Tag: liturgical traditions

w/c 12/01/25

ORDO

Dies	12 SUN	13 MON	14 TUE	15 WED	16 THU	17 FRI	18 SAT	19 SUN
Officium	Dominica infra Octavam Epiphaniæ	Die Octava Epiphaniæ	S. Hilarii Ep& C Ec.Doc	S. Pauli Primi Eremitæ et Confessoris	S. Marcelli Papæ et Martyris	S. Antonii Abbatis	Cathedræ S. Petri	SANCTISSIMI NOMINIS IESU
CLASSIS	Dom. minor	Feria major	Duplex	Duplex	Semiduplex	Duplex	Duplex majus	Duplex II
Color	Albus *	Albus	Albus	Albus	Rubeum	Albus	Albus	Albus
MISSA	In excelso throno	Ecce, advenit	In médio	Justus	In virtúte	Os justi	Státuit	In nomine Iesu
Orationes	2a. Pro Octavam Epiphania		2a. S. Felicis P&M	2a. S. Mauri Abbatis	2a. de S Maria 3a. Contra Persecutores		2a. S. Priscæ Virginis	2a. Dom. II Post Epiph
NOTAE	Gl. Cr. Pref. et Communicantes Epiphania	Gl. Cr. Pref. et Communicantes Epiphania	Gl. Cr. Pref. Communis	Gl. Pref. Communis	Gl. Pref. Communis	Gl. Pref. Communis	Gl. Cr. Pref. de Apostolis	Gl. Cr. Pref. de Nativitate
Nota Bene

Fons Vitae

From the Primus

HE ✠Jerome OSJV, Titular Archbishop of Selsey

Carissimi, Beloved in Christ,

As we celebrate the Baptism of our Lord, we are drawn to contemplate the profound mystery of this event, an occasion rich with meaning for the Church and for every believer. In His Baptism, Christ reveals to us the depths of His humility, the fullness of His identity, and the wellspring of new life—the Fons Vitae, the Fount of Life, from which we draw grace, renewal, and salvation.

The Humility of the Incarnate Word

When Christ entered the waters of the Jordan, He who was without sin submitted Himself to a rite of repentance. In doing so, He united Himself with sinners, taking upon Himself the burden of our frailty and brokenness. St. John the Baptist, astonished by this act, proclaimed, “I need to be baptized by You, and do You come to me?” Yet Christ replied, “Let it be so now, for thus it is fitting for us to fulfill all righteousness” (Matthew 3:14-15). His humility is not weakness but the power of divine love, stooping to lift us from the depths of our fallen state.

In reflecting on this humility, we are called to examine our own lives. Do we approach God and one another with a spirit of humility, acknowledging our need for grace and the gifts we receive from others? Let Christ’s example inspire us to embrace the humility that is the foundation of holiness.

The Revelation of the Trinity

The Baptism of Christ is a theophany, a revelation of the Most Holy Trinity. As the Son emerges from the waters, the heavens are opened, the Spirit descends like a dove, and the Father’s voice proclaims, “This is My beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased” (Matthew 3:17). Here, the divine mystery of one God in three Persons is revealed for our adoration.

This revelation reminds us of our own Trinitarian calling. Through our Baptism, we are incorporated into the life of the Trinity, becoming adopted children of the Father, co-heirs with Christ, and temples of the Holy Spirit. Let us strive to live in this communion, allowing the love of the Triune God to shape our thoughts, words, and actions.

The Fount of New Life

Christ’s Baptism sanctified the waters, making them the vehicle of grace in our own Baptism. As St. Paul teaches, “We were buried therefore with Him by baptism into death, in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, we too might walk in newness of life” (Romans 6:4). Baptism is not merely a rite; it is our entry into the life of God, the washing away of sin, and the beginning of our pilgrimage toward eternal glory.

As we meditate on the waters of the Jordan, let us renew our baptismal promises, rejecting sin and professing our faith in God. May we recognize our Baptism as the foundation of our Christian identity, the source of our mission, and the wellspring of hope in our journey toward the Kingdom.

Conclusion: Living the Mystery of the Fount of Life

The Baptism of Christ calls us to a life transformed by grace. From the Fons Vitae, we are invited to drink deeply, allowing the living water of the Spirit to refresh and renew us. Let us follow Christ’s example of humility, live in communion with the Triune God, and embrace the new life that Baptism bestows.

May the Lord, who was baptized for our sake, grant us the grace to live faithfully as His disciples, so that, nourished by the Fount of Life, we may one day share in the fullness of His glory.

With every blessing in Christ,

---

---

Liturgical Notes

---

The Sunday within the Octave of the Epiphany unfolds like a luminous page of sacred theology, manifesting the continued revelation of Christ’s divine mission. Rooted in the Tridentine liturgy, its themes elevate the faithful into the radiant mystery of divine wisdom made flesh and dwelling among us. The Mass texts, imbued with theological richness, harmonize beautifully with the ancient commentaries of Dom Prosper Guéranger, Fr Pius Pasch, and others, who illuminate the layers of meaning embedded in this liturgical moment.

Christ the Wisdom of God

The Epistle from Romans (12:1–5) exhorts the faithful to offer themselves as a “living sacrifice” to God, reflecting the wisdom of divine service. Dom Guéranger highlights the profound transformation implied in this Pauline call: “True worship is not merely external, but a total oblation of the self, conforming our will to the divine will.” This theme finds its echo in the liturgy’s offertory, where bread and wine signify not only the Church’s offering but the surrender of each Christian to the sovereign designs of God.

The Gospel (Luke 2:42–52), recounting the finding of the Child Jesus in the Temple, underscores His divine wisdom. Fr Leonard Goffine comments on the dual revelation here: Christ’s humanity, obedient to Mary and Joseph, and His divinity, manifesting the eternal Wisdom that astounds the doctors of the Law. The juxtaposition of His submission and divine authority invites the faithful into contemplation of His perfect integration of humility and glory.

Manifestation of Divine Order

Fr Pius Pasch observes that the Tridentine liturgy for this Sunday reveals the interplay of order and mystery. The Collect implores God to “grant us both to perceive and to do what is right,” situating the Church’s worship within the divine pedagogy of grace. Fr Pasch links this prayer to the Incarnation itself, in which divine wisdom restores the fractured harmony of creation, offering humanity the example and means to live rightly ordered lives.

The gradual and alleluia antiphons further enrich this theme. The gradual, drawn from Psalm 71, speaks of the universal kingship of Christ, “He shall rule from sea to sea.” Fr Mary Magdalen links this to the missionary impulse of the Epiphany season, reminding the Church of her charge to proclaim the kingship of Christ over all creation.

