The Forgotten Confessor: Bishop Jia Zhiguo and the Silence of Rome over China’s Underground Church

Fidelitas in Tenebris — Faithfulness in the Darkness

When a confessor of the Faith departs this life, the Church traditionally lifts her voice in gratitude. The names of those who suffered for Christ were once read aloud in the sacred liturgy, placed in the diptychs of memory, and inscribed in stone. But now, as Bishop Julius Jia Zhiguo of Zhengding is laid to rest, the silence of Rome falls heavier than any bell.

This man, who bore imprisonment, torture, and solitude for loyalty to the See of Peter, died on 29 October 2025 at the age of ninety-one. Yet the Vatican has offered no tribute, no acknowledgment, not even a prayer of public record. The world barely noticed, but Heaven has already received a saintly soul. The question remains: why does the Church on earth act as if such faithfulness were an embarrassment?

The confessor of Zhengding
Bishop Jia was born in 1934 in Hebei, a region where Catholic faith has endured wave upon wave of persecution. From his youth he learned that the Cross was not an ornament but a destiny. He entered seminary amid the tightening coils of Maoist repression, and in 1963 he was arrested for refusing to break communion with Rome. Fifteen years he spent in prison, enduring brutal interrogations and isolation. His cell was once deliberately flooded, leaving him crippled with pain — yet he would not deny the Pope.¹

Released in 1978, he was ordained a priest two years later, and clandestinely consecrated a bishop in 1981 by the heroic Bishop Joseph Fan Xueyan of Baoding — who would himself die under house arrest.² For more than four decades, Bishop Jia shepherded the faithful of Zhengding without recognition, without protection, and often without even freedom of movement. His people, numbering more than a million and a half, looked to him as a father who shared their chains.³

He founded an orphanage for abandoned children — one of many quiet works of mercy performed by underground clergy. When the authorities demolished it in 2020 for lacking state approval, he answered with prayer, not protest. He knew that persecution, borne with patience, preaches more eloquently than speeches. His flock loved him for that serenity. When he was last arrested in 2020, on the eve of the Assumption, they gathered to pray the Rosary in secret, confident that their shepherd would again emerge unbroken.

The underground Church
To understand his witness, one must grasp the nature of the underground Church in China. These are Catholics who refused to join the state-controlled Patriotic Association, which since 1957 has claimed to be the “Chinese Catholic Church” independent of Rome. They are loyal to the Successor of Peter and to the universal Magisterium, yet their loyalty costs them their liberty. They celebrate the sacraments in hidden chapels, move from house to house to avoid surveillance, and raise their children knowing that Baptism might one day demand blood.

Pius XII foresaw their plight. In Ad Sinarum Gentem (1954) he warned that “no one can serve two masters: Christ and the state cannot both claim the allegiance of the same heart.”⁴ He urged Chinese Catholics to resist all attempts to build a national church apart from Rome, promising them that fidelity would one day be vindicated. That vindication has yet to come.

When the Holy See entered its secret “provisional agreement” with Beijing in 2018, many hoped it would secure the recognition of faithful bishops and end the long agony of division. Instead, the opposite occurred. The government continued to appoint bishops without papal approval, the faithful underground continued to suffer harassment, and Rome, bound by its own diplomacy, uttered few protests.⁵

The diplomacy of silence
Why has the Vatican not spoken of Bishop Jia? The answer, we are told, lies in diplomacy. Rome, anxious to maintain its fragile accord with the Chinese state, avoids words that might offend. But this policy of silence betrays a profound theological amnesia. The Church is not a political actor negotiating coexistence between powers; she is the mystical Body of Christ, called to bear witness to truth even when inconvenient.

Paul VI, in Evangelii Nuntiandi, declared that “there is no true evangelization if the name, the teaching, the life, the promises, the kingdom, and the mystery of Jesus of Nazareth are not proclaimed.”⁶ By the same measure, there is no true diplomacy that obscures the martyrs’ confession. When bishops and priests are imprisoned for fidelity to the Pope, the successor of Peter cannot remain mute without obscuring his own office.

Silence toward tyrants becomes complicity. Pius XII spoke plainly during earlier persecutions: “The Church has no desire to dominate, but neither will she be silent when the rights of conscience are violated.”⁷ To honour Bishop Jia publicly would be to declare that conscience still matters. To ignore him is to suggest that communion is negotiable.

A Church divided within herself
There is a deeper tragedy in this silence. The very allegiance for which the underground bishops suffered has become the pretext for their abandonment. They resisted the regime because they would not renounce Rome. Now Rome, in its pursuit of compromise, turns its gaze elsewhere. They are too Roman for Beijing and too Chinese for the Curia — witnesses without patrons.

Many of them live under house arrest or in hiding. Priests who refuse to register with the Patriotic Association are stripped of their churches, fined, or imprisoned. Yet they continue to celebrate the Mass in secret, reciting the Canon that unites them to Peter. They pray for the Pope even when he forgets them. Their fidelity has outlasted every persecution, but it has not been met with gratitude.

