The Orphaned Altar: On the Crisis of Episcopal Fatherhood

By the Archbishop of Selsey

A Silent Crisis Beneath the Surface
There are moments in the Church’s history when the gravest crises are not those proclaimed in thunder from the pulpits or the decrees of Rome, but those suffered in silence by her sons. Such is the case today, when many priests—those who once came to the altar aflame with the love of God—now minister beneath the shadow of a wounded fatherhood. Their suffering is seldom spoken of; yet it gnaws at the heart of the Church. It is the hidden trial of a generation of priests orphaned not by heresy or persecution, but by the cold neglect of their spiritual fathers.

The crisis of fatherhood—so visible in society, where fathers have abdicated responsibility for their children—has entered the sanctuary. Bishops, once spiritual patriarchs who guided their clergy as sons, have become administrators, functionaries, and managers of decline. Their governance too often resembles the bureaucracy of a corporation rather than the heart of a father. The result is an orphaned presbyterate: weary, mistrustful, and fearful. What begins as administrative efficiency ends as spiritual sterility.

The Fatherhood that Gives Life
The priesthood, by its nature, is relational. Every priest must stand both in persona Christi and sub episcopo, in filial obedience to his bishop as to a father in Christ. The bishop’s ring signifies not only governance but spousal fidelity to the Church and paternal love for his priests. St. Ignatius of Antioch wrote, “Where the bishop is, there is the Church”¹—yet he also meant that where the bishop is not father, the Church withers into institution.

In the golden age of the Fathers, bishops were shepherds whose charity bound together the presbyterate and flock in a single spirit. St. Gregory the Great described the bishop as “a watchman set upon the walls of Israel”², one who guards both the purity of doctrine and the souls of those under his care. The bishop’s first duty was not strategy but sanctity. He was to pour himself out for his priests, that they might pour themselves out for their people.

But today, that supernatural fatherhood is often eclipsed by managerial pragmatism. Meetings replace mentorship; compliance replaces counsel; fear replaces fraternity. Many priests now dread a summons to the chancery more than the final judgment. They no longer expect paternal concern, only procedural rebuke. In such a climate, holiness becomes private heroism rather than shared pursuit.

The Withering of Fraternal Communion
The health of the Church depends not on policies but on love. When bishops cease to love their priests, when priests no longer feel the warmth of fatherly affection, the supernatural life of the Church begins to bleed away. The priest, deprived of affirmation and guidance, turns inward. Some grow cautious, preaching only what offends no one. Others grow hardened, their zeal dulled by cynicism. Still others, desiring escape, fill their lives with distractions and comforts.

In earlier centuries, the bishop’s household was a school of holiness. Priests were formed by the example of their prelate’s prayer, fasting, and simplicity. But in many dioceses today, bishops live in splendid isolation, surrounded not by brothers but by lawyers, secretaries, and consultants. The house of prayer has become an office; the mitre, a badge of status. The faithful look on, bewildered, while the priests beneath such leadership struggle to remember why they first left all to follow Christ.

The Holy Curé of Ars laboured eighteen hours a day, hearing confessions and offering the Holy Sacrifice with tears. His sanctity rebuilt a nation scarred by revolution. Yet he would be dismissed in many modern dioceses as “too pious,” “too rigid,” or “insufficiently pastoral.” His zeal is out of fashion because the supernatural has been eclipsed by the sociological. Bishops speak of accompaniment but rarely of conversion; of mercy but seldom of repentance. They wish to smell like the sheep, yet too often smell only of politics.

Bureaucracy and the Eclipse of the Supernatural
One of the great deceptions of our time is to confuse activity with vitality. Endless consultations, synodal reports, and policy documents give the illusion of motion while the soul of the Church languishes. The very structures designed to support priests have become labyrinths of paperwork. The priest who once found solace in his bishop’s blessing now finds himself mired in compliance forms and risk assessments.

It is not administration that kills, but the substitution of administration for fatherhood. When the shepherd delegates the care of souls to committees, his priests are left to fend for themselves. “Feed my sheep,” said the Lord to Peter³—not “survey them,” nor “appoint a task force.” Yet many priests live as though their father has forgotten those words. The Church cannot be governed as a corporation without ceasing to be a family.