Adoration and Obedience

Fr Baur, in his classic The Light of the World, emphasizes the importance of adoration in this liturgical context. The wise men’s homage at Bethlehem is fulfilled in the interior worship of the faithful, who, like the magi, bring their gifts—not gold, frankincense, and myrrh, but hearts purified by grace. The liturgical chants of the day, particularly the Introit In excelso throno, lift the soul to this spirit of adoration, placing Christ as the central figure of our worship.

The liturgy also underscores the role of obedience, which Fr Mary Magdalen ties to the life of the Holy Family. Christ’s submission to His earthly parents points to the sanctification of ordinary life through fidelity to divine will. For the Christian, this becomes a model of docility to God’s commands and the teachings of the Church, the true temple of divine wisdom on earth.

A Call to Spiritual Maturity

The Gospel scene offers a poignant call to spiritual maturity. Fr Leonard Goffine notes that the twelve-year-old Christ, entering the temple to engage with the doctors of the Law, symbolizes the transition from childhood to a more profound engagement with the divine mysteries. This invites the faithful to embrace their own growth in the spiritual life, moving from the milk of spiritual infancy to the solid food of mature discipleship.

The Sunday within the Octave of the Epiphany reminds us that the revelation of Christ is not a static event but an ongoing encounter. As Dom Guéranger writes, “The mysteries of this holy season call us to be vigilant, that we may perceive with ever-increasing clarity the Light of the world and walk steadfastly in its radiance.”

In the Tridentine liturgy, this call resounds through every prayer, chant, and reading, summoning us to deeper union with Christ, the incarnate Wisdom of God. Through adoration, obedience, and the pursuit of spiritual maturity, we enter into the mystery of the Word made flesh, whose light shines not only in Bethlehem but in the heart of every believer.

---

A sermon for Sunday

by the Revd Dr Robert Wilson PhD (Cantab), Old Roman Apostolate UK

Sunday within the Octave of Epiphany

And he went down with them and came to Nazareth, and was subject to them. And his mother kept all these words in her heart. And Jesus advanced in wisdom and age and in grace with God and man.

At Epiphany we heard how Christ was manifested to the Gentiles through the visitation of the Magi. In the Sundays following the Epiphany we hear passages from the Gospels that show other occasions when the nature of Jesus was especially manifested. Today we hear the one passage in the Gospels that sheds light on the period between his conception and early childhood, and his public ministry. As faithful Israelites his family travelled to Jerusalem to observe the great feasts of the liturgical year. After the feast (we do not know which feast it was, presumably either the Passover, Pentecost or the Feast of Tabernacles) was completed Jesus remained in Jerusalem rather than returning with his family. People often travelled in large groups, partly as an expression of solidarity and partly for safety. After a day’s journey his parents realised that Jesus was not among his kinsfolk and acquaintances and returned to Jerusalem to seek him. A few days later they finally found him in the temple “sitting in the midst of the doctors, hearing them and asking them questions. And all that heard him were astonished at his wisdom and his answers”. His mother said to him, “Son, why hast thou done so to us? Behold thy father and I have sought thee sorrowing.” Jesus said to them, “How is it that you sought me? Did you not know that I must be about my Father’s business?” It was an early instance of one who would later astonish his contemporaries in his public ministry because he taught with authority and not as the scribes.

His mother did not at the time fully understand this, but she kept all these things and pondered them in her heart. It is important to emphasise that whereas the ancient Greeks located the centre of the personality in the reason or intellect and tended to disparage emotion, the Jews located the centre of the personality in the heart. The heart included both the reason or intellect as well as the emotions. The heart was deceitful above all things and desperately corrupt (as Jeremiah had said) but if the people turned to God with all their heart and repented of their sins then they could be reconciled to God. Their God was not the Unmoved Mover of Aristotle, but the passionate and compassionate God of the Bible who (as St. Augustine later put it) had made us for himself so that our hearts are restless until they find their rest in him.

Jesus grew up in Nazareth, not in the palaces of the mighty, or among the sages and philosophers of the age. Galilee was a remote corner of the Roman empire. It was thriving and populous, but (in the eyes of the sophisticated) culturally a backwater. The Gospels do not tell us anything about the childhood and early years of Jesus before his public ministry and the most reasonable explanation of this silence is that during these years nothing of any great outward significance actually happened. This period marked Jesus’ hidden years before his public ministry and the only sign of what was to come was the type of incident that occurred in Jerusalem in today’s Gospel, an early sign of one who would later be recognised as teaching with authority and not as the scribes.

None the less we can perhaps gain a picture of his home in Nazareth from some of the scenes in the parables of the gospels, as it is reasonable to assume that in his parables Jesus was drawing on scenes from his own experience and childhood. We can picture a clay built, flat roofed, one roomed house whose owner when disturbed at midnight does not need to rise in order to speak to the man outside the door (Luke 11). The furniture is simple: the saucer shaped lamp made of clay, the bed, the bushel or meal tub, which could be put over the lamp’s smoking wick at bed time. We can picture his mother baking for the family’s needs and hiding the leaven in three measures of meal, a process which Jesus would later use as a parable of the growth of the Kingdom of God (Matthew 13). It was not a rich house but one in which the finding of a lost coin was a matter for real rejoicing (Luke 15). It was in this environment that one could learn that an old coat could not tolerate a new patch of unshrunk cloth, an image that would later symbolise the contrast between the old order and the new (Mark 2). In the streets and in the market places people gathered (Luke 7). Jesus’ saying about yokes can be seen to be based on the period when he followed in the family trade (Matthew 11), while the sight of a ploughman at his job suggested the firm quality required of a true disciple. St. John says that “he knew what was in man” (John 2) and this darker side of human nature can be seen in some of the characters who appear in the parables. These included the far seeing rogue in the parable of the Unjust Steward (Luke 16), a self satisfied materialist like the Rich Fool (Luke 12) and a self righteous Pharisee who thanked God that he was not as other men who were “lesser breeds without the law” (Luke 18). These scenes from the parables show a mind that was simple and direct and made the point with a minimum of words.

Jesus’ education would have been in the school attached to the local synagogue. The standard of literacy among the Jews was higher than that of other peoples since it was necessary for the people to understand the Law and the Prophets. That being said, Jesus’ education was not like that of St. Paul, among the learned scribes such as Gamaliel in Jerusalem, but of the more rudimentary kind that most of the population received. Though he was quite capable of arguing with the scribes on their own ground he spoke with an authority like the Hebrew prophets of old that really got to the heart of the matter. His mother tongue was Aramaic, while the liturgy in the synagogues was in Hebrew. Greek was the international language of the time and must have been frequently heard in “Galilee of the Gentiles” and would certainly have been necessary for a Galilean fisherman such as St. Peter or St. John to ply their trade. There is a modern scholarly snobbery that holds that Greek would have been beyond the capabilities of Galilean fisherman but this is quite wrong. It would have been impossible to work as a fisherman, still more to later travel as missionaries like St. Peter and St. John without knowledge of Greek.

