermined by the legalization of assisted suicide.
Economic Pressures: There are concerns that financial pressures might lead to the promotion of assisted suicide as a cost-saving measure in healthcare systems.
Safeguarding risks
In Canada, since legalizing medically assisted death (MAiD) in 2016, the scope has expanded from terminally ill patients to include those with mental health conditions and marginalized individuals facing socio-economic pressures. Reports have shown cases where people seek assisted death due to poverty or inadequate housing rather than terminal illness.
Similarly, in the Netherlands and Belgium, initial restrictions on euthanasia have gradually loosened. For example, the number of dementia patients receiving euthanasia in the Netherlands has increased significantly, raising concerns about consent and the potential for abuse. Moreover, in Belgium, reports indicated a percentage of infant deaths involved active euthanasia by lethal injection, highlighting the risk of extending euthanasia practices to non-consenting or vulnerable populations.
These examples illustrate that once assisted suicide or euthanasia is legalized, the protections meant to safeguard vulnerable individuals often weaken, leading to broader applications that can endanger lives.
Increased Suicide Rates
Evidence from multiple studies indicates that legalizing assisted suicide is associated with an increase in overall suicide rates. Research analyzing the impact of assisted suicide laws in ten U.S. states showed a significant increase in total suicide rates following the legalization of assisted suicide. This increase was particularly notable among the elderly and women, with total suicide rates rising by about 18% overall and by 40% for women specifically.
Additionally, another study highlighted that legalizing assisted suicide might lower societal taboos against suicide, thereby potentially increasing the overall inclination towards suicide, not just assisted suicide. This is consistent with findings from European countries where the introduction of assisted suicide or euthanasia laws has not reduced non-assisted suicide rates but, in some cases, has led to an increase.
These findings suggest that rather than providing a safeguard, the legalization of assisted suicide may inadvertently contribute to higher rates of both assisted and unassisted suicides, challenging the notion that such laws offer a protective measure against suicide. This underscores the need for careful consideration of the broader societal impacts of legalizing assisted suicide.
How to Respond
Supporters in Scotland, and throughout the UK, are encouraged to respond to the consultation. It’s essential to use personal words rather than identical responses, as the Committee will disregard duplicates. Including professional expertise or personal stories can add weight to your response.
The pro-assisted suicide lobby is expected to make persistent efforts to legalize assisted suicide in the coming months and years. It is vital for opponents to be prepared to respond to these attempts, starting with the current threat in Scotland.
Please respond to this consultation by 16 August 2024.
Respond to the Consultation: The Committee’s decision will hinge on public feedback. Use the provided guide to craft a personalized response.
Who Should Respond: While responses from Scotland are crucial, input from across the UK is also important as the outcome in Scotland could influence decisions in Westminster.
What to Say: Draw from personal experience and professional expertise. Avoid identical responses to ensure your submission is considered.
The next few months are critical in the fight against the legalization of assisted suicide. Your participation can make a significant difference.
New assisted suicide bill in House of Lords a “profound threat” to vulnerable people in the UK SPUC
Assisted suicide laws increase suicide rates, especially among women, VoxEU
Legalizing Assisted Suicide Increases Suicide, National Review
Study: Legalizing Assisted Suicide Is Associated with Increased Suicides, National Review
Help Rescue the Freedom of Speech Act
In July, the UK’s Secretary of State for Education, Bridget Phillipson, issued a statement to the House of Commons indicating her intention to halt the commencement of the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act “in order to consider options, including its repeal.”
It was fitting that the Labour Government would declare war on free speech in a written statement, posted quietly to the House of Commons website on a Friday – a good day for bad news, as any journalist will tell you – and unaccompanied by any opportunity for parliamentary debate or scrutiny.
The Freedom of Speech Act was a carefully crafted piece of legislation, properly debated in both Houses of Parliament, and designed to address the free speech crisis in universities. It aimed to strengthen the legal duty on English universities to uphold and promote freedom of speech and introduced enforcement mechanisms, such as a complaints scheme overseen by the higher education regulator, to ensure universities adhered to this duty.
Having received cross-party support during the last Parliament, its most important clauses were due to be commenced on 1st August.
However, because Rishi Sunak called an election before the Act had been fully implemented, this Government has seized its chance to derail it.
The FSU has sent a pre-action protocol letter to the Education Secretary, threatening a judicial review if she does not reverse her decision.
