w/c 27.x.24

Ordo w/c 27.x.24

27 SUN	28 MON	29 TUE	30 WED	31 THU	01 FRI	02 SAT
Domini Nostri Jesu Christi Regis	Ss. Simonis et Judæ Apostolorum	Feria III	Feria IV	In Vigilia Omnium Sanctorum	Omnium Sanctorum	In Commemoratione Omnium Fidelium Defunctorum
“Dignus”	“Mihi autem”	“Dicit Dóminus”	“Dicit Dóminus”	“Júdicant”	“Gaudeámus”	“Réquiem”
Duplex I	Duplex II	Simplex	Simplex	Simplex	Duplex I	Simplex
Commemoratio		Votiva permissa	Votiva permissa			Priv.
Dominica XXIII Post Pentecosten

CHRISTUS REX

Carissimi

Grace and peace to you from our Lord Jesus Christ. As we celebrate the glorious Feast of Christ the King, I am reminded of the profound truth that Christ’s reign extends far beyond the walls of our churches or the confines of our personal lives. He is not merely the King of our hearts or our private spiritual journeys—Christ is the King of all creation, and His social reign must be made visible in every aspect of life, both personal and public.

In reflecting on the themes of this feast, and the Twenty-Third Sunday After Pentecost, it becomes clear that faith is the key to unlocking Christ’s reign in our lives, our families, and in society. “Fides Sanat”—Faith Heals—is not only a spiritual truth for the individual soul, but also a divine principle that can heal our communities and the world when we allow Christ’s kingship to take root in every corner of our lives.

Christ’s Reign in a Secular World

We live in a world that increasingly rejects the idea of Christ as King. Secularism, materialism, and moral relativism have created societies that often seek to exclude God from public life. The Feast of Christ the King, however, reminds us that Christ is sovereign over all creation. His reign is not limited to the spiritual realm; it encompasses all things—our laws, our cultures, our institutions, and even the daily decisions we make in our families and workplaces.

But how can we make Christ’s kingship visible in a world that so often denies His authority? The answer lies in faith. It is our faith that allows us to live as citizens of Christ’s kingdom, even in the midst of a world that rejects Him. Faith gives us the strength to live according to the Gospel in every aspect of our lives, and it enables us to bring Christ’s reign to bear on the world around us.

As St. Paul reminds us in the Epistle for the Feast of Christ the King (Colossians 1:13-20), Christ is the head of all creation. “He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation. For in Him all things were created… and in Him all things hold together.” When we recognize Christ’s kingship, we understand that everything—our homes, our relationships, our work, and our society—must be ordered according to His truth. But we cannot do this through our own efforts; it is faith that makes this possible.

Faith Heals: Bringing Christ’s Reign Into Our Lives

The Gospel for the Twenty-Third Sunday After Pentecost presents two powerful examples of how faith in Christ brings healing. The woman with the issue of blood, who had suffered for twelve years, reached out in faith, believing that even touching the hem of Jesus’ garment would heal her. Her faith was rewarded when Christ turned to her and said, “Thy faith hath made thee whole” (Matthew 9:22). In the same passage, Jairus, faced with the death of his daughter, placed his trust in Christ’s power to bring life where there was death. His faith, too, was rewarded when Christ raised his daughter from the dead.

These stories teach us that faith is not just a belief in Christ’s power, but an active trust that invites His reign into our lives. When we live by faith, we open the door for Christ to heal not only our personal wounds, but the wounds of society. Faith allows us to bring the social reign of Christ the King into our families, our communities, and even our workplaces.

But what does this look like in practice? It means living with the understanding that Christ is King in all things. It means allowing our faith to shape our decisions—both big and small. Faith heals society when we live according to Gospel values in the public square, when we stand for truth and justice in our communities, and when we seek to build a culture that reflects Christ’s kingship.

The Role of Families in Christ’s Social Reign

One of the most important ways we can bring about the social reign of Christ the King is through our families. The family is the foundational unit of society, and when Christ reigns in our homes, His influence extends outward into the broader community. As Pope Pius XI wrote in his encyclical Quas Primas, which established the Feast of Christ the King, the social reign of Christ begins in the hearts of individuals and must spread to families and nations.

Faith is the key to making Christ the King of our families. When we pray together, when we prioritize Sunday Mass, when we teach our children the truths of the faith, we are making Christ’s kingship visible in our homes. As we live out our faith in family life, we become witnesses to the world of the peace and healing that Christ’s reign brings.

In today’s culture, where families are often under attack and where secular values seek to undermine the very fabric of Christian family life, it is more important than ever that we make our homes places where Christ reigns. This means building a culture of faith in our homes, where Christ is acknowledged as King, where we seek to live according to His will, and where we trust Him to heal our wounds and strengthen our bonds.

Bringing Christ’s Reign to Society: A Public Witness of Faith

As Catholics, we are also called to bring Christ’s reign into the public sphere. This does not mean imposing our beliefs on others, but it does mean living out our faith in such a way that others can see the healing power of Christ’s kingship. In a world that often rejects objective truth and moral standards, we are called to stand firm in the truth of the Gospel and to witness to the values of Christ’s kingdom—justice, peace, mercy, and love.

This public witness is essential for bringing Christ’s social reign to the world. When we stand up for the dignity of the human person, when we defend life from conception to natural death, when we work for justice for the poor and marginalized, and when we promote peace in a divided world, we are living out our faith in a way that makes Christ’s kingship visible. Faith is the foundation of this public witness. It is through our trust in Christ that we are able to stand firm in the face of opposition and to work for the transformation of society according to His will.

Conclusion: Faith as the Foundation of Christ’s Social Reign

“Fides Sanat”—Faith Heals—is not only a personal truth; it is a social truth. Faith in Christ has the power to heal not only individuals but families, communities, and entire societies. As we celebrate the Feast of Christ the King, let us renew our commitment to living by faith, trusting that through our faith, Christ’s reign will become more visible in the world.

Let us strive to make Christ the King of our hearts, our homes, and our society. By living out our faith with courage, love, and conviction, we become instruments of His healing grace and ambassadors of His reign. As we place our trust in Him, we can be confident that His kingship will bring peace, justice, and healing to a world that desperately needs it.

May Christ the King reign in our hearts and in the world, now and forever.

In the love of Christ, I remain,

---

---

Spiritual Reflection on the Feast of Christ the King and the Twenty-Third Sunday After Pentecost

The Feast of Christ the King and the Twenty-Third Sunday After Pentecost in the Tridentine Liturgy together form a powerful reminder of the reign of Christ and the transformative power of faith. Both liturgies focus on the themes of Christ’s sovereign kingship, the necessity of faith in healing, and the ultimate victory of Christ over sin and death. As we reflect on these themes, drawing from the wisdom of saints, theologians, and the Fathers of the Church, we come to see that Christ’s kingship is not one of domination but of love, justice, and mercy, and that faith in Him is the path to healing and restoration.

Feast of Christ the King: Christ’s Reign of Justice and Mercy

The Feast of Christ the King, instituted by Pope Pius XI in 1925 with the encyclical Quas Primas, was meant to counteract the growing secularism of the time, which sought to exclude God from public life. The Church, through this feast, proclaims that Christ is the King of the Universe, whose reign transcends all earthly powers. The proper readings and prayers of this Mass emphasize that Christ’s kingdom is not of this world (John 18:36) but is founded on truth, justice, and peace.

Introit: Apocalypse 5:12; 1:6

The Introit for the Feast of Christ the King reads: “The Lamb that was slain is worthy to receive power and divinity and wisdom and strength and honor; to Him be glory and empire for ever and ever.” This passage from the Book of Revelation presents Christ as the sacrificial Lamb who reigns eternally. His kingship is rooted in His sacrifice—He conquered sin and death not by force, but by giving His life on the Cross. Dom Prosper Guéranger reflects on this theme, writing, “The kingdom of Christ rests on the foundation of His sacrifice. It is by the Cross that He reigns.” Guéranger reminds us that Christ’s authority comes not from earthly power but from His total self-gift.

In this kingdom, justice and mercy meet. Christ, as King, brings justice by conquering sin and establishing His reign of righteousness, but He also brings mercy by offering salvation to all who turn to Him in faith.

Epistle: Colossians 1:12-20

In the Epistle, St. Paul describes the nature of Christ’s kingship, saying, “He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation. For in Him all things were created… and in Him all things hold together.” This passage underscores the cosmic reign of Christ, who is not only the Savior of humanity but the Lord of all creation. St. Paul teaches that Christ’s kingship is universal, embracing every corner of the created world, and that all things find their unity and purpose in Him.

Fr. Leonard Goffine, in his “Explanation of the Epistles and Gospels of the Sundays”, highlights how this reading calls the faithful to live under the reign of Christ by recognizing His authority in every aspect of life. Goffine writes, “As citizens of His kingdom, we are called to submit to His will in all things, trusting that in Him, all things hold together and are redeemed.” This means allowing Christ to rule not only in our hearts but also in our families, communities, and societies.

Gospel: John 18:33-37

In the Gospel reading for Christ the King, Jesus stands before Pilate and declares, “My kingdom is not of this world… For this I was born, and for this I have come into the world, to bear witness to the truth. Everyone who is of the truth hears my voice.” Christ’s kingdom, then, is built on the truth, and those who seek the truth are drawn to His reign.

Fr. Gabriel of St. Mary Magdalene reflects on this profound statement, noting that Christ’s kingship invites us into a relationship of truth and love. “Christ reigns in those who accept the truth of His message and conform their lives to it. His kingdom is within those who are faithful to Him.” Fr. Gabriel reminds us that to live under Christ’s kingship means to be people of truth, aligning our lives with His teaching and recognizing that the fullness of life comes from living in His truth.

Twenty-Third Sunday After Pentecost: Faith as the Key to Healing

The Twenty-Third Sunday After Pentecost brings us the account of two healings: the woman with the issue of blood and the raising of Jairus’ daughter (Matthew 9:18-26). Both stories underscore the power of faith in Christ’s healing grace.

Introit: Jeremiah 29:11,12,14

The Introit of the Sunday Mass reads: “The Lord saith: I think thoughts of peace, and not of affliction: ye shall call upon Me, and I will hear you, and I will bring back your captivity from all places.” Here, the Lord assures His people that He desires their peace and healing, not their suffering. This theme of divine mercy and healing is echoed in the Gospel, where Jesus brings physical and spiritual healing to those who approach Him in faith.

Dom Prosper Guéranger, reflecting on this Introit, emphasizes that God’s desire for our healing is at the heart of His reign. “The King who rules with justice is also the King who heals with mercy. To call upon Him is to receive healing and peace.” Guéranger urges the faithful to approach Christ the King with confidence, knowing that His reign brings not only justice but healing to those who trust in Him.

Epistle: Philippians 3:17-21

In the Epistle for this Sunday, St. Paul calls the Philippians to imitate his example and focus their minds on heavenly things: “Our conversation is in heaven, from whence also we look for the Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ.” This call to live with a heavenly perspective reminds us that, while we live in this world, our ultimate citizenship is in Christ’s kingdom.

St. John Chrysostom offers a patristic reflection on this passage, teaching that the Christian must always keep their gaze fixed on Christ the King. “To live in this world but not of it is the calling of every believer. Our hearts must be set on the eternal kingdom of Christ, where our true life and destiny await.” Chrysostom’s insight encourages us to trust in the future glory that Christ will bring when He raises our lowly bodies to be like His glorified body, as St. Paul states in the Epistle.

Gospel: Matthew 9:18-26

The Gospel recounts two miracles: the healing of the woman with the issue of blood and the raising of Jairus’ daughter. Both are powerful examples of faith in Christ’s kingship as the path to healing. The woman, suffering for twelve years, believed that just touching the hem of Jesus’ garment would heal her. Jesus, seeing her faith, responds, “Thy faith hath made thee whole.” Similarly, Jairus approaches Jesus in faith, trusting that He has the power even over death itself.

Fr. Pius Pasch, reflecting on this passage, writes, “Faith is the key to unlocking the healing power of Christ. Both the woman and Jairus came to Jesus with faith, and it was their faith that brought them healing.” Pasch emphasizes that the reign of Christ the King is not just a distant reality but is manifested in the healing power of His grace, available to all who approach Him in faith.

St. Augustine, commenting on this Gospel, sees in the woman’s healing a symbol of the Church’s faith in Christ. “The woman, suffering for twelve years, represents the Church, which suffers in this world but is healed through faith in Christ. Just as she reached out to touch the hem of His garment, so too must we reach out to Christ through faith and receive the healing of our souls.” Augustine’s exegesis invites us to see this miracle as a reflection of the Church’s ongoing need for healing and restoration, which comes through faith in Christ the King.

Thematic Reflection: Christ the King as Healer and Savior

Both the Feast of Christ the King and the Twenty-Third Sunday After Pentecost call us to reflect on Christ’s kingship and the healing power of faith. As King, Christ reigns with justice and truth, but His reign is also one of mercy and healing. He invites us to come to Him in faith, trusting that He will heal the wounds of our hearts, souls, and bodies.

The Gospel readings remind us that faith is the key to experiencing Christ’s healing. Whether we are like the woman suffering for years or like Jairus facing a seemingly hopeless situation, Christ the King responds to our faith with mercy and healing. His reign brings not only justice but also the healing that comes from trusting in His divine authority.

As we celebrate Christ the King, let us approach Him with the faith of the woman and Jairus, confident that His kingship brings healing to all who turn to Him. May we recognize His reign in every aspect of our lives, and may our faith in His kingship heal the divisions, wounds, and struggles we face, both personally and as a Church.

Christus vincit, Christus regnat, Christus imperat!
(Christ conquers, Christ reigns, Christ commands!)

Discussion Questions

For Family Discussions

1. What does it mean for Christ to be the King of our family? How can we make His kingship more visible in the way we live together?
2. The woman in the Gospel reached out to Jesus in faith and was healed. How can we, as a family, place our trust in Jesus when we face challenges?
3. In what ways can our family bring Christ’s reign into our community? How can we live out our faith in service to others?
4. How do we show, through our actions and decisions, that Christ is King in our home? Are there areas of family life where we can grow in faith and trust in His guidance?

For Catechism Classes

1. What does the Feast of Christ the King teach us about Jesus’ role not just in the Church, but in the world? How can we help others see Christ as King?
2. The Gospel story of the woman and Jairus highlights the importance of faith in receiving God’s healing. How can we strengthen our faith so that we can receive Christ’s healing in our own lives?
3. St. Paul says in the Epistle that our citizenship is in heaven. What does it mean to live in the world but belong to Christ’s kingdom? How can we prepare for our heavenly home?
4. What are some practical ways we can share our faith with others, especially those who may not recognize Christ’s reign in their lives?

For Sunday School

1. Why do we call Jesus our King? What kind of King is Jesus compared to other kings we might know about?
2. In the Gospel, a woman was healed because she had faith in Jesus. Can you think of a time when you prayed to Jesus with faith? How did He help you?
3. Jesus raised Jairus’ daughter from the dead. What does this miracle tell us about how powerful Jesus is and why we should trust Him?
4. How can we show others that we love Jesus and that He is the King of our hearts?

For Youth Ministry

1. In a world where people often seek power for their own gain, what does it mean for us to live under the kingship of Christ, who came to serve and not to be served?
2. The woman in the Gospel demonstrated incredible faith, believing that just touching Jesus would heal her. What are some areas in your life where you need to place more trust in Christ’s healing power?
3. How can we, as young people, help bring Christ’s reign into our schools, friendships, and social activities? What are some practical ways we can stand up for truth and live out our faith?
4. St. Paul reminds us that our true home is in heaven. How can this perspective influence the way we make decisions and prioritize things in our lives?

For Personal Reflection

1. What does it mean to you that Christ is King, not only of your heart but of the entire universe? How does this truth shape the way you live?
2. The woman in the Gospel reached out in faith, and her faith brought her healing. In what areas of your life do you need to reach out in faith, trusting that Christ can heal your wounds?
3. In what ways are you living as a citizen of Christ’s kingdom? Are there areas where you still struggle to fully submit to His kingship? What steps can you take to deepen your relationship with Him?
4. How can you bring the reign of Christ the King into your everyday life—at home, work, or in your community? What role does faith play in making His kingship visible to others?

These reflective questions are designed to encourage deeper engagement with the themes of Christ the King and faith as the path to healing, helping participants apply these truths in their daily lives and grow in their relationship with Christ.

---

---

Fides Sanat: Bringing in the Social Reign of Christ the King through Evangelizing Family, Friends, and Non-Traditional Catholics

The motto “Fides Sanat”—Faith Heals—captures the essence of what it means to be a follower of Christ, particularly under the reign of Christ the King. This kingship is not simply a theological abstraction, nor is it limited to the interior life of the soul. The reign of Christ the King is meant to encompass every aspect of life, including society, culture, family, and personal relationships. As Catholics, we are called to be instruments of this reign, bearing witness to Christ’s healing power in our homes, communities, and among those who may have drifted from the faith.

In a world increasingly dominated by secular values, evangelizing family, friends, and non-traditional Catholics is a pressing mission for every believer. Many people today may identify as Catholic culturally but have distanced themselves from active participation in the faith. Others may be disillusioned by the scandals or confusion in the Church, while some are simply indifferent. Yet, Christ remains their King, and through our faith, we can help reintroduce them to His reign—a reign of healing, justice, peace, and truth.

Understanding the Social Reign of Christ the King

The Feast of Christ the King, instituted by Pope Pius XI in 1925, was a response to the rise of secularism and the exclusion of God from public life. It reminds us that Christ’s kingship extends not just over individuals but over nations and societies. As the King of Kings, Christ’s authority encompasses all things, and the Church has the mission to make His reign visible in every aspect of human life.

But Christ’s reign is not one of force or domination; it is a reign of love, mercy, and healing. His kingship is rooted in the Cross, where He offered Himself for the salvation of the world. In this light, the reign of Christ the King is not about imposing rules but about drawing hearts to Him through faith, so that He can heal and restore what has been broken by sin.

Fides Sanat: The Healing Power of Faith in Evangelization

Faith has the power to heal not just personal wounds but also the divisions, indifference, and spiritual apathy that pervade society. “Fides Sanat” means that faith brings Christ’s healing into our relationships, families, and communities. In our mission to evangelize those who may have fallen away from the faith or who struggle with disbelief, faith is the key that opens the door for Christ to reign in their hearts and lives.