All of this helps us to build up a picture of one who grew up among people waiting for the coming age of redemption and who was made in all things like his brethren, as the Epistle to the Hebrews would later put it. He dwelt not among the palaces of the mighty or the schools of the philosophers or even among the learned scribes of his own people, but in a remote backwater of the empire. Yet this would later prove to be the seedbed of a faith that would later capture the very Empire at whose hands he eventually met his death.

O Lord Jesus Christ, who hast deigned to be made like unto men, the sharer of our sorrows, the companion of our journeys, the light of our ignorance, the remedy of our infirmity, so fill us with thy spirit, and endue us with thy grace, that as thou hast been made like unto us, we may grow more like unto thee, for thy mercy’s sake.

---

Feasts this week

The liturgical calendar of the Tridentine Rite is rich with feasts that occur between January 12th and January 19th, offering the faithful a rhythm of devotion, theological reflection, and commemoration of saints and mysteries. This period, still suffused with the light of Epiphanytide, combines major feasts, commemorations, and lesser feasts that deepen the Church’s meditation on the Incarnation and its salvific consequences.

January 12th: The liturgy on January 12th traditionally recalls the Baptism of Christ in the Jordan, although this Theophany is more explicitly celebrated on the octave day of the Epiphany (January 13th). The Baptism of Christ is a manifestation of His divine Sonship, the Trinity, and His mission as the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world. In the Divine Office and Mass, this commemoration emphasizes Christ’s humility in submitting to John’s baptism and the sanctification of the waters for the sacrament of Baptism.

January 13th: The Octave Day of the Epiphany concludes the solemn celebration of the Epiphany, often with a focus on the Baptism of Christ, one of the three great Theophanies (alongside the visit of the Magi and the miracle at Cana). The liturgical texts continue to proclaim the universal kingship of Christ, His divine Sonship, and the sanctification of creation. The antiphons and hymns in the Divine Office glorify the mystery of the Trinity revealed at the Jordan: the Father’s voice, the Spirit descending, and the Son’s mission inaugurated.

January 14th: On January 14th, the Church honors St. Hilary of Poitiers (d. 367), a staunch defender of the faith during the Arian crisis. Known as the “Athanasius of the West,” St. Hilary’s theological works, particularly on the Trinity, solidified orthodox Christology. The liturgy emphasizes his role as a bishop, teacher, and defender of truth. The Collect for his feast highlights his zeal for protecting the Church from heresy and his fidelity to the divinity of Christ.

January 15th: St. Paul the First Hermit (d. c. 342) is commemorated on this day as the father of hermitical life. Fleeing persecution, St. Paul spent nearly a century in solitude, sustained miraculously by God. His life symbolizes the Church’s call to prayer, penance, and detachment from worldly concerns.

On the same day, St. Maurus, a disciple of St. Benedict, is honored for his holiness and miracles. Known for his obedience to his spiritual father and for rescuing a drowning monk through miraculous intervention, St. Maurus represents the fruitfulness of monastic life in imitation of Christ.

January 16th: Pope St. Marcellus I (d. 309) is celebrated as a confessor and martyr who guided the Church during a time of persecution and internal turmoil. His steadfastness in upholding Church discipline and his refusal to compromise with the lapsi (those who renounced their faith under persecution) reflect the Church’s call to fidelity and penance. The liturgy of his feast honors his pastoral zeal and courage in the face of opposition, both from the Roman Empire and from dissenting Christians.

January 17th: St. Anthony the Abbot (d. 356), often called the “Father of Monasticism,” is one of the great figures of the early Church. Born to wealth, he renounced his possessions to live a life of asceticism and prayer in the Egyptian desert. His feast celebrates his spiritual battles, his wisdom, and his role in founding a way of life that continues to inspire countless men and women to embrace the evangelical counsels. The liturgical texts for his feast highlight his detachment from the world, his fight against demonic temptations, and his profound communion with God.

January 18th: The Feast of the Chair of St. Peter at Rome is one of the most significant feasts in this period. It honors the apostolic authority entrusted to St. Peter by Christ, particularly his ministry in Rome as the foundation of the Church’s unity and teaching office. The liturgical focus is on Peter’s confession of faith, his primacy among the apostles, and his role as the visible head of the Church. The Mass and Divine Office emphasize the papacy’s divine institution as the guarantee of unity and orthodoxy.

This day also marks the beginning of the Church Unity Octave, a traditional period of prayer for the return of all Christians to the unity of the Catholic Church under the See of Peter.

A Time of Grace and Devotion

The feasts between January 12th and 19th reflect the Church’s rich liturgical tradition, offering examples of sanctity in diverse states of life—bishops, hermits, popes, martyrs, and confessors. These days also invite the faithful to meditate on central mysteries of the faith, from Christ’s manifestation in the Jordan to the unity of the Church under the Chair of St. Peter. By commemorating these saints and mysteries, the liturgy nurtures the soul, inspiring us to greater fidelity, prayer, and witness in our own lives.

---

CURRENT AFFAIRS

---

The Holy Year 2025: A Tradition Rooted in Divine Mercy

The Holy Year, or Jubilee, is one of the most profound expressions of the Catholic Church’s understanding of God’s mercy and the call to repentance. Instituted as a sacred time of grace, it draws pilgrims from across the globe to encounter the inexhaustible love of Christ, made manifest through the Church’s sacraments, especially Confession and the Eucharist. The upcoming Jubilee of 2025, aptly themed “Pilgrims of Hope,” is poised to rekindle in the hearts of the faithful a longing for the heavenly Jerusalem amidst the trials of this earthly exile.

Theological and Historical Foundations

The Jubilee has its origin in the Mosaic Law, where every fiftieth year was sanctified as a time of liberation and renewal. In the Book of Leviticus, the Lord commands: “You shall hallow the fiftieth year, and proclaim liberty throughout all the land to its inhabitants. It shall be a jubilee for you” (Lev. 25:10). This observance, divinely ordained for the Israelites, prefigured the greater spiritual freedom that would come through Christ, the Redeemer, who proclaims: “If the Son makes you free, you will be free indeed” (John 8:36).

The Catholic Church first instituted a Jubilee Year in 1300 under Pope Boniface VIII. Intended as a time for the remission of sins and the punishment due to sin, it provided plenary indulgences to those who made a pilgrimage to the Eternal City and fulfilled the requisite conditions. Originally celebrated every hundred years, the frequency was adjusted to fifty, and later to twenty-five years by Pope Paul II in 1470, reflecting the Church’s desire to make this extraordinary grace more accessible to the faithful.