When Rome speaks of “inculturation” or “synodality,” it often forgets that true communion is forged in suffering, not in bureaucratic consensus. The underground Church of China is not a relic of the Cold War but a living reminder that faith has enemies, both open and subtle. They do not seek political privilege — only to be recognised as Catholic.

Faith stronger than the State
The authorities may imprison bishops, but they cannot imprison the faith. Tertullian, addressing the pagan Empire, wrote: “The more you mow us down, the more we grow; the blood of martyrs is the seed of Christians.”⁸ In China that paradox remains visible. Every raid on a house-church drives the faithful deeper into conviction; every arrest exposes the fragility of an atheistic state that fears prayer more than protest.

Bishop Jia’s diocese of Zhengding stands as a symbol of that indestructible faith. Decades of harassment have not destroyed it. Young men still discern priestly vocations; families still catechise their children by candlelight; the Eucharist is still adored in makeshift tabernacles hidden from state eyes. This endurance refutes the illusion that faith can be negotiated.

The shadow of modern indifference
Yet persecution alone cannot wound the Church as deeply as indifference can. In former centuries, martyrs faced the fury of pagan emperors; now confessors face the apathy of their own brethren. Western Catholics, preoccupied with ideological fashions and ecclesial politics, scarcely glance toward Asia. The suffering Church is no longer fashionable.

In the halls of the Vatican, words like “dialogue” and “mutual understanding” are spoken with reverence. But dialogue without truth becomes the language of surrender. To negotiate with a regime that imprisons bishops while silencing those who defend them is to trade the Cross for comfort. It was not for such an accommodation that Bishop Jia endured his chains.

When he was ordained, he promised to “preach the Gospel in season and out of season.”⁹ That promise included the risk of death. His fidelity reveals how far much of the modern Church has drifted from the radicalism of its own vows. The Cross is no longer preached as the price of discipleship but as a metaphor for difficulty.

The forgotten testimony
The faithful of Zhengding issued a statement upon his death: “Your heart as a pastor never changed. Even when arrested and imprisoned, you continued to care for the flock, preserving the flame of hope in the darkest nights.”¹⁰ That simple tribute contains more theology than a dozen curial statements. It recalls the image of the Good Shepherd who lays down his life for the sheep — not the hireling who flees when the wolves approach.

In ancient Rome, confessors who survived persecution were revered almost as martyrs. Their names were commemorated, their tombs visited. Bishop Jia belongs to that lineage of confessors: not slain, yet wholly consumed in the offering of fidelity. To forget him is to forget what the priesthood means.

The underground Church of China is not an embarrassment but a mirror. In its humility we see what the Church universal has lost — courage, clarity, and the readiness to suffer for truth. Its priests know that every Mass might be their last. Its faithful understand that the price of Communion may be a prison cell. That is what it means to believe in the Incarnate Word when words are forbidden.

Lament for a silent Rome
It would have been a simple act — a telegram, a brief note, a prayer from the window of the Apostolic Palace. Instead, the Vatican remained still. Perhaps officials feared that even the name of Bishop Jia would irritate Beijing. But what does it profit a Church to gain the favour of princes and lose her confessors?

Saint Ambrose once said, “The Church’s glory is the suffering of her bishops.”¹¹ By that measure, China’s underground Church is glorious indeed. But that glory shames the worldly prudence that now governs Rome. In neglecting her confessors, the Church risks exchanging her birthright for a bowl of political lentils.

The lament is not only for Bishop Jia but for what his silence reveals: a Church hesitant to speak when truth costs. The Lord promised that the gates of hell would not prevail, but He did not promise that cowardice would not wound. Fidelity remains, shining in the darkness — but from Rome, only silence.


¹ Cardinal Kung Foundation, Biographical Note on Bishop Julius Jia Zhiguo (2025).
² AsiaNews, “Bishop Joseph Fan Xueyan and the Bishops of the Underground Church,” 2011.
³ UCANews, “Bishop Jia of Zhengding dies at 91,” 30 Oct 2025.
⁴ Pius XII, Ad Sinarum Gentem, n. 17 (7 Oct 1954).
⁵ Holy See Press Office, “Provisional Agreement between the Holy See and the People’s Republic of China on the Appointment of Bishops,” 22 Sep 2018; see also Cardinal Joseph Zen, For Love of My People I Will Not Remain Silent (Ignatius Press, 2019).
⁶ Paul VI, Evangelii Nuntiandi, n. 22 (8 Dec 1975).
⁷ Pius XII, Allocution to the Sacred College, 24 Dec 1949.
⁸ Tertullian, Apologeticum, c. 50.
⁹ 2 Timothy 4:2.
¹⁰ Statement of the Catholic community of Zhengding, quoted in AsiaNews, 30 Oct 2025.
¹¹ St Ambrose, Epistula extra collectionem 11, PL 16: 1154.