1. Evangelizing Family: The Domestic Church as the Foundation of Christ’s Reign

The family, often referred to as the “domestic Church,” is the primary place where the reign of Christ can be made visible. When faith is lived authentically within the family, it becomes a source of healing and strength for all members. The first step in evangelizing others is ensuring that Christ truly reigns in our own homes.

Faith heals families by fostering forgiveness, reconciliation, and love. In the Gospel of the Twenty-Third Sunday After Pentecost, Jairus comes to Jesus with deep faith, pleading for the healing of his daughter, and through his faith, the girl is restored to life. This story reminds us of the power of a parent’s faith in bringing healing to the family.

• How to evangelize within the family:
  • Pray together regularly: Establishing a family prayer routine—whether through daily prayer, the Rosary, or grace before meals—invites Christ’s healing presence into the home.
  • Model the faith: Show your family the peace and joy that come from a relationship with Christ by living your faith authentically, with love and humility.
  • Foster dialogue: Engage in discussions about faith with family members, especially those who may have questions or doubts. Listen to their concerns and gently invite them to explore the faith with you.

2. Evangelizing Friends: A Witness of Faith and Healing

In our friendships, evangelization often happens through the quiet witness of how we live our lives. People may not be immediately open to discussing matters of faith, but they will notice the peace, integrity, and joy that come from living under Christ’s reign. The healing power of faith is not always a miraculous cure or dramatic conversion, but often it is seen in the gradual transformation of lives.

The woman with the issue of blood in the Gospel also demonstrates that faith in Christ can bring healing after long periods of suffering. Just as her quiet act of faith led to her healing, so too can our witness of faith draw our friends closer to Christ.

• How to evangelize friends:
  • Live your faith openly: Don’t be afraid to talk about your relationship with Christ in natural ways, sharing how faith helps you in daily life.
  • Invite, don’t push: Invite friends to join you for Mass, adoration, or a parish event. If they decline, continue to be a loving witness, and trust in God’s timing.
  • Be a source of hope: Offer to pray for your friends when they are going through difficult times. Show them that faith offers not only comfort but real hope.

3. Reaching Non-Traditional Catholics: A Call to Reengage with Faith

Non-traditional Catholics—those who may identify with the faith culturally but have distanced themselves from active participation—often need a gentle and understanding approach. Many may have experienced hurt or confusion within the Church, or they may feel that the faith no longer speaks to the realities of modern life. Yet, as the Gospel reminds us, faith in Christ can heal even long-standing wounds.

For many non-traditional Catholics, the obstacles to faith are not intellectual but personal. They need to experience the mercy and love of Christ the King, and that experience often comes through personal relationships with practicing Catholics who reach out in faith.

• How to reach non-traditional Catholics:
  • Build relationships: Take the time to listen to their experiences and concerns. Don’t rush to “fix” their doubts, but walk with them, showing that you care for them as a person.
  • Offer a way back: Many non-traditional Catholics are unsure of how to reengage with the faith. Offer practical ways for them to reconnect, such as inviting them to confession or attending a Mass for a special feast day like Christmas or Easter.
  • Share stories of faith: Personal testimony can be a powerful tool. Share how faith has brought healing and meaning to your life, and let them see that faith is not a burden but a source of joy and freedom.

Faith Heals Society: The Social Reign of Christ the King

The mission to evangelize family, friends, and non-traditional Catholics is not just about individual conversions; it is also about transforming society. Christ’s kingship extends to all of human life, including our social structures, politics, and culture. As Catholics, we are called to bear witness to the truth that Christ reigns over all—and this begins with faith.

Faith heals society by promoting the values of the Gospel: justice, peace, mercy, and love. When we live as citizens of Christ’s kingdom, we challenge the secular values that dominate much of contemporary culture. We promote the dignity of the human person, the sanctity of life, and the common good, bringing Christ’s healing touch to a world that is often broken and divided.

Conclusion: Building Christ’s Kingdom through Faith

“Fides Sanat”—Faith Heals—is not just a personal truth but a social mission. By bringing our families, friends, and non-traditional Catholics into a deeper relationship with Christ the King, we participate in His reign of healing and transformation. Evangelization is not a one-time event but a lifelong commitment to sharing the faith that heals hearts and societies.

As we prepare to celebrate the Feast of Christ the King, let us renew our commitment to living out our faith in every aspect of life. Let us invite Christ to reign in our hearts, our homes, and our relationships, trusting that through faith, He will bring healing to all.

---

Life in the Spirit: Christ as YOUR King

In today’s world, where secular values and materialism seem to dominate every aspect of society, living as a faithful Christian can feel like an uphill battle. Many believers find themselves caught between their desire to follow Christ and the pressures of a culture that largely ignores or rejects His kingship. In such a context, the Feast of Christ the King serves as a powerful reminder: Christ is not just the King of the universe, He must also be the King of our hearts, families, and communities. The call to recognize and live under Christ’s reign is not optional for Christians; it is a fundamental part of living the faith.

But what does it mean for Christ to be your King? How can we live out this reality in the midst of a highly secularized society, where the prevailing culture often promotes values in stark contrast to the Gospel? In this reflection, we will explore practical ways to make Christ the King of your life and counter the secular culture within yourself, your family, and your friendships.

Christ’s Kingship: A Universal and Personal Reality

Christus Vincit, Christus Regnat, Christus Imperat!
(Christ Conquers, Christ Reigns, Christ Commands!)

The kingship of Christ is both universal and deeply personal. In Colossians 1:16-17, St. Paul writes, “For in Him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible… all things were created through Him and for Him. He is before all things, and in Him all things hold together.” This passage underscores Christ’s cosmic reign over all creation. As Christians, we acknowledge that Christ is King of the universe, that all things find their origin and purpose in Him.

Yet Christ’s kingship is not an abstract or distant reality. His reign is meant to be lived out in the concrete details of our daily lives. As Pope Pius XI emphasized in his encyclical Quas Primas, which established the Feast of Christ the King in 1925, Christ must reign not only over nations but also “in the wills of men” and “in families and societies.” Christ’s kingship, therefore, extends to our personal decisions, relationships, and values.

Living in a secular society often means being surrounded by ideologies that reject or ignore Christ’s kingship. Relativism, materialism, and individualism—hallmarks of modern secularism—teach that truth is subjective, that happiness comes from acquiring things, and that the self is the ultimate authority. But these values contradict the kingship of Christ, which is based on truth, love, and self-sacrifice.

To live with Christ as your King is to consciously reject these secular values and embrace the values of His kingdom. It means recognizing that true freedom comes not from self-reliance or material wealth, but from submitting to Christ’s authority and living according to His will.

Making Christ the King of Your Heart

The first step in living out Christ’s kingship is to make Him the King of your heart. This involves a deep personal commitment to align every part of your life—your thoughts, actions, and desires—with His will. Romans 12:2 provides an essential guide for this process: “Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that by testing you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect.”

1. Surrender to Christ’s Authority:
To make Christ the King of your heart, you must first recognize His rightful authority over your life. This begins with surrendering your own plans and desires to Him. Ask yourself: Who truly rules my heart? Is it Christ, or is it my career, my ambitions, my desires for comfort or success? By submitting to Christ’s authority, you allow Him to guide you in all areas of life.

2. Daily Prayer and Scripture Reading:
One of the most practical ways to keep Christ as King in your heart is by fostering a daily habit of prayer and Scripture reading. Prayer is the means by which we communicate with Christ and invite His grace to transform us. Reading Scripture allows us to hear Christ’s voice and conform our lives to His teachings. Psalm 119:105 says, “Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light to my path.” In a world full of distractions and competing voices, the Word of God remains a steady guide, helping us stay focused on Christ.

3. Examine Your Conscience Regularly:
In a secularized world, it’s easy to drift away from Christ’s kingship without even realizing it. A regular examination of conscience is essential for keeping your heart aligned with Christ. Reflect on the ways in which you may have allowed secular values to influence your thoughts and actions. Confess your sins, and ask for the grace to live more fully under Christ’s reign.

Christ as King of the Family

As Pope Pius XI reminded us, Christ’s kingship must extend beyond the individual and into the family. The family, often called the “domestic church,” is the primary place where the reign of Christ can be made visible. In a world where the family is under constant attack—whether through secular ideologies, divorce, or the breakdown of traditional values—making Christ the King of your home is more urgent than ever.

1. Create a Culture of Prayer in the Home:
Just as you need to cultivate a personal prayer life, your family also needs to be rooted in prayer. Family prayer—whether it’s the Rosary, grace before meals, or Scripture reading—allows Christ’s reign to take hold in the home. Matthew 18:20 reminds us, “For where two or three are gathered in My name, there am I among them.” Prayer brings Christ into the center of family life, where He can heal wounds, strengthen bonds, and guide decisions.

2. Make Christ the Center of Family Life:
Secular culture often emphasizes the pursuit of individual happiness and success at the expense of communal values. To counter this, families must make Christ the center of their life together. This means prioritizing Sunday Mass, celebrating the liturgical calendar in the home, and seeking to live out the virtues of Christ’s kingdom—love, patience, forgiveness, and self-giving. In doing so, the family becomes a living witness to Christ’s reign in a world that desperately needs examples of authentic Christian living.

3. Educate Children in the Faith:
Secular society exerts a tremendous influence on children, often undermining the values of the Gospel. Parents have the responsibility of educating their children in the faith, teaching them to recognize Christ as their King. This doesn’t just mean formal catechesis, but also modeling the faith through everyday actions—showing how to live as citizens of Christ’s kingdom.

Christ as King of Society: A Public Witness

The social reign of Christ the King extends to the public sphere, even if secular society often rejects it. As Catholics, we are called to bear witness to Christ’s kingship not just in our personal lives, but in how we engage with the world around us.

1. Live Your Faith Publicly:
In a secularized world, it’s easy to compartmentalize faith, keeping it private while going along with the prevailing culture in public. But to live with Christ as King means to live your faith publicly, even when it’s uncomfortable or countercultural. Matthew 5:14 reminds us, “You are the light of the world. A city set on a hill cannot be hidden.” Living your faith in public might mean standing up for truth in conversations, advocating for the dignity of life, or refusing to participate in activities that contradict your beliefs.

2. Engage with Society in a Spirit of Truth and Love:
The reign of Christ the King is a reign of truth and love. This means we must engage with society not through hostility or aggression, but through a spirit of charity, seeking to bring Christ’s truth to others in a way that reflects His love. As Pope St. John Paul II taught, evangelization is not just about speaking the truth; it’s about living it in such a way that others are drawn to Christ through the witness of your life.

3. Promote the Common Good:
Living with Christ as your King means working to promote the common good in society. This includes advocating for laws and policies that protect the dignity of every person, from the unborn to the elderly, and ensuring that justice, peace, and the moral order are upheld in society. Faith heals not just individual hearts but also communities, when Christians live as agents of Christ’s kingdom.

Conclusion: Let Christ Reign in Every Area of Life

To live with Christ as your King is to live a life radically transformed by faith. In a highly secularized society, this is no easy task. But through faith, prayer, and a conscious decision to make Christ the center of every aspect of life—your heart, your family, and your public witness—you can bring His healing reign into the world.

Christ’s kingship is not a distant, theoretical reality—it is a present and active force that can transform lives, homes, and societies. As we reflect on the Feast of Christ the King, let us renew our commitment to living under His reign, trusting that in Him, all things are healed, restored, and made new.

“Seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, and all these things will be added to you” (Matthew 6:33). May Christ reign in our hearts, homes, and the world, now and forever.

Christus Vincit, Christus Regnat, Christus Imperat!
(Christ Conquers, Christ Reigns, Christ Commands!)

---

A Sermon for Sunday: Revd Dr Robert Wilson

Christ the King/Twenty Third Sunday after Pentecost

Today we celebrate the feast of Christ the King, as well as commemorating the Twenty Third Sunday after Pentecost. This feast was instituted to emphasise the claims of the Kingship of Christ in the face of the totalitarian regimes of the last century. But although this feast day is of recent origin, the theme is an ancient and biblical one, for the claim of the Kingship of Christ has always been in opposition to the rulers of this world.

St. Paul asserted the claims of the Kingship of Christ when writing to the Colossians. He gave thanks that they had been delivered from the dominion of darkness into the kingdom of the Son of his love. For he is the image of the invisible God, the first born of every creature, for by him all things were created in heaven and earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominations, or principalities or powers. For all things were created by him and in him, and in him all things consist. He is the head of the Church, the firstborn from among the dead, having reconciled all things to himself, making peace through his blood on the Cross.

It was necessary for St. Paul to assert the absolute supremacy of Christ in the face of what appears to be an early version of the Gnostic heresy that seems to have attracted the Colossians. Gnosticism is the belief in salvation through esoteric knowledge. The fully developed form of this heresy only developed in the second century, when it was combated by St. Irenaeus. But the seeds were already sown even in the apostolic age. Both in Corinth and Colossae St. Paul encountered those who prided themselves on their own esoteric knowledge and religious experience. They were tempted to believe that they could attain salvation through their own esoteric knowledge rather than through the blood of Christ.

It was necessary for St. Paul to assert that deliverance from the principalities and powers, the dark forces that seem to rule this world, came through the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. The Christian faith is not about each person cultivating their own private religious experience, but is rather based on the proclamation of the gospel, wrought out once and for all in time and history. Evil is not seen simply as personal, but as having a cosmic dimension greater than individual human wickedness. It uses the principalities and powers to enslave the world.

But what are the principalities and powers? The ancient pagan worldview saw man as locked in a universe dominated by vast impersonal forces. They were personified as the divinities of the pagan pantheon. Reality was defined in terms of power and the nature of the gods reflected this. It was necessary to have the gods on your side in order to survive in this world. If you were at war you needed Mars, the god of war on your side, if in love, the goddess Aphrodite. The world was defined in terms of power and in order to survive you needed to be on the right side of those in power, both in heaven and on earth. Behind the visible world were mysterious invisible forces.

But what relevance has the worldview of ancient paganism to society today? Did not monotheism reduce the pagan pantheon to one God, and has not atheism now reduced the one God to no God? Is not this seemingly primitive way of thinking outmoded today?

In fact we are not as far removed as we might think from the worldview of ancient paganism. Today, the world is viewed as very much in the grip of vast impersonal forces. Governments and politicians try to claim credit when things go well, but when things go wrong they blame these mysterious impersonal forces. We may no longer given them personal names like the divinities of ancient paganism but these mysterious impersonal forces still seem to enslave the world. The world is still defined in terms of power, and success is seen as placating those in power. Everyone is encouraged to be competing against everyone else for power.

Success is defined as “playing the game”, in other words successfully manipulating the way the world is organised to one’s own advantage. The irony is that modern people claim to be free and emancipated on the surface, but in practice find themselves enslaved to these vast impersonal forces. The advertising industry, which encourages people to buy things that they do not need with money that they do not have in order to impress people who are not worth impressing, wields just as much (perhaps more) power than the gods of ancient paganism.

A different way of viewing the world emerged in ancient Israel. The Jews were the one people who (despite all their failings in practice) refused to bow down to the gods of ancient paganism. They believed that the world was not in the grip of vast impersonal forces, but was rather the creation of one God, the maker of all things and judge of all men, whose nature was not simply power and might, but right. They refused to accept the world as it is. Instead they saw it as a world that had been created good, but had gone wrong due to the fall of man. They looked forward to a time when the present discord between the human race and its Creator would finally be resolved in the messianic age to come, and the world would be redeemed from its present slavery to sin and death.

The early Church proclaimed that this hope had been fulfilled in Jesus of Nazareth. In his life, death and resurrection he had fought and won the decisive battle against the principalities and powers that enslave us. In crucifying him they seemed to have beaten him, as has happened so often to those who have taken on the system in human history. But God raised him from the dead, and so has in principle defeated the forces of evil. He has delivered us from the power of darkness and translated us into the kingdom of the Son of his love, in whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins.

There is still a battle to be fought against the forces of evil, but the good news is that the battle has already been won on our behalf, and we do not need to rely on our own strength, but rather on Christ. We now live in the time between his first coming in great humility, and his second coming in glorious majesty, in that new heaven and new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness.

Christ is the King! O friends upraise!
Anthems of joy and holy praise
For his brave saints of ancient days,
Who for a faith for ever new
Followed the King and round him drew
Thousands of faithful men and true.

O Christian women, Christian men,
All the world over, seek again
The way disciples followed then.
Christ through all ages is the same
Place the same hope in his great Name,
With the same faith his Word proclaim.

Let Love’s unconquerable might
Your scattered companies unite
In service to the Lord of Light:
So shall God’s will on earth be done,
New lamps be let, new tasks begun,
And the whole Church at last be one.

---

---

---

Background and History of the Feast of Christ the King

The Feast of Christ the King was instituted by Pope Pius XI in 1925 through the encyclical Quas Primas. At the time, the world was experiencing significant political upheaval, the rise of secularism, and widespread rejection of religious values. In response, Pope Pius XI sought to reaffirm the sovereignty of Christ not just over the Church but over all aspects of life—personal, social, political, and economic. The feast was established to remind the faithful and the world that Christ reigns as King over all creation, and His kingship is both universal and eternal.

Pope Pius XI declared that the recognition of Christ as King would be a remedy for the growing secularism and moral relativism that were threatening society. By restoring Christ’s reign in the hearts of individuals, families, and nations, the feast aimed to bring about the healing of society through faith in Christ’s truth and authority.

Themes of the Feast of Christ the King

1. Christ’s Universal Kingship:
   The central theme of the feast is that Christ is the King of the entire universe. As stated in Colossians 1:16-17, “For in Him all things were created… He is before all things, and in Him all things hold together.” Christ’s reign extends over every aspect of creation, both visible and invisible.
2. Christ’s Kingship as Redeemer:
   Christ’s kingship is rooted in His work of redemption. Through His sacrifice on the Cross, He conquers sin and death, establishing His reign of mercy, justice, and love. His kingship is not one of earthly power but of spiritual authority, offering salvation and peace to all who follow Him.
3. The Call to Live Under Christ’s Kingship:
   The feast calls all Christians to live under the kingship of Christ. This involves recognizing His authority in our personal lives, families, and societies, and seeking to conform our actions and decisions to His will. It is a reminder that Christ’s truth, justice, and love should guide every aspect of life.
4. The Social Reign of Christ:
   Another key theme is the social dimension of Christ’s kingship. Pope Pius XI emphasized that Christ must reign not only in hearts but also in society. The feast encourages Christians to work for justice, peace, and the common good, ensuring that Christ’s values permeate social and political structures.