The 2025 Jubilee: “Pilgrims of Hope”

The choice of the theme “Pilgrims of Hope” resonates deeply with the Church’s eschatological mission. In a world overshadowed by materialism, war, and spiritual indifference, the Holy Year invites the faithful to lift their eyes heavenward, embracing the theological virtue of hope as a guiding light. Pope Francis has called for this Jubilee to be a time of spiritual renewal, urging Catholics to engage in works of mercy, prayer, and penance, while also reaching out to the marginalized and forgotten.

The Holy Door: A Symbol of Christ, the Way

A central feature of every Jubilee is the ceremonial opening of the Holy Doors in Rome’s four major basilicas: St. Peter’s, St. John Lateran, St. Mary Major, and St. Paul Outside the Walls. These doors, normally sealed, are opened as a visible sign of the extraordinary pathway to salvation offered during the Jubilee. As Our Lord Himself declared, “I am the door. If anyone enters by Me, he will be saved” (John 10:9). Pilgrims who pass through these sacred portals and fulfill the prescribed conditions—sacramental Confession, reception of Holy Communion, and prayer for the Pope’s intentions—are granted a plenary indulgence, remitting all temporal punishment due to sin.

A Time of Renewal Amidst Crisis

The 2025 Jubilee occurs at a time when the Church and the world are beset by crises: geopolitical instability, moral relativism, and a growing apostasy among the baptized. It thus presents an urgent call to Catholics to return to the sources of the faith. Traditional liturgy, doctrinal clarity, and personal sanctification must become the cornerstones of the Church’s response to these challenges. The Church must not hesitate to proclaim the unchanging truths of the Gospel in the face of worldly opposition, for only in Christ can true freedom and hope be found.

A Pilgrimage for the Ages

Rome is already preparing to welcome the millions of pilgrims expected to descend upon the city throughout 2025. Restoration projects, infrastructural improvements, and heightened security measures are underway. Yet the heart of the Jubilee lies not in external preparations but in the interior renewal of the soul. Pilgrims will gather at St. Peter’s Basilica, where the Holy Father will open the Holy Door, signaling the beginning of this sacred time. Special liturgical celebrations, catechetical events, and opportunities for Confession will punctuate the year, culminating in a fervent renewal of faith among the people of God.

Conclusion

The Holy Year 2025 is more than a historical event; it is a providential moment for the Church to reaffirm her mission in the world. Rooted in the tradition of the Jubilees of the Old Covenant and perfected in the grace of the New, it calls all men to embrace the divine mercy of Christ. In a world filled with despair, the Church proclaims with unwavering confidence: “We have this hope as a sure and steadfast anchor of the soul” (Heb. 6:19). May the faithful respond to this call with fervent hearts, rediscovering in the pilgrimage of the Jubilee their eternal home in Christ.

---

The Week of Prayer for Christian Unity

The Week of Prayer for Christian Unity, beginning on the Feast of the Chair of St. Peter at Rome (January 18th), is a significant observance in the modern liturgical calendar, but its origins and contemporary evolution warrant careful examination. Historically, this octave of prayer grew from distinctly Catholic roots, shaped by the vision of fostering unity through the return of separated Christians to the fullness of the Catholic Church. Over time, however, its focus and praxis have shifted, raising concerns among traditional Catholics about its theological coherence and fidelity to the Church’s mission.

Historical Origins: The Church Unity Octave

The roots of the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity trace back to 1908, when the Reverend Paul Wattson, an Anglican priest who later converted to Catholicism, established the Church Unity Octave. His vision was explicitly rooted in Catholic teaching: he prayed for the return of all Christians to the unity of the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church under the See of Peter. This initiative was warmly embraced by Pope St. Pius X, who granted it his blessing, and Pope Benedict XV later extended its observance throughout the universal Church.

The choice of dates, January 18th to January 25th, was deliberate and symbolic. The octave began with the Feast of the Chair of St. Peter at Rome, emphasizing the apostolic authority of the papacy as the foundation of unity, and concluded with the Feast of the Conversion of St. Paul, a reminder of the transformative power of grace in bringing souls into the Church. This structure reflected the Church’s traditional understanding of unity—not as a negotiated compromise, but as a call for all Christians to share in the fullness of truth entrusted to the Catholic Church.

Theological Vision: Unity through Truth

The original Church Unity Octave reflected the Catholic principle of extra Ecclesiam nulla salus (outside the Church there is no salvation), as articulated by figures like St. Cyprian and reaffirmed in the teachings of the Council of Florence and Pope Leo XIII. Fr. Paul Wattson’s vision, shared by many contemporaries, was that true unity could only be achieved when separated Christians recognized the necessity of communion with the See of Peter. Dom Prosper Guéranger, writing decades earlier, had articulated a similar vision: “Unity is the gift of Christ to His Church, and all who desire it must come to Him through her.”

The prayers of the octave were deeply Catholic, pleading for the grace of conversion for Protestants, Orthodox, and others who had separated from the Church. It was not an exercise in interfaith dialogue as understood today but a mission of evangelization, rooted in the conviction that the Catholic Church is the sole ark of salvation.

Contemporary Evolution and Criticisms

The Church Unity Octave underwent significant transformation in the mid-20th century, particularly following the Second Vatican Council. The spirit of ecumenism that emerged during this period led to the reframing of the octave as the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity, with a broader emphasis on fostering dialogue and collaboration among Christian denominations. This shift was formalized through the efforts of the World Council of Churches and the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity, which began jointly organizing the observance.

For many traditional Catholics, these developments represent a departure from the original intent of the octave. Several key criticisms have been raised:

1. Relativizing the Truth
   Traditional commentators argue that the contemporary praxis often adopts a posture of indifferentism, suggesting an equivalence between Catholicism and other Christian traditions. This approach undermines the Church’s claim to be the one true Church founded by Christ, as affirmed in documents like Dominus Iesus (2000), which reiterates that the fullness of grace and truth subsists in the Catholic Church alone.
2. Loss of Evangelical Zeal
   The original octave was a fervent plea for the conversion of souls to Catholic unity. In contrast, the modern Week of Prayer is frequently criticized for neglecting this missionary dimension, focusing instead on shared prayer and dialogue without addressing fundamental doctrinal divergences.
3. Ambiguity in Language
   The language of contemporary ecumenism often avoids discussing sensitive but essential topics, such as the primacy of the pope, the sacrificial nature of the Mass, or the necessity of the sacraments for salvation. Traditionalists argue that such omissions fail to present the fullness of Catholic teaching.
4. Collaboration Without Conversion
   While collaboration in social and charitable initiatives is laudable, traditional critics warn that this can sometimes mask deeper theological disagreements. Such partnerships may give the appearance of unity while leaving the underlying divisions unresolved.