Dr. David Allen White RIP

Dr. David Allen White (1948–2025)
Traditional Catholic Author, Scholar, and Defender of the Faith

Dr. David Allen White, esteemed Catholic author, literary scholar, and champion of tradition, passed away on February 11, 2025. His passing marks the loss of a profound voice in traditional Catholicism, whose love for truth, beauty, and the faith influenced many.

Early Life and Education
Born in Eau Claire, Wisconsin, in 1948, Dr. White earned his B.A. from the University of Minnesota in 1970, followed by an M.A. from the University of Wisconsin in 1971. He completed his Ph.D. in English Literature at Indiana University in 1981. His academic journey included teaching positions at Indiana University, the University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire, and Temple University. He dedicated 29 years to the English Department at the United States Naval Academy, where he was known for his deep knowledge of Shakespeare, Dostoevsky, and other literary giants¹.

Conversion to Catholicism
Dr. White’s conversion to Catholicism in 1979 was a pivotal moment in his life. Raised in a liberal Protestant household, he had little religious training. A transformative encounter with a knowledgeable student at Temple University challenged his secular beliefs and led him to explore the Catholic faith deeply. This journey culminated in his reception into the Church, where he found spiritual fulfillment². Reflecting on his conversion, Dr. White once shared how the traditional Latin Mass profoundly impacted him:

“The old Mass, for me, at that moment, was entirely new. It was not ‘old’. It was home! At that instant, I knew that this is what the Catholic Faith is all about.”²

Authorship and Literary Contributions
As an author, Dr. White made significant contributions to Catholic literature. His notable works include:

  • Mouth of the Lion: Bishop Antônio de Castro Mayer & the Last Catholic Diocese, which chronicles the heroic resistance of Bishop Antônio de Castro Mayer to modernist changes in the Church³.
  • The Horn of the Unicorn, a study of the life and legacy of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre⁴.
  • The Voice of the Trumpet: A Life of Bishop Richard Williamson in Four Movements, a comprehensive biography of Bishop Williamson, with whom he had a long-standing collaboration⁵.

He also served as the editor of Shakespeare A to Z, an essential reference for Shakespearean studies⁶.

Influence and Legacy
Dr. White’s scholarship and eloquence made him a sought-after speaker at Catholic conferences, where he expounded on the connections between culture, literature, and faith. His writings and lectures inspired countless individuals to seek the true, the good, and the beautiful in both spiritual and intellectual life.

Dr. White now joins in eternity the great defenders of the faith—Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Bishop Richard Williamson, and Bishop de Castro Mayer—whose cause he so passionately championed.

Requiescat in pace.

  1. David Allen White (Editor), Shakespeare A to Z, Facts on File, 1990.
  2. Catholic Family News, A Tribute to Dr. David Allen White (1948–2025), February 12, 2025.
  3. Our Lady of the Rosary Library, Dr. David Allen White’s Conversion Story, retrieved February 2025.
  4. David Allen White, Mouth of the Lion, Angelus Press, 2005.
  5. David Allen White, The Horn of the Unicorn, 2006.
  6. David Allen White, The Voice of the Trumpet: A Life of Bishop Richard Williamson in Four Movements, 2019.
YouTube player

Bishop Richard Nelson Williamson RIP

With deep sorrow, we announce the passing of Bishop Richard Williamson, a fearless defender of Catholic Tradition, who departed this life at the age of 84 on January 29, 2025, following a brain haemorrhage suffered on January 25. A priest for 48.5 years, a bishop for 36.5 years.

“Heaven is a reality. This life is a reality.
And the fact that I am going to die is a reality;
and the judgment seat of God is a reality.”
Bishop Richard Williamson

Few men in the post-conciliar era have stood so unapologetically against the tide of modernism, and fewer still have borne the full weight of exile, derision, and ecclesiastical censure for the sake of preserving Catholic Tradition. His life was one of conviction, combat, and consequence, and his legacy remains intertwined with the history of resistance to the ecclesiastical revolution of Vatican II.

Bishop Richard Williamson was undeniably a controversial figure, both within the traditionalist Catholic movement and the broader Church. Admired by many for his unyielding defence of Catholic Tradition, he was equally criticized for his outspoken views, uncompromising stance, and willingness to defy ecclesiastical authority when he believed the integrity of the Faith was at stake.

His forthright personality and provocative rhetoric often placed him at odds not only with the post-conciliar hierarchy but also with his own allies within the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX). His refusal to moderate his criticism of Vatican II, modernist Rome, and even his former SSPX superiors eventually led to his expulsion from the Society in 2012, marking him as a bishop in exile.