Conclusion

The Feast of Christ the King serves as a powerful reminder that Christ’s reign extends beyond the spiritual realm and into every facet of life. It calls the faithful to acknowledge and submit to His kingship, both in their personal lives and in the broader society, and to work for the establishment of His kingdom of truth, peace, and justice on earth.

---

The Rosary: A Timeless Devotion from the Past to the Present Age

The Rosary stands as one of the most beloved and enduring devotions in the Catholic Church. Throughout history, it has been a source of strength, comfort, and spiritual renewal for countless souls. Originating in the early centuries of the Church, the Rosary has evolved, becoming a central prayer of meditation on the life of Christ through the intercession of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Today, amidst the complexities of modern life, the Rosary continues to offer the faithful a powerful means to deepen their relationship with God, seek peace, and experience the fruits of prayer.

This reflection traces the historical roots of the Rosary, the development of the devotion through the centuries, and its significance in the present age as a timeless tool for personal transformation and spiritual growth.

Early Roots of the Rosary: From Psalms to Paternosters

The Rosary as we know it today developed gradually over the centuries. Its earliest roots can be traced to the Desert Fathers and early Christian monastics who sought to maintain a rhythm of prayer throughout the day. Those who were unable to read the Psalms—traditionally prayed by monks and clergy in the Liturgy of the Hours—would instead recite 150 Our Fathers (Paternosters) in place of the Psalter. To keep track of their prayers, they used a form of counting beads or knotted cords, laying the groundwork for the Rosary’s structure.

The devotion to Mary also grew during this time. Early Christians would frequently turn to her for intercession, and the Hail Mary, in its initial form, became a popular prayer of praise and petition to the Mother of God. The Angelic Salutation (Luke 1:28), combined with Elizabeth’s greeting (Luke 1:42), formed the basis of the Hail Mary, and by the 12th century, this prayer was becoming more widespread.

St. Dominic and the Rise of the Rosary

One of the pivotal moments in the history of the Rosary came in the 13th century through the figure of St. Dominic. According to tradition, the Virgin Mary appeared to St. Dominic during a time of great spiritual and moral turmoil in the Church, particularly due to the rise of the Albigensian heresy in southern France. Mary gave St. Dominic the Rosary as a spiritual weapon to combat heresy, encourage conversion, and promote the true faith. She instructed him to preach the Rosary and to use it as a powerful tool to draw people closer to Christ.

While historical debate continues over the exact nature of this tradition, it is clear that the Dominican Order played a crucial role in popularizing the Rosary. The structure of the 15 decades, consisting of 150 Hail Marys corresponding to the 150 Psalms, became a widely accepted form of devotion. The Joyful, Sorrowful, and Glorious Mysteries began to take shape as a way to meditate on key events in the life of Christ and His Mother, offering the faithful a comprehensive meditation on the mysteries of salvation.

The Rosary and Marian Apparitions

Over the centuries, the Rosary continued to grow in popularity, reinforced by numerous Marian apparitions where the Blessed Virgin encouraged its recitation. One of the most famous of these apparitions took place in 1858 in Lourdes, France, where Our Lady appeared to St. Bernadette Soubirous. In her apparitions, Mary was seen holding a Rosary, reinforcing its importance as a means of prayer and intercession.

Perhaps the most significant endorsement of the Rosary in modern times came from the apparitions of Our Lady of Fatima in 1917. In these apparitions, the Virgin Mary appeared to three shepherd children, asking them to pray the Rosary daily for the conversion of sinners and for world peace. She specifically emphasized the need for prayer, penance, and devotion to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. The Fatima message has continued to inspire millions of Catholics to take up the Rosary as a powerful weapon against sin and a source of peace in the world.

In other apparitions, such as those at La Salette and Knock, the Rosary has been a recurring symbol of Mary’s desire to draw the faithful closer to her Son through prayer and contemplation.

The Rosary and Key Moments in History

The Rosary has often been invoked in times of crisis and spiritual warfare. One of the most notable moments in history tied to the Rosary is the Battle of Lepanto in 1571. The Christian forces, led by the Holy League, faced the Ottoman fleet in a decisive naval battle. Pope St. Pius V called upon the faithful to pray the Rosary for victory, and after the Christian fleet miraculously triumphed despite overwhelming odds, the Pope attributed the victory to the intercession of Our Lady of the Rosary. In thanksgiving, the Pope instituted the feast of Our Lady of the Rosary on October 7.

The Rosary was also central to other historical moments, such as the survival of the Christian West from further Ottoman advances, as well as more contemporary events. For example, in Austria in 1955, after years of Soviet occupation following World War II, a nationwide Rosary campaign led by Fr. Petrus Pavlicek encouraged Catholics to pray the Rosary for the country’s liberation. The Soviets unexpectedly withdrew, and Austria regained its freedom without bloodshed—a testament, many believe, to the power of prayer through the Rosary.

Papal Endorsements and the Modern Rosary

Throughout history, numerous popes have encouraged the faithful to pray the Rosary, promoting it as an effective means of spiritual growth and protection. Pope Leo XIII, often called the “Pope of the Rosary,” wrote no fewer than eleven encyclicals on the importance of the Rosary. He emphasized the Rosary as a means of sanctification, particularly through its meditative structure that allows one to ponder the life of Christ while invoking Mary’s intercession.

In the modern era, Pope Pius XII referred to the Rosary as a “compendium of the entire Gospel,” stressing that it leads the faithful into a deeper understanding of the mysteries of salvation. Pope St. John XXIII and Pope St. Paul VI also promoted the Rosary as an essential prayer for families, encouraging them to pray together as a means of building unity and holiness within the home.

Pope St. John Paul II, a great devotee of the Rosary, wrote the Apostolic Letter Rosarium Virginis Mariae in 2002, where he introduced the Luminous Mysteries to reflect more deeply on the public ministry of Christ. John Paul II called the Rosary his favorite prayer, and he credited it with sustaining him throughout his pontificate, particularly during times of personal trial and global crisis.

The Rosary in the Present Age

In our modern world, marked by restlessness, materialism, and spiritual indifference, the Rosary offers a much-needed oasis of peace and contemplation. At its core, the Rosary is a prayer of simplicity that invites us to slow down, reflect on the mysteries of our faith, and place ourselves in the hands of God through the intercession of Mary.

In the fast-paced digital age, where distractions abound, the repetitive structure of the Rosary becomes a tool for mindfulness, allowing the faithful to center their thoughts on Christ. Each decade leads us deeper into the mysteries of salvation, helping us to internalize the life of Christ and His plan for humanity.

For many Catholics today, the Rosary continues to be a source of comfort, particularly during personal struggles, illness, or times of uncertainty. Its intercessory power is as relevant now as ever, offering peace to troubled hearts and hope for those who feel overwhelmed by the complexities of modern life.

Conclusion: The Rosary as a Lifelong Companion

The Rosary, with its roots deep in the tradition of the Church, remains a timeless devotion that draws the faithful closer to Christ through Mary. Whether invoked during times of crisis or prayed quietly in the midst of daily life, the Rosary offers a path of healing, contemplation, and spiritual growth. From its earliest forms to its role in modern Marian apparitions, the Rosary is a prayer that connects heaven and earth, drawing believers into the mysteries of salvation.

As we continue to navigate the challenges of the present age, the Rosary remains a powerful tool for evangelization, spiritual renewal, and personal transformation. May we, like the saints and countless generations before us, hold fast to this sacred prayer, trusting in the intercession of the Blessed Virgin Mary to lead us ever closer to her Son, Jesus Christ.

Our Lady of the Rosary, pray for us!

---

---

CURRENT AFFAIRS

---

An Initial Analysis of Dilexit Nos: Pope Francis’s Sacred Heart Encyclical and Its Traditional Catholic Reception

Pope Francis’s latest encyclical, Dilexit Nos (“He Loved Us”), introduces a detailed reflection on the Sacred Heart of Jesus, touching on both personal spirituality and the broader mission of the Church in addressing societal issues. Released in October 2024, this encyclical takes a notably different approach from some of Francis’s earlier works, like Amoris Laetitia and Fratelli Tutti, by not referencing these documents. Instead, Dilexit Nos turns to pre-Vatican II sources, referencing figures such as Pope Pius XII favorably and integrating their teachings into a call for both spiritual and social renewal.

From a traditional Catholic perspective, Dilexit Nos has provoked a mixed response. On the one hand, Francis’s appeal to pre-conciliar sources, particularly Haurietis Aquas (1956), resonates with conservative Catholics who value the strong doctrinal focus and rich devotional practices of the pre-Vatican II Church. However, concerns arise regarding the encyclical’s emphasis on outward social engagement, its critique of traditional forms of devotion, and its broader theological framework, which some traditionalists view as undermining key elements of personal piety and doctrinal clarity​ [America Magazine][AMAN].

Absence of Self-Referencing and a Return to Pre-Vatican II Sources

One of the most striking aspects of Dilexit Nos is the absence of self-referencing that has been typical of Francis’s previous writings. In Amoris Laetitia, for instance, Francis often cited his own teachings on moral and pastoral issues, particularly regarding the family, marriage, and the reception of the sacraments. This self-referencing sparked controversy, especially among traditionalists, due to the perceived ambiguity surrounding issues such as communion for divorced and remarried Catholics​ [America Magazine]. The absence of such references in Dilexit Nos marks a departure from this pattern, creating an opening for a more focused reflection on the Sacred Heart without the distractions of contentious contemporary debates.

Instead of turning to his previous writings, Francis draws heavily on pre-Vatican II sources, particularly Pope Pius XII’s Haurietis Aquas, an encyclical that revitalized devotion to the Sacred Heart during the mid-20th century. By doing so, Francis acknowledges the richness of this tradition, rooted in both Scripture and Church history, and the importance of fostering an intimate relationship with Christ through devotion to His Sacred Heart. The decision to emphasize pre-conciliar teachings, especially in a document released during the anniversary of St. Margaret Mary Alacoque’s Sacred Heart visions, could be seen as an effort to appeal to more conservative factions within the Church who feel that much of the post-Vatican II era has neglected or diluted such devotions​ [Herald Malaysia Online][AMAN].

A Shift in Focus: From Personal Piety to Social Engagement

While Francis’s appeal to pre-conciliar sources may resonate with traditional Catholics, Dilexit Nos also raises concerns due to its strong emphasis on the social implications of devotion to the Sacred Heart. For Francis, devotion to Christ’s heart must extend beyond personal spirituality and become a call to social and communal action. This is evident when Francis writes, “The Christian message is attractive when experienced and expressed in its totality: not simply as a refuge for pious thoughts or an occasion for impressive ceremonies”​ [America Magazine]. He emphasizes that personal devotion to the Sacred Heart should not result in an isolated religious experience but must lead to engagement in addressing societal issues such as poverty, inequality, and injustice.

For many traditional Catholics, this emphasis on outward social reform over personal piety may be seen as a departure from the traditional focus of Sacred Heart devotion, which has historically emphasized interior spirituality, penance, and reparation for sin. While Catholic social teaching has always highlighted the importance of charity and social justice, the encyclical’s insistence that true devotion is necessarily linked to societal reform might be perceived as downplaying the importance of individual spiritual practices, especially in a world where many feel the Church’s internal stability is at risk​ [America Magazine].

Critique of Traditional Devotions and Sacrifice

Another point of concern for traditional Catholics in Dilexit Nos is Francis’s critique of certain forms of traditional devotion, especially those involving personal sacrifice. In the encyclical, Francis warns against exaggerated forms of reparation, which he argues could give the impression that Christ’s sacrifice was insufficient for redemption. He writes, “So great an emphasis on God’s justice might eventually lead to the notion that Christ’s sacrifice was somehow incomplete or only partly efficacious, or that his mercy was not sufficiently powerful”​ [America Magazine]. Francis’s concern is that an excessive focus on personal suffering as a form of reparation might overshadow the completeness of Christ’s redemptive act on the Cross.

For traditional Catholics, this critique could be interpreted as a dismissal of long-standing spiritual practices, such as offering personal sacrifices and penances in reparation for sin. These devotions, often linked to the theology of atonement and justice, have been central to Catholic spirituality for centuries. By downplaying the importance of these practices, Francis risks alienating Catholics who view such acts of penance as essential to their relationship with Christ and the Church’s call to holiness​ [America Magazine].

Theological and Doctrinal Ambiguities

While Francis’s appeal to pre-Vatican II popes and his critique of secularization may seem like an olive branch to traditionalists, some may argue that the encyclical still lacks the doctrinal clarity that many within the Church desire. In Dilexit Nos, Francis emphasizes that devotion to the Sacred Heart must not only be spiritual but also lead to societal change. He writes, “Would it please the heart that so loved us, if we were to bask in a private religious experience while ignoring its implications for the society in which we live?”​ [America Magazine]. While this message aligns with the Church’s call to social justice, traditional Catholics might see it as part of a broader trend in Francis’s pontificate that prioritizes pastoral outreach and social issues over doctrinal precision.

This tension is evident in the broader context of the synodality debates within the Church, where many traditional Catholics feel that essential doctrines are being sidelined in favor of pastoral accommodation. Francis’s refusal to engage directly with more controversial moral or doctrinal issues in Dilexit Nos—such as those surrounding marriage, sexuality, and the sacraments—may be seen as a continuation of this trend. Traditionalists may argue that while social justice is an essential aspect of the Christian message, the Church’s mission must also include clear teachings on doctrinal and moral issues, which they feel have been increasingly blurred during Francis’s pontificate​ [America Magazine].

Conclusion: A Mixed Reception Among Traditional Catholics

In conclusion, Pope Francis’s Dilexit Nos offers a rich reflection on the Sacred Heart of Jesus, but it has provoked mixed reactions, particularly from traditional Catholic perspectives. While the encyclical appeals to pre-Vatican II sources and emphasizes the importance of personal devotion to the Sacred Heart, its emphasis on social engagement, critique of traditional forms of reparation, and its avoidance of addressing key doctrinal controversies leave room for criticism. The lack of self-referencing to controversial documents like Amoris Laetitia may be seen as an effort to avoid further controversy, yet the encyclical’s overarching framework, which prioritizes societal reform, may not fully satisfy those within the Church who long for a clearer articulation of doctrine and a return to traditional practices of penance and devotion.

Ultimately, Dilexit Nos reflects Francis’s broader vision of the Church, one that calls for a balance between personal spirituality and communal action. However, for traditional Catholics, this balance may still feel skewed towards the latter, at the expense of the former. Whether the encyclical succeeds in bridging the divide between Francis’s progressive reforms and the concerns of traditionalists remains to be seen​ [America Magazine][America Magazine][AMAN].

---

Synod on Synodality: Progress or Crisis? Traditional Catholics Brace for Pope Francis’ Apostolic Exhortation

The conclusion of the Synod on Synodality has stirred intense debate within the Catholic Church, particularly among traditionalists who fear that this process may lead to significant changes in doctrine and governance. Traditional Catholics are especially concerned about how the discussions surrounding gender, LGBTQ+ inclusion, and the role of women in the Church could reshape Catholicism in ways that challenge its core teachings. As Pope Francis prepares to issue an Apostolic Exhortation in 2024 summarizing the Synod’s findings, the Catholic world waits in anticipation—both hopeful and apprehensive—of the potential outcomes. Will the Exhortation guide the Church toward a more inclusive and progressive future, or will it reaffirm the established teachings of the faith?

Key Controversial Issues from the Synod

One of the most divisive aspects of the Synod on Synodality was the discussion on LGBTQ+ inclusion within the Church. The Synod has been lauded for taking steps to reach out to marginalized groups, including those in the LGBTQ+ community, with some bishops suggesting the possibility of blessing same-sex unions. This issue has sent shockwaves through the Church, as many traditionalists view any move in this direction as a departure from Catholic teaching on marriage, which is defined as the union between a man and a woman.

Conservative commentators, including figures like Raymond Cardinal Burke, have warned that such discussions are dangerously close to undermining the Church’s teachings on marriage and sexuality. Burke, known for his unwavering adherence to Catholic orthodoxy, has repeatedly voiced concern about the direction in which the Synod is heading, particularly regarding the potential for doctrinal shifts on these key moral issues. In an interview with Catholic Action, Burke stated, “The Synod has opened the door to ambiguity. If we allow blessings of same-sex unions, we blur the lines between sacramental marriage and relationships that contradict natural law”​ [Catholic Review].

In addition to LGBTQ+ issues, the question of women’s roles within the Church was another flashpoint. While the Synod did not make definitive recommendations regarding women’s ordination, the mere fact that the possibility of women serving in the diaconate was raised has alarmed traditional Catholics. The conversation about expanding women’s roles in the liturgical and ministerial life of the Church signals to many that further progressive reforms may be on the horizon. Bishop Athanasius Schneider, a vocal critic of synodal processes, has expressed concern that any move toward women’s ordination, even as deacons, could pave the way for further changes that would contradict long-standing Church tradition. “The ordination of women would be a rupture in the Church’s sacred tradition, one that cannot be justified by modern cultural trends,” Schneider remarked in an interview​ [Catholic News Agency].

Traditionalist Concerns About Synodal Governance

From a structural perspective, traditional Catholics are also worried about the broader implications of the Synod’s focus on synodality itself. Pope Francis has made it clear that he envisions a more decentralized Church, where greater responsibility is given to local dioceses and laypeople in decision-making processes. This model of “co-responsibility,” where laity and clergy share leadership roles, has been praised by some as a more inclusive and democratic way of governing the Church. However, traditionalists argue that this could lead to fragmentation within the global Church and create inconsistencies in the application of Catholic doctrine.