The Psychological and Spiritual Toll
Behind the statistics of declining vocations lies a deeper tragedy. Priests today are among the loneliest men in society. Studies show widespread distrust between clergy and bishops⁴; many confess to isolation, anxiety, and fear of reprisal. The priest who preaches the moral law risks complaint; the one who maintains reverence in the liturgy risks accusation of rigidity. In such conditions, virtue becomes suspect and mediocrity safe.

Some priests respond with stoic endurance; others withdraw into a safe professionalism that avoids controversy but also avoids conversion. A few, deprived of spiritual fatherhood, lose themselves to the very world they were ordained to sanctify. Thus the bishop’s failure to father becomes the devil’s victory twice over—first by silencing truth, then by corrupting its messenger.

A Mirror of the World’s Fatherlessness
The collapse of paternal identity among bishops mirrors the world’s wider loss of fatherhood. The same cultural forces that have made earthly fathers absent, fearful, or effeminate have also weakened spiritual fathers. Many bishops, trained in the post-conciliar decades of experimentation and ambiguity, have never known genuine paternal formation themselves. They were not taught to command with love, nor to love with authority. They are products of a therapeutic age that mistrusts both discipline and sacrifice.

And yet the Church can no more survive without fathers than a family can. When bishops cease to be fathers, priests become orphans, and the faithful—children of those priests—grow rootless. The contagion of fatherlessness spreads from chancery to rectory, from rectory to home, until the very idea of authority is despised. The devil, who hates the name “Father,” rejoices in such a hierarchy.

The Patristic Measure of True Shepherds
The Fathers of the Church would scarcely recognize many of today’s episcopal priorities. St. Cyprian taught that a bishop must be “united in heart with his priests, sharing their labours, their tears, and their dangers”⁵. St. John Chrysostom warned that the bishop who neglects his clergy commits a sin against the Body of Christ. St. Gregory Nazianzen resigned his see rather than become a mere functionary, declaring that “to lead others, one must first be purified oneself.”

This is the pattern of episcopal life the Church once held up as ideal: ascetical, paternal, prophetic. The bishop was not an administrator of budgets but a man of prayer, whose tears could baptize a diocese. When such men led, their priests followed willingly—even unto martyrdom. The vitality of the early Church sprang not from programs but from the living transmission of holiness.

The Roots of Renewal
The renewal of the priesthood will not begin in offices or conferences. It will begin when bishops again become fathers, and priests sons. True fatherhood does not flatter; it corrects, encourages, and forgives. It does not isolate; it draws near. It does not fear holiness in its sons; it rejoices in it. Bishops who imitate Christ the Good Shepherd will attract vocations even in desolate times, because love always begets life.

What can the faithful do in the meantime? First, pray and fast for priests and bishops. The Rosary is no longer optional in this war for souls. Offer reparation for the sins of shepherds, but also for their wounds. Many bishops act as they do because they have forgotten that they, too, were once priests trembling at the altar. Pray that they may recover the simplicity of their first Mass.

Second, give your priests the warmth of genuine friendship. Invite them into your homes. Encourage them when they preach the truth. Write to them when they are maligned. Many have never heard a layman say, “Father, your priesthood has changed my life.” Such words can rekindle hope more powerfully than any policy.

Finally, resist the temptation to despair. The priesthood belongs to Christ, not to bureaucrats. The same Lord who called Peter from his nets can still raise up saints from the ruins of clericalism. When the hierarchy forgets the Cross, God raises prophets from the laity. The Church’s renewal will come not from strategy but from sanctity.

The Model of the Crucified Father
Christ on the Cross is the image of every true bishop: arms outstretched, heart pierced, blood spent for his children. In Him, authority and love are one. The world can imitate compassion, but it cannot imitate Calvary. It is there that spiritual fatherhood finds its meaning—not in power, but in sacrifice. The bishop who forgets this becomes an official; the priest who forgets it becomes a hireling.

When bishops once again weep for their priests, and priests once again lay down their lives for their flocks, the Church will bloom even in the desert. Until then, we live in the long Lent of ecclesial fatherlessness. Yet even now, grace is not absent. Among the ruins, there are still fathers who love and sons who obey, still altars where the Lamb is offered in purity and faith. In that hidden fidelity, the Church endures.

A Call to Courage and Contrition
Every bishop should kneel before his priests and ask himself: “Do they see in me the face of Christ? Do they hear in my words the voice of a father?” If the answer is uncertain, repentance is the only path forward. The episcopal palace must again become a house of prayer. The miter must be exchanged for the towel of the servant. The shepherd must rediscover the smell not only of the sheep but of the Cross.