A Return to Authentic Unity

The concerns raised by traditional Catholics do not dismiss the importance of Christian unity but call for a return to an authentic vision of unity grounded in truth. As Dom Guéranger wrote, “Unity is not achieved by the abandonment of truth but by its embrace.” The Petrine ministry, commemorated on January 18th, remains the divinely instituted means by which Christ gathers His flock. Unity, therefore, is not a human project but a divine gift that flows from faithfulness to the teachings of Christ as safeguarded by the Church.

The Feast of the Chair of St. Peter is a powerful reminder that Christian unity is inseparable from the papacy. Fr. Leonard Goffine’s reflections on this feast underscore that true unity is realized when all Christians acknowledge the primacy of Peter’s successor as the visible head of the Church on earth. In this light, the original Church Unity Octave offers a model for how the faithful can pray for unity: with zeal for the truth, charity for the separated brethren, and unwavering fidelity to the Catholic faith.

Conclusion: Praying with Conviction

The Week of Prayer for Christian Unity, if understood and practiced in continuity with its origins, remains a valuable spiritual exercise. It reminds the faithful of Christ’s prayer “that they may all be one” (John 17:21), while challenging us to work for unity in fidelity to the Church’s mission. As we commemorate the Feast of the Chair of St. Peter, let us renew our commitment to this mission, praying not only for the visible reunion of all Christians but for their incorporation into the fullness of the Catholic faith, which is the pillar and foundation of truth (1 Timothy 3:15).

---

Cantuar: Sede vacante

The See of Canterbury: A Historical Foundation

The See of Canterbury, established in 597 AD, holds a pivotal place in the history of English Christianity. Founded by St. Augustine, who was sent by Pope Gregory the Great to evangelize the Anglo-Saxons, it quickly became the center of ecclesiastical authority in England. Over the centuries, its archbishops have profoundly influenced religious, political, and cultural developments in the nation.

Notable Archbishops Before the Reformation

Before the Reformation, the Archbishops of Canterbury were instrumental in shaping the religious identity of England. St. Augustine, the first Archbishop, began the conversion of England to Christianity, establishing a lasting spiritual foundation. In the medieval period, figures like St. Anselm, a theologian and philosopher renowned for his ontological argument for God’s existence, underscored the intellectual and spiritual vitality of the see. Anselm’s tenure also highlighted the tensions between the Church and monarchy, as he clashed with King William II over the Church’s independence from royal control.

The Role of Canterbury During the Reformation

During the Reformation, Canterbury remained central to England’s religious transformation. Thomas Cranmer, who became Archbishop in 1533, played a decisive role in the English Reformation. Under the auspices of Henry VIII, Cranmer facilitated the separation of the Church of England from Rome by supporting the annulment of the king’s marriage to Catherine of Aragon. Cranmer’s theological leanings leaned towards Protestant reform, and his authorship of the Book of Common Prayer profoundly shaped Anglican liturgy, emphasizing English worship and Protestant doctrines like justification by faith.

Post-Reformation Canterbury

After the Reformation, the See of Canterbury adapted to its new role as the center of the Church of England. Matthew Parker, appointed during the reign of Elizabeth I, was instrumental in the Elizabethan Religious Settlement. His efforts sought to reconcile Catholic and Protestant elements into a cohesive religious identity, establishing the Anglican “via media.” Later, William Laud, Archbishop during the early 17th century, advocated for high-church Anglicanism and religious uniformity, which provoked conflict with Puritan factions and contributed to the political unrest leading to the English Civil War.

The Significance of Canterbury Pre- and Post-Reformation

The significance of Canterbury evolved from being the Pope’s representative in England to the principal leader of an independent national church. Before the Reformation, the Archbishop of Canterbury wielded immense authority as a mediator between the monarchy and the Vatican, and the see was a symbol of the unity of Western Christendom. Post-Reformation, Canterbury became a symbol of English Protestant identity. The Archbishop assumed the role of spiritual leader of the Church of England, while the monarch was declared its Supreme Governor, reflecting a new intertwining of religion and national identity.

The Metropolitical and Primatial Role of Canterbury

The Archbishop of Canterbury holds dual roles as a metropolitical and primatial figure. As a metropolitical see, Canterbury oversees other dioceses in its ecclesiastical province, with the Archbishop serving as a metropolitan bishop. Its primatial role designates the Archbishop as the senior bishop of the national church, holding the title “Primate of All England.” In contrast, the Archbishop of York, while also a primate, carries the title “Primate of England,” signifying Canterbury’s historical precedence as the senior see, rooted in Augustine’s foundational mission.

The Tenure of Justin Welby

The tenure of Justin Welby as Archbishop, beginning in 2013 and ending with his resignation in January 2025, was marked by both significant initiatives and controversies. Welby sought to address contemporary challenges, including debates over same-sex relationships and the ordination of women. However, these issues exposed deep fissures within the Anglican Communion. In 2023, the Church of England’s decision to bless same-sex unions resulted in severe criticism from traditionalist Anglican provinces, particularly within the Global South Fellowship of Anglican Churches, which declared they no longer recognized Welby as the leader of the Communion. This signaled a profound division within global Anglicanism.

Welby’s tenure also faced scrutiny for his handling of historical abuse cases. One of the most damaging incidents involved his failure to act decisively regarding allegations against John Smyth, a prominent church figure. An independent review revealed that Welby, despite being aware of the allegations as early as the late 1970’s failed on his appointment as Archbishop in 2013 to report them to the authorities. This failure led to accusations of negligence and calls for his resignation, overshadowing much of his leadership.

The Appointment of a New Archbishop

The process of appointing a new Archbishop of Canterbury involves several steps. The Crown Nominations Commission (CNC), a body comprising clergy and laity, convenes to consider candidates, consulting widely within the Church and potentially the wider Anglican Communion. The CNC presents two names to the Prime Minister, who advises the monarch on the preferred choice. The selected individual is then formally elected by the College of Canons of Canterbury Cathedral and confirmed in office.

Potential Candidates and Future Challenges

As speculation mounts over who might succeed Welby, certain figures stand out as potential candidates. Stephen Cottrell, the current Archbishop of York, is noted for his pastoral approach and experience within the Church hierarchy. However, he faces similar calls for his resignation over safeguarding failures during his time as Bishop of Chelmsford. Helen-Ann Hartley, Bishop of Newcastle, is recognized for her theological expertise and advocacy for social justice. Another potential candidate is Sarah Mullally, the Bishop of London, who has garnered respect for her leadership and commitment to inclusivity. Despite the assurances of being “valued” none of the traditionalist bishops is considered a candidate.