To increase the chances of rescuing this vital piece of legislation, it is also necessary to maintain pressure on MPs. The FSU has provided a campaigning tool (here) to write to your local MP, urging them to ask Ms Phillipson to think again.
Completing the form is a simple is a simple, fast process that can have a significant impact. A template is provided to assist, but personalisation is encouraged. Every voice matters, and it is vital that individuals make theirs heard.
The threat to judicially review Bridget Phillipson’s decision is the first legal action this Government is facing, and anything involving lawyers is expensive.
Donations to the Fighting Fund to help cover some of these costs are welcome. Contributions can be made through the provided link. The FSU appreciates all support in this matter.
The Debate on Trans-Inclusive Conversion Therapy Bans
A recent case in Switzerland has highlighted the complexities and potential consequences of legislative measures related to conversion therapy. A 15-year-old Swiss girl was taken into state care after her parents refused to consent to a course of puberty blockers following a disputed diagnosis of gender dysphoria. This incident underscores the contentious nature of proposed legislative changes in the UK, as outlined in Sir Keir Starmer’s recent King’s Speech.
Labour’s Legislative Agenda
During the King’s Speech, Sir Keir Starmer presented his legislative programme for the current Parliamentary session, emphasizing Labour’s commitment to enacting a “full, trans-inclusive ban on conversion practices.” The proposal, while intended to protect vulnerable individuals from harmful conversion therapies, has raised significant concerns regarding free speech and the practical implications of such a ban.
Definitional Ambiguities
The term “conversion practices” remains ambiguously defined, leading to uncertainties about what actions and advice might be prohibited under the new law. This lack of clarity poses a risk to the freedoms enshrined in Articles 9 and 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protect freedom of thought and expression, respectively. The potential for these rights to be compromised is a major point of contention among critics of the proposed ban.
Concerns from the Free Speech Union (FSU)
The Free Speech Union (FSU) has voiced fears that a hastily implemented, poorly defined ban could severely restrict the ability of parents, teachers, religious leaders, and health professionals to engage in open dialogue with gender-confused children. The concern is that advocating for a child to consider all options and reflect before undergoing irreversible medical procedures could be misconstrued as a form of conversion therapy, thus falling foul of the new legislation.
The Swiss Case as a Cautionary Tale
The situation in Switzerland serves as a stark warning. In some cantons, where conversion therapy is already banned, a couple lost custody of their 15-year-old daughter because they did not agree to her taking puberty blockers immediately following her gender dysphoria diagnosis. This incident illustrates the potential extreme outcomes of such bans, where parental rights and alternative medical opinions may be overridden by a rigid interpretation of “gender affirmative care.”
Defining “Conversion Therapy” and Its Implications
Defining “conversion therapy” in a broad and imprecise manner could inadvertently criminalize standard religious practices and pastoral care. For instance, traditional religious counseling that encourages individuals to embrace their birth gender or offers prayer and spiritual guidance could be misconstrued as conversion therapy. This could lead to legal repercussions for clergy and lay counselors practicing their faith. The ambiguity in the definition risks entangling religious expressions and pastoral care in legal disputes, infringing on religious freedoms and the rights of individuals to seek spiritual guidance.
Ministerial Consultation Response
Archbishop Jerome of the Old Roman Apostolate has expressed significant concerns over similar legislation proposed in the UK, highlighting that the lack of clarity in defining “conversion therapy” could inadvertently criminalize standard religious practices and pastoral care. He stresses the need for precise language to ensure that legitimate religious and moral guidance is not misinterpreted as coercive or harmful practices.
Legitimate Religious and Moral Guidance
Legitimate religious and moral guidance refers to the spiritual advice and support provided by religious leaders and communities based on their beliefs and teachings. This includes counseling individuals to adhere to their faith’s principles, praying for them, and offering moral direction. The concern is that without clear definitions, these standard practices could be wrongfully classified as conversion therapy, leading to legal challenges and restrictions on religious freedom.
The Need for a Balanced Approach
Critics argue that a balanced approach is essential. While protecting individuals from genuine harm is paramount, it is equally important to safeguard the right to free speech and to ensure that all treatment options can be openly discussed. The fear is that without clear, precise definitions and protections, well-meaning legislation could lead to unintended and severe consequences, such as those seen in the Swiss case.