The world’s night grows darker, and the Church must shine the brighter. Our age does not need bishops who blend into the world’s noise, but men who bear within themselves the stillness of Gethsemane. Priests will find their courage again when they see courage on the cathedra; they will become holy when holiness is enthroned above them.

Conclusion: Hope Through Paternal Renewal
The renewal of the Church will not come from the top down, nor from the bottom up, but from heart to heart—from father to son. When bishops once more speak to their priests as fathers, when priests rediscover in their bishop the image of Christ, the channels of grace will open again. And from that grace will flow the courage to confront the world’s darkness with divine charity.

Let us therefore pray not for new strategies but for new hearts: hearts of fathers, hearts of sons, hearts conformed to the Sacred Heart of Jesus, who is both Priest and Victim, Shepherd and Lamb. Then the orphaned priests of our time will cease to wander, and the Church will once more be known not for her structures, but for her sanctity.


  1. St. Ignatius of Antioch, Letter to the Smyrnaeans, 8:1.
  2. St. Gregory the Great, Regula Pastoralis (Book II, ch. 4).
  3. John 21:17.
  4. The Catholic Project, Catholic University of America, Survey of American Catholic Priests (2022).
  5. St. Cyprian of Carthage, De Ecclesiae Catholicae Unitate, 5.

Statement: On the Peacehaven Mosque Arson

The Archbishop of Selsey has issued a statement condemning the arson attack on Peacehaven Mosque, expressing sorrow, solidarity with the Muslim community, and a call to peace, charity, and justice across Sussex.

At about 9:50 p.m. on Saturday, 4 October, a fire broke out at a building on Phyllis Avenue, Peacehaven, used as both a mosque and community centre. The blaze caused damage to the front entrance and also destroyed a vehicle parked outside, though thankfully no injuries were reported. Sussex Police have confirmed that the incident is being treated as arson and as a possible hate crime. Detective Superintendent Karrie Bohanna described the response as a “fast-moving investigation” and appealed for witnesses, urging anyone with CCTV, doorbell, dashcam, or mobile footage from the area to come forward.

His Grace has issued the following statement:

Coat of arms of S.E. Hieronymus Lloyd, Archbishop of Selsey, featuring a blue shield with yellow fleur-de-lis and stars, surrounded by ornate decoration and the motto 'Deus Caritas Est'.

[Begins] The news of last night’s deliberate fire at the Peacehaven Mosque has brought sorrow and grave concern to all people of faith and goodwill across Sussex. Such an act—whatever its motive—strikes at the heart of neighbourly peace and the moral fabric of our common life. It is not only a crime against property, but an offence against charity and conscience.¹

We extend our sincere sympathy and solidarity to the Muslim community of Peacehaven, assuring them of our prayers and friendship. The deliberate desecration of any place set apart for the worship of God wounds the entire community. Every religion that seeks the good and the true must be free to gather in peace, without fear of hatred or reprisal.²

The Lord commands us to love our neighbour as ourselves.³ This is not a sentiment, but a sacred duty. In moments such as these, Christians must be first to denounce violence, to comfort the afflicted, and to rebuild trust where it has been broken. Let us stand together against all forms of hatred—religious, racial, or ideological—and reaffirm our shared commitment to peace rooted in justice, truth, and respect for human dignity.⁴

I urge the faithful of the Old Roman Apostolate to remember in their prayers the victims of this attack, those who serve in our emergency services, and all engaged in restoring safety and concord in our towns and villages. May Almighty God bring healing to the injured hearts of our neighbours, strengthen our communities in mutual respect, and turn every act of darkness into an occasion for greater light. [ENDS]

✠ Jerome Lloyd
Titular Archbishop of Selsey
Primus of the Old Roman Apostolate


1 Sussex Police, “Appeal for Information After Arson in Peacehaven” (October 5, 2025).
2 Cf. Vatican II, Dignitatis Humanae, 2 – “Religious freedom, which men demand as necessary to fulfill their duty to worship God, has to do with immunity from coercion in civil society.”
3 Mark 12:31.
4 Cf. Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2304 – “Respect for and development of human life require peace. Peace is not merely the absence of war… but the work of justice and the effect of charity.”

A line of lit candles in the foreground with a sunset over a town in the background, creating a serene and reflective atmosphere.