Beyond his theological battles, Bishop Williamson’s controversial statements on historical and social issues further fueled his reputation as a polarizing figure, drawing widespread condemnation and legal scrutiny in certain jurisdictions. However, his supporters viewed him as a prophetic voice in an age of compromise, a man who remained steadfast in his convictions despite facing public and ecclesiastical censure.

Whether seen as a fearless defender of Catholic Tradition or an intransigent polemicist, Bishop Williamson’s legacy remains one of uncompromising resistance—a bishop who, for better or worse, never wavered in his belief that he was standing for the unaltered truth of the Catholic Faith.

A Journey from Anglicanism to Tradition

Richard Nelson Williamson was born on March 8, 1940, in Finchley, north London, England and raised in an Anglican household. Educated at Winchester College, one of England’s most prestigious schools, and later at Clare College, Cambridge, where he earned a degree in English literature, he distinguished himself early on by his intellectual rigor and unyielding pursuit of truth. After graduating, he spent a brief period teaching in Ghana, yet his restless search for something greater ultimately led him to the one true Faith. Recognizing the fullness of divine revelation in the Catholic Church, he was received into the Church by Fr. John Flanigan in 1971.

Seeking to deepen his newfound faith, he embarked on a pilgrimage to France’s Marian shrines, an experience that confirmed his vocation. Though he briefly entered the Brompton Oratory as a postulant, he soon realized that the post-Vatican II Church, already embracing an aggiornamento of rupture, was not the faith of the Fathers he had sought. Instead, he found that faith preserved and defended within the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX), the traditionalist fraternity founded by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre to uphold the unchanging doctrine, liturgy, and discipline of Holy Mother Church in the face of modernist innovations.

In 1976, after completing his seminary formation at Écône, Fr. Richard Williamson was ordained to the priesthood by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre—an event that would not only shape his vocation but define the very course of his life. From that moment forward, he dedicated himself wholly to the defense of the Traditional Latin Mass, the unaltered doctrine of the Catholic Faith, and the priesthood as Christ instituted it, unsullied by the innovations and compromises of the post-conciliar Church. His ordination placed him among the foremost warriors of Tradition, setting him on a path that would lead to both great influence and great controversy, as he tirelessly fought against the modernist errors that threatened to obscure the perennial truths of the Faith.

He served in the Society of St Pius X as the rector of St. Thomas Aquinas Seminary in Ridgefield, Connecticut (USA) from 1983, and continued in the position when the seminary moved to Winona, Minnesota in 1988.

The 1988 Consecrations: A Bishop for Perilous Times

As the post-conciliar hierarchy accelerated its embrace of ecumenism, religious liberty, and doctrinal ambiguity, it became clear to Archbishop Lefebvre that the transmission of apostolic succession for the preservation of Tradition could not depend on Rome’s approval. Thus, on June 30, 1988, Archbishop Lefebvre and Bishop Antônio de Castro Mayer consecrated four bishops—among them Richard Williamson—without the sanction of the Holy See, an act that resulted in their excommunication by Pope John Paul II.

That sentence, though juridically severe, became in many ways a crown of fidelity for those who stood in uncompromising opposition to the spirit of Vatican II. Far from deterring his mission, it only strengthened Bishop Williamson’s resolve to defend Catholic Tradition without concession.

Following his episcopal consecration, he served as the Society of St. Pius X’s (SSPX) Second Assistant General from 1988 to 1994, while simultaneously remaining rector of St. Thomas Aquinas Seminary in Winona, Minnesota. During this period, he played a key role in forming generations of priests dedicated to the Traditional Latin Mass and immutable Catholic doctrine.

As a bishop, he carried out various episcopal functions, including confirmations and priestly ordinations, ensuring the uninterrupted transmission of valid sacraments within the traditionalist movement. In 1991, he played a pivotal role in assisting the consecration of Licínio Rangel as bishop for the Priestly Society of St. John Mary Vianney (SSJV), following the death of its founder, Bishop Antônio de Castro Mayer. This consecration ensured the continuity of the traditional apostolate in Brazil, particularly for those who remained steadfast in their rejection of Vatican II’s ecclesial innovations.

In 2003, Bishop Williamson was appointed rector of the Seminary of Our Lady Co-Redemptrix in La Reja, Argentina, where he continued his work of priestly formation. His tenure was marked by unwavering doctrinal rigor, emphasizing the necessity of rejecting the errors of modernism and holding fast to the faith as it had been handed down through the centuries.

“Firstly however, if a man really and truly envies the certainty of Catholic believers, he should apply his mind to studying how reasonable are Catholic beliefs. They may be above human reason, but they are not against it. How could they be? How could God both be the creator of our human reason and then impose on it to believe truths flouting that reason? He would be contradicting Himself. St. Thomas Aquinas in his “Summa Theologiae” is constantly showing how faith and reason are quite distinct, but in perfect harmony with one another. (letter #174)”
Bishop Richard Williamson, Eleison Comments Volume 1

Though his excommunication was officially lifted by Pope Benedict XVI in 2009, it did nothing to moderate his opposition to the ongoing doctrinal and liturgical disintegration within the Church. If anything, it reinforced his conviction that Catholic Tradition could not be reconciled with the modernist ethos prevailing in post-conciliar Rome. He continued to speak boldly, challenging both compromise within the SSPX and the ever-deepening crisis in the Church, remaining to the end a defiant voice for Tradition in an era of widespread ecclesiastical capitulation.