PSHEbrighton: Local Support for Parents and Families
A Brighton family, with support from PSHEbrighton, is threatening legal action against Brighton & Hove City Council over its “Classroom to Clinic” guidance, which advises schools on supporting transgender pupils. The family argues that the guidance encourages schools to facilitate children’s gender changes without parental consent, infringing on parental rights and potentially leading to irreversible medical decisions without proper oversight. They are particularly concerned that the policy allows schools to keep parents in the dark about their child’s gender transition, bypassing necessary medical consultations and psychological evaluations.
PSHEbrighton, an organization co-founded by Archbishop Jerome to support parents and families in similar situations, backs the family’s stance. They emphasize the importance of parental involvement in such significant decisions and highlight the need for policies that protect both children’s well-being and parental rights. The family’s lawyer has warned that if the council does not retract the guidance, legal action will proceed on grounds of violating parental rights and failing to provide proper duty of care to the children. The council defends its policy as a means to support transgender students and promote inclusivity in schools, but the case underscores the ongoing tensions and legal complexities surrounding transgender rights and parental consent in educational settings.
Schools in England and Wales are facing potential lawsuits from parents over their use of a gender toolkit that advises on supporting transgender students. The legal opinion by Karon Monaghan KC, recognised as the UK’s leading Human Rights lawyer, suggests the toolkit produced by Brighton & Hove City Council but used widely by other local authorities, fails in safeguarding and Equality Act legislation. The toolkit, intended to foster inclusivity, includes guidelines on allowing students to change their names and pronouns and access facilities corresponding to their gender identity, often without parental consent. Critics argue that these guidelines bypass parental rights and medical oversight, potentially leading to irreversible decisions about children’s gender transitions.
Action for Concerned Citizens
Given these concerns, the FSU is encouraging its members and the general public to voice their apprehensions by contacting their MPs. The FSU has provided an automated campaigning tool to facilitate this process, emphasizing the need to protect free speech, especially in contexts that could have life-altering consequences.
As the debate around trans-inclusive conversion therapy bans continues, it is crucial to strike a careful balance that protects individuals from harm while preserving fundamental rights to free thought and expression. The case of the Swiss teen underscores the importance of getting this balance right, to ensure that legislative measures do not inadvertently cause more harm than good.
Sir Keir Starmer must be remindedthat free speech is a fundamental human right
The Prime Minister’s recent crackdown on free speech is extremely concerning. Since early August, we have witnessed the most significant attack on free expression in this country since Oliver Cromwell outlawed all theatrical performances in 1642.
In response to the civil unrest that spread across the UK following the tragic killing of three children in Southport, Sir Keir has attributed the surge in violence to ‘misinformation’ and ‘disinformation’ on social media. He has called on authorities to prosecute individuals for making supposedly inflammatory statements online.
As a consequence, one man has been sentenced to 18 months in prison for sharing something “offensive” that someone else posted on Facebook, another was imprisoned for three years for posting “anti-Establishment rhetoric,” and a third was jailed for 18 months for chanting “Who the f*** is Allah?”
Stephen Parkinson, the Director of Public Prosecutions, has even issued a warning that people who share footage of the riots online could face prosecution. “People might think they’re not doing anything harmful, but they are, and the consequences will be visited upon them,” he said.
This kind of threatening language is more characteristic of a repressive regime than the birthplace of parliamentary democracy. It has sparked widespread fear across the country, with hundreds of thousands now worried they could be imprisoned for posting something politically incorrect online.
This must end. We need to remind the Prime Minister, a former human rights lawyer, that free speech is the cornerstone of all other rights; without it, we cannot defend any of the others.
Here’s how you can take action: If you’re concerned about the Prime Minister’s attack on free speech, please use our campaign tool to write to your local MP using our template letter.
Completing the form is simple and straightforward.
Here’s how you can take action
If you’re concerned about the Prime Minister’s assault on free speech, please use the FSU campaigning tool to write to your local MP, using the template letter.
Completing the form is a simple, fast process that can have a significant impact. We’ve even provided a template to help, but feel free to personalise it. Your voice matters and it’s vital that you make it heard.
The Winning Mindset is an organization that recognizes the necessity for a more balanced and discerning approach to engaging with the information-rich world we inhabit. Their educational seminars are specifically designed to inspire individuals to think deeply and critically, fostering personal growth and development. By refining these skills, individuals can enhance their ability to counter popular arguments and challenge the prevailing mindset.
The Winning Mindset is an organization that recognizes the necessity for a more balanced and discerning approach to engaging with the information-rich world we inhabit. Their educational seminars are specifically designed to inspire individuals to think deeply and critically, fostering personal growth and development. By refining these skills, individuals can enhance their ability to counter popular arguments and challenge the prevailing mindset.