In particular, critics fear that this decentralized model might weaken the authority of the Vatican and the Pope’s role as the Church’s ultimate teacher on matters of faith and morals. Conservative commentator George Weigel, author of The Irony of Modern Catholic History, has raised concerns that this model could lead to “doctrinal anarchy,” where different regions of the Church adopt divergent practices and teachings. “The unity of the Catholic Church has always depended on the primacy of the papacy and the uniformity of doctrine,” Weigel argues. “What we risk losing with synodality is the clarity and cohesion that have always been the hallmarks of Catholic identity”​ [Catholic News Agency​][National Catholic Reporter].

The Apostolic Exhortation: What’s Next?

With the Synod’s formal sessions concluded, all eyes are now on Pope Francis as he prepares his Apostolic Exhortation, expected to be released in early 2024. This document will outline the Pope’s reflections on the Synod and provide guidance for the Church’s future direction. There is much speculation about what this Exhortation will contain, especially on the controversial issues discussed during the Synod.

Many expect that Pope Francis will emphasize the synodal process itself, encouraging the Church to continue its journey toward greater inclusivity and co-responsibility. Anna Rowlands, a theologian who participated in the Synod, noted that Francis is more interested in “big discussions” than in settling specific doctrinal debates. According to Rowlands, Francis’ goal is to ensure that synodality becomes a “lived reality” for the Church, where laity and clergy work together to shape the Church’s future​ [National Catholic Reporter].

However, for traditional Catholics, this emphasis on process rather than doctrine is precisely what they find concerning. They argue that the Church’s teachings should remain clear and unambiguous, particularly on matters of faith and morals. Many fear that the Exhortation could contain language that, while maintaining the outward appearance of fidelity to doctrine, leaves room for local interpretations that might deviate from traditional teachings.

In terms of LGBTQ+ issues, some speculate that the Exhortation might acknowledge the Synod’s discussions on blessing same-sex unions without formally endorsing them. Francis has previously stated that the Church must accompany people where they are, but he has also reaffirmed the Church’s teaching on marriage. It remains to be seen whether the Exhortation will strike a balance between these two positions or lean toward a more progressive stance.

On the role of women, it is likely that Francis will call for further “reflection” on the possibility of women in the diaconate, echoing the Synod’s recommendation. While this would not amount to an immediate change in doctrine, it would signal an openness to considering reforms that many traditional Catholics find troubling.

Positive Steps and Synod Pressers

Despite these concerns, some positive suggestions and determinations have emerged from the Synod Pressers. The Synod emphasized the need for a renewed formation of priests, particularly in how they engage with families and marginalized communities. There was also consensus on the need for greater transparency in Church governance, with many calling for better use of existing canonical structures to improve decision-making processes.

Pope Francis’ Apostolic Exhortation may build on these suggestions, encouraging bishops to take more active roles in addressing clerical abuses and ensuring that laity are better represented in decision-making processes at the diocesan level. While these reforms may be welcomed by many, traditional Catholics remain skeptical, concerned that greater lay involvement could dilute the Church’s clerical and hierarchical structure.

Conclusion

The Synod on Synodality has revealed deep divisions within the Catholic Church, particularly between progressives who support greater inclusivity and traditionalists who fear that the Church is veering off course. As Pope Francis prepares to release his Apostolic Exhortation, the stakes could not be higher. For traditional Catholics, the future of the Church hangs in the balance, with concerns that synodality could open the door to doctrinal ambiguity and fragmentation. Whether the Exhortation will calm these fears or exacerbate them remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: the debate over the future of Catholicism is far from over.

---

The Crisis in Catholic Education: A Closer Look at RSE and the Role of the Catholic Education Service

The relationship between Catholic education, its adherence to the faith, and the pressures from modern societal norms has become increasingly fraught. Nowhere is this tension more visible than in the recent developments surrounding Relationships and Sex Education (RSE) and the Catholic Education Service (CES). Criticisms have been mounting from both parents and faith leaders who believe that Catholic schools have strayed far from their religious mission. Moreover, the open letter authored by James Esses, co-signed by the Titular Archbishop of Selsey, points to a broader crisis engulfing the very fabric of Catholic educational and religious integrity. Notably, the Archbishop of Selsey, Dr Jerome Lloyd stands as a lone voice among Catholic bishops in raising these criticisms, compared to other leaders of conservative Christian denominations in the UK who have also voiced their concerns.

The Catholic Education Service and Its Role

The CES, in theory, is tasked with ensuring that Catholic schools maintain fidelity to Church teachings in the education of young Catholics. However, the CES has come under scrutiny for its endorsement of RSE programs, particularly Life to the Full, which critics argue presents a distorted version of Catholic moral teaching. As highlighted by the Voice of the Family (VOTF) report, the program contradicts or omits Catholic teaching on critical issues like abortion, contraception, and gender identity (VOTF Report, p. 3). The VOTF report indicates that by approving Life to the Full, the CES has compromised its mission, succumbing to external secular pressures.

Magisterial documents such as Pope Pius XI’s encyclical Divini Illius Magistri (1929) affirm that the Church has always recognized its duty to “watch with the greatest vigilance over the education of the Christian youth committed to her care” (DIM, §43). This duty includes ensuring that education remains faithful to Catholic principles, which is in direct conflict with many of the values promoted by modern secular education systems. Programs like Life to the Full fail to uphold these principles, particularly when they endorse views on gender and sexuality that contradict the Church’s teachings.

Undermining Parental Authority

A major concern raised by both the VOTF report and the open letter to Keir Starmer, co-signed by the Dr Lloyd, is the undermining of parental authority in education. Catholic doctrine firmly asserts that parents are the primary educators of their children, particularly in matters of faith and morality. The Vatican’s Charter of the Rights of the Family (1983) reinforces this point, stating that “parents have the original, primary, and inalienable right to educate their children” (Charter of the Rights of the Family, Article 5). The VOTF report argues that Life to the Full disregards this principle by encouraging children to seek external advice on sexual matters, such as from organizations like Childline, which promote access to contraception and abortion without parental consent (VOTF Report, p. 4).

The Archbishop of Selsey, as the only Catholic leader to co-sign the open letter to the Prime Minister, joins other Christian leaders in defending the rights of parents to educate their children in line with their religious convictions. The letter expresses concern that current political trends, particularly around conversion therapy legislation and gender identity, are increasingly infringing upon parents’ ability to guide their children according to their faith (Conversion Practices Letter, p. 2). Dr Jerome Lloyd’s lone stance among Catholic bishops in co-signing this letter is striking, underscoring his commitment to challenging state overreach into family life, a concern echoed in Vatican documents such as Familiaris Consortio, where Pope John Paul II writes: “The family is the first and fundamental school of social living” (FC, §36).

Gender Ideology and Transgenderism

One of the most controversial aspects of modern RSE programs is their approach to gender and sexuality. The Life to the Full program’s inclusion of materials that affirm transgender identities is particularly concerning to many Catholic parents and educators. This teaching stands in stark opposition to Catholic doctrine, which holds that human beings are created male and female and that this binary identity is a reflection of God’s creation. The Catechism of the Catholic Church clearly states: “Man and woman have been created, which is to say, willed by God” (CCC, §369). By promoting gender fluidity, Life to the Full directly contradicts this foundational belief of the Church (VOTF Report, p. 6).

The legal analysis provided in Karon Monaghan KC’s report on Brighton & Hove’s Trans Inclusion Toolkit highlights broader legal concerns that apply to these educational materials. While Monaghan’s report specifically addresses the Brighton & Hove toolkit, its conclusions are relevant to CES-produced materials like Life to the Full. The analysis warns that policies promoting gender ideology in schools risk violating the rights of parents and children, particularly those with gender-critical or religious views (Monaghan Report, p. 3). By integrating these secular policies into Catholic education, the CES risks infringing upon the religious rights of families and their children’s freedom to be educated in line with their faith.

The Role of Catholic Bishops and Leadership Failures

A recurring theme in the VOTF report is the failure of many Catholic bishops to take decisive action in defending the faith in schools. While some bishops have remained silent on the issue, others have actively endorsed or failed to oppose RSE programs like Life to the Full. This lack of leadership has been a source of great frustration for many Catholic parents who feel that the hierarchy is abdicating its responsibility to safeguard the faith in the education of their children (VOTF Report, p. 8).

The Archbishop of Selsey remains a notable exception to this silence. His decision to co-sign James Esses’ letter to Keir Starmer is a powerful statement, particularly as he stands alone among Catholic bishops in voicing these concerns. His critique of the state’s increasing encroachment into moral education reflects a broader critique of the Catholic hierarchy’s passive stance on RSE and related issues. The Dr Lloyd’s actions contrast sharply with the inaction of other Catholic bishops, who have either failed to speak out or, worse, tacitly supported these problematic educational programs.

The Vatican’s Declaration on Christian Education, Gravissimum Educationis (1965), stresses the duty of bishops to oversee Catholic schools and ensure that they are “imbued with the spirit of Christ” and “contribute to the formation of the students according to the moral and doctrinal principles of the Church” (GE, §8). The VOTF report suggests that the bishops’ failure to address the issues raised by Life to the Full constitutes a dereliction of this duty, leading to confusion and the dilution of Catholic values in schools.

Legal and Grassroots Actions: Reclaiming Catholic Education

Both the VOTF report and the open letter to Keir Starmer emphasize the importance of grassroots and legal actions in defending Catholic education. Parents are urged to demand greater transparency from schools regarding RSE content and to hold educational leaders accountable when these programs deviate from Catholic teachings. According to the VOTF report, parents should not hesitate to request the full scope of RSE materials and raise objections where content contradicts Catholic doctrine (VOTF Report, p. 7).

In addition to grassroots efforts, legal challenges may play a critical role in protecting the religious rights of Catholic families. The Karon Monaghan KC report outlines the potential for legal recourse under the Equality Act 2010 and Human Rights Act 1998 for parents whose children are exposed to ideologies that conflict with their religious beliefs (Monaghan Report, p. 11). In this regard, the introduction of programs like Life to the Full into Catholic schools, particularly when they promote transgenderism and other secular ideologies, could face significant legal challenges.

Conclusion: The Future of Catholic Education

The crisis in Catholic education, as exemplified by the controversies surrounding RSE and the Life to the Full program, reflects broader societal pressures on religious institutions. The growing encroachment of secular ideologies into Catholic education, combined with the lack of decisive action from many bishops, threatens the integrity of Catholic schools. However, the Titular Archbishop of Selsey’s courageous stance, alongside other orthodox Christian leaders, offers hope that the Church can reclaim its educational mission.

The Vatican’s teachings make it clear that Catholic education must remain faithful to the Church’s moral and doctrinal principles. As Pope John Paul II stated in his Apostolic Exhortation Familiaris Consortio, the family is the “domestic church” and the primary place where faith is nurtured and passed on (FC, §36). Catholic schools, in partnership with parents, must uphold this sacred duty.

Ultimately, the future of Catholic education in the UK depends on the Church’s ability to resist secular pressures and reassert its commitment to forming young Catholics in the faith. Parents, educators, and leaders must work together to ensure that Catholic schools remain true to their mission, offering an education that is grounded in the timeless truths of the Gospel and the teachings of the Church.

1. Voice of the Family Report, October 2024, pp. 3-8
2. Advice of Karon Monaghan KC, pp. 3-11
3. Conversion Practices Letter to Keir Starmer, October 2024, pp. 1-2
4. Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC), Paragraph 6. Man, §369
5. Divini Illius Magistri, Pope Pius XI, §43
6. Familiaris Consortio, Pope John Paul II, §36
7. Gravissimum Educationis, §8
8. Charter of the Rights of the Family, Article 5

---

A Celebration of Faith: Pope Francis Canonizes 14 New Saints, Honoring Lives of Service, Martyrdom, and Mission

In October 2024, Pope Francis presided over a significant event in the Catholic Church: the canonization of 14 new saints. This ceremony, held in St. Peter’s Square, was a global celebration that attracted thousands of pilgrims from around the world. These newly canonized saints reflect diverse vocations and contributions to the Church, from missionary work to acts of martyrdom. Their recognition emphasizes the Church’s continuing mission to inspire modern Catholics through the lives of those who displayed extraordinary virtue and devotion.

The Martyrs of Damascus: Witnesses to the Faith

Among the most notable of the newly canonized saints are the Martyrs of Damascus, a group of seven Franciscan friars and three laymen who were martyred in 1860. This group was killed during a wave of violence against Christians in Syria, sparked by political and religious tensions in the region. Despite the threats they faced, these men refused to renounce their Christian faith, remaining steadfast in their beliefs until their deaths. Their martyrdom is a profound testament to the Church’s recognition of those who give their lives in the name of Christ.

The canonization of these martyrs resonates particularly strongly in the modern era, as Christians in various parts of the world continue to face persecution for their faith. The Church has always viewed martyrdom as the ultimate act of fidelity to God, and the Martyrs of Damascus serve as a powerful reminder of the cost of discipleship. Their elevation to sainthood is not only an honor for those who died but also a call for Catholics to stand firm in their faith in the face of adversity.

St. Giuseppe Allamano: The Missionary Spirit

Another newly canonized figure is St. Giuseppe Allamano, an Italian priest who founded the Consolata Missionaries in the early 20th century. Allamano’s vision was to send missionaries across the globe, particularly to regions in Africa, Asia, and South America, where Catholicism was less established. His work laid the groundwork for the spread of the Gospel in these areas, and his missionary order continues to thrive today, with Consolata missionaries working in more than 30 countries.

Allamano’s canonization highlights the importance of missionary work in the Church’s history and its relevance today. As Pope Francis himself has often emphasized, the Church must always have an outward focus, constantly seeking to bring the message of Christ to the “peripheries” of the world. St. Giuseppe Allamano embodies this missionary spirit, showing that the work of evangelization is not confined to any particular time or place. His life serves as an inspiration for those who continue to spread the Gospel in difficult and often dangerous circumstances.

St. Marie-Léonie Paradis: Humility in Service

Another figure who stands out among the newly canonized saints is St. Marie-Léonie Paradis, a Canadian nun who founded the Little Sisters of the Holy Family. Paradis dedicated her life to serving priests, particularly by managing rectories and providing household services to clergy members. Her work was often hidden and uncelebrated, but it played a crucial role in supporting the mission of the Church.

Pope Francis has frequently spoken about the importance of humility and service in the life of the Church, and St. Marie-Léonie Paradis is a model of these virtues. Her canonization is a reminder that sanctity is not only found in dramatic acts of martyrdom or missionary work but also in the quiet, everyday acts of service that sustain the Church’s life and ministry. Paradis’ example encourages Catholics to embrace the often-overlooked tasks that are essential to the Church’s mission.

Global Significance and the Church’s Mission

The canonization of these saints is significant not only for the individuals themselves but also for the Church’s broader mission. By recognizing individuals from different backgrounds—missionaries, martyrs, and servants—the Church affirms the diverse ways in which holiness can be lived out. Each of these saints responded to the call of God in their own unique way, but all of them demonstrated the same commitment to living a life of virtue and faith.

In his homily during the canonization Mass, Pope Francis underscored the centrality of service, love, and faithfulness to the Christian life. He praised the new saints for their “creativity in doing good, steadfastness in difficulties, and generosity to the end.” This message, delivered to a global audience, encourages Catholics to view holiness as something accessible to everyone, regardless of one’s specific vocation or circumstance.

Pope Francis also connected the lives of the new saints to the broader challenges facing the Church today. As the Church continues to navigate complex social, political, and religious landscapes, the examples of the new saints serve as a guide for how Catholics can live out their faith in a world that often seems hostile to Christian values. Whether by standing firm in the face of persecution, like the Martyrs of Damascus, or by serving quietly and humbly, like St. Marie-Léonie Paradis, the new saints provide models for how to respond to the call of holiness in everyday life.

Canonization and the Church’s Future

The canonization of these saints also reflects Pope Francis’ vision for the Church. Throughout his papacy, Francis has emphasized the need for the Church to be a “field hospital,” caring for those on the margins of society and engaging with the world in a spirit of dialogue and compassion. The new saints, each in their own way, embody this vision. Whether through missionary work, martyrdom, or humble service, they all lived out the Church’s call to be a source of healing and hope for a broken world.

This emphasis on service and humility is particularly relevant in the context of the modern Church, where many Catholics feel disconnected from institutional structures. By highlighting the lives of these saints, Pope Francis is calling the Church to return to its roots, focusing on personal holiness, service to others, and a commitment to living the Gospel in concrete, everyday ways.

Conclusion: A Call to Holiness

The canonization of 14 new saints in October 2024 is a moment of great celebration for the Catholic Church. These new saints come from diverse backgrounds and vocations, but they all share a deep commitment to living out their faith in extraordinary ways. Whether through missionary work, martyrdom, or humble service, each of these individuals responded to the call of holiness with courage and fidelity.

For modern Catholics, the lives of these saints serve as a powerful reminder that sanctity is not confined to any particular time or place. Each of us is called to holiness, whether in the dramatic moments of life or in the quiet, everyday tasks that sustain the Church’s mission. As Pope Francis has consistently reminded the faithful, the path to holiness is open to all, and the new saints provide us with concrete examples of how we can walk that path with joy, courage, and faithfulness.

As the Church continues to face new challenges in the 21st century, the lives of the new saints offer a beacon of hope and a source of inspiration. Their canonization reminds us that the call to holiness is universal, and that by living lives of service, love, and faith, we too can participate in the Church’s mission to bring the Gospel to the world.

---

Condemned: Silent Prayer

The case of Adam Smith-Connor has become a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate over free speech and religious freedom in the UK, especially concerning the controversial buffer zones around abortion clinics. Smith-Connor, a British army veteran, was convicted in October 2024 for silently praying near an abortion facility in Bournemouth. His silent prayer violated a Public Space Protection Order (PSPO), which bans protests, including silent vigils and prayers, within buffer zones around abortion clinics. Smith-Connor’s prayer, which he stated was for his son who had been aborted years prior, was deemed by the court to be an act of “disapproval of abortion”​ [ADF International][​Christian Today].

This case has sparked considerable controversy, with critics describing it as a “thoughtcrime” trial, given that Smith-Connor was neither speaking nor engaging with anyone but simply praying in his mind. He was given a conditional discharge and fined £9,000 in prosecution costs. Smith-Connor, along with his legal counsel from ADF UK, has argued that this sets a dangerous precedent for prosecuting individuals based on the content of their thoughts and beliefs​ [Christian Today].