Bishop Richard Williamson’s remarks on the Holocaust, made during a 2008 Swedish television interview, became a source of significant controversy, drawing criticism from both civil authorities and Catholic leaders. His statements, which questioned aspects of the historical narrative regarding World War II, led to legal proceedings in Germany and contributed to his eventual expulsion from the SSPX in 2012. The Vatican, while clarifying that his views were entirely separate from the Church’s position, requested that he reconsider his statements in light of historical evidence. The incident further distanced him from mainstream traditionalist circles, reinforcing his reputation as an independent and often polarizing figure.

A Bishop in Exile: The Preservation of Apostolic Succession

By the early 21st century, as the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) navigated its complex relationship with Rome, signs of a more conciliatory posture began to emerge from its leadership. Increasing overtures toward regularization with the post-conciliar Church sparked deep concerns among those within the Society who feared that such negotiations would come at the cost of doctrinal compromise.

Among those most vocal in his opposition to these developments was Bishop Richard Williamson, whose unwavering commitment to Catholic Tradition made him an uncompromising critic of any perceived rapprochement with what he saw as a Rome lost to modernism. Viewing the Society’s increasing engagement with the Vatican as a dangerous departure from Archbishop Lefebvre’s original mission, he repeatedly warned against any movement toward reconciliation that did not first require an unequivocal rejection of the errors of Vatican II.

This stance placed him in direct conflict with the SSPX leadership, particularly Bishop Bernard Fellay, then-Superior General, who sought a path toward canonical recognition while maintaining the Society’s independence. The tension between Bishop Williamson and the SSPX hierarchy became increasingly public and contentious, with Williamson issuing sharp rebukes against any willingness to negotiate with Rome under the prevailing conditions.

As the 2012 SSPX General Chapter approached, this growing discord reached its breaking point. In what was seen as both a tragic rupture and an inevitable conclusion, Bishop Williamson was expelled from the Society on October 24, 2012, officially on the grounds of disobedience and insubordination. For his supporters, however, his expulsion marked the Society’s final departure from its original militant stance in defense of uncompromising Tradition.

Despite his dismissal, Bishop Williamson remained undeterred. Refusing to abandon the fight for Catholic orthodoxy, he pressed forward with even greater resolve, determined to ensure that the legacy of Archbishop Lefebvre’s resistance would not be lost to history. He founded the St. Marcel Initiative, bringing together some 60 priests from around the world, mostly former members of the SSPX. Seeing the grave crisis afflicting the post-conciliar Church and recognizing that Traditional Catholicism needed bishops who would not capitulate, he undertook the consecration of bishops without Rome’s mandate, a move that was as controversial as it was, in his mind, necessary.

The Bishops Consecrated by Bishop Williamson

Bishop Richard Williamson has consecrated several bishops to uphold and propagate Catholic Tradition. Below is a detailed overview of each individual:

  1. ✠Jean-Michel Faure (French, born September 1941, Algeria)
    Consecrated on March 19, 2015, in Nova Friburgo, Brazil, Bishop Faure was a former member of the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) ordained priest by Archbishop Lefebvre, June 1977 at Écône, Switzerland. He was a founding member of the South American apostolate of the SSPX, variously seminary rector, professor in Argentina and District Superior of Mexico. He opposed the Society’s discussions with Rome and later founded the Société des Apôtres de Jésus et de Marie (SAJM), on August 22, 2016 to continue Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre’s work.
  2. ✠Tomás de Aquino (Miguel) Ferreira da Costa (Brazilian, born in Rio de Janeiro, 1954)
    Consecrated on March 19, 2016, in Brazil. Ferreira da Costa, was a Benedictine monk (solemnly professed 1976) and after his priestly ordination by Archbishop Lefebvre at Écône, Switzerland, a founding member of the monastery at Le Barroux in 1980. On May 3rd, 1987 the monastery of Santa Cruz was officially founded and Father Thomas Aquinas became the prior. The monastery sought episcopal oversight from Bishop Williamson when he left the SSPX in 2012.
  3. ✠Gerardo Zendejas (Mexican, born 1963 in Mexico City)
    Consecrated on May 11, 2017, in Vienna, Virginia. He received his theological education and clerical formation at the FSSPX seminary in La Reja, Argentina, where he was ordained a priest in 1988. That same year, he became pastor of the FSSPX in Colombia and was appointed prior of Bogotá in 1989. In 1992, he founded a school for underprivileged children under the Fraternity’s patronage. From 1996, he worked in Mexico, first in Guadalajara, then at a nursing home in Zapotiltic (1997). In 1998, he was sent to the United States, managing the FSSPX-run retirement home in Ridgefield, where he later became prior (2000). Transferred to Texas in 2009, he served as prior in Dickinson and oversaw a school there. In 2014, he joined the FSSPX Resistance, eventually affiliating with the Priestly Fraternity of the Apostles of Jesus and Mary (SAJM) in 2017.
  4. ✠Giacomo Ballini (Italian)
    Consecrated in January 2021, Bishop Ballini is an Italian priest (ordained at Écône, Switzerland on June 29 2011) who was leading the Cork branch of the St. Marcel Initiative, a group founded by Bishop Williamson to promote traditional Catholicism. He famously led a procession in protest at the Irish Government’s handling of the Covid pandemic. Bishop Williamson announced this consecration, which was in secret, on January 5, 2023.
  5. ✠Paul William Morgan (British, born in England, 11 August 1963)
    Consecrated on February 14, 2022, in Cork, Ireland, Bishop Morgan was ordained by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre at Écône on 29 June 1988. He has served in the United States and the Philippines, served as Principal of St. Michael’s, the Society’s school, and was Superior of the SSPX in Great Britain between 2003 and 2015. He is the son of William J. Morgan, a lay theologian who was an advocate of the sedevacantist theory
  6. ✠Michał Stobnicki (Polish, born in Poland in 1987)
    Consecrated on August 15, 2022, in Poland, Bishop Stobnicki was a Polish priest (ordained by Bp Williamson on 1 July 2017,) who was leading the Polish branch of the St. Marcel Initiative, a group founded by Bishop Williamson to promote traditional Catholicism. He attended the SSPX seminary in Zaitzkofen, Germany, until 2008 and spent a few weeks at the new seminary of the Institute of the Good Shepherd in Courtalain, before continuing formation under the direction of Bishop McKenna OP and Bishop Andrés Morello. In 2014 he graduated from law school in Poland.
  7. ✠Carlo Maria Viganò (Italian, born Varese, Italy, 16 January 1941)
    In January 2024, it was reported that Bishop Williamson performed a conditional episcopal consecration for Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò. He was ordained a priest on 24 March 1968 by Bishop Carlo Allorio. He earned a doctorate in utroque iure (both canon and civil law). On 3 April 1992, Viganò was appointed Titular Archbishop of Ulpiana and Apostolic Pro-Nuncio to Nigeria by Pope John Paul II. At the close of his mission to Nigeria in 1998, he was assigned to functions within the Secretariat of State as delegate for Pontifical Representations, then as Secretary-General of the Governorate of Vatican City State from 2009 to 2011. He then served as Apostolic Nuncio to the United States from 2011 to 2016, and is an outspoken critic of the current papacy.

These consecrations, performed without papal approval, led to renewed accusations of schism and automatic excommunication under Canon 1382 of the 1983 Code of Canon Law. However, Bishop Williamson saw them as acts of moral necessity, undertaken in the same spirit that animated Archbishop Lefebvre in 1988: to ensure that valid, uncompromised sacraments would continue for future generations of faithful Catholics.

A Legacy of Fidelity Amidst Persecution

Bishop Williamson’s final years were marked by an unyielding commitment to Catholic Tradition. He continued to confirm, ordain, and instruct, drawing both admiration and condemnation in equal measure. To his critics, he was an intransigent polemicist; to his supporters, he was a prophetic voice in a time of apostasy.

While not a sedevacantist, Bishop Williamson occupied a unique position in the traditionalist landscape—more radical than the mainstream SSPX but refusing to deny the existence of a legitimate pope. His approach can be best described as “practical sedeprivationism”—acknowledging the reigning pope while regarding him as so doctrinally compromised that he is unfit to govern. This ambiguity allowed him to engage with both SSPX-aligned traditionalists and sedevacantists, while also making his precise stance a subject of debate even among his supporters. [See Impact]

Regardless of one’s stance on his more controversial views, one thing remains certain: Bishop Williamson never wavered. In an age when so many clerics sought compromise, he remained a sign of contradiction, bearing in his person both the burden and the blessing of standing with the immutable Faith.

His death marks the passing of one of the most uncompromising voices in the post-conciliar resistance, but his legacy endures in the bishops he consecrated, the priests he formed, and the countless faithful who, through his ministry, remained rooted in the Faith of their fathers.

May his soul rest in peace, and may his labours continue to bear fruit in the Church he loved and fought for with such unswerving conviction.

Requiescat in pace.

Bishop Bernard Tissier de Mallerais RIP

We are saddened to announce the passing of Bishop Bernard Tissier de Mallerais, who died on October 8, 2024, at the age of 79.