Welby’s resignation comes at a critical juncture for the Church of England and the Anglican Communion. The divisions that characterized his tenure, particularly over doctrinal and moral issues, underscore the challenges facing his successor. The next Archbishop will inherit a fractured Communion, with conservative provinces increasingly asserting their independence and liberal factions advocating for progressive reforms. The circumstances surrounding Welby’s departure highlight the urgent need for leadership that can navigate these divisions, reaffirm the Church’s mission, and address the crises of identity and unity that now define the Anglican landscape.

---

The UK Grooming Gangs Scandal: An overview

The Grooming Gangs Scandal in the United Kingdom represents one of the most profound and disturbing cases of systemic child sexual exploitation in modern history. Spanning several towns and cities across the nation, the scandal exposed both widespread abuse and shocking institutional failures. It has ignited debates over race, religion, class, and the responsibilities of public institutions to protect vulnerable children. This essay provides a detailed examination of the scandal, its background, the institutional responses, and the sociopolitical implications that continue to shape public discourse.

Overview of the Grooming Gangs Scandal

The scandal revolves around the systematic grooming and sexual exploitation of predominantly white, working-class young girls by organized groups of men. These groups, operating in towns like Rotherham, Rochdale, Telford, and elsewhere, preyed on vulnerable girls, often using a well-established pattern of manipulation and coercion. Victims were groomed with gifts, attention, and substances like drugs or alcohol before being subjected to horrific acts of sexual violence, gang rape, and trafficking.¹ Reports indicated that many of the perpetrators shared a common ethnic and religious background, predominantly being British Pakistani men.² This aspect of the scandal sparked intense debates about cultural factors and the potential role of ethnicity in shaping these crimes. At the same time, the abuse revealed extensive failures within police forces, social services, and local authorities, which often ignored or dismissed reports of abuse for fear of being accused of racism or Islamophobia.³

The Pattern of Abuse

The grooming process typically began with the perpetrators identifying vulnerable girls, often from disadvantaged or troubled backgrounds. These girls were offered gifts, food, transportation, and drugs or alcohol, creating a false sense of trust and dependency. Over time, this manipulation escalated into sexual exploitation.³ Victims were coerced into compliance through threats of violence, humiliation, and isolation. In many cases, they were also trafficked between different towns and forced into repeated acts of sexual violence.⁴ Evidence showed that many victims were dismissed by authorities as unreliable or complicit in their exploitation.³

Ethnicity and Cultural Sensitivities

The shared ethnic background of many of the perpetrators became a central and controversial aspect of the scandal. Critics argued that the reluctance of authorities to address the ethnic dimension of these crimes stemmed from fears of being labeled racist or Islamophobic.² This hesitation allowed the abuse to persist for years and contributed to the systemic failures within law enforcement and social services. Cultural factors, such as patriarchal norms and attitudes toward women within certain communities, were cited as potential contributors to the behaviors of the perpetrators.⁵ However, discussions about these cultural influences were often fraught with tension, as many feared that they would lead to the stigmatization of entire communities.³

Institutional Failures

One of the most damning aspects of the scandal was the widespread failure of institutions to protect the victims. Police, social services, and local authorities repeatedly ignored reports from victims and their families.⁶ In many cases, officials dismissed the victims as troublemakers or unreliable witnesses, perpetuating a culture of neglect and inaction.⁶ The 2014 Jay Report, which investigated the abuse in Rotherham, found that over 1,400 children were exploited between 1997 and 2013.¹ Similar inquiries in Rochdale, Telford, and other towns uncovered hundreds of additional cases.¹ These reports highlighted how systemic issues, such as underfunding, lack of training, and political sensitivities, contributed to the failures of child protection systems.³

The Role of Media and Public Outrage

The media played a critical role in exposing the Grooming Gangs Scandal and bringing it to public attention. Investigative journalists uncovered cases of abuse and institutional neglect, sparking widespread outrage.⁷ High-profile reports, such as the Jay Report and the Alexis Jay-led Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Exploitation, revealed the scale and severity of the abuse.³ However, media coverage also fueled divisive narratives, with far-right groups seizing upon the ethnic and religious backgrounds of the perpetrators to promote anti-immigration and anti-Muslim agendas.⁸

Far-Right Narratives and Legitimate Concerns

Far-right groups, such as the English Defence League and the British National Party, used the Grooming Gangs Scandal to advance their ideologies.⁹ They framed the scandal as evidence of the incompatibility of Muslim communities with British values, fueling xenophobia and anti-Muslim sentiment.⁹ At the same time, legitimate concerns about systemic failures and cultural factors were often unfairly labeled as far-right rhetoric.⁹ This dynamic created a chilling effect on public discourse, where individuals raising valid points risked being dismissed or stigmatized.⁹

The Complexity of Race and Religion in Public Discourse

The intersection of race, religion, and child sexual exploitation in the Grooming Gangs Scandal highlighted the challenges of discussing sensitive issues in a multicultural society. While it was essential to acknowledge the ethnic and cultural backgrounds of the perpetrators to understand the dynamics of the abuse, it was equally important to avoid generalizing or stigmatizing entire communities.⁵ Discussions about race and religion in this context often became polarized, with critics accusing authorities of either downplaying the role of ethnicity or promoting racist stereotypes.⁸

Government Response and Policy Changes

In response to the public outcry and media revelations, the UK government introduced several measures to address the failures exposed by the Grooming Gangs Scandal.¹ These included independent inquiries, legislative changes, and policy reforms aimed at improving child protection and holding institutions accountable.⁷ Independent inquiries, such as the Jay Report and the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Exploitation, provided detailed accounts of the abuse and identified systemic weaknesses.¹ These reports informed policy changes, including mandatory training for professionals on recognizing and responding to grooming and exploitation.⁷ Legislative measures were also introduced to strengthen the prosecution of grooming and trafficking cases and impose harsher penalties on perpetrators.⁸ Efforts to support survivors of abuse included the establishment of specialized services and funding for counseling and legal assistance.⁶

The Impact on Society

The Grooming Gangs Scandal has had a profound impact on British society, exposing deep flaws in child protection systems and eroding trust in public institutions.⁶ It has also heightened tensions between ethnic and religious communities, fueling divisive debates about immigration, multiculturalism, and societal cohesion.⁷ For many victims, the trauma of their experiences continues to affect their lives. While some have received justice, others still struggle to rebuild their lives and seek accountability for the abuse they suffered.⁶

Lessons Learned and the Way Forward

The Grooming Gangs Scandal underscores the importance of vigilance, transparency, and accountability in protecting vulnerable children. It highlights the need for:

1. Improved training and resources for professionals working in child protection.
2. Greater transparency and accountability within public institutions.
3. A victim-centered approach to safeguarding and justice.
4. Open and respectful dialogue about cultural and societal factors contributing to exploitation.³

By addressing these issues, society can work to prevent similar abuses in the future and ensure that the voices of victims are heard and respected.⁷

Calls for a Public Enquiry

A Public Inquiry is a formal investigation initiated by the government to address matters of significant public concern. It is an independent process, often chaired by a judge or expert, designed to examine complex or controversial issues transparently. Public inquiries involve gathering evidence, calling witnesses, and analyzing documents to uncover the root causes of the problem and determine accountability. They are conducted openly, allowing for public scrutiny and engagement, with individuals or groups affected by the issue often invited to provide testimony. At the conclusion, the inquiry produces a report with detailed findings and recommendations aimed at preventing similar issues in the future. Examples in the UK include the Hillsborough Disaster Inquiry, the Leveson Inquiry into media ethics, and the ongoing Grenfell Tower Inquiry.