The broader context of this case lies in the newly expanded buffer zones, which will soon be rolled out across England and Wales. These zones, part of the 2023 Public Order Act, criminalize any form of influence or protest within 150 meters of abortion facilities. Critics of the legislation argue that such zones infringe on basic freedoms of speech, thought, and assembly, especially for religious groups​ [spuc.org].

The case has also drawn attention from political figures like Sir Edward Leigh MP, who criticized the prosecution, stating, “To offer a prayer silently in the depths of your heart cannot be an offence”​ [Christian Today]. As buffer zones become more widespread, the outcome of Smith-Connor’s case could be a watershed moment for how such laws are enforced in the UK, with the potential for more prosecutions of individuals engaged in peaceful, silent prayer.

---

Labour’s Orwellian Britain: The Threat to Free Speech and Religious Freedom

The UK’s Labour Party under Sir Keir Starmer is increasingly facing criticism for its policies that many argue could undermine free speech and religious freedom. While Labour claims to promote inclusivity and protect marginalized groups, several of its proposed laws have drawn comparisons to the dystopian world of George Orwell’s 1984. Critics argue that these policies, particularly the trans-inclusive ban on “conversion therapy” and restrictions on online speech, risk creating a society where open debate is stifled, religious teachings are criminalized, and dissenting views are systematically suppressed.

The Threat to Free Speech: Labour’s “Conversion Therapy” Ban

One of the most controversial aspects of Labour’s legislative agenda is its proposal to introduce a sweeping ban on “conversion therapy” that includes not only sexual orientation but also gender identity. While aimed at protecting individuals from abusive practices, critics have raised concerns about how the broad definition of “conversion therapy” could criminalize legitimate conversations between parents, religious leaders, and therapists. In particular, those who counsel caution to gender-questioning individuals—especially children—might find themselves in legal trouble.

The Free Speech Union and various commentators have expressed fears that the proposed ban could stifle discussions around gender identity. According to these critics, the legislation could prevent doctors and parents from offering well-meaning, non-coercive guidance or alternative perspectives that challenge immediate affirmation. As a result, professionals and family members could face accusations of attempting to “convert” a person’s gender identity simply by raising concerns about irreversible medical interventions​ [The Free Speech Union][​The Spectator. This broad scope echoes Orwell’s 1984, where government control extends to every aspect of personal life, suppressing dissent and controlling thought through fear of reprisal.

Laurie Wastell of The Spectator highlights this threat, warning that free speech “will be in peril” under Labour. He points out that such policies risk criminalizing dissenting views on sensitive topics like gender identity, ultimately discouraging open and honest debate​ [The Spectator].

Online Speech Regulation and the “Legal but Harmful” Clause

Another area of concern is Labour’s approach to regulating online speech, particularly with its support for laws that include the controversial “legal but harmful” clause introduced in the Online Safety Act. This legislation, initially passed under the Conservative government, gives the state the power to regulate speech that is not illegal but is deemed harmful. The vagueness of the term “harmful” has led to widespread concerns that it could be used to silence political dissent and restrict discussions on controversial issues.

Fred de Fossard, writing for The Critic, argues that such laws can easily be weaponized to suppress speech the government finds inconvenient. He warns that Labour’s government could expand these powers, leading to an Orwellian scenario where the state controls the flow of information, labeling any dissent as “misinformation” or “harmful”​ [The Critic Magazine]. This would create a chilling effect on free speech, with individuals and organizations censoring themselves to avoid falling foul of vague and subjective laws. In 1984, Orwell’s “Thought Police” ensure that only state-approved narratives are allowed, with any dissenting views erased or rewritten to fit the government’s preferred version of reality. Modern critics fear Labour’s online speech regulations could lead to a similar outcome in the UK.

Religious Freedom Under Threat

Labour’s proposals have also raised concerns about freedom of religion, particularly regarding the impact of the trans-inclusive conversion therapy ban on faith communities. Many religious groups fear that expressing traditional views on gender and sexuality could be criminalized under the new law. For instance, religious leaders who preach or counsel according to their faith’s teachings on marriage and gender might find themselves accused of promoting conversion therapy if their views do not align with modern political norms.

Fred de Fossard highlights the risks to religious freedom in this context, arguing that Labour’s focus on combating “misinformation” and hate speech could silence religious leaders who express views that clash with progressive ideologies​ [The Critic Magazine]. Much like in Orwell’s 1984, where religious expression is subsumed by the state’s ideology, critics fear that Labour’s policies could create an environment where traditional religious beliefs are viewed as harmful or intolerant, and thus suppressed.

Buffer Zones, Two-Tier Policing, and Protest Rights Under Labour

Labour’s approach to public protests, especially concerning sensitive issues like abortion and political dissent, has raised significant concerns about the erosion of protest rights and the rise of what critics term “two-tier policing.” One prominent example is the implementation of “buffer zones” around abortion clinics, which ban protests and other forms of “influencing” within 150 to 200 meters of clinic entrances. The intention behind these zones is to protect women seeking abortions from harassment, but critics argue that the legislation, enacted under the Public Order Act of 2023, is vague and disproportionately restricts free expression.

Human rights organizations, including ADF International, have voiced concerns that the broad nature of these laws could result in the prosecution of individuals engaging in peaceful activities such as silent prayer or offering support to those entering the clinic. Jeremiah Igunnubole, legal counsel for ADF UK, has described the buffer zones as a dangerous precedent, warning that the law’s vagueness makes it susceptible to misuse, potentially criminalizing peaceful expressions of faith​ [ADF International].

This issue also touches on the broader criticism of “two-tier policing,” a concept that has gained traction in the UK. “Two-tier policing” refers to the idea that police enforce laws differently depending on the ideological or political slant of the protest in question. For instance, critics argue that progressive protests, such as those related to environmental activism or certain human rights causes, are policed more leniently, while protests with conservative or religious motives, like pro-life demonstrations, face stricter enforcement. Labour’s policies have fueled these concerns, with commentators suggesting that the introduction of buffer zones and crackdowns on conservative protests indicate a double standard in policing​ [The Spectator].

Under Labour’s current trajectory, critics fear that buffer zones, combined with enhanced police powers to regulate protests, will significantly curtail the right to peaceful assembly and free expression, especially for religious and conservative groups. Protests outside abortion clinics have already led to the prosecution of individuals like Adam Smith-Connor, who was charged for silently praying within a buffer zone. His case exemplifies the growing tension between freedom of thought and expression, and the state’s increasing regulation of protest spaces​ [ADF International].

The broader issue of protest rights under Labour extends beyond abortion clinics, with concerns that these policies could normalize tighter controls on public demonstrations. With accusations of selective policing based on the nature of the protest, the concept of a truly equitable legal system is under question. As the political landscape continues to evolve, many are watching closely to see whether Labour’s approach will continue to prioritize certain viewpoints while marginalizing others.

EDI and the Suppression of Debate

In addition to direct threats to speech and religion, Labour’s emphasis on Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) initiatives has sparked concerns about the stifling of open debate in workplaces and academic settings. The expansion of unconscious bias training and anti-discrimination policies, while intended to promote inclusivity, often leads to the suppression of legitimate discourse. Critics argue that these initiatives foster a culture of conformity, where individuals are afraid to challenge prevailing ideologies for fear of being labeled as discriminatory or bigoted​ [The Free Speech Union][​The Critic Magazine].

In 1984, Orwell’s concept of “doublethink”—the ability to hold two contradictory beliefs simultaneously—mirrors this modern pressure to adhere to conflicting ideas in the name of inclusivity. For example, individuals are often encouraged to accept progressive views on gender identity while simultaneously being discouraged from questioning or debating these views. This suppression of intellectual freedom, critics argue, undermines the very principles of free speech and democratic debate that Labour claims to support.

Parallels with Orwell’s 1984

Labour’s current legislative direction bears troubling similarities to the dystopian world described in George Orwell’s 1984. In the novel, the government controls language, thought, and information through mechanisms like Newspeak and the Thought Police. Any dissenting opinion is not only censored but erased from public consciousness, ensuring that only the state’s version of reality is permitted. The Labour Party’s increasing regulation of speech—whether through the conversion therapy ban or the Online Safety Act—raises fears of a similar trajectory in the UK.

Fred de Fossard has pointed out that Labour’s efforts to combat “misinformation” by regulating speech online creates a slippery slope where dissenting views are suppressed in the name of protecting the public. He argues that the government could label any speech it dislikes as harmful or false, much like how Orwell’s Party dismisses inconvenient truths as “thoughtcrime”​ [The Critic Magazine]. This fear is compounded by Labour’s broad definitions of what constitutes harmful speech, particularly when it comes to discussions on gender identity and religious teachings. The result is a society where individuals and institutions censor themselves, echoing Orwell’s vision of a populace that is too afraid to speak freely.

Conclusion: Labour’s Orwellian Britain?

Labour’s proposed policies, from the trans-inclusive conversion therapy ban to the regulation of online speech, raise serious concerns about the future of free speech and religious freedom in the UK. Critics argue that these measures, while intended to protect marginalized groups, risk creating an Orwellian society where dissent is suppressed, debate is stifled, and traditional beliefs are criminalized. As Fred de Fossard warns, the increasing regulation of speech in the name of protecting the public could lead to a chilling effect on free expression, much like the controlled and censored society depicted in Orwell’s 1984 [​The Critic Magazine].

As Labour continues to push its legislative agenda, the challenge will be to balance the protection of vulnerable communities with the preservation of the fundamental rights to free speech and religious expression. Without careful consideration, the UK could find itself drifting toward an Orwellian future, where open debate and intellectual freedom are replaced by conformity and censorship.

---

---

#WallOfSilencingBrighton: Protest Highlights Gender-Critical Concerns as Councillors Pass Through Demonstrators at Hove Town Hall

The #WallOfSilencingBrighton protest on October 24, 2024, marked a significant moment in the ongoing gender-critical debate in Brighton. Timed to coincide with a full City Council meeting, the protest took place outside Hove Town Hall, ensuring that councillors had to pass through the gathering of demonstrators to enter the building. The event aimed to confront the Brighton and Hove City Council’s handling of gender-critical issues, specifically the perceived silencing of concerns regarding transgender policies in schools and the lack of single-sex spaces for women.

The protest gained additional attention with the presence of Dr. Jerome Lloyd, the Titular Archbishop of Selsey and co-founder of PSHEbrighton, an organization that campaigns on safeguarding issues, particularly in relation to gender identity in education. Dr. Lloyd’s attendance underscored the gravity of the concerns being raised, particularly regarding the well-being of children and women in spaces traditionally reserved for females. PSHEbrighton has been vocal in criticizing Brighton’s schools for allowing practices like breast binding without parental knowledge, a practice Labour Council Leader Bella Sankey has dismissed as “baseless smears” despite attending a meeting at a school with parents about such a case.

Protesters handed out leaflets to members of the public, drawing attention to the absence of single-sex spaces for rape survivors in Brighton and the broader issues surrounding gender-affirming policies in schools. These leaflets, which had previously been confiscated at a separate council event under claims of being “offensive” and “transphobic,” were distributed without incident during the protest. Many demonstrators reported positive, appreciative conversations with passersby, indicating a significant level of public support for their cause.

The protest was not just about gender-critical views but also about the broader issue of free speech and the suppression of certain viewpoints in the city. Demonstrators argued that the Brighton and Hove City Council’s actions—whether in schools or in public debates—amounted to the systematic silencing of those questioning the prevailing narratives around transgender issues. The timing of the protest, coinciding with a City Council meeting, was a deliberate attempt to ensure that councillors could not ignore these concerns as they went about their business inside the hall​ [Brighton and Hove News][Brighton & Hove City Council][Brighton and Hove News].

This event represents a growing tension in Brighton, a city known for its inclusive stance, between the push for transgender rights and the insistence by some that women’s safety and children’s welfare are being overlooked in the process. Dr. Lloyd’s involvement highlights the intersection of religious, safeguarding, and educational concerns in this debate, further elevating the profile of the gender-critical movement in Brighton.

---

Hope: Rising attendance at traditional forms of worship

In recent years, there has been a noticeable resurgence in interest and attendance at traditional liturgical services across Christian denominations. Notably, services such as Choral Evensong in Church of England cathedrals and the Traditional Latin Mass (TLM) in Catholic churches have experienced significant growth, attracting not only long-time worshippers but also newer and younger congregants, including millennials and Generation Z. This revival speaks to a broader cultural hunger for tradition, reverence, and a connection to the historical roots of the Christian faith—elements that seem increasingly appealing in a fast-paced, modern world.

The Rise of Choral Evensong in the Church of England

Choral Evensong, a hallmark of Anglican worship that blends scripture, music, and prayer, has seen a remarkable increase in attendance, particularly in the last decade. Attendance at midweek services, largely driven by Evensong, has surged by more than 60%, according to Church of England statistics. In 2007, around 7,000 people attended midweek services each week. By 2017, that number had grown to over 18,000​ [Premier Christian News]​][Christian Today]. This growth is especially striking at a time when many other forms of church attendance, particularly in rural parishes, are in decline.

What makes Evensong so compelling? For many, it is the combination of choral music, liturgical structure, and contemplative atmosphere that draws them in. The service itself is steeped in history, dating back to the time of the English Reformation and Archbishop Thomas Cranmer’s Book of Common Prayer in 1549, which provided the foundational text for the service. Evensong incorporates elements from older monastic offices such as Vespers and Compline, which have their roots in Christian and Judaic traditions. The service is also framed by beautiful choral compositions, which, over centuries, have included works by great composers like William Byrd, Thomas Tallis, and more recently, modern composers who continue to add to the Evensong repertoire​ [Christian Today].

In an era dominated by digital media and short attention spans, Evensong offers a counterbalance—a 45-minute service characterized by stillness, reflection, and musical beauty. For some, this sacred space is what sets Evensong apart. As one study by Oxford musicologist Kathryn King suggests, the peaceful environment and emotional impact of the choral music have helped foster a revival in attendance. Her research aims to understand the psychological and spiritual effects of Choral Evensong on congregants, with initial findings indicating that many people are drawn to the serenity and transcendence the service provides​ [Premier Christian News].

Interestingly, this resurgence in Evensong attendance isn’t limited to practicing Christians. It has also attracted individuals who don’t identify with the faith, including atheists and agnostics. Richard Dawkins, a prominent atheist, has expressed a particular affection for Evensong, remarking on its aesthetic and emotional appeal, even if he does not subscribe to the religious aspects. This highlights how Evensong has become a cultural as well as a spiritual experience, one that appeals to a wide audience seeking peace, beauty, and a sense of history in an increasingly secular world​ [Christian Today].

The Appeal of the Traditional Latin Mass (TLM)

Parallel to the growth of Evensong, the Traditional Latin Mass, or TLM, has experienced its own renaissance, particularly among younger Catholics. While the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965) sought to modernize Catholic liturgy with the introduction of the Novus Ordo Mass, which could be celebrated in vernacular languages, many Catholics have found themselves drawn back to the older, more solemn Latin rite. What is most notable about this resurgence is the demographic that supports it—millennials and Generation Z, generations that are often perceived as disconnected from tradition.

In the United States, it is estimated that approximately 100,000 Catholics regularly attend Latin Masses. These Masses, characterized by Gregorian chant, traditional vestments, and the priest facing the altar (ad orientem), offer a radically different experience compared to the modern Novus Ordo liturgy. For many, the appeal of the Latin Mass lies in its emphasis on reverence, mystery, and a sense of the sacred. Younger Catholics in particular have spoken about feeling more connected to the roots of the Church and experiencing a deeper spiritual fulfillment at TLM services​ [Premier Christian News][​Christian Today].

One striking aspect of this movement is that many of these young Catholics did not grow up with the Latin Mass and may have only encountered it as adults. For them, attending the TLM represents a deliberate choice, often motivated by a desire for greater solemnity and a more tangible connection to the history of the Church. The emphasis on beauty, reverence, and tradition resonates with those who feel that modern liturgies have, in some cases, lost their sense of awe and transcendence​ [Anglican Mainstream].

Moreover, traditionalist movements like the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter (FSSP) and the Institute of Christ the King Sovereign Priest (ICKSP), which are dedicated to preserving and promoting the Latin Mass, have seen growth in vocations and attendance. This phenomenon underscores the appeal of the TLM not only as a form of worship but as a way of life that seeks to recover the spiritual depth that many believe has been lost in modern Catholic practice​ [Christian Today].

Shared Elements: A Hunger for Tradition and Transcendence

Both Choral Evensong and the Traditional Latin Mass share common themes in their revival. At the heart of both is a desire for a worship experience that transcends the everyday, one that connects the present with the past through ritual, music, and sacred space. This desire for transcendence reflects a broader cultural trend, one that seeks to counterbalance the speed, distraction, and often superficial nature of modern life.

In both cases, the liturgical beauty of the services plays a significant role. Evensong’s polyphonic choral compositions, often sung in magnificent cathedral settings, evoke a sense of divine beauty that resonates deeply with attendees. Likewise, the Latin Mass, with its Gregorian chants and solemn rituals, offers an immersive experience that invites congregants into the mystery of the divine.

Another shared element is the growing number of younger people who are finding meaning in these traditional forms of worship. While contemporary forms of worship have their place, many younger worshippers are seeking something more rooted, more reverent, and more timeless. These younger attendees often express a sense of disenchantment with what they perceive as the casualness or lack of depth in some modern liturgies. By contrast, the traditional forms offer a countercultural alternative—one that emphasizes reverence, contemplation, and connection to a sacred tradition​ [Premier Christian News][​Christian Today][​Anglican Mainstream].

Looking Forward: The Future of Traditional Liturgies

The growing popularity of Choral Evensong and the Traditional Latin Mass raises important questions about the future of traditional liturgies in Christian worship. Will these services continue to grow in popularity, or are they simply enjoying a temporary revival? While it is difficult to predict the long-term trajectory, the current trends suggest that these traditional forms of worship are meeting a deep spiritual need that is not easily satisfied by more modern forms of liturgy.