Bishop Bernard Tissier de Mallerais was a man whose life and work spanned a significant period of upheaval and transformation in the Catholic Church. Born into a France marked by the shifting tides of secularism and religious tradition, he found his vocation not only in the priesthood but also in the preservation of Catholic orthodoxy as he understood it.

Born on September 14, 1945, in Sallanches, France, Tissier de Mallerais came from a background that instilled in him a strong sense of intellectual curiosity. He initially pursued studies in biology, reflecting a scientific inclination. However, in his early twenties, he was drawn to the Catholic priesthood, enrolling in the SSPX’s nascent seminary in Fribourg in 1969. Here, he was deeply influenced by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, whose passionate advocacy for traditional Catholicism would shape Tissier de Mallerais’s life and theology​.

The SSPX was founded by Lefebvre in 1970 as a reaction to the sweeping changes brought about by the Second Vatican Council, particularly reforms related to the Mass and ecumenism. For Tissier de Mallerais, Lefebvre became a mentor who inspired his strong stance against what they saw as modernist tendencies infiltrating the Church. Under Lefebvre’s guidance, he developed a theological outlook that emphasized the importance of tradition, orthodoxy, and a strict interpretation of Catholic doctrine​.

Ordained in 1975, Tissier de Mallerais quickly took on prominent roles within the SSPX. He began as a professor at the Écône seminary, where he taught future priests and shared Lefebvre’s mission to preserve the Latin Mass. His dedication and intellectual rigor led to his appointment as rector, where he shaped the formation of many SSPX priests who would go on to serve in various parts of the world. This role allowed him to deepen his influence within the SSPX and reinforce its commitment to traditionalist values.

In 1988, at the peak of the SSPX’s conflict with the Vatican, Archbishop Lefebvre consecrated Tissier de Mallerais as one of four bishops without papal approval, a decision that resulted in automatic excommunication. This act was seen by Lefebvre and Tissier de Mallerais as necessary to ensure the continuation of traditionalist Catholicism, even if it meant breaking from the Vatican. The excommunication marked Tissier de Mallerais as a figure of defiance but also of deep conviction, as he remained unwavering in his belief that he was defending the true faith​.

As a bishop, Tissier de Mallerais traveled widely, offering confirmations and ordinations, particularly for those within the SSPX who resisted post-Vatican II changes. He became a familiar figure in traditionalist communities around the world, administering sacraments and offering pastoral guidance. His presence was a source of encouragement for those who felt alienated by the mainstream Church’s embrace of reform, and he played a critical role in sustaining the SSPX’s global reach​.

Bishop Tissier de Mallerais was also a prolific writer, perhaps best known for his biography of Archbishop Lefebvre. This work remains a cornerstone for those studying the SSPX and the traditionalist movement. In his writings, he consistently defended the Latin Mass and critiqued the reforms of Vatican II, which he viewed as diluting the faith. His theological contributions, while controversial, were rooted in a deep desire to preserve what he saw as the essence of Catholicism. His works continue to be read by traditionalists and serve as a reference point for those seeking to understand the SSPX’s position within the Church​.

With a profound understanding of both the early years of the SSPX and the broader Traditional Catholic movement, Bishop Bernard Tissier de Mallerais held a sincere appreciation for the Old Romans commitment to preserving the Traditional Latin Mass. He recognized the essential role these communities played, especially in the United States, where Old Roman chapels often served as early Mass centers for the SSPX. During a memorable encounter with Bishop Kelly of the Old Roman apostolate at a Chicago dinner party hosted by a mutual friend, Bishop Tissier de Mallerais warmly acknowledged their work. Upon their introduction, he graciously expressed his gratitude, saying, “Thank you, thank you, thank you, for keeping the old Mass alive until we came!”

In 2009, Pope Benedict XVI lifted the excommunications of the four SSPX bishops, signaling a willingness on the part of the Vatican to engage in dialogue with the SSPX. However, Tissier de Mallerais remained skeptical of the Vatican’s intentions, often criticizing what he perceived as ongoing modernist influences. He maintained his strong stance against certain aspects of the Church’s direction, asserting that true reconciliation could only occur if the Vatican renounced many of the reforms that he and the SSPX opposed​.

Bishop Tissier de Mallerais’s legacy is deeply intertwined with that of the SSPX and the broader traditionalist Catholic movement. He was a figure who inspired both admiration and controversy, depending on one’s perspective on Vatican II and the Church’s modern trajectory. His death leaves a void within the SSPX, as he was one of its most vocal and visible leaders. The SSPX, now with two of the original four bishops remaining, faces a new era without one of its most ardent defenders of tradition.

Following a fall in September 2024 that led to a skull fracture and internal injuries, Bishop Tissier de Mallerais was placed in a coma and ultimately passed away on October 8, 2024. His passing was met with sorrow from SSPX members and traditionalist Catholics who viewed him as a stalwart of the faith. Various SSPX communities around the world have organized memorial Masses and prayer vigils, honoring his contributions to their religious lives and commitment to what they see as the unchanging truths of Catholicism​.