Current Public Petitions Regarding Relationships & Sex Education (RSE) in the UK
There are several public petitions related to Relationships and Sex Education (RSE) in the UK, reflecting various concerns and opinions on the subject. Here are some notable ones:
Strip Ruth Hunt of her peerage for her role in the gender medical scandal
Summary: There has been wide cross-party support for the Cass Review, which delivered stinging criticisms of NHS gender clinics and found that for most young people, a medical pathway is not the best way to treat gender-related distress. It also found there is little or no evidence about the long-term effects of puberty blockers and sex hormones for the under-18s.
Summary: Following the election, it will be the responsibility of the incoming government and the new Education Secretary to review this consultation and decide whether to uphold the guidance and whether it should be statutory – which means schools MUST follow it.
Summary: Christian Concern is objecting to a massive display of Progress Pride flags planned for Regent Street in 2024. These divisive, gaudy displays are completely inappropriate for this historic, iconic street at the centre of London. They make everyone who doesn’t support the whole LGBTQ+ agenda feel unwelcome.
Labour’s ‘conversion therapy’ ban will harm children, criminalise parents, and place restrictions on talking and praying
Summary: Labour has confirmed it will proceed with its pledged “trans-inclusive” ban on ‘conversion therapy’ and ‘conversion practices’. Announcing that work has begun on a ban, Sir Keir Starmer said it was “a promise that has lingered in the lobby of good intentions for far too long”. While the specifics of the ban remain unclear, it is important to note that harmful physical ‘conversion practices’ do not happen in the UK and are already illegal. Therefore, any ban on ‘conversion practices’ would primarily impact free speech, including consensual conversations, counselling, and even prayer.
For more detailed information, you can refer to the specific petitions linked above and the GOV.UK website, which provides comprehensive guidance and updates on RSE policies.
Current Public Petitions Regarding Changes to the UK’s Abortion Laws
There are several active public petitions in the UK addressing proposed changes to abortion laws. These petitions reflect a wide range of perspectives on this highly contentious issue. Here are some of the notable petitions:
Remove references to ‘gender identity’ from relationships education guidance
Summary: This petition argues against the inclusion of gender identity in RSE guidance, citing concerns about political indoctrination and inconsistency with the Education Act.
Review abortion laws to reduce the gestational limit
Summary: A cross-party group of MPs has proposed reducing the upper gestational limit for abortions from 24 weeks to 22 weeks. This petition supports the amendment, highlighting that medical advancements have increased the survival rate of babies born at 22 weeks.
Summary: This petition seeks to make it explicitly illegal to perform abortions based on the sex of the fetus, addressing concerns that sex-selective abortions are occurring in the UK despite current legal ambiguities.
Summary: This petition opposes any move to decriminalise abortion in the UK, arguing that current laws provide necessary safeguards to ensure ethical medical practice and protect both women and unborn children.
Summary: This petition calls for the cessation of ‘DIY’ abortion services, arguing that they endanger women’s lives and lack proper medical supervision, thus advocating for stricter regulations.
A General Election has been called for 4 July 2024
Summary: Please contact your MP now asking them to make it clear to their party leadership that abortion decriminalisation and assisted suicide should not be included in manifestoes. You can use our tool below.
Current Public Petitions Regarding Abortion Laws in the USA
Nebraska Right to Abortion Initiative (2024)
Summary: This initiative proposes an amendment to the Nebraska Constitution to establish a right to abortion until fetal viability, defined by the professional judgment of the treating healthcare practitioner.
Summary: The Moral Outcry is a petition aimed at making abortion illegal in all 50 states in the USA. The petition was instrumental in the reversal of Roe v. Wade and continues to push for comprehensive abortion bans nationwide.
These petitions represent the diverse and often conflicting views on abortion laws in the UK, highlighting ongoing debates about gestational limits, sex-selective practices, and the broader legal framework surrounding abortion.
Heavenly Father, we humbly beseech You to forgive the countless sins committed by mankind, for we have strayed far from Your commandments and fallen short of Your glory. Grant us Your boundless grace and strength to persevere in Your service, that we may walk in Your ways with steadfast hearts, ever seeking to do Your will. We place our trust in Your infinite mercy and ask for Your compassion and forgiveness…
Miserere nobis
Support this Newsletter and the work of the Archbishop and the Old Roman Apostolate