For the Church of England, the rise in Evensong attendance has prompted further exploration into how these services can be made more accessible to a wider audience. Academic research into the psychological and emotional benefits of attending Evensong, such as that conducted by Kathryn King, may provide insights that help churches continue to grow their congregations. Additionally, outreach initiatives like the Evensong reception scheme have proven effective in attracting new attendees, suggesting that these efforts could be expanded in the future​ [Premier Christian News].

For the Catholic Church, the growing interest in the Latin Mass presents a unique challenge. While many Catholics are drawn to the beauty and reverence of the TLM, the post-Vatican II reforms emphasized the importance of Mass in the vernacular, making it accessible to more people. Balancing the desire for tradition with the need for inclusivity will likely remain a point of discussion within the Church for years to come. However, the increasing number of vocations to traditionalist orders and the growing attendance at TLM services suggest that the Latin Mass will continue to play a significant role in Catholic worship.

Conclusion

The resurgence of traditional liturgies such as Choral Evensong and the Traditional Latin Mass speaks to a broader cultural and spiritual hunger for depth, beauty, and connection to the sacred. In a world that often feels disconnected from history and tradition, these services offer a sense of continuity with the past while providing a deeply transcendent worship experience. Whether through the soaring harmonies of Evensong or the solemn rituals of the Latin Mass, congregants—young and old alike—are rediscovering the power of traditional liturgy to nourish the soul.

---

Beyond Nostalgia: Reclaiming Mutual Respect in a Fragmented Society

In recent years, the growing popularity of period dramas like Downton Abbey, Call the Midwife, and All Creatures Great and Small speaks to a collective yearning for a time when society appeared more cohesive and grounded in shared values. These shows offer a nostalgic glimpse into a recognizably “British” culture, with strong themes of respect, duty, and community. However, while we may celebrate the elegance and order of these bygone eras, we rarely acknowledge the decline of the virtues that made them function. These dramas remind us of a world where societal roles, manners, and mutual consideration were foundational. Yet today, these elements are mostly relegated to television sets and historical fiction, leaving us captivated by the echoes of a past we’ve largely forgotten or abandoned.

Despite this nostalgia, there is no reason why, even with modern advancements, we couldn’t reclaim some of the positive elements of that past—values like deference, respect, appreciation for knowledge and wisdom, prudence, cultural awareness, and a deep sense of history. These virtues fostered a society in which dignity and mutual respect were paramount. The popularity of these dramas indicates a yearning for something more substantial, a way of living that is both rooted and respectful, a sharp contrast to the fragmented world we navigate today.

The Missteps of EDI: Diluting Genuine Respect and Understanding

This modern fragmentation is exacerbated by frameworks like Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI), which, while well-intentioned, often create more division than unity. EDI programs, designed to foster fairness and inclusivity, frequently focus too much on identity categories—race, gender, and sexual orientation—rather than fostering deeper human connections and mutual respect based on individual merit and character.

While these initiatives have gained traction, especially in corporate and academic environments, they are often criticized for promoting superficial diversity metrics instead of fostering a culture where genuine understanding and respect thrive. Commentators argue that such frameworks reduce people to their demographic labels, disregarding the nuances of individual experience​ [Times Higher Education (THE)][Emerald]. This approach often results in tokenism and performative gestures, which fail to address systemic inequalities meaningfully.

Moreover, EDI’s focus on compliance rather than true engagement has led to what some cultural critics call a “culture of conformity,” where the emphasis is on meeting quotas rather than fostering environments that encourage open dialogue and intellectual freedom​ [Illiberalism]. This stifles meaningful interactions and limits the potential for individuals to be seen and respected for their unique contributions.

In fact, many argue that EDI’s emphasis on equal outcomes rather than equal opportunities undermines merit and contribution. The idea of “equity” as enforced sameness flattens the landscape of individual differences, eroding respect for genuine expertise, effort, and talent. The result is a society in which mutual consideration is diminished, replaced by a superficial focus on diversity metrics​ [Emerald].

The Erosion of Traditional Virtues

At the heart of this modern crisis is a loss of the traditional virtues that once defined a more cohesive society. Respect has become a shallow term, reduced to mere tolerance rather than being rooted in a deeper understanding of character, wisdom, or experience. The obsession with surface-level equality has led to the erosion of deference to those who have earned respect through merit, expertise, or moral authority. In striving to make everything equal, we’ve stripped away the reverence for genuine merit, wisdom, and authority that once held society together.

This cultural shift has been exacerbated by the rise of identity politics, which places personal identity markers above shared human values. While inclusivity is important, mutual consideration cannot thrive when individuals are primarily viewed through the lens of their group identity. This focus can breed resentment, as people feel either unfairly favored or marginalized based on their demographic category rather than their character or contributions​ [Canadian HR Reporter][Illiberalism].

A Call to Reclaim Mutual Consideration and Merit

To rebuild a society grounded in mutual respect and dignity, we must move beyond the limiting frameworks of EDI and instead reclaim a focus on individual merit, character, and shared humanity. True respect is earned through wisdom, contribution, and moral integrity—not simply demanded based on demographic identity. Without this recalibration, we risk deepening the fragmentation that already plagues our culture.

By fostering environments that value open dialogue, intellectual diversity, and individual merit, we can rebuild a culture of mutual consideration. This is not a call to regress to the past, but to reintegrate the timeless virtues of respect, wisdom, and prudence into contemporary society. The modern world, with all its advancements, still stands to benefit from these enduring principles, which foster the dignity and mutual regard that so many seek but often fail to extend to others.

The increasing nostalgia for a bygone era seen in the popularity of period dramas reflects a cultural hunger for these very virtues. While shows like Downton Abbey and Call the Midwife remind us of a society grounded in respect and order, they also highlight what we have lost. These stories allow us to escape into an idealized version of the past, but without a real effort to revive the values that once made society function cohesively, we remain stuck in a world where respect is fleeting and superficial​ [Times Higher Education (THE)][Canadian HR Reporter].

A Path Forward: Beyond EDI and Toward a Balanced Society

The challenge before us is to move beyond outdated frameworks like EDI and to cultivate a society where true diversity—of thought, experience, and character—is genuinely valued. This requires a shift in focus from identity politics to individual merit and contribution. As more cultural commentators and professionals begin to recognize the shortcomings of current diversity frameworks, there is a growing call for a more balanced approach that honors both individuality and shared human values​ [Times Higher Education (THE)][Illiberalism].

In conclusion, the current state of cultural fragmentation calls for a revival of the virtues that once grounded society—respect, wisdom, and prudence. These values, when paired with a genuine appreciation for individual contributions, can restore the mutual consideration that our society so desperately needs. By moving beyond performative EDI policies and fostering environments where true merit is rewarded, we can build a more cohesive and respectful society.

---

Archbishop of Selsey at the Battle of Ideas 2024: Defending Free Speech and Religious Freedom in a Modern World

At the Battle of Ideas Festival 2024, held at Church House in Westminster from October 19-20, the Archbishop of Selsey, a notable advocate for free speech and critical discourse within religious circles, was among the attendees. The festival, organized by the Academy of Ideas and spearheaded by Baroness Claire Fox, is widely regarded as one of the UK’s most intellectually stimulating events, bringing together speakers from diverse backgrounds to engage in debates on pressing social, political, and cultural issues.

Founded nearly two decades ago by Baroness Fox, the Academy of Ideas has sought to combat the growing trend of ideological conformity. The Battle of Ideas embodies this mission by creating a space where controversial and challenging subjects can be discussed without fear of censorship. The festival’s motto, “Free Speech Allowed,” was on full display in 2024 as discussions tackled a range of topics including the culture wars, misinformation, cancel culture, and the role of technology in shaping the future.

A particularly contentious debate was the panel titled “Banning Conversion Therapy: A Threat to Freedom and Conscience?”, which addressed the difficult balance between individual rights and religious freedom. The Archbishop of Selsey, known for his strong views on protecting freedom of religion, attended this session, reflecting his continued engagement with modern societal challenges while upholding traditional values.

Prominent speakers at the festival included Inaya Folarin Iman, founder of the Equiano Project, Paul Embery, a trade unionist and critic of contemporary left-wing ideologies, and Maya Forstater, an outspoken advocate for free speech and gender-critical perspectives. These figures, along with many others, engaged in spirited debates, embodying the festival’s commitment to open and respectful discourse.

For attendees like the Archbishop of Selsey, the festival was more than a forum for discussion—it was an opportunity for networking and building camaraderie with like-minded individuals who share concerns about the increasing suppression of public debate. Whether during formal panels or informal gatherings, the Battle of Ideas fosters an environment where intellectual diversity and the defense of free speech are celebrated. The Archbishop’s participation further underscored the importance of religious leaders engaging with broader societal debates on freedom and expression.

The structure of the festival encourages participation from the audience, ensuring that voices from all walks of life can contribute to the conversation. For seasoned attendees like the Archbishop, it provides a vital platform to challenge assumptions, meet new people, and build alliances with those committed to defending the right to speak freely in increasingly restrictive environments.

With the 2024 festival now concluded, the Academy of Ideas continues to hold debates and discussions on key social and cultural issues throughout the year. Claire Fox, in her role as an independent peer in the House of Lords, remains a staunch advocate for free speech, regularly addressing these issues within the political arena. The Archbishop of Selsey’s involvement in the festival highlights the intersection of religious discourse with broader debates on freedom, as he remains a vocal defender of religious liberties and the free exchange of ideas.

Ultimately, the Battle of Ideas serves as a critical platform for anyone invested in the protection of free speech, especially in an era where the boundaries of acceptable discourse seem increasingly constrained. The festival, with its wide-ranging discussions and engaged participants, is an invaluable event for those committed to preserving the principles of free expression.

---

Assisted dying professionals and experts speak up…

The debate over the UK’s proposed Assisted Dying Bill has reached a pivotal moment as it moves towards a vote in Parliament in November 2024. Labour MP Kim Leadbeater’s bill, which would legalize assisted dying for terminally ill adults, has sparked both strong support and fierce opposition from various sectors, including religious, medical, and disability rights groups.

Growing Opposition from Religious and Disability Groups

Christian Concern, SPUC (Society for the Protection of Unborn Children), and disability advocacy groups like Disabled People Against Cuts have led public demonstrations against the bill. Christian Concern organized a demonstration outside Parliament under the banner “Kill the Bill, Not the Ill,” drawing attention to international examples, such as Canada, where euthanasia laws have expanded dramatically, leading to concerns about vulnerable individuals being pressured into choosing assisted suicide as a solution to inadequate care or social support. Andrea Williams, CEO of Christian Concern, emphasized that legalizing assisted dying sends the message that some lives are not worth living, saying, “Assisted suicide claims to be compassionate but, in fact, it turns vulnerable people into problems that can be ‘fixed’ with a lethal injection”​ [Christian Concern][​SPUC].

Disability rights campaigners have voiced fears that the bill could disproportionately impact disabled people. Ellen Clifford of the Deaf and Disabled People’s Organisations (DDPOs) warned that legalizing assisted dying could put pressure on disabled individuals to end their lives prematurely due to the lack of sufficient support services. She stressed that this could lead to a situation similar to Canada or Oregon, where laws initially designed with strict safeguards have since expanded. “Our support services are currently broken. We must not create a system like Canada where assisted suicide plugs gaps in services,” Clifford argued​ [Morning Star].

Criticism from Medical Professionals

A major point of contention for critics is the perceived failure of the NHS to adequately provide palliative care. Palliative care doctors have expressed alarm at the bill, calling it a “cheaper solution” than investing in proper end-of-life care. The Association for Palliative Medicine (APM), representing over 1,300 doctors, has spoken out strongly against the proposed legislation. Dr. Matthew Doré, honorary secretary of the APM, criticized the focus on assisted dying when hospice care is underfunded and palliative care resources are stretched thin. He highlighted that only 37% of hospice funding comes from the government, with the rest reliant on charitable donations, and warned that the bill would undermine efforts to improve end-of-life care​ [SPUC].

Dr. Susan Marriott, head of public policy at the Christian Medical Fellowship, echoed these concerns, pointing out that recent reports have highlighted the poor state of the NHS, particularly in end-of-life care. She cited a poll showing that assisted dying ranked very low on the list of public priorities, with only 4% of respondents viewing it as urgent. “People approaching the end of life need better support… [but] if parliament focuses on making it legal to assist them in committing suicide, then it is seriously missing the mark,” Marriott said​ [Christian Daily].

Political Reaction and Ethical Concerns

The debate in Parliament will be a free vote, allowing MPs to vote according to their conscience. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has expressed his personal support for assisted dying, but the government remains officially neutral on the matter. However, there is growing concern among politicians and commentators about the ethical and practical implications of the bill.

Critics, including the Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby, have warned of a “slippery slope” where the criteria for assisted dying could expand, as seen in other countries. Welby has consistently argued that the law should prioritize protecting the most vulnerable in society, stating that legalizing assisted dying could lead to a situation where individuals feel compelled to end their lives due to societal pressure or lack of care options​ [Morning Star].

Even within political circles, the timing and practicality of implementing such legislation have been questioned. The Health and Social Care Secretary, Wes Streeting, expressed concerns that the NHS is not equipped to handle the sensitive and complex nature of assisted dying properly, particularly given ongoing issues with underfunding and staff shortages in palliative care​ [Christian Daily].

Conclusion: A Crossroads for Assisted Dying in the UK

As the UK approaches its vote on assisted dying, the debate continues to divide public opinion. While supporters argue that the bill provides autonomy and dignity for those suffering at the end of life, critics, including religious leaders, medical professionals, and disability rights advocates, highlight the risks to vulnerable individuals and the potential for abuse. The outcome of this debate will shape the future of end-of-life care in the UK and may set a precedent for other countries considering similar legislation.

---

Archbishop Signs Open Letter to Keir Starmer Calling for Public Inquiry into Gender Ideology: A Broad Coalition Demands Accountability

In recent years, debates surrounding gender identity and the treatment of gender dysphoria—especially in young people—have become a flashpoint in public policy, healthcare, and education. This complex and contentious issue has led to increasing calls for more scrutiny and transparency, with a wide range of voices raising concerns about the current trajectory of gender-related practices. One such effort is the open letter authored by James Esses, a gender-critical activist, which calls for a public inquiry into the infiltration of gender ideology into public institutions. Co-signed by a variety of professionals, including Dr Jerome Lloyd, the Titular Archbishop of Selsey, the letter emphasizes the need for a transparent investigation into how this ideology has shaped public policy and impacted the lives of children and families [✠SELEISI].

This letter, addressed to Labour Party leader Keir Starmer, represents a coalition of concerned individuals from diverse professional backgrounds—healthcare, law, academia, religion, and advocacy—who argue that current approaches to treating gender dysphoria, particularly among minors, may not be evidence-based and could lead to long-term harm. The call for a public inquiry is not simply a demand for policy change; it is a plea for safeguarding, ethical medical practices, and the protection of free speech and open debate.

The Key Figures Behind the Letter

James Esses, the primary author of the letter, has been a central figure in the gender-critical movement in the UK. His own story has garnered attention, as he was expelled from a psychotherapy training program in 2021 after raising concerns about the treatment of children with gender dysphoria. Esses argued that children were being pushed too quickly toward medical interventions like puberty blockers and hormone treatments without sufficient exploration of psychological alternatives. His dismissal from the program, followed by the removal of his volunteer role at Childline, sparked a broader conversation about the silencing of gender-critical voices in public and professional discourse​ [GB News][Anglican Mainstream].

Esses’ experience, along with his activism, has led him to become a prominent advocate for what he sees as child safeguarding in the face of an uncritical embrace of gender ideology. His open letter to Sir Keir Starmer is part of this broader effort to challenge what he and others view as the dangerous consequences of rushing young people into irreversible medical procedures without fully considering the long-term effects.

A vocal advocate for safeguarding and transparency, Archbishop Jerome’s involvement adds significant weight to the letter, particularly as a representative of religious leadership concerned with the well-being of young people. Archbishop Jerome has been a critic of gender ideology for some time, particularly in his role within the educational sector. He previously provided feedback on the Brighton & Hove Trans Inclusion Toolkit for schools, raising concerns about how gender identity policies were being implemented without adequate consideration of their impact on child development​ [✠SELEISI].

Archbishop Jerome’s co-signing of this letter, along with his previous advocacy efforts, signals the broadening of the gender-critical movement beyond secular and political lines. His involvement reflects a commitment to fostering open dialogue about gender identity policies and their potential implications for the future of child welfare and education in the UK.

The Broader Coalition of Co-Signatories

Archbishop Jerome’s signature is one among several high-profile signatories, the letter has attracted support from a wide range of professionals. These co-signatories come from various sectors, including healthcare, law, academia, and free speech advocacy, creating a broad coalition that is united by a shared concern over the current direction of public policies on gender identity.

1. Medical Professionals: Among the co-signatories are doctors, clinicians, and healthcare professionals who are increasingly concerned about the medical treatment of children with gender dysphoria. These professionals emphasize that more research is needed to understand the long-term effects of interventions like puberty blockers and hormone therapy. They point to the findings of the Cass Review, an independent report commissioned by NHS England, which raised significant concerns about the safety and efficacy of these treatments for minors. The Cass Review found that there was insufficient evidence to support the widespread use of medical interventions for young people with gender dysphoria, particularly when these treatments have potentially irreversible consequences​ ​[The JC][✠SELEISI].

Medical professionals who co-signed the letter argue that psychological exploration should be prioritized over immediate affirmation of a child’s gender identity. They stress the need for a more cautious approach that allows children to fully understand the complexities of their feelings before undergoing medical procedures that could have life-altering effects.

2. Legal Experts: Lawyers and barristers who have signed the letter express concern over the legal implications of gender identity policies, particularly in relation to child safeguarding. These legal experts point out that current policies may infringe on the rights of parents and children by fast-tracking young people toward medical interventions without thorough psychological evaluation. They also raise the possibility of future legal challenges against medical professionals who may be held liable for administering treatments that could later be deemed inappropriate or harmful​ [✠SELEISI][GB News].

The involvement of legal experts underscores the potential for broader legal and ethical challenges related to gender identity policies. These professionals argue that a public inquiry is necessary to ensure that the legal framework surrounding gender dysphoria treatment is robust, ethical, and focused on protecting the rights of all parties involved.