The SSPX, along with the traditionalist Catholic community, continues to reflect on Bishop Tissier de Mallerais’s legacy and the impact he had on their faith. As they mourn his passing, his writings and teachings remain influential, providing guidance and inspiration for those who uphold traditionalist values within the Church.

Please join us in offering prayers for the repose of his soul and for the Society he so fervently served. The funeral Mass will be celebrated at the St. Pius X Seminary, Ecône, Switzerland, on Friday 18 October at 9:30 am, followed by burial in the seminary vault.

YouTube player

Bishop Clarence Kelly RIP

It is with deep regret that we announce the passing of Bishop Clarence Kelly, the revered founder of the Congregation of St. Pius V (CSPV), who bravely fought against cancer until his demise on December 2nd at the age of 82.

Renowned for his unwavering dedication to the tenets of Catholicism, Bishop Kelly held a prominent position within the Traditional Catholic movement. He fervently championed the revival of orthodox liturgical practices, firmly convinced of their indispensable role in nurturing the spiritual welfare of the devout. Although his endeavors to safeguard the Latin Mass garnered both commendation and censure, he resolutely stood by his deeply held beliefs.

Clarence Kelly was born in 1941, in Brooklyn, New York. He joined the United States Air Force in 1959. Clarence Kelly joined a seminary in Pennsylvania in 1964 and completed his novitiate year in 1966–1967. Kelly attended the Catholic University of America between 1967 and 1969 where he studied philosophy. He began his theology studies in 1969 at the Seminary of the Immaculate Conception in Huntington, New York

Kelly entered the seminary at Econe in 1971, he received his ordination as a priest from Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre on April 14, 1973. Returning from Switzerland to America, he began his ministry on Long Island, New York offering Mass in a garage converted into a chapel by his brother, dedicated to St Pius V. In 1974, Father Kelly published a book titled “Conspiracy against God and Man” (Boston, MA: Western Islands) about the attack by Freemasonry on American society. Father Kelly eventually became SSPX District Superior in the U.S. North-East district.

Archbishop Lefebvre directed the SSPX’s American priests to follow the 1962 liturgical books. Father Kelly and eight other American priests refused to do this, advocating instead for a return to the pre-1955 edition of the Roman Missal. In April 1983, Father Kelly was one of the individuals referred to as ‘The Nine,’ who gained notoriety for being expelled by Archbishop Lefebvre. Prominent figures such as Fathers Donald Sanborn, William Jenkins, Anthony Cekada, Daniel Dolan, and several others were among the group. Kelly was replaced by Father Richard Williamson as the SSPX District Superior. Following their expulsion, Father Kelly and his companions proceeded to establish the Society of St. Pius V (SSPV).

The SSPV in it’s Statement of Principles questions whether the popes since 1958 have in fact been legitimate Roman Pontiffs, believing that “those who presently are thought to be occupying hierarchical positions in the Catholic Church are acting, for the most part, as though they do not have the Faith, according to all human means of judging”. Though the SSPV, like the Old Romans, does not claim the competency to decide on the question of sedevacantism. So it was that some of the original priests of the SSPV, such as Father Daniel Dolan, Father Anthony Cekada, Father Donald Sanborn, and Father Thomas Zapp, broke away from the society to become sedevacantists.

As superior of the SSPV Kelly’s quiet diligence and fidelity grew the Society’s apostolate in America. In 1984, he successfully founded the Congregation of the Daughters of Mary, Mother of Our Saviour. Later, on October 19, 1993, Bishop Alfred Mendez, a retired Roman Catholic Bishop of Arecibo, Puerto Rico, consecrated him to the sacred episcopate in Carlsbad, California. Following this, in the year 1996, Bishop Kelly established the Congregation of St. Pius V, and began building the Immaculate Heart Seminary in Round Top, New York.

Throughout his lifetime, Bishop Kelly dedicated himself unwaveringly to safeguarding the integrity of the teachings of the Catholic Church, striving to shield them from the dilution caused by contemporary influences. During the 1990s, he made regular appearances as a guest on the televised program “What Catholics Believe.” He was an unwavering advocate of orthodoxy and firmly recognized the significance of maintaining conventional principles within a constantly evolving society. On February 28th, 2007, Bishop Kelly consecrated Fr Joseph Santay, and on December 27th, 2018, co-consecrated Fr James Carroll to the holy episcopate. He leaves the Congregation with two bishops, ten priests, seven seminarians and five religious brothers.

His Grace ✠Jerome commends the faithful everywhere to pray for the soul of ✠Clarence Kelly and the priests of the Old Roman apostolate to offer Masses, and for us all to remember with thanksgiving his valiant efforts to retain and restore the perennial Catholic faith and liturgy to the Church.

Réquiem aetérnam dona ei, Dómine, et lux perpétua lúceat ei. Requiéscat in pace. Amen.