In a recent YouGov poll, 76% of citizens expressed their desire for a Public Inquiry into the Grooming Gangs phenomenon, highlighting overwhelming public support for investigating the scandal. This sentiment is shared across party lines, with 91% of Reform voters, 84% of Conservative voters, 71% of Liberal Democrats, and even 65% of Labour supporters backing the call for an inquiry. Despite this, the Labour Government has repeatedly refused petitions and requests by victims and politicians for such an inquiry. This week, the Tory Party tabled an amendment to the Children’s Welfare Bill calling for a national inquiry but were defeated in a vote of MPs, with Labour claiming the amendment was a tactic to obstruct the passing of the entire bill. However, the growing public demand and cross-party consensus suggest that the Labour Party’s stance on this issue may become increasingly difficult to maintain.

Sources

1. Jay, A. (2014). Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Exploitation in Rotherham (1997–2013). Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council.
2. Casey, L. (2015). Report of Inspection of Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council. Department for Communities and Local Government.
3. Coffey, A. (2014). Real Voices: Child Sexual Exploitation in Greater Manchester. Greater Manchester Combined Authority.
4. Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA). (2022). Final Report. IICSA.
5. HM Government. (2015). Tackling Child Sexual Exploitation: Action Plan. Home Office.
6. BBC News. (2012-2019). Various articles on the Grooming Gangs Scandal.
7. Guardian, The. (2014-2020). Various investigative reports on grooming gangs and institutional responses.
8. Channel 4 News. (2017). Documentary on child sexual exploitation in the UK.
9. Malik, K. (2014). The Failure of Multiculturalism: Community versus Society in Europe. Foreign Affairs.
10. Scraton, P. (2016). Power, Conflict, and Criminalisation: Statecraft in Contemporary Britain. Routledge.

---

Cardinal McElroy’s Washington Appointment: Progress or Peril for Church Accountability?

Pope Francis’s decision to appoint Cardinal Robert McElroy as the Archbishop of Washington has reignited heated discussions within and beyond the Catholic Church. This appointment has drawn attention not only to McElroy’s past actions in managing cases of clerical sexual abuse but also to the broader implications of his financial and administrative strategies during his tenure as Bishop of San Diego. The controversy underscores the ongoing tension between institutional reform and accountability in the Church.

Cardinal McElroy’s leadership has faced significant scrutiny regarding his handling of sexual abuse allegations. In 2016, McElroy received reports about inappropriate behavior by then-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, specifically regarding McCarrick’s interactions with seminarians. McElroy has defended his response, claiming the whistleblower refused to provide corroborating evidence, thereby limiting his ability to act decisively. However, critics argue that his inaction reflects a pattern of insufficient responsiveness to such allegations, which has been a long-standing issue among Church leaders. These criticisms are particularly resonant given Pope Francis’s stated commitment to addressing abuse within the Church and rebuilding trust with the faithful.

Financially, the Diocese of San Diego under McElroy’s leadership was embroiled in one of the most significant abuse settlements in Church history. In 2007, the diocese reached a landmark agreement to pay $198 million to resolve 144 claims of clerical sexual abuse. This settlement, while aiming to provide restitution to survivors, severely strained the diocese’s financial resources. By 2024, the diocese faced an additional 450 claims, many involving allegations dating back over fifty years. To manage this deluge of lawsuits, the diocese filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, marking a significant moment of crisis. McElroy justified the bankruptcy as a necessary step to ensure equitable compensation for all victims while preserving the Church’s mission and operations. However, this decision was not without its detractors.

The bankruptcy filing brought renewed criticism of the diocese’s financial practices. Advocates for survivors accused the diocese of transferring assets to individual parish corporations to shield them from potential settlements. These asset restructuring efforts, critics argued, prioritized institutional preservation over the needs of abuse survivors. McElroy and diocesan officials refuted these claims, asserting that such restructuring had been underway long before the lawsuits emerged and was not a reactionary measure. Nevertheless, the perception of financial maneuvering to limit liabilities has fueled skepticism about the Church’s commitment to genuine accountability.

The implications of these controversies extend beyond financial management and into the broader realm of Church leadership. McElroy’s critics view his track record as emblematic of the Church’s continued failure to adequately address systemic issues related to sexual abuse. His appointment as Archbishop of Washington has, therefore, been seen by some as contradictory to Pope Francis’s reformist agenda, raising questions about the consistency of leadership appointments with the Pope’s stated priorities.

At the same time, McElroy’s supporters emphasize his alignment with Pope Francis’s vision of a more inclusive, pastoral Church. They point to his advocacy for social justice and his efforts to reach out to marginalized communities as evidence of his progressive approach. However, the unresolved controversies from his time in San Diego cast a shadow over his ability to embody the reform and renewal that many Catholics expect from the Church’s hierarchy.

The appointment of Cardinal McElroy as Archbishop of Washington serves as a microcosm of the Church’s ongoing struggles with accountability, transparency, and moral leadership. While his promotion aligns with the Pope’s broader efforts to bring pastoral and progressive perspectives into key leadership roles, it also underscores the persistent challenges the Church faces in addressing historical abuses and restoring trust. The tension between institutional survival and justice for victims remains a critical point of contention, one that will likely continue to shape debates about leadership and reform within the Church.

1. 2007 Settlement Figures: “San Diego Diocese to Pay $198M in Abuse Settlement,” Associated Press, 2007.
2. 2024 Bankruptcy Filing: “San Diego Diocese Files for Bankruptcy Amid Abuse Claims,” Reuters, June 2024.
3. Asset Transfers Allegations: “Analysis of San Diego Diocese Asset Practices,” BishopAccountability.org, 2024.
4. Bankruptcy Framework Defense: “Statement on Chapter 11 Filing,” Diocese of San Diego, 2024.
5. Criticism of McElroy’s Leadership: “Analysis of McElroy’s Leadership and the McCarrick Report,” Washington Examiner, 2025.
6. McCarrick Allegations: “Whistleblower Report on McCarrick,” National Catholic Reporter, 2016.
7. Papal Vision and Appointments: “Understanding Pope Francis’s Leadership Choices,” America Magazine, 2025.