Statement: On the Appointment of the New Archbishop of Canterbury

On 3 October 2025, Downing Street announced that Dame Sarah Mullally, currently Bishop of London and former Chief Nursing Officer for England, has been appointed the 106th Archbishop of Canterbury, the first woman ever to hold the post in the 1,400-year history of the office. Her confirmation is scheduled for January 2026 at St Paul’s Cathedral, with her installation at Canterbury Cathedral in March.

The Titular Archbishop of Selsey, as Primus of the Old Roman Apostolate, has issued this statement to place the appointment in its wider historical and theological context, noting the irony of the timing, the sadness of further division, and the necessity of prayer — above all, for the conversion of Dame Sarah and of England itself to the fullness of Catholic faith.

His Grace has issued the following statement:

Coat of arms of S.E. Hieronymus Lloyd, Archbishop of Selsey, featuring a blue shield with yellow fleur-de-lis and stars, surrounded by ornate decoration and the motto 'Deus Caritas Est'.

[Begins] The announcement of Dame Sarah Mullally as the next Archbishop of Canterbury has been greeted as a historic milestone: the first woman to occupy the See of Augustine in its long history. As Catholics, we do not meet such news with rancour, but with prayerful reflection — and with a sense of history that brings both sorrow and hope.

It is not without irony that this appointment comes in the very week when the Catholic Church in England and Wales marks the 175th anniversary of the restoration of the hierarchy by Blessed Pope Pius IX.¹ In 1850, after centuries of persecution and suppression, the Church regained the fullness of her episcopal order in these lands. Bishops were once again set over dioceses, restoring to the faithful the visible structure of apostolic government that had been interrupted since the Reformation. It was, and remains, a sign of continuity with the ancient faith first planted here by St Augustine of Canterbury in 597.²

The juxtaposition could not be more striking. On the one hand, Catholics recall with thanksgiving the providential renewal of true apostolic order. On the other, the Church of England presents to the world a figure who embodies the innovations of recent decades. Dame Sarah’s own story is admirable in many respects: a distinguished career in nursing, service as Chief Nursing Officer for England,³ and a respected tenure as Bishop of London. Yet her elevation is also symbolic of the different path the Church of England has taken — one that has sought renewal not in fidelity to the deposit of faith, but in adaptation to cultural change.

This decision also has ecumenical consequences of the highest order. Whatever fragile hopes once existed for reconciliation between Canterbury and the apostolic Churches — Rome, Constantinople, Antioch, and the rest — have now effectively been set aside. Both the Catholic Church⁴ and the Orthodox Churches⁵ have spoken with one voice: Holy Orders are of divine institution, and the Church has no authority whatsoever to ordain women. To install a woman as Archbishop is therefore not only an ecclesiological innovation but a definitive signal that the Church of England has chosen a path of permanent separation from apostolic Christianity. If reunion with the successors of Peter and Andrew was once a dream, this decision has placed it far beyond reach.

Meanwhile, the fruits of this progressive path are already evident. Since the ordination of women in the 1990s, Anglicanism has suffered defections of clergy and laity, dwindling attendance,⁶ and deep fractures across the Communion. The recent controversy surrounding the election of the new Archbishop of Wales, Cherry Vann, provoked strong reactions both within Britain and across the Global South. Christian Concern described the appointment as “tragic,”⁷ while the Archbishop of Nigeria declared that his province “cannot share communion with a church that has departed from the teachings of the Bible.”⁸ Such division illustrates how fragile Anglican unity has become. The appointment of a woman to Canterbury is likely to deepen those divisions, not heal them.

And yet, our response must not be triumphalism. For Catholics, the sight of Canterbury in confusion and fragmentation is never a cause for satisfaction, but for sorrow. The See of Augustine was once the beacon of unity in England, and its decline is bound up with the spiritual decline of the nation itself.

We must therefore pray. We must pray for Dame Sarah Mullally’s conversion to the fullness of truth, that she may yet come to see the beauty of the apostolic faith unbroken in the Catholic Church. We must pray for those Anglicans who still hunger for unity with the Church Christ founded. And above all, we must pray for the conversion of England itself, once known as Our Lady’s Dowry, that this nation may return to the faith that sanctified its saints and martyrs and alone can secure its future.