3. Academics and Researchers: A number of academics, particularly in the fields of psychology, sociology, and gender studies, have also signed the letter. These researchers are concerned that the rapid adoption of gender-affirming policies in schools and healthcare systems is not supported by sufficient empirical evidence. They argue that the push to affirm a child’s gender identity without critical evaluation may lead to harmful outcomes, particularly for those who later regret their decision to transition [​✠SELEISI].

Academics stress the importance of maintaining a rigorous, evidence-based approach to gender dysphoria. They advocate for more research into the psychological and social factors that contribute to gender identity issues and caution against implementing policies that could cause irreversible harm to young people.

4. Free Speech Advocates: The letter has also garnered support from free speech organizations, including the Free Speech Union. These advocates argue that the current climate around gender identity stifles open debate and discussion, particularly for those who hold gender-critical views. They contend that the fear of being labeled transphobic has led to self-censorship and the silencing of dissenting voices, which ultimately harms the public’s ability to engage in meaningful dialogue about the issue [​Anglican Mainstream].

Free speech advocates highlight the importance of protecting the right to question policies related to gender identity, particularly when those policies have significant implications for children and families. They argue that a public inquiry would provide a platform for all perspectives to be heard, ensuring that public policy is informed by a diversity of viewpoints rather than dominated by a single ideological stance.

5. Child Safeguarding Experts: Many of the co-signatories are involved in child protection and safeguarding. These experts emphasize that the current approach to gender dysphoria, which often involves affirming a child’s gender identity without sufficient exploration of underlying psychological issues, may undermine proper safeguarding practices. They argue that young people should be given time and space to explore their feelings without being rushed into medical interventions that they may later regret​ [✠SELEISI][​GB News].

Child safeguarding experts are particularly concerned about the potential for long-term harm to children who undergo medical transitions without fully understanding the consequences. They call for a public inquiry to ensure that the rights and well-being of children are prioritized in any future policy decisions.

Conclusion

The open letter to Keir Starmer, co-signed by a diverse coalition of professionals, reflects growing concern about the impact of gender ideology on public institutions and policies. The call for a public inquiry represents a demand for transparency, accountability, and a more cautious approach to the treatment of gender dysphoria, particularly in children. The involvement of high-profile figures like Archbishop Jerome, alongside medical professionals, legal experts, academics, and child safeguarding advocates, demonstrates the broad support for this initiative.

As the debate over gender identity continues to evolve, the letter’s signatories argue that now is the time for a thorough and impartial investigation into the long-term implications of current policies. Their collective goal is to ensure that public policy is informed by evidence, prioritizes the well-being of children, and allows for open and respectful debate on this critical issue​ [✠SELEISI][GB News][​Anglican Mainstream].

Read the full text of the Open Letter here.

---

A Traditional Catholic Critique of the Anglican Ordinariate: Liturgy, Formation, and Doctrinal Concerns

The Anglican Ordinariate was established to provide a pathway for Anglicans to enter full communion with the Catholic Church while retaining elements of their liturgical and cultural patrimony. However, many Traditional Catholics view it with deep concern, arguing that it reflects modernist tendencies and compromises essential Catholic doctrines and practices. From the liturgy and clergy formation to political correctness and doctrinal concessions, this article outlines the key criticisms of the Ordinariate from a Traditional Catholic perspective. A recent interview by Anglicanorum Coetibus Society of Bishop David Waller, recently consecrated Ordinary for the Ordinariate in Great Britain, reveals these issues.

Liturgy: The Protestantization of Worship

The adaptation of Anglican liturgical practices within the Catholic Church is one of the most contentious issues surrounding the Ordinariate. The Ordinariate Mass utilizes the Book of Divine Worship, which incorporates elements from the Anglican Book of Common Prayer. While approved by the Vatican, many Traditional Catholics believe these Anglican elements, rooted in the Protestant Reformation, and infused with post Vatican II ideologies, carry theological ambiguities that could diminish the Catholic understanding of the Eucharist as a true sacrifice​ [National Catholic Reporter][National Catholic Reporter].

Bishop David Waller himself acknowledges the significance of Anglican liturgical heritage in his interview, saying, “We’ve been doing some of that particular re-learning, discovering anew some of the great riches of Anglican tradition, particularly the words of the prayer book”​ [Catholic Critique] However, for Traditional Catholics, these “riches” are perceived as Protestantized versions of Catholic liturgy, which risk undermining the solemn and transcendent nature of Catholic worship. They argue that the focus on clarity and community participation in the Ordinariate liturgy contrasts sharply with the mystical, sacrificial focus of the traditional Latin Mass, which places emphasis on the re-presentation of Christ’s sacrifice.

Shortened Clergy Formation and Theological Concerns

In many cases, Ordinariate candidates go through an accelerated formation program, sometimes relying heavily on teleconferencing and weekend seminars. For instance, in the U.S., priests who were previously Episcopalian often complete an expedited course of study before being ordained as Catholic priests, with additional theological studies continuing after ordination. This approach has raised concerns that these priests do not receive the same depth of theological formation as seminarians trained in the Latin Rite​ [National Catholic Register] who undergo residential seminary formation for an average seven years prior to ordination.

Bishop Waller acknowledges that there are “gaps” in theological education due to the differences between Anglican and Catholic formation. He admits that Anglican clergy entering the Ordinariate often lacked exposure to important areas like Catholic ecclesiology. He stated, “I certainly did no ecclesiology as a studied subject, but am in the middle of it now”​ [National Catholic Register]. While this acknowledgment demonstrates a willingness to address the issue, Traditional Catholics remain wary that the formation may still be insufficient, particularly in preparing clergy to fully embrace and teach Catholic doctrine on critical theological issues such as the papacy and Marian dogmas.

Modernist Tendencies and Political Correctness

A broader concern for Traditional Catholics is what they perceive as the Ordinariate’s susceptibility to modernist trends, particularly political correctness. This issue came into sharp focus in 2023 when Calvin Robinson, a conservative Anglican commentator, had his GB News Easter Special cancelled at the Ordinariate Church of Our Lady of the Assumption and St. Gregory in London. The cancellation occurred after the church’s choir objected to Robinson’s outspoken conservative views, particularly his stance on women’s ordination, homosexual in and critical race theory​ [Virtue Online][​Anglican Mainstream].

Traditional Catholics view this incident as indicative of the Ordinariate’s tendency to prioritize inclusivity and social harmony over doctrinal clarity. By canceling an event that featured conservative viewpoints aligned with Catholic moral teachings, the Ordinariate is seen as giving in to modernist pressures rather than standing firmly for Catholic doctrine. Bishop Waller’s focus on “healing divisions” and promoting inclusivity further reflects this trend, as he emphasizes bringing former Anglicans into communion while respecting their traditions, even at the risk of compromising doctrinal integrity​ [Catholic Critique].

Celibacy Exemption: A Doctrinal Compromise?

The Ordinariate’s accommodation of married clergy also raises concerns about maintaining the Catholic priesthood’s commitment to celibacy. While married Anglican priests who convert can remain married, critics argue that this exemption undermines the uniformity of the Catholic priesthood. The exemption is seen as a concession that compromises the spiritual discipline traditionally associated with the Catholic priesthood​ [National Catholic Reporter].

Traditional Catholics are particularly concerned that these married priests are often integrated into diocesan ministry, where celibacy remains the norm. Bishop Waller himself is married, which means he cannot be ordained a bishop, highlighting the differences in the priestly experience between Ordinariate clergy and their Latin Rite counterparts. Critics worry that such differences could lead to doctrinal and pastoral inconsistencies, especially given the rapid formation these clergy undergo​ [National Catholic Reporter][​National Catholic Reporter].

Conclusion: A Compromised Vision

From the adaptation of Protestant liturgical practices and shortened clergy formation to modernist influences and political correctness, the Ordinariate faces significant criticism from Traditional Catholics. While the Ordinariate was established with the noble goal of fostering unity and welcoming Anglicans into full communion with the Catholic Church, these concessions are seen as undermining the Church’s mission to preserve doctrinal integrity and the fullness of Catholic tradition.

As Bishop Waller’s comments reveal, the Ordinariate’s leadership is aware of the challenges, but their focus on inclusivity and the preservation of Anglican patrimony continues to raise concerns about the future integrity of Catholic teaching within this structure. For Traditional Catholics, the Ordinariate’s willingness to accommodate former Anglican practices and modern secular ideologies represents a troubling departure from the Church’s timeless doctrines and practices. The question remains: can the Ordinariate maintain the fullness of Catholic truth, or will it continue to be seen as a modernist compromise?

---

---

Christian Concern: A call to action ref Assisted Dying

Christian Concern is calling on individuals to take action against a proposed assisted suicide bill currently under debate in the UK Parliament. They argue that legalizing assisted suicide could endanger vulnerable people, potentially pressuring those who are elderly, ill, or disabled into choosing death over life. To oppose this bill, Christian Concern urges the public to reach out to their Members of Parliament, share information within their communities, and participate in educational efforts to raise awareness about the risks and ethical concerns associated with assisted suicide.

Speak to your MP

Most MPs hold surgeries where you can meet them and explain your concerns. This is the most powerful way to ask your MP to oppose this bill. By attending your MP’s surgery, you can gently present your view to them, and they will be required to consider what you say and may even be confronted with a perspective they had not considered.

You can find out who your MP is and how to contact them using the link below. MPs usually share how to attend a surgery on their own websites, but you can always email them to ask.

If you cannot meet face-to-face with your MP, please write to them.

In either case, please engage your MP with truth and love, using the resources below.

• Find your MP (Parliament website)
• Guide for speaking to your MP

Alert your church

The Church is vital in this battle. Please ask your church leaders to speak up on this vital issue.

Here’s how to help:

• Play and share our video in church meetings and small groups to call your church to act
• Invite your MP to meet a group from the church and explain your opposition to assisted suicide
• Give time in your meetings to pray that assisted suicide would not be introduced

We will add more resources for churches to this page soon.

Understand the issue in depth

There are many good reasons Christians and everyone who loves their neighbour should oppose assisted suicide. Please use the resources below to understand the issue in more depth:

• Download and read Christian Concern’s booklet on euthanasia and assisted suicide
• Watch CC’s Gospel Issues seminar with Dr Peter Saunders: should Christians support the ‘right to die’?
• Watch CC’s video with Alex Schadenberg explaining how the assisted suicide law in Canada has led to a spiralling death culture
• Read: What does the Bible say about assisted suicide and euthanasia?
• Watch Liz Carr’s documentary, Better off Dead? on BBC iPlayer

---

The bill on assisted suicide being debated in Parliament poses a significant threat to the protection of vulnerable individuals, particularly those who are elderly, disabled, or facing mental health challenges. The bill aims to legalize assisted suicide, allowing terminally ill patients to end their own lives with medical assistance. However, the ethical and societal implications of such legislation are grave and widespread.

Opponents of the bill argue that legalizing assisted suicide could lead to dangerous outcomes, including the pressure on vulnerable individuals to end their lives prematurely. Many fear that legalizing this practice could create a slippery slope, leading to abuses where individuals may feel obligated to choose death due to external pressures, such as being a burden on their families or society. This could disproportionately affect the elderly, disabled, and those suffering from mental illnesses.

Furthermore, the experience of other countries where assisted suicide has been legalized shows concerning trends. For example, in places like Belgium and the Netherlands, initial restrictions on assisted suicide have been gradually loosened, leading to an increase in cases, including those involving individuals with mental health conditions or disabilities.

Medical professionals, too, have voiced strong opposition, with many doctors expressing concerns about the potential erosion of the doctor-patient relationship. Traditionally, doctors are committed to saving lives and providing care, not facilitating death. Legalizing assisted suicide could fundamentally alter the role of medical professionals, shifting their focus from healing to assisting in death.

The bill also raises significant moral and ethical concerns, as it challenges the sanctity of life, which is a principle upheld by many religious and cultural groups. For these reasons, it’s essential that concerned citizens urge their MPs to reject this bill and safeguard the dignity and protection of vulnerable individuals in society.

For more information and to take action, visit the original campaign: No to Assisted Suicide.

---

RECOMMENDED BOOKS

From theology to culture war there are some brilliant minds still publishing worthy, well-researched content heartily recommended to you for reading. These would make great additions to your own or another’s personal library, perhaps as a gift?

Two Families: A Memoir of English Life During and After the Council

Diary of an American Exorcist

An Exorcist Explains the Demonic: The Antics of Satan and His Army of Fallen Angels

---

RECOMMENDED VIEWING

Do the UK Bishops Endorse Progressive Grooming?

The Synod’s Massive Credibility Problem

Conversation with Bishop David Waller

Are We Living in the Third Secret of Fatima?

The Gender Experiment | The Truth Revealed Documentary

The Gender Experiment Part II – The Truth Revealed Documentary

The UN’s DARK Agenda: What You’re Not Being Told About Agenda 2030

The Strange Death of Church Discipline

Is the New Mass a New Religion? | Ask Father with Fr. Albert Kallio

Claire Fox Closing Speech and Thanks at the Battle of Ideas festival 2024

---

---

PRACTICUM

The following are ways in which you may practically support the work of others for the betterment of our society and the plight of sufferers, the impoverished and defenceless.

Prayer Requests

Pray for vocations
Pray for traditional seminaries and the creation of formation houses
The Church – contending with the crisis of faith

Pray for Bishop Nioclas Kelly recovering from hip surgery
Pray for Eileen Butler diagnosed with colon cancer that has spread to her liver
Pray for Fr Stanislaus Ybarra FMCD in recovery relocating to Michigan

Praying for vocations

In our times of spiritual and moral challenges, the need for vocations to the Traditional Catholic priesthood and religious life is more pressing than ever. Traditional Catholic communities, which adhere closely to the liturgical and doctrinal practices predating the Second Vatican Council, offer a profound and timeless witness to the faith. These communities emphasize the Tridentine Mass, the rich traditions of the Church, and a deep commitment to orthodoxy and reverence in worship.

Praying for vocations to these communities is essential for several reasons:

SPIRITUAL LEADERSHIP AND GUIDANCE: The spiritual formation offered in traditional seminaries and religious houses is rigorous and deeply rooted in the Church’s intellectual and spiritual traditions. Priests and religious formed in this environment are well-prepared to provide strong spiritual leadership and guidance to the faithful. They play a crucial role in fostering spiritual growth, administering the sacraments with reverence, and leading souls to Christ.

PRESERVATION OF LITURGICAL HERITAGE: Traditional Catholic communities are guardians of the Church’s ancient liturgical heritage. The Tridentine Mass, also known as the Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite, offers a deeply contemplative and reverent worship experience that has nourished countless saints. By praying for vocations, we support the continuity of this sacred tradition and ensure that future generations can experience the beauty and depth of traditional Catholic worship.

WITNESS TO ORTHODOXY: In an age of doctrinal confusion and moral relativism, traditional Catholic communities stand as beacons of orthodoxy. Their unwavering commitment to the timeless teachings of the Church provides a clear and steadfast witness to the truth. Praying for vocations helps sustain this witness and equips the Church with priests and religious who can boldly proclaim the faith without compromise.

Response to a Growing Demand

There is a growing interest and demand for traditional liturgy and spirituality among the faithful. Many young people, in particular, are drawn to the beauty and depth of traditional Catholic practices. By praying for vocations, we support the growth of these communities and respond to the spiritual needs and desires of many who seek a deeper connection with their faith.

Please pray for the new formation house proposed by Archbishop Vigano, and likewise our own effort to establish a formation house under my own aegis here in Brighton.

In conclusion, praying for vocations to the priesthood and religious life is essential for the Church, especially during times of crisis. It is a way to invite Christ to send more laborers to the harvest, honor the contributions of religious orders, and ask for their intercession in renewing the Church. By praying for vocations during this time, we are participating in the Church’s mission to spread the Gospel and to build a stronger, more vibrant faith community.

---

Restore Justice for Rev. Dr. Bernard Randall: End the Church of England’s Unfair Blacklisting

Rev. Dr. Bernard Randall, a former Church of England chaplain, was dismissed after delivering a sermon upholding Christian teachings on marriage and advising against feeling pressured to accept any ideology. Despite being cleared by various authorities, he remains blacklisted by his diocese as a safeguarding risk, solely for his adherence to biblical teachings. Legal challenges have revealed serious errors in the Church’s handling of his case. Six months on, Bernard is still barred from ministry, forcing him to seek other work.

Read more and sign the petition to demand the Church of England stop this unjust punishment and restore his position.

---

New Threat to Legalize Assisted Suicide in the UK

Only a few weeks into the new Parliament, a new threat to legalize assisted suicide has emerged. Lord Falconer’s Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults Bill secured second place in the Lord’s ballot for private members’ bills. Concurrently, a similar bill is under debate on the Isle of Man and has been approved in principle in Jersey.

The most pressing concern is in Scotland, where Liam McArthur MSP introduced the Assisted Dying Scotland Bill on March 27, 2024. The Health, Social Care and Sport Committee at Holyrood is calling for evidence on this bill, and responses are crucial by August 16, 2024. This consultation will influence the Committee’s recommendation on whether the bill should proceed.

Ethical and Practical Concerns

Opponents of assisted suicide argue that legalizing such practices can lead to significant ethical and practical issues. According to Right to Life UK, concerns include the potential for abuse, pressure on vulnerable individuals, and the undermining of trust in medical professionals. There is also the argument that legalizing assisted suicide can create a slippery slope leading to the normalization of euthanasia.

The pro-assisted suicide lobby is expected to make persistent efforts to legalize assisted suicide in the coming months and years. It is vital for opponents to be prepared to respond to these attempts, starting with the current threat in Scotland.

Key Points:

• Terminology: “Assisted dying” is often used as a euphemism for assisted suicide and euthanasia. The UK proposals focus on assisted suicide, not euthanasia.
• Reasons for Assisted Suicide: Common reasons include fear of becoming a burden, loss of autonomy, and fear of future pain rather than current pain.
• Impact on Disabled People: Many disabled people and their advocacy groups oppose assisted suicide, fearing coercion and a reduction in their perceived value.
• Safeguards and Slippery Slope: Evidence from other countries shows that safeguards around assisted suicide often erode over time, leading to broader and potentially more dangerous practices.
• Effect on Suicide Rates: Legalizing assisted suicide has been associated with an increase in overall suicide rates.
• Palliative Care: Good palliative care can alleviate the primary reasons people seek assisted suicide. However, the availability and quality of palliative care can be undermined by the legalization of assisted suicide.
• Economic Pressures: There are concerns that financial pressures might lead to the promotion of assisted suicide as a cost-saving measure in healthcare systems.