---

The Decline of Marriage and Fertility: A Crisis Rooted in Modernity

Marriage and Family in Crisis
The family, as the foundational unit of society and the “domestic Church,” is under unprecedented attack. The widespread decline in marriage rates is inextricably linked to the plummeting fertility rates across the Western world, as studies consistently show. Marriage, ordained by God for the procreation and education of children, is no longer seen as a necessary institution for family life. This crisis is not merely demographic but deeply spiritual and cultural.

Canadian researchers Andrea Mrozek and Peter Jon Mitchell, in their 2024 book I…Do? Why Marriage Still Matters, highlight the relationship between declining marriage rates and fertility, particularly in Western nations. They argue that the decline in marriage is a “contributing issue” to the fertility crisis that grips nations such as Canada, the United States, and much of Europe. Canada’s fertility rate, for instance, has fallen to 1.3 births per woman—far below the 2.1 children per woman required for population replacement. This follows broader trends across the West, where declining birth rates mirror the abandonment of traditional family structures.¹

Delaying Marriage, Rejecting Life
One of the most troubling trends is the rising age of marriage, accompanied by delayed childbearing. Studies show that as individuals postpone marriage, they also reduce their capacity to have children, compressing their fertile years.² The modern rejection of marriage as a sacred covenant and vocation has fueled this crisis. Instead, cohabitation and other alternative arrangements dominate, undermining God’s design for the family.

Mitchell emphasizes that while marriage remains the primary context for childbearing, a growing number of young adults now remain unpartnered into their late 20s and early 30s.³ This, coupled with the cultural idolization of career and personal fulfillment, has led to a significant decline in family size and the overall stability of communities.

Government Responses: Insufficient Without Cultural Renewal
In response to the fertility crisis, some governments have introduced policies aimed at incentivizing childbirth. For example:

• South Korea offers housing subsidies for newlyweds to encourage family formation.⁴
• Italy and Greece have implemented financial rewards, such as “baby bonuses” and monthly allowances for new parents.⁵
• Japan has experimented with reduced workweeks to provide couples with more time to build families.⁶

While well-intentioned, these efforts are insufficient without addressing the underlying spiritual and cultural causes of the crisis. Fertility cannot be reduced to financial considerations alone; the restoration of a marriage-centered culture is essential.

Marriage as a Witness to the Faith
The Catholic Church teaches that marriage is both a natural and sacramental institution, instituted by God for the good of spouses and the raising of children. The collapse of marriage is not merely a sociological phenomenon but a moral and spiritual failure. Among Catholics, the situation is particularly dire, with marriage rates falling by 70% between 1969 and 2019.⁷ This decline reflects the broader rejection of traditional values in Western culture.

Rebuilding a healthy marriage culture requires concerted effort. First and foremost, Catholic families and parishes must model the joy and stability of family life rooted in Christ. Programs for marriage preparation and ongoing formation must be revitalized, ensuring that young people understand the sacramental and vocational nature of marriage.⁸

The Role of the Church and Society
Governments must also eliminate barriers to marriage, such as tax policies that penalize families. However, the primary responsibility lies with the Church and her faithful. Faith and educational institutions must teach the beauty of marriage and the blessings of large families. Mitchell rightly observes that “rebuilding a healthy marriage culture will be slow work, but worth the effort.”⁹

In the final analysis, the fertility crisis cannot be solved by policy alone. It is a reflection of a deeper cultural and spiritual malaise that only a return to God’s design for marriage and family can heal. As St. John Paul II often reminded us, the future of humanity passes through the family.¹⁰ To restore the sanctity of marriage is to restore hope for society.

1. Mrozek, A., & Mitchell, P. J. (2024). I…Do? Why Marriage Still Matters. Cardus Press.
2. Institute for Family Studies. “Fertility Rates and Delayed Marriage.” Retrieved 2023.
3. Mitchell, P. J., Interview with CNA. November 2024.
4. Reuters. “South Korea’s Housing Subsidies to Address Low Fertility.” November 2024.
5. AP News. “Italy’s Baby Bonuses Aim to Combat Falling Birth Rates.” November 2024.
6. Business Insider. “Japan’s Four-Day Workweek for Couples.” June 2024.
7. Georgetown University, Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate. “Marriage Trends in the Catholic Church.” 2019.
8. Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1601–1617.
9. Mitchell, P. J., CNA Interview. November 2024.
10. St. John Paul II, Familiaris Consortio. 1981.

---

The Black Nazarene Procession attracts thousands in Manila

The Black Nazarene procession, or “Traslación,” is one of the most significant religious events in the Philippines, attracting millions of devotees annually. It revolves around the Black Nazarene, a life-sized statue of Jesus Christ enshrined at the Minor Basilica and National Shrine of Jesus Nazareno in Quiapo, Manila.

Historical Background

The statue, believed to have been carved by an anonymous Mexican artist, arrived in the Philippines in 1606 through Spanish missionaries. It depicts Christ carrying the cross on His way to the crucifixion. Over time, the Black Nazarene has become a symbol of hope and perseverance for Filipino Catholics, especially the poor, who resonate with its darkened features and humble representation.¹

The Traslación

“Traslación” commemorates the 1787 transfer of the image from its original location in Intramuros to Quiapo Church. The annual procession on January 9 is marked by barefoot devotees who consider this act a form of penance and humility. Participants strive to touch the statue or the ropes of its carriage, believing in its miraculous powers.²

Contemporary Celebrations

The procession continues to attract millions, with recent years seeing even larger crowds. For instance:

• The 2024 Traslación gathered over six million devotees, filling the streets of Manila with participants in maroon and yellow. The procession lasted for hours, reflecting the deep spiritual fervor of attendees.³
• In 2025, an estimated 8.1 million people joined the event, which spanned nearly 21 hours. Despite challenges posed by the massive turnout, the event remained largely peaceful due to organized efforts by the Church and local authorities.⁴

Significance

The Black Nazarene procession is not only a religious celebration but also a cultural testament to the resilience and unwavering faith of the Filipino people. The statue’s survival through fires, earthquakes, and bombings during World War II symbolizes hope for its devotees. Participation in the Traslación is seen as a profound spiritual experience, fostering solidarity and providing strength amid personal and communal challenges.⁵

¹ “Black Nazarene,” Wikipedia.
² “Feast of the Black Nazarene,” Wikipedia.
³ “Filipino Catholics pray for good health and peace in huge procession venerating Jesus statue,” Associated Press.
⁴ “Philippines’ Black Nazarene procession draws hundreds of thousands of devotees,” Reuters.
⁵ “Black Nazarene’s enduring devotion,” Inquirer.net.

---