In this week of anniversaries, we are reminded of two paths: one of restoration, when the Catholic hierarchy was re-established in fidelity to apostolic order; the other of innovation, which risks further disintegration. History will judge which path leads to life. For our part, we remain committed to witness, to charity, and to prayer — confident that the truth entrusted to the Church will endure, and that England will, in God’s time, find its way home. [ENDS]


¹ Pius IX, Universalis Ecclesiae (1850), restoring the Catholic hierarchy in England and Wales.
² Bede, Ecclesiastical History of the English People, I.25–26, on Augustine’s mission to Kent in 597.
³ UK Government, Department of Health archives, “Dame Sarah Mullally, Chief Nursing Officer for England” (1999–2004).
⁴ John Paul II, Ordinatio Sacerdotalis (1994): “the Church has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women.”
⁵ Inter-Orthodox Theological Consultation, “Women and the Priesthood,” Chambésy (1988), reaffirming that priestly ordination is reserved to men.
⁶ Church of England, Statistics for Mission 2022; Harriet Sherwood, The Guardian, 24 Oct 2024, reporting a fall of 169,000 worshippers in four years.
Newsweek, “Gay Archbishop’s Appointment Criticized by Christian Group,” Jul 2025, on Cherry Vann’s election in Wales.
The Times, Aug 2025, quoting the Archbishop of Nigeria rejecting communion with the Church in Wales after Vann’s appointment.

From Ruin to Restoration: The Story of Catholic England

By the Archbishop of Selsey

On the feast of St Michael, 29 September 1850, Pope Pius IX restored diocesan bishops to England and Wales. Nicholas Wiseman, made Archbishop of Westminster, cried out with joy that Catholic England was “restored to its orbit in the ecclesiastical firmament.”¹ That orbit had been broken for nearly three centuries. The Church in England had lived in eclipse. It had been stripped of its altars, mocked by its enemies, betrayed by its rulers, and sustained only by the blood of martyrs and the courage of recusants. What was restored in 1850 had first been shattered in 1559, when Elizabeth’s Act of Supremacy and Act of Uniformity outlawed the ancient Mass.²

The parish altar, once the heart of every village, was torn down. Chalices were hidden in cupboards, vestments ripped for rags, bishops thrown into prison, priests exiled or compelled to conform. Families were dragged to court, fined into ruin for missing the new services. By the 1580s, a Catholic who refused to attend owed £20 each month, a fine calculated to destroy.³ In 1570, Pope Pius V excommunicated Elizabeth in the bull Regnans in Excelsis.⁴ To Catholics, it was a defence of truth; to the Crown, it was proof of treason. Parliament tightened the law still further. In 1585, the Act against Jesuits and Seminary Priests decreed that any priest ordained abroad who returned home should die as a traitor, and any layman who gave him shelter could share his fate.⁵ From that moment, the presence of a Catholic priest on English soil was a hanging crime.

Yet priests came anyway. Edmund Campion, Oxford’s golden boy, traded honours for a disguise and a chalice. He moved by night, heard confessions in barns, preached Christ in attics. Caught, racked in the Tower, he went to Tyburn in 1581 and told his judges they condemned their own ancestors. He died with calm defiance.⁶ Margaret Clitherow, the butcher’s wife of York, opened her home to fugitives. When arrested, she refused to plead, knowing that a trial would force her children to betray her. For this she was crushed to death beneath stones in 1586, thirty-three years old, pregnant, praying for her killers.⁷ Nicholas Owen, a Jesuit carpenter, turned wood and stone into weapons of survival. He built priest-holes so cunning that many remain hidden even now. He saved countless priests, then died under torture in 1606.⁸ More than three hundred Catholics were executed under Elizabeth and James, many for nothing more than saying Mass.⁹

For those who lived, recusancy meant a slow martyrdom. Fines ruined estates, laws excluded children from schools, informers prowled villages. Whole communities gathered at midnight for a furtive Mass, watchmen posted on the lanes. Rosaries were fingered in whispers, catechisms taught in secret, faith lived under constant threat. The Armada of 1588 convinced Protestants that Catholics were Spain’s agents. The Gunpowder Plot of 1605, the folly of a few, stained the entire community with treason. Bonfires and sermons each November renewed the suspicion. Later, Titus Oates’s fabricated Popish Plot in 1678 sent innocent men to the gallows.¹⁰ In 1780, the Gordon Riots set chapels aflame and mobs howled “No Popery!” in the streets.¹¹

Rome did not abandon England. In 1623, Pope Gregory XV appointed William Bishop as Vicar Apostolic, the first of a line of bishops without dioceses, shepherds of shadows who confirmed children in barns and ordained priests abroad.¹² And in London, Richard Challoner sustained the hidden faithful with his revision of the Douai-Rheims Bible and his Garden of the Soul (1740), a book of prayers that became the catechism of generations who had no parish or procession but carried the Church in their hearts.¹³

By the late eighteenth century the storm began to lift. The Relief Act of 1778 permitted Catholics to inherit land, though it provoked the Gordon Riots. The Act of 1791 allowed registered chapels and schools, still under scrutiny.¹⁴ At last the great Relief Act of 1829 swept away most remaining restrictions. Catholics could sit in Parliament, hold office, live as citizens.¹⁵ The long night of penal times was ending.