Safeguarding risks

In Canada, since legalizing medically assisted death (MAiD) in 2016, the scope has expanded from terminally ill patients to include those with mental health conditions and marginalized individuals facing socio-economic pressures. Reports have shown cases where people seek assisted death due to poverty or inadequate housing rather than terminal illness.

Similarly, in the Netherlands and Belgium, initial restrictions on euthanasia have gradually loosened. For example, the number of dementia patients receiving euthanasia in the Netherlands has increased significantly, raising concerns about consent and the potential for abuse. Moreover, in Belgium, reports indicated a percentage of infant deaths involved active euthanasia by lethal injection, highlighting the risk of extending euthanasia practices to non-consenting or vulnerable populations.

These examples illustrate that once assisted suicide or euthanasia is legalized, the protections meant to safeguard vulnerable individuals often weaken, leading to broader applications that can endanger lives.

Increased Suicide Rates

Evidence from multiple studies indicates that legalizing assisted suicide is associated with an increase in overall suicide rates. Research analyzing the impact of assisted suicide laws in ten U.S. states showed a significant increase in total suicide rates following the legalization of assisted suicide. This increase was particularly notable among the elderly and women, with total suicide rates rising by about 18% overall and by 40% for women specifically​​​​.

Additionally, another study highlighted that legalizing assisted suicide might lower societal taboos against suicide, thereby potentially increasing the overall inclination towards suicide, not just assisted suicide​​. This is consistent with findings from European countries where the introduction of assisted suicide or euthanasia laws has not reduced non-assisted suicide rates but, in some cases, has led to an increase.

These findings suggest that rather than providing a safeguard, the legalization of assisted suicide may inadvertently contribute to higher rates of both assisted and unassisted suicides, challenging the notion that such laws offer a protective measure against suicide. This underscores the need for careful consideration of the broader societal impacts of legalizing assisted suicide.

How to Respond

Supporters in Scotland, and throughout the UK, are encouraged to respond to the consultation. It’s essential to use personal words rather than identical responses, as the Committee will disregard duplicates. Including professional expertise or personal stories can add weight to your response.

The pro-assisted suicide lobby is expected to make persistent efforts to legalize assisted suicide in the coming months and years. It is vital for opponents to be prepared to respond to these attempts, starting with the current threat in Scotland.

Please respond to this consultation by 16 August 2024.

There is a short survey and a more detailed call for evidence. SPUC (Society for the Protection of the Unborn Children) has produced a guide explaining both options and giving advice on how to respond to the questions.

Action Steps

1. Respond to the Consultation: The Committee’s decision will hinge on public feedback. Use the provided guide to craft a personalized response.
2. Who Should Respond: While responses from Scotland are crucial, input from across the UK is also important as the outcome in Scotland could influence decisions in Westminster.
3. What to Say: Draw from personal experience and professional expertise. Avoid identical responses to ensure your submission is considered.

The next few months are critical in the fight against the legalization of assisted suicide. Your participation can make a significant difference.

---

Help Rescue the Freedom of Speech Act

In July, the UK’s Secretary of State for Education, Bridget Phillipson, issued a statement to the House of Commons indicating her intention to halt the commencement of the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act “in order to consider options, including its repeal.”

It was fitting that the Labour Government would declare war on free speech in a written statement, posted quietly to the House of Commons website on a Friday – a good day for bad news, as any journalist will tell you – and unaccompanied by any opportunity for parliamentary debate or scrutiny.

The Freedom of Speech Act was a carefully crafted piece of legislation, properly debated in both Houses of Parliament, and designed to address the free speech crisis in universities. It aimed to strengthen the legal duty on English universities to uphold and promote freedom of speech and introduced enforcement mechanisms, such as a complaints scheme overseen by the higher education regulator, to ensure universities adhered to this duty.

Having received cross-party support during the last Parliament, its most important clauses were due to be commenced on 1st August.

However, because Rishi Sunak called an election before the Act had been fully implemented, this Government has seized its chance to derail it.

The FSU has sent a pre-action protocol letter to the Education Secretary, threatening a judicial review if she does not reverse her decision.

To increase the chances of rescuing this vital piece of legislation, it is also necessary to maintain pressure on MPs. The FSU has provided a campaigning tool (here) to write to your local MP, urging them to ask Ms Phillipson to think again.

Completing the form is a simple is a simple, fast process that can have a significant impact. A template is provided to assist, but personalisation is encouraged. Every voice matters, and it is vital that individuals make theirs heard.

The threat to judicially review Bridget Phillipson’s decision is the first legal action this Government is facing, and anything involving lawyers is expensive.

Donations to the Fighting Fund to help cover some of these costs are welcome. Contributions can be made through the provided link. The FSU appreciates all support in this matter.

---

The Debate on Trans-Inclusive Conversion Therapy Bans

A recent case in Switzerland has highlighted the complexities and potential consequences of legislative measures related to conversion therapy. A 15-year-old Swiss girl was taken into state care after her parents refused to consent to a course of puberty blockers following a disputed diagnosis of gender dysphoria. This incident underscores the contentious nature of proposed legislative changes in the UK, as outlined in Sir Keir Starmer’s recent King’s Speech.

Labour’s Legislative Agenda

During the King’s Speech, Sir Keir Starmer presented his legislative programme for the current Parliamentary session, emphasizing Labour’s commitment to enacting a “full, trans-inclusive ban on conversion practices.” The proposal, while intended to protect vulnerable individuals from harmful conversion therapies, has raised significant concerns regarding free speech and the practical implications of such a ban.

Definitional Ambiguities

The term “conversion practices” remains ambiguously defined, leading to uncertainties about what actions and advice might be prohibited under the new law. This lack of clarity poses a risk to the freedoms enshrined in Articles 9 and 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protect freedom of thought and expression, respectively. The potential for these rights to be compromised is a major point of contention among critics of the proposed ban.

Concerns from the Free Speech Union (FSU)

The Free Speech Union (FSU) has voiced fears that a hastily implemented, poorly defined ban could severely restrict the ability of parents, teachers, religious leaders, and health professionals to engage in open dialogue with gender-confused children. The concern is that advocating for a child to consider all options and reflect before undergoing irreversible medical procedures could be misconstrued as a form of conversion therapy, thus falling foul of the new legislation.

The Swiss Case as a Cautionary Tale

The situation in Switzerland serves as a stark warning. In some cantons, where conversion therapy is already banned, a couple lost custody of their 15-year-old daughter because they did not agree to her taking puberty blockers immediately following her gender dysphoria diagnosis. This incident illustrates the potential extreme outcomes of such bans, where parental rights and alternative medical opinions may be overridden by a rigid interpretation of “gender affirmative care.”

Defining “Conversion Therapy” and Its Implications

Defining “conversion therapy” in a broad and imprecise manner could inadvertently criminalize standard religious practices and pastoral care. For instance, traditional religious counseling that encourages individuals to embrace their birth gender or offers prayer and spiritual guidance could be misconstrued as conversion therapy. This could lead to legal repercussions for clergy and lay counselors practicing their faith. The ambiguity in the definition risks entangling religious expressions and pastoral care in legal disputes, infringing on religious freedoms and the rights of individuals to seek spiritual guidance.

Ministerial Consultation Response

Archbishop Jerome of the Old Roman Apostolate has expressed significant concerns over similar legislation proposed in the UK, highlighting that the lack of clarity in defining “conversion therapy” could inadvertently criminalize standard religious practices and pastoral care. He stresses the need for precise language to ensure that legitimate religious and moral guidance is not misinterpreted as coercive or harmful practices.

Legitimate Religious and Moral Guidance

Legitimate religious and moral guidance refers to the spiritual advice and support provided by religious leaders and communities based on their beliefs and teachings. This includes counseling individuals to adhere to their faith’s principles, praying for them, and offering moral direction. The concern is that without clear definitions, these standard practices could be wrongfully classified as conversion therapy, leading to legal challenges and restrictions on religious freedom.

The Need for a Balanced Approach

Critics argue that a balanced approach is essential. While protecting individuals from genuine harm is paramount, it is equally important to safeguard the right to free speech and to ensure that all treatment options can be openly discussed. The fear is that without clear, precise definitions and protections, well-meaning legislation could lead to unintended and severe consequences, such as those seen in the Swiss case.

PSHEbrighton: Local Support for Parents and Families

A Brighton family, with support from PSHEbrighton, is threatening legal action against Brighton & Hove City Council over its “Classroom to Clinic” guidance, which advises schools on supporting transgender pupils. The family argues that the guidance encourages schools to facilitate children’s gender changes without parental consent, infringing on parental rights and potentially leading to irreversible medical decisions without proper oversight. They are particularly concerned that the policy allows schools to keep parents in the dark about their child’s gender transition, bypassing necessary medical consultations and psychological evaluations.

PSHEbrighton, an organization co-founded by Archbishop Jerome to support parents and families in similar situations, backs the family’s stance. They emphasize the importance of parental involvement in such significant decisions and highlight the need for policies that protect both children’s well-being and parental rights. The family’s lawyer has warned that if the council does not retract the guidance, legal action will proceed on grounds of violating parental rights and failing to provide proper duty of care to the children. The council defends its policy as a means to support transgender students and promote inclusivity in schools, but the case underscores the ongoing tensions and legal complexities surrounding transgender rights and parental consent in educational settings.

Schools in England and Wales are facing potential lawsuits from parents over their use of a gender toolkit that advises on supporting transgender students. The legal opinion by Karon Monaghan KC, recognised as the UK’s leading Human Rights lawyer, suggests the toolkit produced by Brighton & Hove City Council but used widely by other local authorities, fails in safeguarding and Equality Act legislation. The toolkit, intended to foster inclusivity, includes guidelines on allowing students to change their names and pronouns and access facilities corresponding to their gender identity, often without parental consent. Critics argue that these guidelines bypass parental rights and medical oversight, potentially leading to irreversible decisions about children’s gender transitions.

Action for Concerned Citizens

Given these concerns, the FSU is encouraging its members and the general public to voice their apprehensions by contacting their MPs. The FSU has provided an automated campaigning tool to facilitate this process, emphasizing the need to protect free speech, especially in contexts that could have life-altering consequences.

Conclusion

As the debate around trans-inclusive conversion therapy bans continues, it is crucial to strike a careful balance that protects individuals from harm while preserving fundamental rights to free thought and expression. The case of the Swiss teen underscores the importance of getting this balance right, to ensure that legislative measures do not inadvertently cause more harm than good.

---

Sir Keir Starmer must be reminded that free speech is a fundamental human right

The Prime Minister’s recent crackdown on free speech is extremely concerning. Since early August, we have witnessed the most significant attack on free expression in this country since Oliver Cromwell outlawed all theatrical performances in 1642.

In response to the civil unrest that spread across the UK following the tragic killing of three children in Southport, Sir Keir has attributed the surge in violence to ‘misinformation’ and ‘disinformation’ on social media. He has called on authorities to prosecute individuals for making supposedly inflammatory statements online.

As a consequence, one man has been sentenced to 18 months in prison for sharing something “offensive” that someone else posted on Facebook, another was imprisoned for three years for posting “anti-Establishment rhetoric,” and a third was jailed for 18 months for chanting “Who the f*** is Allah?”

Stephen Parkinson, the Director of Public Prosecutions, has even issued a warning that people who share footage of the riots online could face prosecution. “People might think they’re not doing anything harmful, but they are, and the consequences will be visited upon them,” he said.

This kind of threatening language is more characteristic of a repressive regime than the birthplace of parliamentary democracy. It has sparked widespread fear across the country, with hundreds of thousands now worried they could be imprisoned for posting something politically incorrect online.

This must end. We need to remind the Prime Minister, a former human rights lawyer, that free speech is the cornerstone of all other rights; without it, we cannot defend any of the others.

Here’s how you can take action: If you’re concerned about the Prime Minister’s attack on free speech, please use our campaign tool to write to your local MP using our template letter.

Completing the form is simple and straightforward.

Here’s how you can take action

If you’re concerned about the Prime Minister’s assault on free speech, please use the FSU campaigning tool to write to your local MP, using the template letter.

Completing the form is a simple, fast process that can have a significant impact. We’ve even provided a template to help, but feel free to personalise it. Your voice matters and it’s vital that you make it heard.

---

Become a Warrior Teacher

The Winning Mindset is an organization that recognizes the necessity for a more balanced and discerning approach to engaging with the information-rich world we inhabit. Their educational seminars are specifically designed to inspire individuals to think deeply and critically, fostering personal growth and development. By refining these skills, individuals can enhance their ability to counter popular arguments and challenge the prevailing mindset.

The Winning Mindset is an organization that recognizes the necessity for a more balanced and discerning approach to engaging with the information-rich world we inhabit. Their educational seminars are specifically designed to inspire individuals to think deeply and critically, fostering personal growth and development. By refining these skills, individuals can enhance their ability to counter popular arguments and challenge the prevailing mindset.

---

Petitions

Current Public Petitions Regarding Relationships & Sex Education (RSE) in the UK

There are several public petitions related to Relationships and Sex Education (RSE) in the UK, reflecting various concerns and opinions on the subject. Here are some notable ones:

1. Strip Ruth Hunt of her peerage for her role in the gender medical scandal
   • Summary: There has been wide cross-party support for the Cass Review, which delivered stinging criticisms of NHS gender clinics and found that for most young people, a medical pathway is not the best way to treat gender-related distress. It also found there is little or no evidence about the long-term effects of puberty blockers and sex hormones for the under-18s.
   • Link: Change.Org
2. New RSHE guidance for schools MUST become law
   • Summary: Following the election, it will be the responsibility of the incoming government and the new Education Secretary to review this consultation and decide whether to uphold the guidance and whether it should be statutory – which means schools MUST follow it.
   • Link: CitizenGo
3. Stop divisive Progress Pride flag displays
   • Summary: Christian Concern is objecting to a massive display of Progress Pride flags planned for Regent Street in 2024. These divisive, gaudy displays are completely inappropriate for this historic, iconic street at the centre of London. They make everyone who doesn’t support the whole LGBTQ+ agenda feel unwelcome.
   • Link: CitizenGo
4. Labour’s ‘conversion therapy’ ban will harm children, criminalise parents, and place restrictions on talking and praying
   • Summary: Labour has confirmed it will proceed with its pledged “trans-inclusive” ban on ‘conversion therapy’ and ‘conversion practices’. Announcing that work has begun on a ban, Sir Keir Starmer said it was “a promise that has lingered in the lobby of good intentions for far too long”. While the specifics of the ban remain unclear, it is important to note that harmful physical ‘conversion practices’ do not happen in the UK and are already illegal. Therefore, any ban on ‘conversion practices’ would primarily impact free speech, including consensual conversations, counselling, and even prayer.
   • Link: CitizenGo

For more detailed information, you can refer to the specific petitions linked above and the GOV.UK website, which provides comprehensive guidance and updates on RSE policies.

Current Public Petitions Regarding Changes to the UK’s Abortion Laws

There are several active public petitions in the UK addressing proposed changes to abortion laws. These petitions reflect a wide range of perspectives on this highly contentious issue. Here are some of the notable petitions:

1. Remove references to ‘gender identity’ from relationships education guidance
   • Summary: This petition argues against the inclusion of gender identity in RSE guidance, citing concerns about political indoctrination and inconsistency with the Education Act.
   • Link: Remove references to ‘gender identity’
2. Review abortion laws to reduce the gestational limit
   • Summary: A cross-party group of MPs has proposed reducing the upper gestational limit for abortions from 24 weeks to 22 weeks. This petition supports the amendment, highlighting that medical advancements have increased the survival rate of babies born at 22 weeks.
   • Link: Right to Life UK
3. Ban sex-selective abortions
   • Summary: This petition seeks to make it explicitly illegal to perform abortions based on the sex of the fetus, addressing concerns that sex-selective abortions are occurring in the UK despite current legal ambiguities.
   • Link: Right to Life UK
4. Oppose decriminalisation of abortion
   • Summary: This petition opposes any move to decriminalise abortion in the UK, arguing that current laws provide necessary safeguards to ensure ethical medical practice and protect both women and unborn children.
   • Link: British Medical Association
5. End ‘DIY’ Abortion Services
   • Summary: This petition calls for the cessation of ‘DIY’ abortion services, arguing that they endanger women’s lives and lack proper medical supervision, thus advocating for stricter regulations.
   • Link: Right to Life UK
6. A General Election has been called for 4 July 2024
   • Summary: Please contact your MP now asking them to make it clear to their party leadership that abortion decriminalisation and assisted suicide should not be included in manifestoes. You can use our tool below.
   • Link: SPUC

Current Public Petitions Regarding Abortion Laws in the USA

1. Nebraska Right to Abortion Initiative (2024)
   • Summary: This initiative proposes an amendment to the Nebraska Constitution to establish a right to abortion until fetal viability, defined by the professional judgment of the treating healthcare practitioner.
   • Link: Ballotpedia
2. End Abortion in the USA
   • Summary: The Moral Outcry is a petition aimed at making abortion illegal in all 50 states in the USA. The petition was instrumental in the reversal of Roe v. Wade and continues to push for comprehensive abortion bans nationwide.
   • Link: The Moral Outcry

These petitions represent the diverse and often conflicting views on abortion laws in the UK, highlighting ongoing debates about gestational limits, sex-selective practices, and the broader legal framework surrounding abortion.

---

Heavenly Father, we humbly beseech You to forgive the countless sins committed by mankind, for we have strayed far from Your commandments and fallen short of Your glory. Grant us Your boundless grace and strength to persevere in Your service, that we may walk in Your ways with steadfast hearts, ever seeking to do Your will. We place our trust in Your infinite mercy and ask for Your compassion and forgiveness…

Miserere nobis

---

Support this Newsletter and the work of the Archbishop and the Old Roman Apostolate

---