But the missionary structure of vicariates could no longer suffice. Catholics were multiplying, parishes thriving, schools spreading. In 1850, Pius IX restored the hierarchy by Universalis Ecclesiae. Thirteen dioceses were created, with Westminster as metropolitan. Wiseman, newly made cardinal, was appointed archbishop.¹⁶ Protestant England fumed. Lord John Russell railed against papal aggression in his “Durham Letter.”¹⁷ Effigies of the Pope were burned, and Parliament passed the Ecclesiastical Titles Act forbidding Catholic bishops to use Anglican titles.¹⁸ But the storm passed, and the hierarchy endured.

Catholic England was visible once more. Parishes multiplied, schools flourished, orders revived, Irish immigration filled churches, and converts like John Henry Newman gave prestige. Westminster Cathedral rose in 1895 as a sign of permanence.¹⁹ Through two world wars Catholics fought, served, and suffered alongside their countrymen. Chaplains brought the sacraments to the trenches, parishes endured the Blitz. By mid-century, Catholics were no longer outsiders. The old stigma of recusancy was gone.

But even as the Church grew strong in public, new storms rose from within. The Second Vatican Council (1962–65) sought renewal but brought upheaval. The traditional Latin Mass, the anchor through centuries of persecution, was replaced. Vocations fell. Catechesis faltered.²⁰ The faith that had survived rope and rack now waned in an age of comfort. Meanwhile Britain itself drifted into secularism, with laws liberalising abortion and divorce, reshaping family life, and eroding Christian morality. Later decades exalted ideologies hostile to Catholic truth. Attendance dwindled, parishes closed, vocations dried up. The diocesan structure restored in 1850 still stands, but the Church it governs is weakened.

And yet the story is not finished. The martyrs still speak. Campion from the scaffold, Clitherow from beneath the stones, Owen from the hidden chamber, Challoner from the secret chapel. They endured not only for their own age but for ours. Their sacrifice is our summons. The England that once outlawed the Mass now shrugs at it. Indifference has replaced hostility. But the demand remains the same: fidelity to Christ, whatever the cost.

If Catholic England was restored to its orbit in 1850, it must not drift into eclipse today. The Church that survived rope and rack must not surrender to compromise. Catholic England will be truly restored only if her children reclaim the fidelity of the martyrs, the patience of the confessors, the courage of the recusants. The dawn broke once before. It can break again. But only if the faith that endured the darkness burns as brightly in our own time.


  1. Nicholas Wiseman, Pastoral Letter from out of the Flaminian Gate (1850).
  2. Statutes of the Realm: 1 Eliz. I, c.1–2 (1559).
  3. 23 Eliz. I, c.1 (1581).
  4. Regnans in Excelsis (Pius V), 25 February 1570.
  5. 27 Eliz. I, c.2 (1585).
  6. Evelyn Waugh, Edmund Campion (1935).
  7. John Mush, A True Report of the Life and Martyrdom of Mrs Margaret Clitherow (1586).
  8. Michael Questier, Catholicism and Community in Early Modern England (2006).
  9. John Bossy, The English Catholic Community, 1570–1850 (1975).
  10. John Kenyon, The Popish Plot (1972).
  11. Norman Davies, The Isles: A History (1999).
  12. Catholic Encyclopedia, “England (Ecclesiastical History).”
  13. Richard Challoner, The Garden of the Soul (1740).
  14. 18 Geo. III, c.60 (1778); 31 Geo. III, c.32 (1791).
  15. 10 Geo. IV, c.7 (1829).
  16. Universalis Ecclesiae (Pius IX), 29 Sept. 1850.
  17. Lord John Russell, “Durham Letter,” Hansard (1850).
  18. 14 & 15 Vict., c.60 (1851).
  19. Owen Chadwick, The Spirit of the Oxford Movement (1990).
  20. Alcuin Reid, The Organic Development of the Liturgy (2004).